Skip to Main Content

Yale Psychiatry Grand Rounds: December 18, 2020

December 18, 2020

Yale Psychiatry Grand Rounds: December 18, 2020

 .
  • 00:00Leave, you're introducing our speaker
  • 00:02today. Yes, my pleasure.
  • 00:03Do we have any announcements before?
  • 00:06Yeah, I just I just wanted to
  • 00:08to everybody on the call.
  • 00:10I just wanted to say that this
  • 00:13has been just an incredible year.
  • 00:17Where we faced many,
  • 00:20many terrible challenges and losses.
  • 00:23With particularly Randumb Ann
  • 00:26and Bob Malesan. Close friends
  • 00:30and colleagues teachers mentors.
  • 00:33People have played an important
  • 00:35life in the Department. We've lost
  • 00:38other important alumni and friends.
  • 00:40Other apartment as well.
  • 00:43Um? On top of that,
  • 00:46we've had to completely adapt
  • 00:48and change nearly everything
  • 00:49that we do the way we treat the
  • 00:52way that we conduct research.
  • 00:55The way that we take care of patients
  • 00:57and the Department has shown remarkable
  • 01:00flexibility and resilience and
  • 01:02adapting to the changing context.
  • 01:04I also wanted to note that
  • 01:07whenever our Department was
  • 01:09asked to step up and to do more.
  • 01:11That we had volunteers from our
  • 01:14residents who volunteered to serve
  • 01:16taking care of medical patients,
  • 01:19going back to to volunteer and
  • 01:22medical units to volunteers on our
  • 01:25voluntary and full-time faculty
  • 01:27who have provided support to
  • 01:30people in our healthcare community
  • 01:33without any compensation.
  • 01:35Trainees participated
  • 01:36in that program as well.
  • 01:39That that that the actions of
  • 01:43our Department have provided.
  • 01:45You know,
  • 01:46one source of inspiration after
  • 01:49another and and that's been really
  • 01:52good because as a Department we've
  • 01:55also faced the terrible burden of
  • 01:58the murder of of black Indigenous
  • 02:01people of color by police that
  • 02:04reverberated through our Department
  • 02:07and resonated with the health care
  • 02:10disparities in the impact of Covid.
  • 02:13They have been such a painful
  • 02:16part of this year as well.
  • 02:18And and the hopeful actions
  • 02:21of many in the Department.
  • 02:23And now the Anti Racism Taskforce,
  • 02:26hopefully will will make something
  • 02:29good and positive out of the adversity
  • 02:33that that we've seen around us.
  • 02:36So I come away thinking that I'm
  • 02:40very glad to put 2020 behind us.
  • 02:43Looking forward to 2021 with
  • 02:46great anticipation.
  • 02:47I hope those of you who have
  • 02:51the opportunity to do so.
  • 02:54Take advantage of the opportunity to
  • 02:57get an early injection of the vaccine.
  • 03:00This is really going to be another
  • 03:02way that we in our community can
  • 03:05take care of ourselves and to prevent
  • 03:08being part of the spread of this
  • 03:11terrible pandemic to our families,
  • 03:13to our patients, to our colleagues.
  • 03:15So I hope you will take advantage
  • 03:18of this vaccine that has been
  • 03:21so well tested and developed.
  • 03:23Um? So thank you again.
  • 03:27I think we have a wonderful lecture to
  • 03:32celebrate the end of 2020 and Chris,
  • 03:36would you introduce our
  • 03:39distinguished speaker today?
  • 03:41Thank you John.
  • 03:42Yeah my pleasure in my honor to to do so.
  • 03:46Our speaker today is Roland
  • 03:49Griffiths from Johns Hopkins.
  • 03:51Roland is let me get the
  • 03:53full title right here.
  • 03:54The Oliver Lee McCabe,
  • 03:55the third professor in the
  • 03:57Neuropsychopharmacology of consciousness
  • 03:58as well as professor of Psychiatry
  • 03:59and Behavioral Sciences in Hopkins.
  • 04:01And he's the director of the
  • 04:03Hopkins Center for Psychedelic
  • 04:05and Consciousness Research.
  • 04:07And Roland was already added
  • 04:09extraordinarily impactful and and
  • 04:10productive figure in pharmacology prior
  • 04:12to getting involved in psychedelics.
  • 04:14But since 1999,
  • 04:16when he began his work with psilocybin
  • 04:18and other psychedelic drugs,
  • 04:20it's it's really difficult to
  • 04:22overstate the impact he's had as a
  • 04:25central figure in the resurgence of
  • 04:27interest in psychedelics as potential
  • 04:29therapeutic agents as well as agents
  • 04:32that give us some window into the
  • 04:35nature of human consciousness.
  • 04:37This is,
  • 04:38as I'm sure many in this audience knows,
  • 04:41something that's that's really
  • 04:42burst onto the the the the
  • 04:44mainstream public imagination,
  • 04:45and as well as academic
  • 04:47medical seen in the last.
  • 04:49I'll say five or six years.
  • 04:51But it was been.
  • 04:52But that is due to the pioneering
  • 04:54efforts of Roland and a small
  • 04:56handful of other colleagues
  • 04:58who's kept interest in these
  • 05:00substances alive over the decades.
  • 05:02The work of the Hopkins Group has
  • 05:04been truly seminal in doing the
  • 05:06first modern controlled studies.
  • 05:08Of psilocybin and other drugs as.
  • 05:11Therapeutic agents across
  • 05:12a number of indications,
  • 05:14particularly impactful or 2016,
  • 05:15study on the use of psilocybin in late life,
  • 05:18existential despair.
  • 05:19So in the hospital setting and
  • 05:21then the study that just came out
  • 05:23in depression and I trust we'll
  • 05:25hear something about those today.
  • 05:27So this is an area that we're
  • 05:29beginning to do some work on it.
  • 05:32Yale and with work in a number
  • 05:34of different agents.
  • 05:35Of course,
  • 05:36this has been the Home Academy
  • 05:38in research for some time,
  • 05:40but more recently with Serial
  • 05:42Diseuse is work.
  • 05:43Looking at salvinorin A as well as
  • 05:45ongoing studies with DMT and and psilocybin,
  • 05:48Ben Kelmendi has spearheaded work
  • 05:50in both PTSD and USI Dee Ann.
  • 05:52We have some work in depression coming
  • 05:54along as well as some mechanistic work.
  • 05:57Alex Kwan and others,
  • 05:58and Alan anticipating this group have
  • 06:00been doing some mechanistic work.
  • 06:02So this is an area that we're excited
  • 06:05about and so to bring one of The
  • 06:08Pioneers of this field in to speak
  • 06:10to us today is really a great way to.
  • 06:13Map upper Ground round series for 2020,
  • 06:15so Roland it's really a pleasure to
  • 06:16have you here today and we're very much
  • 06:18looking forward to your presentation.
  • 06:22Thank you, Chris is delightful to be here,
  • 06:25so I'm going to talk about psilocybin
  • 06:29little bit of history neuro.
  • 06:31Pharmacology and then implications
  • 06:33for treatment user might disclosures.
  • 06:36In a nutshell, a variety of.
  • 06:40Private sector and philanthropic
  • 06:42support has been important to this.
  • 06:46A little bit of NIH support as well.
  • 06:51But I'm going to talk about is our research
  • 06:55at Johns Hopkins over the last 20 years.
  • 06:58Ancilla Simon and that started off with.
  • 07:03As a labor of love with a very little bit
  • 07:07of philanthropic support and blossom,
  • 07:10this last year with the founding
  • 07:12of our Center for psychedelic
  • 07:15and Conscious Research.
  • 07:17The work I'm going to present is is that on
  • 07:21behalf of a team of very talented colleagues,
  • 07:25a member of whom I've worked
  • 07:28with for some time, like Matt.
  • 07:31Johnson and then Bill Richards.
  • 07:36So just by way of background,
  • 07:38psilocybin is a naturally
  • 07:40occurring tryptamine alkaloid.
  • 07:42It's the principal psychoactive
  • 07:43component of Sloss Pea,
  • 07:45genus of mushrooms and psilocybin,
  • 07:47in the form of mushrooms,
  • 07:49have been used for hundreds or perhaps
  • 07:53thousands of years in various cultures.
  • 07:56In terms of background,
  • 07:58these classic.
  • 07:59Psychedelics are structurally diverse
  • 08:02group of compounds that bind serotonin
  • 08:052A receptors and then of course,
  • 08:07they produced this unique profile
  • 08:10in changes of perceptions,
  • 08:12emotions and thoughts.
  • 08:13And so, structurally,
  • 08:15they are the classic tryptamines
  • 08:18and then the phenethylamines.
  • 08:20Historically,
  • 08:21a lot of research was conducted
  • 08:23back in the 50s and 60s and then
  • 08:26research with this whole set of
  • 08:28compounds went dormant for almost
  • 08:30three decades because of the safety
  • 08:33concerns that were raised in response
  • 08:36to the widespread non medical use of
  • 08:39these compounds in the in the 60s.
  • 08:42Just a brief statement about abuse and risk,
  • 08:47of course.
  • 08:48Psilocybin is a schedule.
  • 08:50One compound is not considered to
  • 08:53be a drug of addiction sabinada
  • 08:56because it doesn't produce compulsive
  • 08:59drug seeking behavior.
  • 09:02Medical emergency from psilocybin
  • 09:04use are very rare.
  • 09:06Nonetheless,
  • 09:07there is concern about potential
  • 09:10adverse effects,
  • 09:11including panic reactions and
  • 09:13possible precipitation.
  • 09:15Of enduring psychiatric conditions and and,
  • 09:18we documented the validity of these
  • 09:20concerns in a large Internet survey.
  • 09:24We did have almost 2000 people
  • 09:26who described and reported the
  • 09:29effects of challenging experiences.
  • 09:31After taking psilocybin and 11%
  • 09:34of this group describing their
  • 09:36very worst experience,
  • 09:38put themselves at risk or others at
  • 09:42risk for physical harm an I think.
  • 09:45Most most notably to me is 10% reported
  • 09:50in during adverse psychological
  • 09:52symptoms lasting over a year that they
  • 09:56attributed to this difficult experience.
  • 09:59So such.
  • 10:00Experiences are very uncommon
  • 10:03in laboratory environments.
  • 10:05With respect to molecular
  • 10:07mechanisms of action,
  • 10:09I mentioned serotonin 2A receptors is
  • 10:11is the target in which they function as
  • 10:15agonist Saint Agnes just as last year,
  • 10:19Kim at L and Incel looked and
  • 10:22determine the active state structure
  • 10:24of the serotonin 2A receptor as it's
  • 10:28bound to a prototypic hallucinogen,
  • 10:31and so I think we can expect
  • 10:34with this kind of development.
  • 10:37In the understanding of the
  • 10:39receptor pocket and the active
  • 10:42sites that this is going to accelerate the
  • 10:46discovery of even more selective compounds.
  • 10:50Again, in terms of mechanisms
  • 10:53and serotonin 2A receptors are
  • 10:56expressed in key cortical areas,
  • 10:59particularly cortex in apical dendrites,
  • 11:02in layer five of paramel cells,
  • 11:06thalamus, claustrum, locus Aurelius.
  • 11:10And with respect to biological mechanisms.
  • 11:13The current thinking is that there's
  • 11:16really a small subset of serotonin 2A
  • 11:19excitatory trigger neurons that are
  • 11:22responsible for initiating cascade of
  • 11:25cellular events that result ultimately
  • 11:28in destabilization of brain networks.
  • 11:31And then the emergence of novel
  • 11:34patterns of connectivity that of course
  • 11:37resolved when the drug is illuminated
  • 11:40and it's been hypothesize, d'oh.
  • 11:43He said metaphor, if you will,
  • 11:47that in the case of psychiatric disorders,
  • 11:51malfunctioning networks can
  • 11:52subsequently reconnect in more
  • 11:54adaptive and healthier ways.
  • 11:57So the metaphor given is to that
  • 12:00of resetting the computer system.
  • 12:05This is a now classic depiction of
  • 12:09brain network communication patterns.
  • 12:12This was out.
  • 12:13This is MRI data out of Imperial and
  • 12:18what's shown here is this connected gram.
  • 12:24And the left shows placebo.
  • 12:26The different colors are different
  • 12:28networks and most of the connectivity
  • 12:31is within network connectivity.
  • 12:34Some across network connectivity and
  • 12:36then on the right they connectivity
  • 12:39pattern acutely under psilocybin.
  • 12:42So there's this large breakout
  • 12:44of intercommunication.
  • 12:45This isn't just random.
  • 12:47The width of those lines are indicating that.
  • 12:54Systematic organization
  • 12:55of that communication,
  • 12:57and then that resolves as psilocybin is.
  • 13:03Illuminated so another snapshot at.
  • 13:07You know what are these
  • 13:10mechanisms of action you know,
  • 13:12takes us to the different
  • 13:14network functions and.
  • 13:16And one very popular and metaphorically
  • 13:20compelling observation has been
  • 13:23that there are deactivations in the
  • 13:27default mode network under psilocybin,
  • 13:30and the default mode network is very
  • 13:34often thought to under write a sense of
  • 13:40self or self preferential processing.
  • 13:44It's increased in depression.
  • 13:46Decreased acutely with Silla Simon
  • 13:49and it fits with this story that
  • 13:52these compounds may result in,
  • 13:54you know, dissolution of self,
  • 13:57if you will,
  • 13:58or ego if you dissolve this
  • 14:00self preferential processing.
  • 14:02It also fits with the fact that long
  • 14:06term meditators showed decreases
  • 14:07in default mode network processing,
  • 14:10but this is just going to be one
  • 14:13of many levels of explanation.
  • 14:19Barrett Fred Barrett from our lab
  • 14:22has just recently published some work
  • 14:25showing that psilocybin alters colostrum
  • 14:28connectivity to classic brain networks,
  • 14:30and that's a big interest because.
  • 14:36Crick, among others,
  • 14:38hypothesize that the Claustrum might
  • 14:40be intricately involved in the nature
  • 14:43of consciousness and classroom is,
  • 14:46you know, a structure that is
  • 14:48highly enervated in serotonin.
  • 14:502A receptors in a lot of connectivity
  • 14:54in cortical brain structures,
  • 14:56so that's that's going to be an
  • 14:59interesting piece to the puzzle
  • 15:01and then buried in a separate study
  • 15:05showed psilocybin transcendent.
  • 15:07Transiently reduces amygdala response
  • 15:09to emotional and neutral faces.
  • 15:12This is a week post psilocybin,
  • 15:16so we're what we're looking for.
  • 15:19Here is what?
  • 15:21What elements of neuronal functioning might
  • 15:25account for enduring effects of psilocybin?
  • 15:29The Olsen lab at UC.
  • 15:34Davis has, let's see.
  • 15:39Well, let me start with the
  • 15:42anti inflammatory effects.
  • 15:44So Chuck Nichols has shown that
  • 15:47psychedelics have very potent
  • 15:48anti inflammatory effects,
  • 15:50so that may be among the potential
  • 15:53mechanisms and then the Olson
  • 15:56lab has shown that psychedelics
  • 15:58produce structural and functional.
  • 16:01Neuroplasticity narrated Genesis,
  • 16:02Spina Genesis of Napa Genesis immediately
  • 16:05through various signaling pathways.
  • 16:07So, so,
  • 16:08the idea that.
  • 16:10Enduring neuroplastic changes might
  • 16:12account for what's going on with
  • 16:15psychedelics is certainly compelling
  • 16:17and interesting biological mechanism.
  • 16:22Overall, this neuropharmacology is
  • 16:23just a very active area of research,
  • 16:27and there's a lot of progress being made,
  • 16:30so it's a hugely exciting area to jump into.
  • 16:36However, to me when we first started this
  • 16:39among the most interesting features of
  • 16:41the psychedelics were that they produce
  • 16:44these profound acute and sometimes
  • 16:47enduring alterations of consciousness.
  • 16:49And just I just need to say how
  • 16:53deeply ignorant we are about the
  • 16:56very nature of consciousness.
  • 16:58So I think we need to go into
  • 17:01this with some humility.
  • 17:04There's this hard problem of consciousness,
  • 17:06which is indeed a hard and
  • 17:09perhaps unsolved soluble problem.
  • 17:11And it strikes me as a mystical
  • 17:15puzzle in and of itself.
  • 17:18And then just last week we published
  • 17:20a pair of viewpoint articles.
  • 17:23This is in pharmacology and
  • 17:25translational Sciences.
  • 17:26Olson taking the position,
  • 17:28that subject subjective effects are
  • 17:30not necessary for therapeutic effects,
  • 17:33and we took the contrarian
  • 17:35position that they are.
  • 17:37And of course it's going
  • 17:40to be some interaction.
  • 17:41Well, I would submit it's going to
  • 17:45be some interaction between the two.
  • 17:48Um?
  • 17:50So to tell you a little bit about what we
  • 17:54have done over the last 20 years we've done.
  • 17:59A number of studies in healthy participants,
  • 18:03both psychedelic,
  • 18:04naive and experienced.
  • 18:06We've looked at novice
  • 18:08and long-term meditators,
  • 18:10religious professionals.
  • 18:13Depressed and anxious cancer patients,
  • 18:15people with major depressive disorders,
  • 18:18cigarette smoking.
  • 18:19We're doing studies now with anorexia
  • 18:21nervosa and depressed patients
  • 18:24with early Alzheimer's disease.
  • 18:26And So what I'm going to do is tell you
  • 18:30a little bit about the healthy volunteer.
  • 18:34Participants were search and then
  • 18:36quickly go over the work with the
  • 18:40cancer and depressed patients and.
  • 18:43And smokers.
  • 18:44Today we have treated over 375
  • 18:47participants and over 700 sessions,
  • 18:50so we've accumulated a good bit of
  • 18:53experience with still assignment.
  • 18:57So I want to start off with the studies
  • 19:01in healthy participants because it's a
  • 19:04model for administration of high doses
  • 19:08an it's that model that we have used
  • 19:12in our our treatment studies to date.
  • 19:15So these I'm going to just summarize some
  • 19:18results across several different studies,
  • 19:21but these are all double blind studies.
  • 19:25Participants were medically and
  • 19:27psychiatrically healthy and most.
  • 19:29In these studies were without any
  • 19:32histories of psychedelic use because
  • 19:35we didn't want to skew the population
  • 19:38toward people who were proponents or
  • 19:41had had positive experiences that our
  • 19:45participants meet with our session
  • 19:47monitors to develop repor and trust,
  • 19:50thought to minimize adverse reactions.
  • 19:53An experimental conditions are
  • 19:55designed to minimize expectancy bias,
  • 19:58but this is a.
  • 20:00Incredibly complex thing to do with
  • 20:04approach to different ways.
  • 20:07Studies are conducted in a comfortable
  • 20:09living room like environment.
  • 20:11I participant comes in in the morning,
  • 20:14takes a capsule containing cell assignment,
  • 20:17is asked to lay on a couch.
  • 20:20We used this structured situation
  • 20:22developed back in the 60s.
  • 20:24We ask people to have eye shades and
  • 20:27headphones through which they listen
  • 20:29to a program of music throughout
  • 20:32the period of drug action there,
  • 20:34in the presence of two.
  • 20:37Monitor facilitators guides if you will,
  • 20:39but the invitation is to go inward and
  • 20:42explore their own inner experience,
  • 20:44so this isn't a guided session.
  • 20:46We don't. We don't think of it as a.
  • 20:50Certainly not a classic
  • 20:52psychotherapeutic session.
  • 20:53We're not inviting them to talk.
  • 20:55We're inviting them just to going inward.
  • 21:00This shows time course of monitor
  • 21:02ratings across the six Hours session period.
  • 21:05This is from a dose effect study
  • 21:08showing very nice orderly dose
  • 21:10and time related effects of.
  • 21:13Up still assignment with effects.
  • 21:15As you can see coming on in about
  • 21:1730 minutes reaching peak effects at
  • 21:19two to three hours and then tapering
  • 21:22off by the end of the session day.
  • 21:25People are very close to back to normal.
  • 21:28We release them in the company
  • 21:29of a friend or family member who
  • 21:32accompanied them home.
  • 21:35So what happens will,
  • 21:37not surprisingly,
  • 21:38you give a high dose of psilocybin,
  • 21:42and you produce these
  • 21:43classic psychedelic effects,
  • 21:45including the perceptual changes,
  • 21:47greater emotionality,
  • 21:48both positive and negative,
  • 21:49and cognitive changes.
  • 21:51Sense of meaning,
  • 21:53sometimes suspiciousness but what was
  • 21:55stood out and was so intriguing to me
  • 21:59initially was that in most participants
  • 22:02under these kinds of conditions.
  • 22:06Psilocybin produces large increases
  • 22:07in self rated questionnaires.
  • 22:09To designed that were initially
  • 22:12designed to measure naturally occur
  • 22:14in mystical or insightful type
  • 22:16experiences and this shows post session
  • 22:19ratings of mystical experience on
  • 22:22our Mystical Experience questionnaire
  • 22:24that we've developed and validated.
  • 22:26Just showing this is nice dose
  • 22:29related effects high scores.
  • 22:31What in the world is a
  • 22:34mystical experience you?
  • 22:36Might very well ask,
  • 22:37and in retrospect we have a.
  • 22:40We made a series branding error here.
  • 22:43Calling this questionnaire and
  • 22:45mystical experience Questionnaire
  • 22:47'cause if the funnels people but.
  • 22:50But in any case,
  • 22:52this questionnaire is really comprised
  • 22:55of questions that probe different
  • 22:58phenomenological factors and the.
  • 23:00The first three questions,
  • 23:03or three sets of questions you know,
  • 23:07probe the phenomenological.
  • 23:08Our concept of unity as a core feature.
  • 23:12This interconnectedness of all people
  • 23:14and things all is 1 pure consciousness.
  • 23:18And that's accompanied by
  • 23:19this sense of sacredness,
  • 23:21reference or press ishness.
  • 23:23There's something valuable
  • 23:24about this experience,
  • 23:26and it has this noetic quality of.
  • 23:31Having encountered ultimate
  • 23:32reality or the truth value of it,
  • 23:35it seems more real and more true
  • 23:38than everyday waking consciousness.
  • 23:41And then the other factors are
  • 23:44this deeply felt positive move
  • 23:46transcendence of time and space and the
  • 23:49ineffability difficulty put into words.
  • 23:52Well, here's that.
  • 23:54Thorn in our side,
  • 23:56having used mystical and so so I just
  • 23:58need to state mystical experience
  • 24:00is defined by respondent endorsing
  • 24:03a constellation of empirically
  • 24:05measured phenomenological dimensions,
  • 24:07and these this measure need
  • 24:10not imply supernational or non
  • 24:12rational levels of explanation.
  • 24:14And and if you think about it,
  • 24:18it's just been this kind of phenomena
  • 24:21has been described by very many
  • 24:24different names across the decades,
  • 24:27like conversion experience with what
  • 24:30William James initially described this.
  • 24:32But also mystical religious peak.
  • 24:35Transcendental experiences,
  • 24:36transforming moment epiphanies.
  • 24:39So when I initiated this work at Hopkins,
  • 24:43Paul McHugh was our chair.
  • 24:45Anne and Paul was insistent that
  • 24:48we were just looking at delirium.
  • 24:51And so we did a study in which
  • 24:55we administered his scale,
  • 24:57which is a gold standard measure
  • 25:00now for delirium than many mental
  • 25:03status examination to people
  • 25:05who had psilocybin and what we
  • 25:09were able to show is that.
  • 25:11Um,
  • 25:12that many metal isn't affected
  • 25:14across the same range of doses
  • 25:17of psilocybin that produced
  • 25:20full on mystical experiences.
  • 25:22In addition to mystical experiences,
  • 25:25there's this other quality
  • 25:27of these experiences,
  • 25:29and that's those would be labeled experiences
  • 25:32of significant psychological insight,
  • 25:35and so those are increased
  • 25:37in a dose related manner.
  • 25:40We've actually now just developed and.
  • 25:45I think it's in press or maybe
  • 25:48just recently published.
  • 25:49Our Psychological Insight questionnaire
  • 25:52that pairs with our Mystical experience
  • 25:55questionnaire and gets at a different
  • 25:57facet of these experiences that may
  • 26:00be quite important. We think too.
  • 26:03And during therapeutic effects.
  • 26:06So what I've described to this point
  • 26:08has been the session experience.
  • 26:11You know, these are all post session ratings,
  • 26:15but the interesting piece of this
  • 26:18work is the attributions that
  • 26:20people make to these experiences.
  • 26:23Going further out in time.
  • 26:25And so here's one month after high dose
  • 26:29sessions and healthy volunteers in which
  • 26:32we have about 80% of people staying.
  • 26:35Reflecting back on that experience
  • 26:38a month ago and rating,
  • 26:40it is among the five most personally
  • 26:43meaningful or spiritually significant
  • 26:45experiences of their entire lifetimes.
  • 26:48And that it wouldn't even occur to
  • 26:51me to ask a question of this sort.
  • 26:54People rate these things about
  • 26:5730% say it's the single most
  • 26:59spiritually significant experience
  • 27:00of their entire lifetime,
  • 27:02but it was only after we start
  • 27:05bringing people back in to do follow
  • 27:09up interviews and we're realizing this.
  • 27:11This is really unusual and certainly
  • 27:14unprecedented in my working with a
  • 27:17variety of psychoactive. Substances.
  • 27:21And here we have about 90%.
  • 27:25Attributing increased sense of
  • 27:27well being life satisfaction
  • 27:29or positive behavior change.
  • 27:32So I'm just going to run down the kinds
  • 27:36of things that people are endorsing.
  • 27:39This is either one month after Sessions
  • 27:42or in the right hand side from a
  • 27:46different studies were six months after
  • 27:49sessions and just the large effect sizes,
  • 27:53Cohen D's of greater than one.
  • 27:56But this is classically people attribute
  • 27:59to these experiences, positive changes,
  • 28:01positive attitudes about self, so.
  • 28:04Increase self confidence in authority,
  • 28:07authenticity, playfulness etc.
  • 28:09Positive attitudes about life
  • 28:11like increased life appreciation,
  • 28:15gratitude, enthusiasm, meaning,
  • 28:17etc.
  • 28:18Positive mood changes increased love,
  • 28:21inner peace,
  • 28:23positive emotions decreased anger.
  • 28:27Positive social effects.
  • 28:28Positive relationships,
  • 28:29greater tolerance start.
  • 28:31Others love towards others.
  • 28:33Empathy towards others compassion.
  • 28:38Broadly speaking, increased
  • 28:40spirituality, increased sense,
  • 28:42of reverence, preciousness of life,
  • 28:45profound sacred experiences.
  • 28:50And people will also endorse
  • 28:52behavior changes now these are in
  • 28:55the healthy volunteer so we didn't
  • 28:57have a single behavior target which
  • 29:00we do in the addictions of course.
  • 29:03But people report all kinds of things,
  • 29:06such as increased improved
  • 29:08social relationships or increased
  • 29:10physical self care activities,
  • 29:12spiritual practices, creative activities.
  • 29:15So that's out to six months.
  • 29:17Here is 14 months and this
  • 29:19is just endorsement of.
  • 29:21Increases in well being or life satisfaction.
  • 29:24The red bar shows five weeks after a
  • 29:28high dose of psilocybin and the blue
  • 29:31bar shows 14 months in that same group.
  • 29:35So these are these are sustained
  • 29:37and anecdotally years later people
  • 29:40will still make attributions of
  • 29:42this type and and it's not just the
  • 29:45volunteer that's reporting this,
  • 29:47we have done, we've added.
  • 29:51Measures of Community observer ratings.
  • 29:53These would be family members,
  • 29:55friends, colleagues at work.
  • 29:59Providing ratings.
  • 30:00Volunteers across a range of measures
  • 30:04similar to those that they report and
  • 30:08those are showing similar kinds of effects.
  • 30:12And then just as a placeholder,
  • 30:15'cause I'm going to return to
  • 30:18it at the very end,
  • 30:20mystical experiences scores predict
  • 30:22meaningfulness and spiritual significance
  • 30:24and openness in personality.
  • 30:26At 14 months of there's something about
  • 30:29these mystical experiences that are
  • 30:31predictive of long-term enduring effects,
  • 30:33and I'd just be remiss not
  • 30:36to acknowledge that,
  • 30:37in spite of all the screening
  • 30:40we do in the preparation,
  • 30:42the support during and after.
  • 30:45About 1/3 of volunteers in
  • 30:48one of our studies and I think
  • 30:51that figure is roughly right.
  • 30:54Experienced stronger extreme feelings
  • 30:57of fear sometime during the session.
  • 31:02Figure as unpredictable time course,
  • 31:04but Despite that,
  • 31:06most of these volunteers rated
  • 31:08these experiences overall having
  • 31:10meaning and spiritual significance.
  • 31:13Then no volunteer rated the
  • 31:15experiences to decrease their sense
  • 31:18of well being or life satisfaction.
  • 31:23OK, so now I'm going to move on to
  • 31:26talk about our therapeutic trials and
  • 31:29I'll start with our cancer study.
  • 31:31These are people. With.
  • 31:36With the. And a significant life
  • 31:41threatening diagnosis of cancer.
  • 31:45And as as you might imagine,
  • 31:48people with such a diagnosis often develop
  • 31:51chronic and debilitating syndromes
  • 31:53of either anxiety or depression.
  • 31:55There were several studies back
  • 31:57in the 60s or 70s that suggested
  • 32:01that psychedelics might be an
  • 32:03interesting intervention here.
  • 32:05In this case, we have 51 participants,
  • 32:09mean age, 56 have female.
  • 32:12Most of the studies that we have
  • 32:15done to date, you know are skewed
  • 32:19toward educated white individuals.
  • 32:21In this case, about 45% had some
  • 32:25lifetime use of a psychedelic,
  • 32:28but on average 31 years ago.
  • 32:31So these weren't current users.
  • 32:35This is the prognosis.
  • 32:39About 65% had recurrent or
  • 32:43metastatic disease.
  • 32:4435% possibility of recurrence,
  • 32:47and there are various types of cancers.
  • 32:52Terms of skin diagnosis.
  • 32:55About 40% had depressed mood,
  • 32:5930% anxiety 3030% mixed
  • 33:02anxiety or depression.
  • 33:0451% had used medications previously
  • 33:08for treatment of anxiety or depression.
  • 33:15This is the study design.
  • 33:17It was randomized double
  • 33:18blind crossover design.
  • 33:20Looking at the acute and sustained
  • 33:22effects of a very low dose placebo like
  • 33:25dose of still 7 one milligram for 70
  • 33:29kilogram versus a moderately high dose.
  • 33:31And and we administered that
  • 33:34very minimal dose, partly blind,
  • 33:36for blinding reasons.
  • 33:37I can go into that in more detail,
  • 33:40but people were told that they
  • 33:43were going to receive psilocybin.
  • 33:45The dose might vary.
  • 33:46They were not told that there
  • 33:49were simply 22 conditions,
  • 33:51and that instruction set was similar
  • 33:54for both the guides and the volunteers.
  • 33:57So we're bending over backwards to.
  • 34:01To blind the study as best as we
  • 34:04could with respect to expectancies.
  • 34:07Some people were randomized
  • 34:09to just two session orders.
  • 34:11They either received the high
  • 34:13dose first on session one,
  • 34:15and then there's a five week follow up,
  • 34:18followed by the low dose or or the
  • 34:21inverse sequence of dough sing,
  • 34:24and then we did a six month follow up.
  • 34:28Not surprisingly,
  • 34:30under these conditions.
  • 34:32People are reporting mystical
  • 34:34type experiences.
  • 34:35You can see our low dose session actually
  • 34:38produces a not inconsequential elevation
  • 34:41of this and that's as it should be.
  • 34:44People are told they're
  • 34:46going to get psilocybin.
  • 34:48These are conditions are optimized
  • 34:50to produce these kinds of effects,
  • 34:53but a much bigger effects
  • 34:55with still assignment.
  • 34:57And here's the Attribution of meaning
  • 34:59spiritual significance and well,
  • 35:01being.
  • 35:01Orange bars showing five
  • 35:03weeks after the high dose.
  • 35:06And blue bars now are showing that these
  • 35:09effects are sustained out to six months.
  • 35:13OK, So what about our clinical measures?
  • 35:17So this is Hamdy Gold standard
  • 35:20clinician rated measure of depression.
  • 35:24The left panel shows clinically
  • 35:27significant improvement.
  • 35:28That's 50% drop in Ham D scores.
  • 35:32So you're seeing about 92% of participants
  • 35:36showing clinically significant
  • 35:38improvement five weeks after the high dose,
  • 35:42and that's sustained.
  • 35:44It's six months.
  • 35:47And then in the right panel,
  • 35:49remission to the normal range.
  • 35:52That's a handy score of seven or less
  • 35:55considered to be in the normal range,
  • 35:5960% at the end of five weeks
  • 36:02and 70% at six months.
  • 36:04Hamdy is showing very
  • 36:07similar kinds of results.
  • 36:09So we concluded from this study
  • 36:12single moderate dose of psilocybin,
  • 36:14when administered under supported
  • 36:16conditions to these carefully
  • 36:18screen and prepared participants can
  • 36:20produce substantial and enduring
  • 36:22decreases in depressed mood.
  • 36:24In these people would like threading,
  • 36:27cancer diagnosis and and the NYU
  • 36:30Group ran a very similar study,
  • 36:33slightly smaller in and got
  • 36:36very similar conclusions.
  • 36:38OK,
  • 36:39moving on to the treatment
  • 36:42of major depressive disorder.
  • 36:45Don't need to tell your Department,
  • 36:49but depressions of serious
  • 36:51concern and I leave it at that.
  • 36:55This study we reported JAMA
  • 36:58Psychiatry just last month.
  • 37:01And it was a randomized delayed
  • 37:03treatment or or wait list control
  • 37:06trial examining the efficacy
  • 37:08of two psilocybin sessions,
  • 37:10either 20 or 30 milligrams, for 70 kilogram.
  • 37:14Sequentially 1st 20,
  • 37:17then 30 under psychologically
  • 37:20supported conditions.
  • 37:21This is the study design,
  • 37:24so there was a screening baseline.
  • 37:27People randomized to immediate
  • 37:29treatment or delayed treatment.
  • 37:31They after preparation they receive
  • 37:34two psilocybin sessions and then
  • 37:36they followed up with handy.
  • 37:39So the delayed treatment you
  • 37:41literally just was delayed.
  • 37:43They got timing of their hamdis
  • 37:46were at similar time points and
  • 37:49then they were crossed over.
  • 37:52To the active condition.
  • 37:5524 subjects mean age, 40 years,
  • 37:58females overrepresented again.
  • 38:01Educated white mean duration of illness.
  • 38:0522 years duration of current episode
  • 38:0824 months 58% had failed one or more
  • 38:13medical trials in the current episode,
  • 38:17baseline Hamdis were 23%.
  • 38:19About 25% had some lifetime
  • 38:23use of psychedelics.
  • 38:25Hi, mystical experience scores.
  • 38:28Not much of a difference
  • 38:31between the two doses.
  • 38:33And here's blinded handy ratings in
  • 38:36the delay treatment and the immediate
  • 38:40treatment at 5 weeks and eight weeks.
  • 38:44So we're seeing huge effects.
  • 38:47Major consti SUV.
  • 38:50Well over 2.
  • 38:53And this is showing data combined
  • 38:56across the groups just showing that.
  • 38:59The delay group decreased just
  • 39:02in the very same way that the
  • 39:05immediate group did post treatment.
  • 39:09This is clinically significant response
  • 39:12in the upper panel showing that one
  • 39:15week for week and 12 weeks we have about 70%.
  • 39:20And remission.
  • 39:21At the same time,
  • 39:24points is about 50 minutes better than 50%,
  • 39:28which is very good.
  • 39:30Here's quids.
  • 39:31This is a patient rated depression
  • 39:34inventory showing rather similar effects.
  • 39:36I can't account for why that increased
  • 39:40in the late treatment group at 5 weeks,
  • 39:44but nonetheless big effect sizes,
  • 39:47and this is interesting because we
  • 39:50gave the quids post session days.
  • 39:53And so what's shown here?
  • 39:56This is collapsed across both
  • 39:59groups is changing.
  • 40:00Score from Baseline today day one
  • 40:04post session one is that first
  • 40:07point suggesting that we're getting
  • 40:11full on therapeutic effects even
  • 40:14the day after the first session.
  • 40:20This is Beck depression inventory.
  • 40:22Then this is just showing
  • 40:25the same kinds of effects.
  • 40:27Here's Patient health questionnaire,
  • 40:30patient rated depression,
  • 40:32large effect sizes. Here's hammeh.
  • 40:37State trade inventory patient rated.
  • 40:41And suicidal ideations with
  • 40:44not significantly different,
  • 40:45intended to decrease, and in both groups.
  • 40:50Sport conclusions here are the
  • 40:52modern high dose of psilocybin when
  • 40:55administered under supportive conditions,
  • 40:57can produce substantial in and
  • 40:59during decreases and depressed mood.
  • 41:02Depression was subsequently deep
  • 41:03was substantially decreased the day
  • 41:06after the first monitor dose session,
  • 41:08suggesting that a single dose may be
  • 41:12adequate for therapeutic response.
  • 41:14Treatment did not exacerbate
  • 41:16depression in any participant.
  • 41:18I didn't didn't show you that,
  • 41:21but there was no indication that
  • 41:24treatment exacerbated depression.
  • 41:26Two of the 24 participants had little or
  • 41:29no therapeutic response, and and were.
  • 41:34Working up our follow up data now but these.
  • 41:38These attacks are impressively
  • 41:41sustained out to our one year followup,
  • 41:45with some some recurrence,
  • 41:48but nonetheless it's it's interesting.
  • 41:51Um?
  • 41:52Big limitation of this study is
  • 41:54that didn't include a placebo or
  • 41:57pharmacologically active control condition.
  • 41:59But as I said, that's a it's a.
  • 42:03Very difficult to figure out.
  • 42:06Well,
  • 42:06I don't think there's any single
  • 42:09comparison condition that actually
  • 42:12results in an adequate control.
  • 42:15And in terms of status,
  • 42:17FDA is given breakthrough therapy
  • 42:20status designation to two companies
  • 42:23that are working now with psilocybin
  • 42:26for indications of either treatment
  • 42:28resistant depression or MDD.
  • 42:31And so if those trials are positive,
  • 42:34that's a big.
  • 42:36If you know the FDA approval processes.
  • 42:41Incredibly involved,
  • 42:42but it could result in approval
  • 42:46of psilocybin for medical use
  • 42:49and I would guess it will take.
  • 42:52Four to six years for that to occur.
  • 42:55OK, turning now to treatment of addiction.
  • 42:59Why would we have even thought of addiction?
  • 43:03Well,
  • 43:04you know there's anthropological evidence
  • 43:07from Native Americans suggesting that
  • 43:09addictions of reasonable thing to do,
  • 43:12and also again look reflecting
  • 43:14back on earlier studies in the
  • 43:181950s and meta analysis and recent
  • 43:20study in Alcoholics suggests that
  • 43:23addictions are reasonable target.
  • 43:26In this case,
  • 43:28this study was led by Matt Johnson
  • 43:31from our group and our first study
  • 43:34was a simple pilot study looking at
  • 43:39psilocybin facilitation of treatment
  • 43:41cessation with cognitive behavioral
  • 43:44therapy for smoking integrated
  • 43:46into our standard preparation
  • 43:49and support for psilocybin.
  • 43:51We offered up to three psilocybin sessions,
  • 43:55first one being 20.
  • 43:57Milligrams for 70 kilograms that
  • 44:00corresponded to the target quit date
  • 44:03for smoking and then two subsequent
  • 44:06sessions so it's open label.
  • 44:09It's very weak in that respect.
  • 44:1215 participants mean age 50 years.
  • 44:15Males over represented 19
  • 44:17cigarettes per day on average.
  • 44:20Mean year.
  • 44:21Smoking 31 mean previous quitus attempt 6
  • 44:24so these are chronic long-term smokers.
  • 44:28But the results are astonishingly
  • 44:31clear when you look at them like this.
  • 44:34This is urinary code, Nina,
  • 44:36major metabolite,
  • 44:37for for nicotine.
  • 44:39And you can see in the left there
  • 44:41prior to the target quit date when
  • 44:44people are learning the cognitive
  • 44:46behavior therapy approaches,
  • 44:49code mean is maintained at
  • 44:51relatively stable levels.
  • 44:52They hit the target quit date
  • 44:56corresponding to that first.
  • 44:58Session and these are median
  • 45:01levels dropped to 0,
  • 45:03so there's some. Some variation,
  • 45:08but they are sustained at.
  • 45:13At very low levels and
  • 45:15at six months follow up,
  • 45:18we had 80% abstinence, which.
  • 45:21In the smoking cessation business
  • 45:23is just an absurdly high number
  • 45:27and and so really calls on us
  • 45:30to continue to look at that.
  • 45:33This is some follow up data with Johnson.
  • 45:37He has published this that's incorrectly
  • 45:40labeled looking at 7 point prevalence
  • 45:43abstinence rates out to 30 months,
  • 45:46which is still up to 60%.
  • 45:51So this whole area I should also say
  • 45:55Matt now has moved onto an is a good way
  • 46:00through a comparative efficacy trial.
  • 46:04Comparing psilocybin to nicotine replacement
  • 46:07therapy in the results of that look,
  • 46:10very look very promising.
  • 46:14So that works that works going on and
  • 46:17and we're looking for opportunities to
  • 46:19expand the cigarette smoking research,
  • 46:22but I just wanted to point out
  • 46:24with respect to addiction,
  • 46:26Michael Bogen shoots at NYU, you has some.
  • 46:31Very promising data with alcohol dependence
  • 46:34that we expect should be published.
  • 46:37Certainly in the next several months.
  • 46:40Um? Peter Hendricks has a small study in
  • 46:44cocaine use disorder down in Birmingham,
  • 46:48AL, which looks quite promising and
  • 46:51we did a cross sectional survey study
  • 46:55documenting naturalistic psychedelic use
  • 46:59associated with reductions in cessation
  • 47:02of opiate cannabis and stimulant use,
  • 47:06with substantial decreases and
  • 47:08substance use criteria so so.
  • 47:12The concept here is that there really could
  • 47:17be significant transdiagnostic applicability.
  • 47:22So earlier I spoke about the
  • 47:24biological mechanism of action.
  • 47:26I just now want to kind of pick up on.
  • 47:31Psychological or cognitive mechanisms
  • 47:32of action and just throw out some
  • 47:35ideas floating around about those.
  • 47:37So one is mystical experience
  • 47:39as as an important component,
  • 47:41and I'm going to show you a little bit
  • 47:46more data on that in just a second.
  • 47:49And these are.
  • 47:51These aren't independent,
  • 47:53but another of label ontological
  • 47:55shock resulting in profound shift
  • 47:58and sense of self and worldview
  • 48:01that may result in a reconstruction
  • 48:03of life story and hallucinate,
  • 48:06loosening himself focused narrative.
  • 48:08Another is this insight about self
  • 48:11or relationships could be experienced
  • 48:14as memory or catharsis.
  • 48:16I mentioned that we've developed a
  • 48:20Psychological insight questionnaire.
  • 48:21Another domain,
  • 48:22just this sense of increased
  • 48:25self efficacy or agency.
  • 48:27Openness to.
  • 48:30Seeing the world differently
  • 48:32to trying alternative things,
  • 48:35curiosity about the nature of
  • 48:38mind or consciousness, that's.
  • 48:41Akin to increased mindfulness.
  • 48:43And that may be at play and then
  • 48:47this interesting one kind of varied
  • 48:50or tolerance for an interest
  • 48:53in benefiting from discomfort.
  • 48:55Um?
  • 48:57Turning to mystical experience,
  • 48:59now I just want to show you the.
  • 49:03The correlations that have.
  • 49:06I that have been demonstrated across a
  • 49:09range of studies showing that mystical
  • 49:12experience predicts positive outcomes,
  • 49:14so this was in healthy volunteers
  • 49:17and I already said this.
  • 49:19Mystical experience scores predict.
  • 49:22The meaningfulness,
  • 49:23spiritual significance and
  • 49:24openness in personality.
  • 49:2614 months later and that's shown
  • 49:28in the left panel there there's
  • 49:30a mysticism SCORM immediately
  • 49:32after psilocybin is correlated
  • 49:35significantly and positively with.
  • 49:37In this case its rating of
  • 49:40spiritual significance.
  • 49:41Set at one year or 14 months and
  • 49:45that correlation does not hold
  • 49:47true in the right hand panel.
  • 49:50For the intensity of the psilocybin effect.
  • 49:53And so we've seen variations of
  • 49:55that across a range of studies,
  • 49:57so this is our mystical.
  • 49:59This is the can.
  • 50:01Search study where mystical experience
  • 50:03scores predicting decreases in
  • 50:05depression and anxiety at 5 weeks.
  • 50:08This is the major depressive disorder study.
  • 50:13Again,
  • 50:13mystical experience predicting
  • 50:15decreases in depression.
  • 50:18This is mystical experience scores
  • 50:20predicting decreased smoking,
  • 50:22craving and smoking is biologically
  • 50:25measured at 6 and 12 months.
  • 50:30This is the model that we have actually.
  • 50:34Currently favoring and thinking about
  • 50:36this fell out of a large survey study,
  • 50:40but I think there's some value in this Ann.
  • 50:45What's showing here is this is a
  • 50:49path model looking at survey data,
  • 50:52but when it's showing is that.
  • 50:56Their their tune fact interactive factors
  • 50:59that is this acute miskell if it affects
  • 51:03in this acute insightful effects,
  • 51:06and they seem to feed into this
  • 51:08mediating construct of increases
  • 51:11in psychological flexibility.
  • 51:13And that's a there solid measures of
  • 51:16that that have come out of the Act,
  • 51:20psychotherapy, literature,
  • 51:21and that accounts for decreases
  • 51:24and depression and anxiety.
  • 51:28So the overall conclusion and implication
  • 51:32of this work is under these conditions.
  • 51:36Psilocybin occasions, discrete experiences,
  • 51:38having marked similarities to classic
  • 51:41mystical insightful experiences.
  • 51:43These experiences are associated
  • 51:45with enduring positive trait
  • 51:47changes and attitudes,
  • 51:49moods and behaviors in both
  • 51:52healthy and patient populations.
  • 51:55And then when I find most intriguing,
  • 51:59is that the finding that psilocybin can,
  • 52:02in most people studied occasion these
  • 52:05mystical and insightful experiences
  • 52:07that are so similar to those that
  • 52:10occur naturally suggests that such
  • 52:13experiences are biologically normal.
  • 52:15That is where we're wired to have such
  • 52:19experiences and the exciting piece of this
  • 52:22is that these experiences their consequences.
  • 52:26And the basic neuropharmacology
  • 52:29are now amenable to systematic
  • 52:31prospective cyantific study,
  • 52:33and they have alluded this to
  • 52:37this to this point in time.
  • 52:41And I often feel like.
  • 52:45And they met.
  • 52:46That thought is kind of Rip Van Winkle.
  • 52:49This is an opportunity for us all
  • 52:52within the scientific community
  • 52:54to explore these compounds.
  • 52:56The psychedelics that have been put
  • 52:58in the deep freeze for a couple
  • 53:02of decades and think about think
  • 53:04of all the science and all of our
  • 53:07the methods that have developed,
  • 53:09you know, over over the last 20 years.
  • 53:13And so there are so many really
  • 53:16interesting questions at.
  • 53:17Any different level that can be
  • 53:20addressed about these compounds that
  • 53:23really could be quite consequential,
  • 53:25so biological psychiatry how factors
  • 53:28such as personality, genetics,
  • 53:29intention affect likelihood,
  • 53:31neuroscience, ton of stuff.
  • 53:33They're wondering,
  • 53:34the structural functional changes
  • 53:36in brain that account from this
  • 53:38behavioral Sciences.
  • 53:40What behaviors are changed with
  • 53:43behavioral mechanisms can account
  • 53:45for such experiences.
  • 53:47Then of course we have the whole
  • 53:49area of therapeutics and the
  • 53:51exciting prospect that there might
  • 53:54be cross diagnostic generality to the
  • 53:56efficacy of these of these drugs,
  • 53:59but yet is yet to be proven.
  • 54:02And then and then a piece that I can't
  • 54:05help but feel is deeply important,
  • 54:09but we don't have.
  • 54:10We don't have funding agencies
  • 54:13to allow us to pursue it.
  • 54:15Is this the fact that these drugs can?
  • 54:19Increase these tendencies towards
  • 54:21altruism and pro social behavior.
  • 54:23It really couple into ethical systems
  • 54:27that have been promulgated by major
  • 54:30religious traditions and are are
  • 54:32so integral to the survival of our
  • 54:35culture and ultimately to our species.
  • 54:38And I think with these compounds,
  • 54:41among others,
  • 54:42will allow us to get purchase
  • 54:46an unstudied such effects.
  • 54:48Song, I think that I think that's it.
  • 54:51Thank you very much.
  • 54:55Thank you Roland for a
  • 54:57wonderful talking edit.
  • 54:57It's an overview of this
  • 55:00extraordinary body of work.
  • 55:02Really exciting to see and
  • 55:03to see you synthesize it.
  • 55:06We have a good bit of time for
  • 55:09questions now and I guess let's see.
  • 55:11If I can see if people can raise their hands.
  • 55:16And I can call on you, or you're
  • 55:18welcome to put questions in the chat.
  • 55:21As well. And I want to ask a quick
  • 55:25one if I made to get things started,
  • 55:28which is you shared at the beginning.
  • 55:31This model,
  • 55:31which is intuitively quite compelling,
  • 55:33especially in light of the default
  • 55:35mode network effects of the drugs.
  • 55:37That perhaps what's happening is
  • 55:39the drugs are acute psilocybin
  • 55:40and perhaps other drugs.
  • 55:42Other psychedelics are acutely
  • 55:43dissociating the mechanisms of
  • 55:45sense of self and then they are
  • 55:47being reconfigured or reassembling
  • 55:48in a more adaptive or positive way.
  • 55:50My question is that in the context
  • 55:53of psychopathology.
  • 55:54If you are turning,
  • 55:55if you're rebooting the computer,
  • 55:56you know if you're if you're disrupting
  • 55:58the sense of the integrative sense
  • 56:00of self and then reassembling it.
  • 56:02Why should it reassemble in
  • 56:03a more adaptive way?
  • 56:06But why is that good?
  • 56:12I haven't I have. I have no idea.
  • 56:17I mean, it's yeah, it's it's,
  • 56:20it's highly. Curious that the even
  • 56:24that these effects seem to be skewed
  • 56:29toward this positive beneficial.
  • 56:34You know outcome?
  • 56:36I mean it wouldn't.
  • 56:38Ah, Priora, you wouldn't think
  • 56:40that would need to be true.
  • 56:42Yet it is. Yeah, yeah.
  • 56:47I don't know, you know,
  • 56:49you know other than the thought is
  • 56:52that it's it's pretty clear in the
  • 56:54context in which we now find ourselves,
  • 56:58and in these cultures that that
  • 57:00we get entangled in, you know,
  • 57:03a web of narrative structures
  • 57:06of you know that sets out our.
  • 57:10Our our moment to moment
  • 57:12priorities in terms of the kind
  • 57:14of a narrative context of what
  • 57:17of how we're viewing the world,
  • 57:19and if you pull back from
  • 57:22that very substantially,
  • 57:23there can be this shift
  • 57:26that occurs that that.
  • 57:28Wakes people up to the idea
  • 57:31that there's those narrative.
  • 57:33Trues are only one aspect of what
  • 57:36it is to be aware in a in a in in
  • 57:40the fully functioning amazement
  • 57:42that we are actually these.
  • 57:45Highly evolved.
  • 57:47Creatures that have developed
  • 57:51this capacity for language and
  • 57:55to to change our environment.
  • 57:59We've invented mathematics and.
  • 58:03And and yet the most astonishing
  • 58:06piece of that mystery is that we're
  • 58:08aware that we're aware that we had,
  • 58:11that that we're in this this awareness,
  • 58:14and that needn't necessarily be the case.
  • 58:16And so if someone is ripped out of
  • 58:19that narrative structure and kind
  • 58:21of blinks at the astonishment of
  • 58:24what we don't understand but is so
  • 58:27compellingly true about the human condition,
  • 58:29that we're all in this together.
  • 58:31In this mystery of not knowing what
  • 58:34the hell is actually going on here.
  • 58:37Uh, you know, perhaps there's.
  • 58:42Deep potential therapeutic value to that.
  • 58:48As you say it empirically, true,
  • 58:49yes, so we have. We have a number of
  • 58:51hand raised in quite a lot in the chat,
  • 58:53so I'm going to call and fill Corlett.
  • 58:56Thanks so much for a brilliant talk and
  • 58:59beautiful work. I have a question
  • 59:02about a potential experiment that you
  • 59:04might do to resolve this debate about
  • 59:08the necessity of mystical experiences.
  • 59:11Are you considered or do you know of
  • 59:13anyone who's trying to administer
  • 59:15these substances to people who are
  • 59:17unconscious under other anesthetics?
  • 59:18Because of course,
  • 59:19that would be one way of showing that you
  • 59:22get these therapeutic improvements in
  • 59:24the absence of the mystical experiences.
  • 59:26Full disclosure,
  • 59:27I'm betting on the mystical experience
  • 59:29is actually being a mediator,
  • 59:31but but I'm interested in your
  • 59:33thoughts there.
  • 59:35Yeah, well, thanks for asking that.
  • 59:38So this viewpoint article we
  • 59:41actually proposed that as the as the
  • 59:46critical question to disprove the
  • 59:49importance of psychedelic experience.
  • 59:52It might be an impossibly
  • 59:55difficult experiment to run
  • 59:57to come to any final conclude.
  • 01:00:01But yeah, the idea is yeah,
  • 01:00:03if you fully anesthetize someone.
  • 01:00:05And then give them a full on psychedelic.
  • 01:00:08Maintain the anesthesia past the point
  • 01:00:11that the psychedelic is no longer active
  • 01:00:14and then allow people to come out.
  • 01:00:17They have no memory of
  • 01:00:19having gotten psilocybin.
  • 01:00:20And then the question is, are they?
  • 01:00:23Are they therapeutically?
  • 01:00:24You know benefited from that
  • 01:00:27and if this is all. Uh.
  • 01:00:30If this is all neurogenesis, and then,
  • 01:00:34then you're going to have full on
  • 01:00:37therapeutic effects, and we think that's.
  • 01:00:41Incredibly unlikely.
  • 01:00:44But you know the problem with that
  • 01:00:47is that even if you didn't show the.
  • 01:00:51Uh.
  • 01:00:54The. That in during effects of.
  • 01:01:01The the psychedelic.
  • 01:01:03It could be argued that whatever
  • 01:01:07anesthetic you gave interrupted that
  • 01:01:10you know whatever narrow genic.
  • 01:01:15Neural processes underlying
  • 01:01:17neural processes and would have
  • 01:01:19under undermine those, and so you
  • 01:01:23wouldn't have a final Test of that.
  • 01:01:27But it does. It seems to me
  • 01:01:30that there's there's something.
  • 01:01:32Profoundly important.
  • 01:01:35About this shift in narrative structure,
  • 01:01:38'cause if you if you think of it,
  • 01:01:42you know for for our cigarette smokers,
  • 01:01:45for instance,
  • 01:01:46they come in and they identify
  • 01:01:48as being addicted to cigarette
  • 01:01:50smoking and they and for good
  • 01:01:53reason they've they've quit numerous
  • 01:01:55times and an failed and relapse,
  • 01:01:58they know that they concede to craving.
  • 01:02:03And if they hold themselves as addicted,
  • 01:02:06then that's that's exactly what they are.
  • 01:02:09I mean, they're never going
  • 01:02:11to get out of that,
  • 01:02:13but you change that narrative
  • 01:02:15structure and make it plausible to
  • 01:02:18them that they they have a sense
  • 01:02:20of freedom and efficacy that they
  • 01:02:23didn't imagine they had before.
  • 01:02:25And then everything ships here.
  • 01:02:27You really,
  • 01:02:28it's almost like you're rewriting
  • 01:02:30the operating system.
  • 01:02:31If you can change that.
  • 01:02:34Narrative structure because the self
  • 01:02:36instructions that they're going to
  • 01:02:38be giving themselves going forward
  • 01:02:40are going to be very different,
  • 01:02:42and my guess is that that's at play in,
  • 01:02:46you know,
  • 01:02:46in a lot of the therapeutic kinds
  • 01:02:49of effects that we're going to see.
  • 01:02:55Jerry, I think your sister next and
  • 01:02:57I saw. Yep, can you hear
  • 01:02:58Chris so role in great.
  • 01:03:00Great job and just sorry you couldn't
  • 01:03:01be there in person to to be with you.
  • 01:03:06Just a very quick comment on.
  • 01:03:07Yeah, I think anesthetize Ng
  • 01:03:09somebody in doing it could be a
  • 01:03:10real problem even with cada mean.
  • 01:03:12We can see if.
  • 01:03:14If we give high enough dose even we
  • 01:03:16don't get these physiologic changes,
  • 01:03:18so I think that's a problem,
  • 01:03:20but that wasn't the main point.
  • 01:03:22The big point I have is I don't
  • 01:03:25see maybe the discrepancy or seems
  • 01:03:27like a false dichotomy between
  • 01:03:29all sending you in terms of.
  • 01:03:32Yeah, what?
  • 01:03:34Is going on in terms of the
  • 01:03:36psychological and biological.
  • 01:03:37If you look at it in terms of.
  • 01:03:40Just these drugs, including you know
  • 01:03:42all the psilocybin and keta mean
  • 01:03:44actually having this
  • 01:03:45ability to induce cognitive
  • 01:03:46flexibility. Then there's
  • 01:03:47this huge component of expectation
  • 01:03:49and how you build this up.
  • 01:03:51And I'm not sure I.
  • 01:03:53I guess what my question to you
  • 01:03:55is how sure are we that it's the
  • 01:03:58mystical experience part of it?
  • 01:04:00'cause all these people are prepped
  • 01:04:02for it to have this mystical experience
  • 01:04:04in the prep sessions usually correct?
  • 01:04:06Where in Europe they usually
  • 01:04:08don't prep them so much and they
  • 01:04:10don't. Report so much of the mystical
  • 01:04:12experience. Could you
  • 01:04:13just comment on, you know,
  • 01:04:15is that the critical thing? Or is it
  • 01:04:18the fact that you're getting
  • 01:04:19a drug that induces cognitive
  • 01:04:21flexibility and you're doing
  • 01:04:22something to reinforce that?
  • 01:04:25Yeah, let's see. So I mean,
  • 01:04:28there's no question that the seven
  • 01:04:30setting conditions are primary
  • 01:04:32determinants of of what people
  • 01:04:34come out of these experiences.
  • 01:04:36And it is the case that our.
  • 01:04:41Set and setting conditions and preparation
  • 01:04:44conditions are optimized to provide support.
  • 01:04:48You know for this deeply introspective
  • 01:04:52introvertive kind of experience.
  • 01:04:54Our initial studies.
  • 01:04:56We actually bent over backwards not to.
  • 01:05:01Matt to provide.
  • 01:05:05The suggestion that people are going
  • 01:05:07to have mystical experiences. Um?
  • 01:05:10But nonetheless they did, and that was,
  • 01:05:13I think, what was so compelling
  • 01:05:16to me about that initial work is
  • 01:05:19how that really was falling out.
  • 01:05:22Now, however, it's totally unavoidable.
  • 01:05:24I mean, the word is out.
  • 01:05:26It's in their culture, and we and we can't.
  • 01:05:30We can't, possibly, you know,
  • 01:05:32pull back that expectancy.
  • 01:05:34And so that's you.
  • 01:05:36Know that that is a real challenge in
  • 01:05:39terms of how you know what controls you
  • 01:05:43want and how you tease out the role of that.
  • 01:05:48But I do think you know,
  • 01:05:51with mystical experiences,
  • 01:05:53still that there's something about this.
  • 01:05:56Dissolving of a worldview.
  • 01:06:02As a sense of worldview and a sense of self.
  • 01:06:06And getting a different
  • 01:06:08perceptual set on that.
  • 01:06:10That is as I described as ontological shock.
  • 01:06:13It's like wait a second.
  • 01:06:16What I thought to be true.
  • 01:06:19I no longer no.
  • 01:06:21To be true, you know everything's
  • 01:06:24on the on the table here,
  • 01:06:26and for whatever reason.
  • 01:06:28People feel empowered by that it's it's.
  • 01:06:32It's not scary.
  • 01:06:34It's it's an opening to change.
  • 01:06:37How we move forward to tease those
  • 01:06:40you know kinds of things apart.
  • 01:06:42You know for that matter I mean yeah.
  • 01:06:47What does FDA do in terms?
  • 01:06:49Yeah, exactly.
  • 01:06:50That's where it really comes down to
  • 01:06:53is when you go to implementation.
  • 01:06:55This this is.
  • 01:06:57To do it the way it's currently
  • 01:07:00done would be incredibly expensive.
  • 01:07:02We see how difficult
  • 01:07:03it is to implement esketamine
  • 01:07:05treatment because of the cost and
  • 01:07:07the Accessibility limitations.
  • 01:07:08This you know, until we can really figure
  • 01:07:11out what the critical component is,
  • 01:07:13it's going to be a major
  • 01:07:16problem in implementing this.
  • 01:07:17Yeah, I mean that I can imagine
  • 01:07:20there may be group that there's.
  • 01:07:23Could be elements of group preparation
  • 01:07:27and certainly subtracting out some of the.
  • 01:07:32Incredible support that we're providing
  • 01:07:34with two, you know, folded full-time.
  • 01:07:37Essentially therapists there
  • 01:07:38you know for duration.
  • 01:07:40I mean, that's just that's not going
  • 01:07:43to be workable in the long run,
  • 01:07:45but you know, I'm imagining there,
  • 01:07:48you know there there could be
  • 01:07:50changes of that sort and we have yet
  • 01:07:54to investigate the shorter acting
  • 01:07:56psychedelics and whether they are going
  • 01:07:59to have some of these same affects.
  • 01:08:01That's that's all open.
  • 01:08:03Uh, so there's I mean there's so much
  • 01:08:06to tease apart that's but that's why
  • 01:08:09this is so astonishingly interesting,
  • 01:08:11I, I think.
  • 01:08:14Well,
  • 01:08:14it's great to have stuff to tease apart.
  • 01:08:18And that's what we that's what we've
  • 01:08:21been bred to do right? As scientists,
  • 01:08:23that's you know, this is fun.
  • 01:08:28Congratulations. There's a lot of
  • 01:08:31questions in the chat too that I'm
  • 01:08:34going to lump together.
  • 01:08:36Here are about predictors of non response.
  • 01:08:38Have you any factors associated with
  • 01:08:40people who experience fear or have
  • 01:08:42negative experiences during psilocybin?
  • 01:08:44And are there any predictors or
  • 01:08:46characteristics of those who have a
  • 01:08:49relatively poor clinical response?
  • 01:08:51Not during but
  • 01:08:52after. Yeah, you know in our hands,
  • 01:08:56sadly no, we don't have predictors of
  • 01:09:00difficult experiences or non response.
  • 01:09:03We need to look for that.
  • 01:09:07Um? You know, but.
  • 01:09:09You know all of our subject groups have been
  • 01:09:14highly selected and and so I think it has.
  • 01:09:19Is this gets dispersed over
  • 01:09:21a much larger population,
  • 01:09:23we're going to learn a lot,
  • 01:09:26alot more about that were.
  • 01:09:28Yeah, we've been doing our long-term.
  • 01:09:31Follow up now and our depression study
  • 01:09:34and just try looking as best we can
  • 01:09:38for predictors of of non response
  • 01:09:40and so far nothing is showing up.
  • 01:09:44I mean you could make the guess that.
  • 01:09:49A number of the kinds of people
  • 01:09:51that we would have screened out.
  • 01:09:53Under concern about our inability to
  • 01:09:57develop significant trust and report with.
  • 01:10:01Then you know said borderline
  • 01:10:06personality types,
  • 01:10:08for instance,
  • 01:10:10or people who hold incredibly
  • 01:10:16rigid worldviews.
  • 01:10:18You know those people would would
  • 01:10:21likely be screened out because
  • 01:10:23we would feel like we couldn't
  • 01:10:25couldn't work with them and so
  • 01:10:27it may very well be that you know
  • 01:10:30populations of that type are going to.
  • 01:10:34Are going to have more difficult times
  • 01:10:36or or be less responsive to treatment?
  • 01:10:40And there was actually the
  • 01:10:42next question in the chat.
  • 01:10:43Was about borderline personality
  • 01:10:45and whether you or anyone
  • 01:10:46has done work in that area.
  • 01:10:48And I hear what you say about it may
  • 01:10:50be difficult to form the bond and
  • 01:10:52that maybe maybe have a qualitatively
  • 01:10:54different experience because of that.
  • 01:10:56On the other hand,
  • 01:10:57your theory about rewriting the
  • 01:10:59self narrative being the core
  • 01:11:00therapeutic component that might
  • 01:11:01be exactly what people with
  • 01:11:03borderline personality needs.
  • 01:11:04And so I wonder if you have any
  • 01:11:07comments on that.
  • 01:11:10Let's see well.
  • 01:11:12Yeah, I think that's exactly right.
  • 01:11:15It's it's unknown and God bless
  • 01:11:18you if you want to undertake that.
  • 01:11:23Big big big because yeah,
  • 01:11:26we you know we have had a
  • 01:11:30Kate occasional volunteers
  • 01:11:32who we subsequently recognize
  • 01:11:35have strong tendency toward
  • 01:11:39borderline personalities and and.
  • 01:11:42And you can imagine that they are.
  • 01:11:47Can be very difficult to deal
  • 01:11:49with and particularly under
  • 01:11:51these conditions where you've
  • 01:11:53given them something very.
  • 01:11:55You know? Very potent,
  • 01:11:56and if they interpreted as
  • 01:11:59not having been helpful,
  • 01:12:01you have your hands full.
  • 01:12:06Want to come back to the
  • 01:12:08raised hands? Colin LK.
  • 01:12:11Thank you so wonderful talk in
  • 01:12:13thinking about kind of relating
  • 01:12:15to psychological mechanisms of
  • 01:12:16the mystical experience
  • 01:12:17that you talked
  • 01:12:19about to biological mechanisms.
  • 01:12:20I was thinking about the study from
  • 01:12:23the Kobayakawa Group in Osaka,
  • 01:12:24where they show that.
  • 01:12:26Serotonin 2A receptor effects
  • 01:12:28should decrease innate fear
  • 01:12:30behavior but not learn fear.
  • 01:12:32Through this central amygdala.
  • 01:12:35Subpopulation of neurons.
  • 01:12:37And I was wondering to what extent
  • 01:12:40you could speculate on the relationship
  • 01:12:42between a kind of suppression of
  • 01:12:44innate fear or innate fear responses
  • 01:12:46and that kind of ontological
  • 01:12:47shock that you were describing.
  • 01:12:52That's an interesting question.
  • 01:12:57So you know we have not looked for
  • 01:13:01instance at psilocybin and for treatment
  • 01:13:04of PTSD not that's an innate fear,
  • 01:13:07but it's an acquired very significant fear.
  • 01:13:12Until we suspect when we have some
  • 01:13:16funding to look at at PTS di,
  • 01:13:19we suspect it might be,
  • 01:13:22you know, quite quite helpful.
  • 01:13:26But 111 concern is that is it possible
  • 01:13:30that these kinds of experiences
  • 01:13:33could actually re traumatized people,
  • 01:13:36and so it's it's unknown.
  • 01:13:42I don't think I don't think I
  • 01:13:44have any particular thoughts
  • 01:13:45about innate innate fears.
  • 01:13:47What? What would an example
  • 01:13:49of that innate fear be?
  • 01:13:51So in this study they used kind
  • 01:13:54of predator odorant. And what
  • 01:13:55they show basically is that.
  • 01:13:59That kind of fear would be suppressed
  • 01:14:02by the serotonin 2A agonism,
  • 01:14:04whereas learn fear would be
  • 01:14:06the opposite, yeah?
  • 01:14:10Interesting question.
  • 01:14:12I don't have any. Any thoughts?
  • 01:14:16I wonder how if innate fears were some.
  • 01:14:21Somehow suppressed in during Lee what?
  • 01:14:23How would that show up clinically?
  • 01:14:26I mean, these individuals are.
  • 01:14:29You know who report positive experiences?
  • 01:14:34Appear to be well adjusted in engaged and.
  • 01:14:42And and not.
  • 01:14:46And not compromised in any sense.
  • 01:14:50But we could be missing something.
  • 01:14:56I have several questions in
  • 01:14:57the chat that are speaking to
  • 01:14:59the demographics of the samples in
  • 01:15:01your study, which you acknowledged
  • 01:15:03are large majority white and large
  • 01:15:05majority highly educated. And as I said,
  • 01:15:08there are several questions on this,
  • 01:15:10but if you could speak to the gender,
  • 01:15:12how that may limit the
  • 01:15:13generalizability of this,
  • 01:15:14what you are doing practically,
  • 01:15:16and what other groups can do practically
  • 01:15:18to try to mitigate it going forward
  • 01:15:20and what you see the role of these.
  • 01:15:23These approaches being to address
  • 01:15:26difficulties that may be specific
  • 01:15:28to other groups.
  • 01:15:30For example,
  • 01:15:31the experience of racial trauma and
  • 01:15:33chronic stress source associated with
  • 01:15:36minority status, yeah, well.
  • 01:15:38Let's say it's it's unknown,
  • 01:15:41so it's a you know a significant
  • 01:15:44limitation of what we have
  • 01:15:46done to date and and you know,
  • 01:15:48I've wondered a lot about that.
  • 01:15:52Peter Hendricks is doing this work.
  • 01:15:55The time that I referenced
  • 01:15:58in burning Birmingham, AL.
  • 01:16:00On cocaine dependence.
  • 01:16:02And Interestingly,
  • 01:16:04the demographics of the
  • 01:16:05group that he's looking at,
  • 01:16:08and it's just been a small number,
  • 01:16:10but it's it's mostly.
  • 01:16:15Very underprivileged minority communities.
  • 01:16:18Large, largely black.
  • 01:16:22And and yet his reports to date have
  • 01:16:26been that the intervention with
  • 01:16:29psilocybin has been hugely effective.
  • 01:16:35His his group, it actually gets to
  • 01:16:39the expectancy question. Curious too.
  • 01:16:44His group is such that he claims a
  • 01:16:47number of the individuals who have
  • 01:16:51enrolled in treatment haven't had
  • 01:16:54no idea what a psychedelic even is,
  • 01:16:58and so somewhere there they're coming in
  • 01:17:02with zero expectancies in that score.
  • 01:17:06Yet they feel.
  • 01:17:07Are there yet the results appear
  • 01:17:10to be very positive,
  • 01:17:12so I so I simply don't know I I
  • 01:17:15actually was astonished when Peter
  • 01:17:17initially told me of those results,
  • 01:17:20'cause I I think I would have predicted
  • 01:17:23that so much of this is about cut
  • 01:17:26cognitive meaning and interpretation,
  • 01:17:28and that that's less likely
  • 01:17:31going to be the case.
  • 01:17:34In underprivileged population,
  • 01:17:37you know, and then in terms of,
  • 01:17:40you know, racial trauma.
  • 01:17:42You know of some type.
  • 01:17:44I mean that that kind of fits with,
  • 01:17:47you know, perhaps the PTSD question.
  • 01:17:50I think it just remains to be to be examined.
  • 01:17:57Thanks. I'm gonna go back to the
  • 01:18:01raised hand Zoncolan and reading.
  • 01:18:04Hi, thanks for your work,
  • 01:18:06Doctor Griffiths.
  • 01:18:07I remember reading some of it in
  • 01:18:09College in 2007 and never thinking
  • 01:18:12that this could ever be related to
  • 01:18:15my career and as a resident now.
  • 01:18:18It's amazing to see the
  • 01:18:20possibilities that exist.
  • 01:18:21So my question was you mentioned the
  • 01:18:24overlapping perspectives fostered
  • 01:18:25by psilocybin and those of major
  • 01:18:27religious and spiritual traditions? To
  • 01:18:29what degree has I guess
  • 01:18:31spiritually or emergently
  • 01:18:33oriented thinking?
  • 01:18:34Kind of driven your.
  • 01:18:35Hard science, so to speak,
  • 01:18:38hypothesis generation.
  • 01:18:42Yeah, I don't think I'm quite
  • 01:18:47catching what. Restate the question to
  • 01:18:50what extent, to
  • 01:18:52what extent has like I guess more
  • 01:18:55spiritually oriented thinking?
  • 01:18:58As a lot of this kind of reminds me of kind
  • 01:19:03of Eastern spiritual constructs driven,
  • 01:19:05your creation of hypothesis within a
  • 01:19:08more kind of Western hard science system.
  • 01:19:13Well, let's say so my my personal story
  • 01:19:17is that I was doing psychopharmacology
  • 01:19:21for decades at Johns Hopkins.
  • 01:19:24Mostly on mood altering drugs.
  • 01:19:27Most of my research is funded by Hnyda,
  • 01:19:30so I was really interested in mood altering
  • 01:19:34drugs and measurement of subjective
  • 01:19:36effects and then about 25 years ago I
  • 01:19:40started a meditation practice that was.
  • 01:19:43Pivotal to me it just got me
  • 01:19:46asking questions about changes and
  • 01:19:48worldview with nature of meditation.
  • 01:19:50What you know? What is this?
  • 01:19:53How does this fit in with spirituality?
  • 01:19:56You know more broadly and I I had no.
  • 01:20:03Particular religious affiliation,
  • 01:20:04or even grounding in spirituality.
  • 01:20:08So so so I got it intellectually
  • 01:20:12interested in that question,
  • 01:20:15and that actually prompted me to start
  • 01:20:18reading the older literature on psychedelics.
  • 01:20:23An an you know,
  • 01:20:26eventually proposing to do.
  • 01:20:28A study with psilocybin.
  • 01:20:30So I was I was moved to to initiate this
  • 01:20:34research because I was deeply curious
  • 01:20:37about transformative experiences.
  • 01:20:40And that and that continues to be the case.
  • 01:20:44I mean, I'm I'm I'm very interested
  • 01:20:46in my own exploration of the
  • 01:20:49nature of experiences and then and
  • 01:20:52then nature of what is true at
  • 01:20:55the deepest level and and how to.
  • 01:20:57How do I interpret that?
  • 01:20:59And so that has led us to this
  • 01:21:02series of studies that I didn't
  • 01:21:05talk about an beginning,
  • 01:21:07meditators and long term
  • 01:21:09meditators in the study were just.
  • 01:21:11Concluding in religious clergy.
  • 01:21:15Because I'm really interested in
  • 01:21:19the interplay between those things.
  • 01:21:24But so I guess the answer to
  • 01:21:27the question is that that.
  • 01:21:29I'm interested in that, but I don't.
  • 01:21:33I don't think that has.
  • 01:21:37Impacted this in.
  • 01:21:38The the core of a science that
  • 01:21:42I want to do and how I want to
  • 01:21:45understand the mechanisms that
  • 01:21:48whether the reason I ask is because
  • 01:21:51it seems like the cross disease
  • 01:21:54or the fact that it affects a
  • 01:21:57variety of diseases that might
  • 01:21:59not from a more reductionist
  • 01:22:02perspective seem to be linked.
  • 01:22:04It makes much more, so to speak,
  • 01:22:07common sense from a more
  • 01:22:09like spirituals psycho.
  • 01:22:11Dynamic respective issues like
  • 01:22:12personal narrative and spirituality
  • 01:22:14with regard to like addiction
  • 01:22:16and depression and so forth.
  • 01:22:17Yeah, I mean,
  • 01:22:19but you wouldn't. You wouldn't need
  • 01:22:21to bring spirituality into it.
  • 01:22:23I mean, it could be.
  • 01:22:25Yeah, it could be changed
  • 01:22:27in narrative structure,
  • 01:22:28and in that sort of thing,
  • 01:22:31but I am interested in that.
  • 01:22:33I just want to comment on the
  • 01:22:36your initial comment about you.
  • 01:22:38Having read about this in 2007 and thought
  • 01:22:42there's no way that you would touch it.
  • 01:22:46We have a couple of postdocs who
  • 01:22:48are in our who were residents
  • 01:22:51in psychiatry at Johns Hopkins,
  • 01:22:53and now have gotten very involved
  • 01:22:55in our work and are doing some
  • 01:22:58some really interesting things.
  • 01:23:00An just earlier this week they gave a
  • 01:23:04presentation to GW medical students and
  • 01:23:06I asked him what was that like and they said,
  • 01:23:10you know there were.
  • 01:23:12They have 40 students on the line and I said,
  • 01:23:16well. Was there skepticism because I
  • 01:23:18haven't gotten into this work initially?
  • 01:23:21There was plenty of skepticism
  • 01:23:23within the psychiatric community,
  • 01:23:25and they said no, not at all.
  • 01:23:28There's a lot of enthusiasm,
  • 01:23:30and then one of them reflected that
  • 01:23:33when when she was in medical school.
  • 01:23:36Like you, she actually had this
  • 01:23:38curiosity about psychedelics,
  • 01:23:40but she felt like she needed
  • 01:23:42to keep it a secret,
  • 01:23:44and so she should go out.
  • 01:23:47On the Internet and kind of
  • 01:23:49explore this kind of stuff,
  • 01:23:51but it was not a topic that she was even
  • 01:23:55willing to broach with her mentors at
  • 01:23:58the time because it was it was considered.
  • 01:24:02Ascentia a taboo subject,
  • 01:24:04so so the that the shift within psychiatry
  • 01:24:07and the culture is just been profound.
  • 01:24:10In that sense,
  • 01:24:11I felt that way.
  • 01:24:13So thank you for making that
  • 01:24:15less of a concern.
  • 01:24:20I think we're going to have to
  • 01:24:21make this next. The last question
  • 01:24:23I want to call Angela Heating.
  • 01:24:29Oh yes, well you kind of
  • 01:24:30asked my question earlier,
  • 01:24:32but I was just wondering if you
  • 01:24:33could talk a little bit about the
  • 01:24:35roots of psychedelic treatment.
  • 01:24:37An traditional healing practices
  • 01:24:38in communities of color and one
  • 01:24:40of your colleagues, Alan Davis,
  • 01:24:41just recently published a paper in
  • 01:24:43collaboration with Doctor Monica Williams.
  • 01:24:45Um on a secondary or data collection.
  • 01:24:48Looking at the effects of racial
  • 01:24:50trauma and reduce the effects
  • 01:24:51of psychedelic use in reducing
  • 01:24:53racial trauma among black,
  • 01:24:55indigenous and other people of color.
  • 01:25:00Yeah, let's see.
  • 01:25:01So I yeah, I think that's it.
  • 01:25:04Certainly open area investigation.
  • 01:25:06There's a lot that can be done with that.
  • 01:25:10You know in terms of where how this
  • 01:25:13interfaces with Indigenous use.
  • 01:25:17I I kind of deeply conflicted
  • 01:25:21feelings about that.
  • 01:25:23I mean, there's there's a lot
  • 01:25:28of wisdom that's come out of.
  • 01:25:32Indigenous communities that
  • 01:25:34have used these sorts of.
  • 01:25:37Substance I'm sure but.
  • 01:25:41But we we get into, you know very.
  • 01:25:45Tricky an as yet unresolved.
  • 01:25:49No set of ethical questions about how.
  • 01:25:56What is the world view that the
  • 01:25:59therapist holds an an and what is
  • 01:26:03the world view that we're going to
  • 01:26:06structure these experiences around?
  • 01:26:10And I did and I have and I
  • 01:26:13have concern because of the.
  • 01:26:16Ontological shock characteristics of
  • 01:26:19these kinds of experiences that under.
  • 01:26:24Set and setting conditions you know
  • 01:26:27that would encourage a very radically
  • 01:26:30different and alternative worldview that
  • 01:26:33you might open people up to that Ann.
  • 01:26:37And I'm not wise enough to
  • 01:26:40understand what the consequences are,
  • 01:26:42but, but to the extent that.
  • 01:26:47It disconnected from some of the
  • 01:26:50understandings that we hold in
  • 01:26:53our current culture that I see
  • 01:26:55that as as deeply problematic.
  • 01:26:58So I think there are some really
  • 01:27:01interesting questions to be asked there,
  • 01:27:02but to get to get back to your point yet,
  • 01:27:05yes, certainly there are going
  • 01:27:08to be opportunities for.
  • 01:27:10To address.
  • 01:27:12Psychological problems that
  • 01:27:15come out of trauma.
  • 01:27:19Do too.
  • 01:27:20Minority status in the line.
  • 01:27:25Alright. So we do have questions
  • 01:27:27continuing to come in in the chat,
  • 01:27:29but I think we're at
  • 01:27:30where it's time boundary.
  • 01:27:31I haven't managed to convey every
  • 01:27:32single question in the chat,
  • 01:27:34but I think we've hit on
  • 01:27:35the majority of the themes.
  • 01:27:37And this has been a wonderful
  • 01:27:39rich discussion.
  • 01:27:40I want to thank you again,
  • 01:27:42rolling for coming.
  • 01:27:43Being with us today in our last
  • 01:27:45grand rounds of this remarkable
  • 01:27:47year and ending it on such a
  • 01:27:50high note with this beautiful
  • 01:27:51talk and rich discussions.