Skip to Main Content

Yale Psychiatry Grand Rounds: February 12, 2021

February 12, 2021

Yale Psychiatry Grand Rounds: February 12, 2021

 .
  • 00:00Good morning everyone.
  • 00:01Welcome to the Department
  • 00:03of Psychiatry grand rounds.
  • 00:04I'm Cindy Cristom,
  • 00:05deputy chair for diversity,
  • 00:07equity and inclusion in the Department,
  • 00:09and we have a very important grand
  • 00:12rounds today focused on the recruitment
  • 00:14and retention of minorities in
  • 00:16the Sciences and engineering.
  • 00:18Before I turn the program over
  • 00:20to Doctor Sinha to introduce
  • 00:21our speaker doctor Summers,
  • 00:23I want to say a few words
  • 00:26about the diversity,
  • 00:27equity and inclusion in anti racism.
  • 00:29Work in the Department.
  • 00:31As some of you know,
  • 00:32we have a longstanding commitment to DVI,
  • 00:35but in 2014 that a commitment was
  • 00:37deep in with the establishment of
  • 00:39the Diversity Taskforce which made
  • 00:41some important recommendations,
  • 00:43including the stablishment of a
  • 00:45Standing Diversity Committee and the
  • 00:47Assistant Chair for Diversity Position.
  • 00:49Then with the events of last
  • 00:51year we added anti racism work,
  • 00:54including the Anti Racism Task Force
  • 00:57and the Steering Committee for the
  • 01:00Anti Racism Task Force has been
  • 01:02meeting since October of last year.
  • 01:04RDI and anti racism efforts
  • 01:07are focused in four areas.
  • 01:09The first is policy procedures
  • 01:11and accountability.
  • 01:12The second is recruitment,
  • 01:13retention and advancement.
  • 01:15The third is educational program so our
  • 01:18training programs but also grand rounds.
  • 01:21And the 4th area is representation
  • 01:23in public spaces,
  • 01:24so the images that we see around us.
  • 01:28Our work spans the educational,
  • 01:30clinical and research missions
  • 01:32of the Department,
  • 01:33an we interface with DI and
  • 01:35anti racism efforts in our
  • 01:37affiliated institutions and also
  • 01:40in our Community collaborations.
  • 01:42We are large Department,
  • 01:44over 1000 people an we attend a faculty,
  • 01:47staff and trainees.
  • 01:48We are engaged in a tremendous amount of
  • 01:52work that's carried out by a lot of people.
  • 01:55Not just me,
  • 01:56but in every institution there are
  • 01:58people engaged in this work and
  • 02:01every aspect of our Department.
  • 02:03And I would say in the last year there
  • 02:05is increased commitment at all levels
  • 02:07of the Department to becoming more diverse,
  • 02:10more equitable and inclusive.
  • 02:12An less racist.
  • 02:14We have learned a lot and made some progress,
  • 02:17yet we still have a lot
  • 02:19to learn and accomplish,
  • 02:21and these are long-term endeavors.
  • 02:22I know that we can learn a lot today
  • 02:25from the Meyerhoff Scholars Program,
  • 02:28and I look forward to your ideas of
  • 02:30how we can apply elements of what we
  • 02:33learn about today to our Department.
  • 02:36So I'm going to turn it over to Doctor Sinha.
  • 02:41Thank you so much Cindy.
  • 02:44It is my pleasure to welcome
  • 02:47you all to today's grand rounds
  • 02:49with Doctor Michael Summers.
  • 02:52Doctor Summers is the University
  • 02:54Distinguished Professor
  • 02:55at University of Maryland,
  • 02:57Baltimore County in the
  • 02:59Department of Chemistry.
  • 03:00He is also Howard Hughes investigator
  • 03:03and holds the Meyerhoff Chair for
  • 03:06Excellence in research and mentoring at UMBC.
  • 03:10He received his bachelors in chemistry
  • 03:13from the University of West Florida
  • 03:16in 1980 and then his PhD from
  • 03:18Emory University in bioinorganic
  • 03:20Chemistry in 1984 and then was
  • 03:23a postdoc fellow at NIH until 87
  • 03:27before joining the faculty at UMBC
  • 03:30in 87 and has been there since then.
  • 03:33In 1994 he was appointed investigator with
  • 03:36the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Ann.
  • 03:39In 2016.
  • 03:40He was elected to the National
  • 03:43Academy of Sciences.
  • 03:45Doctor Summers has is an eminent
  • 03:48researcher and with the focus
  • 03:50on NMR studies of proteins,
  • 03:52RNA macromolecular interactions
  • 03:54associated with HIV,
  • 03:55one genome packaging and virus assembly.
  • 03:59He is not going to be talking to
  • 04:03us about that aspect of his work.
  • 04:06He has also led efforts to
  • 04:08develop programs for retaining
  • 04:10minority students in the Sciences,
  • 04:13and this work has has really
  • 04:15taken off and and brought him
  • 04:18a number of different awards.
  • 04:20Numerous awards,
  • 04:21really,
  • 04:21because he's really led the field
  • 04:24in helping us think about how to
  • 04:27increase diversity in STEM area.
  • 04:30Doctor Summers is a recipient of
  • 04:32the Roots Kersting Award of the
  • 04:35American Society of Biochemistry and
  • 04:37Molecular Biology, and several others.
  • 04:40I'll name a couple of key ones.
  • 04:43The A as B MB award for exemplary
  • 04:46contributions to education and
  • 04:48the Mentor Award of the American
  • 04:51Association for the Advancement of
  • 04:53Science and then the White House
  • 04:56Presidential Award for Science,
  • 04:58Mathematics and engineering mentoring.
  • 05:00We are thrilled to have Doctor
  • 05:02Summers speak with us today about
  • 05:05the Meyerhoff Scholars Program,
  • 05:06which he started and has shown amazing,
  • 05:09successful outcomes and what I've
  • 05:11really been interested in is the
  • 05:14success of his program has been
  • 05:16described in a recent science paper as well,
  • 05:19and the program has been established at
  • 05:22a number of other universities which
  • 05:24I'm sure we're going to hear about,
  • 05:27including Stanford, Duke,
  • 05:29Penn State, UNC Chapel Hill.
  • 05:30An others so please join me in welcoming
  • 05:33Doctor Summers to grand rounds today.
  • 05:36Practicing thank
  • 05:37you so much Vegeta.
  • 05:38It's a real pleasure to be here.
  • 05:41For those of you who joined more.
  • 05:43More conversation just more recently
  • 05:45I just wanted to point out that Yale
  • 05:47was one of our early partners with
  • 05:49our meyerhof undergraduate program.
  • 05:51I'll talk to you about
  • 05:53the program in a minute,
  • 05:55but many of our early Meireles
  • 05:57scholars were accepted into Duke,
  • 05:58so they were they were reaching
  • 06:00out to us and working with us
  • 06:03to accept minority students.
  • 06:04When this wasn't normally
  • 06:06done around the country.
  • 06:07And so a lot of our earliest PHD's in
  • 06:10MD PHD's got their degrees from Yale,
  • 06:13so it's really exciting for
  • 06:15me to be here with you today.
  • 06:17I'm going to go ahead and share my
  • 06:19screen and then launch my presentation.
  • 06:25And so you know much of this.
  • 06:27You don't need to see again.
  • 06:31But I want to just point out is that
  • 06:34if you look at national population
  • 06:36growth of Hispanics in the US from 1980
  • 06:40till and this was published in 15 and
  • 06:43compare that to college enrollment,
  • 06:45what you'll see is their college
  • 06:47enrollment has not kept kept up
  • 06:50for Hispanics and for Blacks there
  • 06:52has been a small increase in the
  • 06:54population of Blacks in the US,
  • 06:57but there has been a completely
  • 06:59flat level of enrollment and so
  • 07:01you can see the gap between.
  • 07:04The US population and an enrollment in the
  • 07:07top 100 private and public universities,
  • 07:10which includes Yale,
  • 07:11has been either been flat or decreased,
  • 07:14and this actually led the New York Times
  • 07:17to conclude that affirmative action which
  • 07:20occur during this period hasn't worked.
  • 07:23And so if affirmative action doesn't work,
  • 07:25and we're not really doing
  • 07:27affirmative action now,
  • 07:28the way it was done back then,
  • 07:30you know,
  • 07:31how do we address these disparities?
  • 07:33And why do we even need to
  • 07:36care about diversity?
  • 07:37This is data from the US Census
  • 07:40Bureau showing that according to
  • 07:42their projections by well in 20 ten,
  • 07:4565% of the US was Caucasian,
  • 07:47but by 2030 it'll probably be almost 50%,
  • 07:50and by 2050 it'll be below 50% and I'm sure
  • 07:54you all know that in California and Texas,
  • 07:57Caucasians already make up less
  • 07:59than half the state populations,
  • 08:01and so if we care about the education of the.
  • 08:05Of our country of our fellow citizens,
  • 08:08we've got to be paying more attention to
  • 08:11groups that are not participating in colleges
  • 08:14in higher education the way they need to be.
  • 08:17Another reason to care is health disparities.
  • 08:20This is Shar del Hawk shardul Hawkins.
  • 08:23She was a undergraduate at a historically
  • 08:26black College in Maryland University,
  • 08:29Maryland,
  • 08:29Eastern Shore.
  • 08:30She came to UMBC to do summer
  • 08:33research in my lab and liked it.
  • 08:36So she joined our PhD program.
  • 08:39She did really well.
  • 08:40She was a straight A student.
  • 08:42She had her candidacy exam about three months
  • 08:45before her wedding and at her candidacy
  • 08:48exam she did what all graduate students do,
  • 08:51they she brought a little
  • 08:53food to the committee.
  • 08:55Usually students bring Donuts
  • 08:56because it's a stressful event.
  • 08:58You know,
  • 08:59UMBC is a white majority.
  • 09:01School I'll talk a little
  • 09:03bit more about that later,
  • 09:04but she was a minority at our
  • 09:06University and she has to get up in
  • 09:09front of the white male committee and
  • 09:11presenter work and so most students
  • 09:13bring Donuts is sort of a bribe.
  • 09:15Her father was a chef for the
  • 09:18National Library of Congress,
  • 09:19and so she brought a tray of
  • 09:21oysters and shrimp and everything,
  • 09:23so she passed without any problems.
  • 09:25The reason I'm showing you this picture
  • 09:27is that a month after her candidacy exam,
  • 09:30her father passed away
  • 09:31unexpectedly from heart disease.
  • 09:33He was a tall, thin man who didn't drink.
  • 09:36He didn't smoke,
  • 09:37he was raising Shard Elan three younger
  • 09:39siblings of hers on his own.
  • 09:41He was only 46 years old.
  • 09:43The only thing that he had going against
  • 09:46him statistically was the color of his skin.
  • 09:49And I also want to point out Lamont.
  • 09:52Tolliver, who ran the Meyerhoff
  • 09:54undergraduate program for more than 10 years.
  • 09:56A terrific guy who was
  • 09:58raised in an orphanage in.
  • 10:00Master at Homes in Petsburgh.
  • 10:02He was a phenomenal leader.
  • 10:03He was on his way to my office too
  • 10:06so that we and others could discuss
  • 10:08how we might help other universities.
  • 10:11Replicator Meyerhoff program,
  • 10:12he called said he was running late and
  • 10:14he collapsed just outside my office.
  • 10:16We were unable to resuscitate him,
  • 10:18he passed away when he was 48 years old.
  • 10:21Again of heart disease.
  • 10:23And so when we meet with.
  • 10:26High school students and talk
  • 10:27about a PhD or an MD,
  • 10:29PhD or as as a goal that they might consider.
  • 10:33We talk about health disparities,
  • 10:34and I asked the students to look at
  • 10:37their fathers and who brought them to
  • 10:39the meetings or look at their mothers.
  • 10:42And we talk about the fact that
  • 10:44if their fathers are black,
  • 10:46they have a 30% higher chance of
  • 10:48dying from coronary heart disease
  • 10:50than their white friends.
  • 10:51And it's the same for their mothers
  • 10:53that diabetes one in four American
  • 10:55African American women over 55.
  • 10:57In the US right now has diabetes.
  • 11:00Lupus is threefold higher in African
  • 11:02American women than it is in their.
  • 11:05Their white friends,
  • 11:06and this was published a few years ago
  • 11:09that Blacks live about 5 1/2 years.
  • 11:11Fewer years then then there than
  • 11:13their white friends.
  • 11:15And so these are health disparities
  • 11:17that our students need to be thinking
  • 11:19about as their choosing their careers.
  • 11:22And when we talk about.
  • 11:24In our careers in medicine,
  • 11:25you know,
  • 11:26it's great to want to go back into
  • 11:28your into their communities and
  • 11:29to give back and to help people.
  • 11:32But we tell them that if they are
  • 11:34competitive for our meyerhof program,
  • 11:36they're not just going to be the best.
  • 11:38The well, best,
  • 11:39well prepared and highest achieving and
  • 11:41hardest working Blacks on our campus.
  • 11:43They're going to be among our best students,
  • 11:46period.
  • 11:46And that means that they'll have an
  • 11:49opportunity to do more than just go
  • 11:51back and use the existing technologies.
  • 11:53They can be part of developing better
  • 11:56health care systems for their communities.
  • 11:58So why aren't more minorities earning
  • 12:00science PHD's and the answers that
  • 12:02I typically get from my white
  • 12:04friends are that there aren't many
  • 12:05students of color who are interested
  • 12:07in science and math and the smart
  • 12:09ones all go to medical school.
  • 12:11I mean, I still when I give my talks,
  • 12:13that's what my friends tell me.
  • 12:16But there's a lot of facts out there that
  • 12:19show that that's the perception is wrong.
  • 12:21Actually,
  • 12:22the College Board publishes data
  • 12:24that go back more than 20 years,
  • 12:26showing that similar percentages of
  • 12:28African Americans and Caucasian freshman.
  • 12:30Who start college aspired to a stem degree.
  • 12:34And we're actually help these days
  • 12:35by television shows that portray
  • 12:37Blacks as being very smart in science.
  • 12:39You know, we get a lot of students
  • 12:41that now want to be CSI scientists.
  • 12:43They want they want to learn forensic
  • 12:45chemistry, so we can't really blame you.
  • 12:47Know what we used to do in the past.
  • 12:50We say, well, Blacks smart Blacks are
  • 12:52always portrayed in a very negative way.
  • 12:54That's just not true anymore.
  • 12:57And then to tell I'll be telling
  • 13:00you about our meyerhof program.
  • 13:02We typically get more than 2500
  • 13:05nominations for our undergraduate program.
  • 13:07We typically get more than 200 completed
  • 13:10applications from minority students,
  • 13:12of which about 80% are
  • 13:14Maryland area students.
  • 13:15And this is for about
  • 13:1745 to 70 freshman slots,
  • 13:19depending on our funding resources.
  • 13:21So the only thing that you
  • 13:24can conclude based on data.
  • 13:27Is that large numbers of talented
  • 13:29African American and minority students
  • 13:31in high schools are interested in stem,
  • 13:34and we're just doing a bad job
  • 13:37of retaining them.
  • 13:38It's not fair or accurate
  • 13:40or appropriate to a blame.
  • 13:42The high school to college pipeline or to
  • 13:45blame the education of the high schools.
  • 13:48Because these students are well prepared.
  • 13:52So then you have to ask, well,
  • 13:55why are we doing such a poor job of retaining
  • 13:57minority students in stem in our colleges?
  • 14:00And I think, and this is my view, but I
  • 14:03think it's shared by many of my colleagues.
  • 14:06Is that typically our expectations are
  • 14:08not where they need to be, and let me
  • 14:10just give you a couple of examples.
  • 14:13This is Kristi Pullen who was
  • 14:15an undergraduate meyerhof.
  • 14:16She published a couple of papers in my lab,
  • 14:18did really well,
  • 14:19went to Berkeley work with Tom Alber,
  • 14:22solved a really interesting crystal
  • 14:23structure as a graduate student at Berkeley.
  • 14:26So I invited her to give a talk at a
  • 14:28Keystone meeting that I organized and
  • 14:30Christy showed up to give her talk in
  • 14:33the morning and the other speakers,
  • 14:35all white males were asking her,
  • 14:37you know how this slide projector
  • 14:39worked and how the lighting worked and
  • 14:41things and then finally one of 'em said,
  • 14:43oh, you're Christie, Poland.
  • 14:45I thought you were the projectionist.
  • 14:47Anh DEP individual that said that
  • 14:49wasn't intending to put her down,
  • 14:51but it's just an example of what's
  • 14:53called a micro aggression,
  • 14:54and it's the kind of language that
  • 14:56she has heard her entire life because
  • 14:58she's always done well in math,
  • 15:00and she's done well in science.
  • 15:02And yet the people that were educating her
  • 15:04didn't really expect her to be there now.
  • 15:07It's also true she was the first
  • 15:08black to ever give a talk at this
  • 15:11particular Keystone meeting,
  • 15:12and so you know there were.
  • 15:14There was a reason why people
  • 15:16didn't expect her to be here.
  • 15:18But the language we use can be discouraging.
  • 15:21And then I want to tell you one
  • 15:23other story that really illustrates
  • 15:25the changes that occur at UMBC.
  • 15:28This was from a senior colleague.
  • 15:31And we got into an argument about the
  • 15:34weather meyerhof when it was started
  • 15:36was really the right thing to do.
  • 15:38So here we have a black president
  • 15:40who had just become our president
  • 15:42and he's building a program that is
  • 15:45supposed to at that time focus on black
  • 15:47males and and this senior colleague
  • 15:49said that that wasn't appropriate,
  • 15:51that everybody should be treated
  • 15:53the same and he pounded his fists on
  • 15:56the table when we started arguing,
  • 15:58he said I don't have a prejudice
  • 16:00bone in my body.
  • 16:01I've never voted for a Republican in my life.
  • 16:04I went to school in Berkeley in the 60s.
  • 16:07Don't tell me that I that I have prejudices.
  • 16:11So, five years later,
  • 16:13we were at a dinner with a visitor
  • 16:16who gave a chemistry Department
  • 16:18seminar and this same senior colleague
  • 16:20was talking to the visitor about
  • 16:23the Meyerhoff program.
  • 16:24And what he said is that prior to meyerhof,
  • 16:27if there was one or maybe two Blacks
  • 16:30in his upper level chemistry class,
  • 16:32they sat in the back.
  • 16:33They didn't ask questions,
  • 16:35and if they earned AC,
  • 16:36he would write a strong recommendation.
  • 16:38Now he said there are large numbers.
  • 16:40They sit in the front of the class.
  • 16:43They ask questions regularly there
  • 16:45in the tutorial centers as tutors.
  • 16:47And here's the important point.
  • 16:49He said. Now if a black student
  • 16:50earns AC on his first exam,
  • 16:52he calls them into his office to ask what
  • 16:55the problem is or to work on a solution,
  • 16:58his expectations went up and I don't
  • 17:00know if he even gets it to this day.
  • 17:02But it struck me when he told
  • 17:04his visitor about his change and
  • 17:06I realized that so many of us
  • 17:08had the same shared experience.
  • 17:10Can you imagine going into a
  • 17:12classroom with 350 students?
  • 17:13And let's say that there are 25
  • 17:15black students scattered around in
  • 17:17the classroom in the class starts
  • 17:18in India and they go unnoticed.
  • 17:20With the Meyerhoff program,
  • 17:22the students have to be in class
  • 17:2415 minutes before class starts.
  • 17:25They have to sit in the front row,
  • 17:28shoulder to shoulder, and so if I'm,
  • 17:30you know,
  • 17:30typical white guy walk into the
  • 17:32classroom to get ready to lecture,
  • 17:34and there are those 25 students
  • 17:36in the front row and we start
  • 17:38having a conversation and I can't
  • 17:40get the first few words out of my
  • 17:42lecture out of my mouth,
  • 17:44and they're raising their hand,
  • 17:45asking questions,
  • 17:46and they're doing well on their exams.
  • 17:48It's easy to see how I would then go home.
  • 17:51And look in the mirror and say wow.
  • 17:54I've gotta rethink things.
  • 17:57This didn't involve diversity training.
  • 17:58It didn't involve anything other
  • 18:00than me seeing in front of me,
  • 18:02something that I had not seen before.
  • 18:05So part of the Meyerhof program is not
  • 18:08only preparing these students to do well,
  • 18:10but putting them in a position
  • 18:12where they can help people like
  • 18:14me change their expectations.
  • 18:17And so you know another real problem
  • 18:20that we have is that the news is
  • 18:22not good for minority students.
  • 18:24So you know there there are there
  • 18:26articles that claim where we're
  • 18:28producing way too many PHD's and we
  • 18:30don't have enough faculty positions
  • 18:32for all the PHD's were producing,
  • 18:34there's the Ginter paper that
  • 18:36said Blacks can't compete for
  • 18:37NIH grants even when accounting
  • 18:39for preparation and training.
  • 18:40And then, more recently,
  • 18:42another science article said that
  • 18:43the reason they're not competing
  • 18:45is that they're choosing.
  • 18:46Uninteresting research topics.
  • 18:48So why would anybody want to go
  • 18:50into science with all that bad news?
  • 18:55So at UMBC things really changed because
  • 18:57of our President Freeman her boskey.
  • 19:00Here's a picture of him when he and
  • 19:02I both started at UMBC in 1987.
  • 19:05The black students were protesting
  • 19:07because they perceived our
  • 19:09campus to be racist at that time,
  • 19:11fewer than six Blacks had ever
  • 19:13earned better than a C in genetics,
  • 19:15and the same went for physics
  • 19:17and so they view that as racist.
  • 19:20The white view.
  • 19:21The students felt that the campus was cold.
  • 19:25And now we for many years now
  • 19:27we've been the top school of Origin
  • 19:30of Blacks who go on to earn MD
  • 19:33PhD degrees by a large number.
  • 19:35Places like Howard University, Spelman.
  • 19:37They don't come close.
  • 19:38Where the number 2 School of Origin
  • 19:41of Blacks who go under in stem PHD's
  • 19:44actually were probably number one these.
  • 19:46This was the based on the latest report
  • 19:49from the National Science Foundation
  • 19:51and of course Howard is a large,
  • 19:53predominantly African American University.
  • 19:56We're condemned,
  • 19:56considered a national model for inclusive
  • 19:58excellence in STEM, and if you want to.
  • 20:00Learn more about Freeman.
  • 20:02Just Google Freeman, her boskey or he has it.
  • 20:05They did a really nice video on
  • 20:07him when he won the UCSF medalist.
  • 20:11Last year and there are many other that
  • 20:14he's been on 60 minutes for the program.
  • 20:17He's just an amazing guy.
  • 20:19So for those of you who don't know,
  • 20:21I'll just quickly tell you his name.
  • 20:23Is Freeman her about?
  • 20:24See the 3rd that her boskey comes
  • 20:26from the fact that his great,
  • 20:28great, great Gran father was a white
  • 20:30Polish slave owner.
  • 20:31There,
  • 20:32Freeman,
  • 20:32the third comes from the fact that he's
  • 20:36the third generation that was Born
  • 20:39Free rather than having to be freed.
  • 20:42He was raised in Birmingham and one
  • 20:44of the girls that was the four girls
  • 20:46that was killed in the baptistery
  • 20:48church bombing was a friend of his.
  • 20:51And it hurt him deeply,
  • 20:52as you could imagine.
  • 20:54So he helped organize a youth March
  • 20:56at 12 years old and was rounded up
  • 20:58by the police and incarcerated for
  • 21:00a week with hardened criminals.
  • 21:02Now, if I'd gone through something like that,
  • 21:04I'd be very angry and very bitter.
  • 21:07He is the most positive, energetic,
  • 21:08brilliant person I've ever known,
  • 21:10and he's my most important mentor in my life.
  • 21:14So because of the program that
  • 21:15he started and I've been able to
  • 21:17help with in some respects.
  • 21:21We have this program.
  • 21:22The Meyerhoff Scholars
  • 21:23Program started in 1989.
  • 21:24It only originally focused on
  • 21:26African American males because
  • 21:28the donor who who gave us money to
  • 21:31start the program, Bob Meyerhof,
  • 21:32had read in the Baltimore Sun that if
  • 21:35you were born black male in Baltimore,
  • 21:38your chances of going to college
  • 21:40at that time were lower than
  • 21:43your chances of going to jail.
  • 21:45And he wanted to do something about the
  • 21:48plight of black males in Baltimore.
  • 21:50It was opened up a year later to
  • 21:52African American females because
  • 21:54we raised money from sources that
  • 21:56we couldn't discriminate that way.
  • 21:58And then,
  • 21:59based in part on the Banneker decision,
  • 22:02another affirmative action decisions
  • 22:03that occur during the Clinton years.
  • 22:05This was opened up to all students
  • 22:08who care about issues of inclusion,
  • 22:10and this is a really important point.
  • 22:13Because we do get large numbers
  • 22:16of very high achieving white and
  • 22:19Asian students as well.
  • 22:20And those students typically get not
  • 22:23only because they are very competitive,
  • 22:25they not only get offers to
  • 22:27join the Meyerhoff program,
  • 22:29but they typically get offers to
  • 22:31become University scholars or take
  • 22:33other scholarships that don't have
  • 22:34all the requirements and activities
  • 22:36and social justice components
  • 22:38of the Meyerhoff program.
  • 22:40And so this tends to be self
  • 22:42selective for majority students
  • 22:43that care about issues of inclusion
  • 22:46and social justice so historically,
  • 22:48now since its inception about
  • 22:5071% are minorities,
  • 22:51most of them African American.
  • 22:53And then about 15% Caucasian and
  • 22:5615% Asian students typically.
  • 22:59This is a student centered approach.
  • 23:01We attract high achieving minority
  • 23:04students and we don't apologize for that.
  • 23:06We provide intrusive support
  • 23:08with very high expectations.
  • 23:10We use a cohort learning model
  • 23:12where students work in teams.
  • 23:14Let me just give you an example
  • 23:18of cohort learning.
  • 23:19We have a summer bridge where students,
  • 23:21if they want to be in the Meyerhoff program,
  • 23:24they have to come and spend six
  • 23:26weeks on campus in our summer
  • 23:28bridge and the students like to
  • 23:30call it a bootcamp an it is tough.
  • 23:32The students are up at breakfast at
  • 23:347 their activities typically don't
  • 23:36end in the day until about 8:00
  • 23:38and then they can start studying
  • 23:40for their classes.
  • 23:41For which they get,
  • 23:42they are graded and the grades
  • 23:44go on their transcripts.
  • 23:45Now,
  • 23:46many of these students have never earned
  • 23:48AB or have only earned very few bees,
  • 23:50and so they're used to doing well
  • 23:53while they basically get one of their
  • 23:55courses is a very intensive math course.
  • 23:57Most students take a full course
  • 23:59of calculus in six weeks,
  • 24:00plus the social justice classes and
  • 24:02learning how to write a resume.
  • 24:04There's all kinds of things that
  • 24:06they have to do,
  • 24:07but this math class is probably a
  • 24:09key part of the cohort building.
  • 24:12Because.
  • 24:14The students typically are asked
  • 24:17to self select into groups of four.
  • 24:20They are told to learn how to.
  • 24:22They are taught to learn how to
  • 24:24study as individuals.
  • 24:24An study within that group.
  • 24:27They take their first quiz.
  • 24:30And the group gets the average grade.
  • 24:35Of the group, so everybody in a group
  • 24:37gets the average grade for that group.
  • 24:39But what's even better is the entire class
  • 24:43gets the grade for the weakest group.
  • 24:46Now if any of you have taught and
  • 24:48ask people to study in groups,
  • 24:49you know what typically happens.
  • 24:50The well prepared students get together
  • 24:52and then that leaves the students that
  • 24:54are less well prepared, struggling,
  • 24:55and it really doesn't accomplish much well.
  • 24:57Now what happens is they all know
  • 24:59that they're all in this together,
  • 25:00so the well prepared students are holding
  • 25:02their hands up saying who needs help.
  • 25:04I got an A and the students they need
  • 25:06more help or raising their hands and
  • 25:08saying we should work together and
  • 25:09they're allowed to reorganize into
  • 25:11new groups of four that they then
  • 25:13maintained for the rest of the semester.
  • 25:15And so this is just one of the more.
  • 25:17Interesting ways that Freeman and
  • 25:19others came up with for trying to get
  • 25:22students to learn to reach out to
  • 25:24their colleagues when they need help
  • 25:26and to work together as a cohort.
  • 25:29There is early emergent in research,
  • 25:31so we really want students to focus on
  • 25:33their grades during their first semester,
  • 25:35and if all is going well and it usually is,
  • 25:38then in the second semester we want
  • 25:40them interviewing faculty and we they
  • 25:42teach them how to interview faculty
  • 25:43and then join a research lab in the
  • 25:45summer after their freshman year.
  • 25:47So they start to see themselves as
  • 25:48a scientist right away rather than
  • 25:50something that they're aspiring to.
  • 25:52And in 10 years or more.
  • 25:55And then high exposure.
  • 25:56This raises expectations of the
  • 25:57faculty and the students, so again,
  • 25:59you're in a 350 room class and you're a
  • 26:02black student who might be working part time.
  • 26:05Maybe you've got a family.
  • 26:06Maybe you've coming back to school later.
  • 26:09You get that first quiz,
  • 26:10and you make a C.
  • 26:12Or maybe you've struggled even more.
  • 26:14The first impression isn't,
  • 26:15I don't belong here because you look
  • 26:17down in the front row and you see
  • 26:19these other students doing well.
  • 26:21So what we see is A is a retention
  • 26:24of minority students.
  • 26:25Even when they're not in our program
  • 26:27and the GPA's have gone up even when
  • 26:29they're not in the program because
  • 26:31they can go to the tutorial center
  • 26:33now and get help from people with
  • 26:36that have similar life experiences.
  • 26:38And I just want to give you an example.
  • 26:42I prepared this because a northeastern.
  • 26:47School, not Yale.
  • 26:48The leader of that school said,
  • 26:50well,
  • 26:51we could never do meyerhof at our
  • 26:53institution because the black students
  • 26:55just can't compete with our white students.
  • 26:58They're just too good.
  • 27:01And so I put this together so that
  • 27:03I could present it the next day
  • 27:06at a board meeting.
  • 27:07And so this individual could see this.
  • 27:09So this is typical numbers.
  • 27:11What you can see.
  • 27:12We had been this year.
  • 27:14Given year we had 2100 nominations.
  • 27:16We had 500 completed applications,
  • 27:17more than 80% in state.
  • 27:19Half of the Mail,
  • 27:20more than half of 'em minority and I
  • 27:23want to point out that the male part
  • 27:25is really important because we do
  • 27:28have to work really hard to keep their
  • 27:30minority population of males as high as the.
  • 27:33Is the females.
  • 27:36But you can see the ethnicity more
  • 27:38than 50% were minorities in the class.
  • 27:41I'm just going to quickly point out here.
  • 27:44These are the graduation
  • 27:45plans in the applications.
  • 27:46We have 157 that say they just want
  • 27:49to do an MD during selection Week.
  • 27:52We bring 10 of 'em in this year
  • 27:54because there was something about
  • 27:56their application that made us think
  • 27:58that they might consider an MD,
  • 28:00PhD or research.
  • 28:03And then if you look,
  • 28:05we ended up with a total
  • 28:07of three out of those 157,
  • 28:09we're really focusing on people who are
  • 28:11hopefully going to become leaders in science,
  • 28:14and you can see these are strong
  • 28:16students because you know the
  • 28:18average GPA of this class was 4.0,
  • 28:20seven, and average math S80 was.
  • 28:22Here.
  • 28:22We have some minority students
  • 28:25who have perfect math essay Tees.
  • 28:28Now this is 1 individual and I
  • 28:31selected this individual for a reason.
  • 28:34Because of the person in the
  • 28:36audience he came in from a
  • 28:38great curriculum in high school.
  • 28:41He had already had AP Physics,
  • 28:43AP Stat, AP calculus, A&B,
  • 28:45AP chemistry, AP biology.
  • 28:46He'd he'd scored well on the essay Tees,
  • 28:49but not among our very best.
  • 28:52He came to UMBC with 41 AP credits
  • 28:54at high school research he took
  • 28:57first place in a New Jersey Merck
  • 29:00State Science Day Test in 7th place
  • 29:02in a science Lee competition.
  • 29:04He placed into calculus three.
  • 29:06He graduated with a four.
  • 29:08Oh did research at all these
  • 29:10places you can see here.
  • 29:12He got into all of the PhD MVP.
  • 29:15I'm sorry, MD,
  • 29:16PhD programs he applied to and
  • 29:18decided to go to Johns Hopkins.
  • 29:20Now this is one of the best prepared,
  • 29:23highest performing students we've had.
  • 29:24There's this is another person
  • 29:26in this same individuals class.
  • 29:28Who came from Maryland from a weak school?
  • 29:31We know it's not the best
  • 29:33preparation so our GPA was high,
  • 29:35but it doesn't equate to this GPA.
  • 29:38Came in with pre calculus AP
  • 29:40Biology AP chemistry below.
  • 29:42What we would normally
  • 29:43expect on the math S80.
  • 29:45No AP credits,
  • 29:46no research experience in high school,
  • 29:48but there was again something about her.
  • 29:50She placed into precalculus but there
  • 29:52was something about her interview.
  • 29:54Something about her that
  • 29:56showed fire in the ability.
  • 29:58We don't just make acceptance is based.
  • 30:00Down scores we look for other things that
  • 30:03make us believe they're going to do well,
  • 30:06so she ends up.
  • 30:07She ends up getting an HMI scholarship.
  • 30:09She's a meyerhof.
  • 30:10She got into our mark program.
  • 30:12She graduated cume Laude A and she
  • 30:15just finished her PhD at Upenn.
  • 30:17So this is how pulling these
  • 30:19students together and having
  • 30:21them work as a cohort can actually raise
  • 30:24the outcomes for some of our students,
  • 30:26and that it's obviously beneficial
  • 30:28even for our best students.
  • 30:32So what are the outcomes?
  • 30:34We've had a total of about 1500
  • 30:37meyerhof participants, 71% minority.
  • 30:40We've had 1150 graduates 91%.
  • 30:43Retained instead and you think about
  • 30:45that because these are kids who are
  • 30:48coming in from high school telling
  • 30:50us they want to be a stem major.
  • 30:53An 91% of them are being retained.
  • 30:55We've had 930 graduates pursue
  • 30:57graduate or professional degrees
  • 30:59we've had so far 312 PHD's awarded,
  • 31:01of which 82% or minorities.
  • 31:03So it's not like it's just the the
  • 31:06majority students who are being successful
  • 31:08after they leave the minority students
  • 31:11are we had 59 MD pH D's awarded.
  • 31:1390% of those were minorities.
  • 31:15And 256 stem Masters degrees awarded.
  • 31:18I should point out that Upenn has the
  • 31:21oldest medical school in the country
  • 31:23and their first ever African American,
  • 31:25MD PhD went to a Meyerhoff scholar.
  • 31:30And we now have right now about 260
  • 31:33of our graduates meyerhof graduates
  • 31:36who are enrolled in Graduate School.
  • 31:40Now people say, well,
  • 31:42you're selecting the really strong students.
  • 31:44They would do well anywhere.
  • 31:46Shouldn't you be giving money to
  • 31:48people that really needed most?
  • 31:49Actually, I should point out
  • 31:52Freeman was once confronted by.
  • 31:54African American students were
  • 31:55not in the Meyerhoff program
  • 31:57and they basically said to him,
  • 31:58why are you giving them money?
  • 32:01We're the ones that really need it.
  • 32:03We're the ones that don't have the
  • 32:04same preparation and we're struggling.
  • 32:06We were holding down jobs and.
  • 32:08And it's a it's a tough argument, right?
  • 32:10But Freeman said well,
  • 32:11wait a minute,
  • 32:12you know we're trying to develop science
  • 32:14you didn't complain when we gave
  • 32:16scholarships to the basketball team.
  • 32:17Why are you complaining when we're
  • 32:19giving scholarships to people that
  • 32:21want to do science and want to go
  • 32:23into medicine and want to improve
  • 32:24the health of your communities?
  • 32:26So. There is a.
  • 32:29Perception,
  • 32:30even among our black students that we're
  • 32:33helping people that don't need help.
  • 32:35But actually,
  • 32:36so we've what we've done,
  • 32:37and this is again one of the genius
  • 32:39things that Freeman and his colleagues,
  • 32:41when they first started the program, did.
  • 32:45Is when they invited families to
  • 32:47come to our selection weekend.
  • 32:49We asked the parents to sign forms.
  • 32:52That say that if we make your
  • 32:54son or daughter an offer and you
  • 32:56turn us down to go to the Ivies.
  • 32:58That we can track their academic
  • 32:59performance and the parents mostly
  • 33:01signed those because they didn't
  • 33:03know what scholarship offers
  • 33:04their kids were going to get or
  • 33:06where they would want to go.
  • 33:07So we have a control group now of students
  • 33:10who by every metric we could come up with,
  • 33:13whether it's GPA,
  • 33:14SAT scores.
  • 33:15High School Research experience
  • 33:16stated interest in wanting to
  • 33:18be a scientist by every metric.
  • 33:21They would be great in our program
  • 33:23for those that that turned us down.
  • 33:26They graduated with similar GPA's
  • 33:28but they were half as likely
  • 33:30to graduate with a stem degree
  • 33:33and seven times less likely to
  • 33:35complete a STEM graduate degree.
  • 33:37So in terms of having an impact,
  • 33:39we're having an enormous impact on
  • 33:42retention of high achieving students
  • 33:43who say they want to be a scientist.
  • 33:46We're helping them achieve their dreams.
  • 33:50Now this is obviously had a huge impact
  • 33:54on institutional climate by 2005,
  • 33:56and this was a paper
  • 33:58published by Freeman and me.
  • 34:00We we showed that we saw in more
  • 34:03than 400% increase in non meyerhof
  • 34:06African American stem degrees.
  • 34:08We saw African American stem GPA's at
  • 34:11graduation finally equal Caucasians
  • 34:12from 2.7 which is still the national
  • 34:15average to about 3.2 which is the
  • 34:18national average for Caucasians in STEM.
  • 34:20Meyerhoff components were adapted
  • 34:22within the broader curriculum.
  • 34:24I can talk to you about that later,
  • 34:27and that's probably also had an effect
  • 34:29on retention of non meyerhoff scholars
  • 34:31in the Sciences and then by 2018.
  • 34:34We're really proud of this.
  • 34:35We haven't published this and he is
  • 34:37not in any peer reviewed article,
  • 34:40but we we posted this if you're
  • 34:42African American at UMBC,
  • 34:43it doesn't matter what your what
  • 34:45your major is or or what Department
  • 34:48you're in or what program you're in.
  • 34:50Meyerhof non meyerhof.
  • 34:52Graduation rates equal or exceed
  • 34:55Caucasians in all majors.
  • 34:57Just to give you a couple examples,
  • 34:59this is Isaac.
  • 34:59In day he came from California.
  • 35:01We do take a small number of
  • 35:03out of state students,
  • 35:04but because we have to come up
  • 35:06with the money for tuition,
  • 35:08the numbers are pretty small.
  • 35:09This is one that we took and his younger
  • 35:12brother opinion I Zic worked in my lab.
  • 35:14He published a few papers with me.
  • 35:16He turned actually he turned down.
  • 35:18Stanford said to come to UMBC.
  • 35:21He did after graduating from UMBC did his
  • 35:24MD PhD with Bert Vogelstein he come up with.
  • 35:27He came up with a way of detecting cancers
  • 35:30early in Pap smears and in fecal samples.
  • 35:33So he Co founded a company
  • 35:36called Thrive Early Detection.
  • 35:37This guy is going to revolutionize
  • 35:39healthcare for women.
  • 35:40He made it too.
  • 35:42He was he was featured in Forbes
  • 35:44magazine 30 under 30.
  • 35:46You may have seen Kizzie on television
  • 35:48sometime over the past year.
  • 35:50Kosmicki A she is a.
  • 35:52A leading the effort to work with
  • 35:55Moderna to develop the Moderna vaccine.
  • 35:57You can see her on television here
  • 36:00and actually one of the scientists
  • 36:02at Moderna worked in my lab on RNA
  • 36:05work before doing his PhD at UCLA
  • 36:07and he's now at Moderna working with
  • 36:09Kizzie on the on the Moderna vaccine.
  • 36:12We've had an impact beyond UMBC.
  • 36:14I know you've seen Jerome Adams
  • 36:16on television recently.
  • 36:17He's Rus surgeon general,
  • 36:19especially in the early days
  • 36:21of Covid and then you.
  • 36:23I don't know if you know Sylvia Trent Adams.
  • 36:26She's a deputy principal deputy
  • 36:27Assistant Secretary for health,
  • 36:29and we've had 40 of our former
  • 36:31Meyerhoff undergraduates take tenured
  • 36:32or tenure track faculty positions.
  • 36:34Here's just a mosaic that I
  • 36:36put together recently.
  • 36:37Some of you already know cough,
  • 36:39who's up there in the middle,
  • 36:41'cause he just visited or vert,
  • 36:44probably virtually visited Yale,
  • 36:45and these are the places where they are.
  • 36:48They're not bad, right?
  • 36:49We have four of our former
  • 36:51Meyerhoff undergraduates now
  • 36:52have tenured or tenure track
  • 36:54faculty positions at Duke.
  • 36:55Two of them are at Stanford.
  • 36:58Several are at Johns Hopkins in
  • 36:59tenured or tenure track positions,
  • 37:01and these are all the other research.
  • 37:04One universities that have our
  • 37:05former undergrads on their faculty.
  • 37:10Now, everything I've been telling you
  • 37:12about it relates to our undergraduate
  • 37:14program and one of the things that
  • 37:17I did early on was I thought,
  • 37:19well, you know what we're doing.
  • 37:21All this great work with undergrads.
  • 37:24What are we doing at the graduate level?
  • 37:27And this is a chart showing minority science
  • 37:29and engineering PHD's awarded by UMBC.
  • 37:32And remember my I moved UMBC,
  • 37:34and 87 Meyerhoff undergraduate was
  • 37:36started in 89 and so this is the period
  • 37:39with which the Meyerhoff undergrad
  • 37:41program was really getting going.
  • 37:43And this is an awful chart, right?
  • 37:46This is a binary chart.
  • 37:48We produce 0001 pH D 000011.
  • 37:50So these are the numbers of PHD's
  • 37:54in all areas of stem from UMBC.
  • 37:57So I started this.
  • 37:59What we call the Meyerhoff
  • 38:00Graduate Fellows program.
  • 38:01It's a lot different from the undergrad
  • 38:04program because these students have
  • 38:06families and you know they're at
  • 38:08a different stage in their life,
  • 38:10so we have different activities for them.
  • 38:12It's been supported exclusively
  • 38:14by 1 grant from the NIH called.
  • 38:16It was an IMS Degrant,
  • 38:18and we originally supported students for
  • 38:20the first 2 years and sometimes three years.
  • 38:23But as faculty began taking more
  • 38:25and more risks because they
  • 38:27saw the students doing well,
  • 38:29you know.
  • 38:29Taking students from places they might not
  • 38:31normally take students into their programs,
  • 38:33we were able to cut back the number
  • 38:36of years to now wait for many years.
  • 38:38Now we only provide one year
  • 38:40of support from the grant,
  • 38:41and then they immediately go onto
  • 38:43training grants or borrow ones,
  • 38:45and so this was one of our,
  • 38:47you know,
  • 38:47this was after maybe four or five
  • 38:49years of our program in place
  • 38:51where we went white water rafting.
  • 38:53We go hiking.
  • 38:54This was a shot taken above
  • 38:55Harpers Ferry in 2017.
  • 38:56That's a terrific group of people.
  • 38:58This just shows you some numbers.
  • 39:00These are the numbers of students
  • 39:02supported by the grant in blue.
  • 39:04And the numbers of students supported by
  • 39:07institutional or other funding in red.
  • 39:09And this shows by 2017 we are up.
  • 39:12We started with three three students by 2017.
  • 39:15We're up to over 100 enrolled students.
  • 39:18These are PHD's awarded to
  • 39:20minorities in this program.
  • 39:21You can see the numbers going up so from
  • 39:25that ain't a 10 year period from 87 to 97,
  • 39:28UMBC produced six minority PHD's
  • 39:30and now we produce 142 minority
  • 39:33PHD's in this 20 year period.
  • 39:35We have 28 more that are
  • 39:37now advanced to candidacy.
  • 39:39We have an 84% retention rate and
  • 39:42112 minorities were enrolled in
  • 39:44September of this year and we've been
  • 39:48above 100 for the past four years.
  • 39:51Many programs, like our biochemistry program,
  • 39:53which includes the medical school
  • 39:55downtown we're up to between 30 and
  • 39:5740% of our PhD students are minorities.
  • 40:01So my half is considered the gold
  • 40:03standard for inclusive excellence
  • 40:05in stem by some people.
  • 40:07The question is,
  • 40:08can it be adopted at a majority institution?
  • 40:11Other majority institutions with like
  • 40:13minded majority leadership and our
  • 40:16view is that you know most of the
  • 40:18PHD's are coming to minorities are
  • 40:20coming from majority institutions.
  • 40:22We should be doing a better job and when I
  • 40:25raise the question to my colleagues you know
  • 40:28why aren't you doing something like this?
  • 40:32The answer that I always got was
  • 40:35we don't have a Freeman ribowsky.
  • 40:38Right, so the assumption is that
  • 40:40you have to have a black president.
  • 40:42Or at least the charismatic dynamic
  • 40:44black president.
  • 40:44Like Freeman, if you wanted,
  • 40:46do something important for minority
  • 40:47students at your institution.
  • 40:49And to me that was an experiment
  • 40:51that just begged to be done.
  • 40:53And so we started a partnership with
  • 40:55the University of North Carolina,
  • 40:57Chapel Hill and Penn State University,
  • 40:58primarily because they were the
  • 41:00first to really reach out and say,
  • 41:02would you help us?
  • 41:03And then I went to HMI and asked,
  • 41:06how are you some medical Institute?
  • 41:08If they could provide some seed
  • 41:10money and they did more than that,
  • 41:12they actually help with.
  • 41:13On site meetings and bringing
  • 41:15in experts to help guide us and
  • 41:18several other things that have
  • 41:19helped with this partnership.
  • 41:21So let me just tell you
  • 41:23the institutional context.
  • 41:24UMBC has about 11,000 undergrads,
  • 41:2634% of our students are minorities,
  • 41:2870% African American,
  • 41:29and we're a suburb of Baltimore.
  • 41:31UNC has 18,000 undergrads.
  • 41:33They have a medical school there
  • 41:35only half as diverse as UMBC with
  • 41:38only 8% African Americans and have
  • 41:40a terrible history of inclusion,
  • 41:41they only had four Blacks on
  • 41:44their campus in by 1960.
  • 41:47And if you look at Penn State,
  • 41:49this is where I really did
  • 41:51not think this would work.
  • 41:53They have 41,000 undergrads,
  • 41:5412% minorities, 5% African Americans,
  • 41:56so their their diversity is very
  • 41:58low compared to the rest of us.
  • 42:00Yet they are the top five among the top
  • 42:03five schools of origin of Stem PHD's.
  • 42:06So 193 year PHD's per year
  • 42:08over a 10 year period.
  • 42:10According to the NSF,
  • 42:11193 PHD's in STEM in the US.
  • 42:15Got their undergraduate
  • 42:17degrees at Penn State.
  • 42:19But of those 193,
  • 42:21only four year African American.
  • 42:23And their chief diversity Officer
  • 42:25told us this will never work at
  • 42:27Penn State because parents of
  • 42:29high achieving black kids will
  • 42:30not trust us with their children.
  • 42:32And so we took a partnership approach.
  • 42:34There's immersive meyerhof training their
  • 42:36faculty that we're going to do this,
  • 42:38their administrators,
  • 42:39even some of their leaders came to
  • 42:41UMBC to learn about our program.
  • 42:43We went to their institutions.
  • 42:45I stayed in a student dorm for
  • 42:47about a week and a half at UNC,
  • 42:50and we went with Meyerhoff scholars
  • 42:52and even our parents Association
  • 42:53to both campuses to help them with
  • 42:56their initial recruiting efforts.
  • 42:57We have BI weekly staff meetings,
  • 42:59annual leadership meetings that
  • 43:01go on to this day.
  • 43:03An regular,
  • 43:03ongoing formative assessment
  • 43:04which is key to everything we do.
  • 43:06Everything is based on numbers and
  • 43:08I should tell you at the very first
  • 43:11selection weekend at Penn State.
  • 43:12And again, this is where we were told
  • 43:15that this would not work there by there
  • 43:17by their chief diversity Officer,
  • 43:19who'd been there for 20 years,
  • 43:21and I should tell you now he's
  • 43:23a huge fan of what we're doing,
  • 43:25but at the time, everything in his
  • 43:28history said this would not work.
  • 43:31So. They in their very first
  • 43:33year they had no money from HMI,
  • 43:36it was all internal.
  • 43:38They said, well,
  • 43:39we can probably support about 18 students,
  • 43:41and so they invited 72 students and
  • 43:43their families to the selection
  • 43:45weekend for interviews and to
  • 43:47tell them about the program.
  • 43:48They had 70 show up into
  • 43:50that that attended virtually.
  • 43:52They decided to make 25 offers,
  • 43:54hoping that they get about 12 and then
  • 43:57they would make a few more offers
  • 43:59until they got up to 18 and May 25 offers.
  • 44:02They had 23 accepts in their very first year,
  • 44:05in fact that their selection weekend it
  • 44:07always ends with a white tablecloth dinner.
  • 44:09One father went black,
  • 44:11father stood up and said when will I find
  • 44:13out if my son gets into this program?
  • 44:16I would pay for him to be in this program.
  • 44:20And so it's interesting because
  • 44:21it Penn State they've never had a
  • 44:24decline group large enough to do
  • 44:25a statistical assessment of the
  • 44:27effectiveness of their program.
  • 44:29So even a place like Penn State
  • 44:31can really make this work.
  • 44:33The outcomes at both schools
  • 44:35exceeded or met Meyerhoff outcomes.
  • 44:36Stem retention matches.
  • 44:37Meyerhof retention is better better
  • 44:39than 90% four year graduation rate.
  • 44:41So this is the first year of
  • 44:44meyerhof of UMBC in Gray.
  • 44:45After four years we only had
  • 44:47a small percentage graduate.
  • 44:49After four years we were still.
  • 44:51Trying to work on the program
  • 44:53and make it work.
  • 44:54You can see UNC and Penn State their
  • 44:57graduation rates after four year
  • 44:58and stem are much higher and in
  • 45:00fact they are equal to present day.
  • 45:03UMBC graduation rates at after
  • 45:04four years GPS at graduation.
  • 45:06Meyerhoff,
  • 45:06you know we at our first cohort
  • 45:09was really quite low,
  • 45:10is below 3 1/4 and you can see
  • 45:12over the years as we're learning
  • 45:14and we're getting more faculty
  • 45:16buy in the numbers go up the 28
  • 45:19year average is just below 3.45.
  • 45:21What you can see is Penn State
  • 45:23and UNC from year from cohort
  • 45:26one is achieving outcomes,
  • 45:28GPA outcomes that meet or exceed.
  • 45:30They greatly exceed our early outcomes
  • 45:33and they meet or exceed present
  • 45:35day in average meyerhof outcomes.
  • 45:38PhD, Matriculation UMBC's first cohort.
  • 45:40We had a lot that went to
  • 45:42medical school but now you can
  • 45:45see on the chart on the right.
  • 45:47We have many more that do a PhD or an MD PhD.
  • 45:51But look at the very first cohort
  • 45:53of Penn State is equaling the
  • 45:56Meyerhof present day cohort.
  • 45:57An UNC is also doing quite well.
  • 46:00Much better than our early outcomes
  • 46:02and then minority participation
  • 46:04exceeds the meyerhof by year.
  • 46:056 by year six of their programs,
  • 46:08UNC is 67% African American.
  • 46:1093% Minority Penn State.
  • 46:1253% African American 74% minority.
  • 46:16The growth is good.
  • 46:17You can see present day Meyerhof
  • 46:19in the dotted bars and over over a
  • 46:21period of years and you can see the
  • 46:23cohort one for meyerhof is white and
  • 46:25the other schools are these other
  • 46:27colors blue and red and you can see
  • 46:29how they're growing at the same rate.
  • 46:31It takes money to do these.
  • 46:33You have to raise the money,
  • 46:34so that's how we're growing an this.
  • 46:36These are what the costs are.
  • 46:38I can go over more of this with you later.
  • 46:40The important thing is that money
  • 46:42from the institutional budget or
  • 46:44are in Gray and you can see that
  • 46:45in the beginning the institutions
  • 46:47put in about 1/2 a million.
  • 46:49But people got really excited.
  • 46:50They built their programs into
  • 46:52their capital campaigns and you
  • 46:54can see that there's been growth.
  • 46:56This is present day meyerhof and you
  • 46:58can see we put less institutional
  • 47:00money into our program,
  • 47:01but we do a lot of fund raising.
  • 47:06An endowment building after three years,
  • 47:08UNC raised $16 million just for its
  • 47:11and meyerhof like program Endowment,
  • 47:13Penn State rate 12 million after three years.
  • 47:16For comparison,
  • 47:17UMBC presently only has a little
  • 47:19over $22 million,
  • 47:21and that's because most of our
  • 47:23money that we raise goes into
  • 47:25operating costs and hasn't been
  • 47:27able to be to go into an endowment.
  • 47:31So the point is that there is
  • 47:33considerable outside interests,
  • 47:35especially among.
  • 47:36You know the the graduates of the schools
  • 47:39and even at places like UNC in the South.
  • 47:43Here's a picture of the
  • 47:45Millennium Group at Penn State.
  • 47:46This is at the presidents dinner.
  • 47:48Can you imagine having dinner with this
  • 47:51group of people with your president?
  • 47:53The impact that that has you put this
  • 47:55group into a small room with the president,
  • 47:58and they're all talking science
  • 48:00and talking about their dreams.
  • 48:02Can you imagine the the impact that
  • 48:04has on the President, the University?
  • 48:06And then here's the same.
  • 48:08I think about the same year,
  • 48:10the Chancellor Science scholars
  • 48:12is what they've named there.
  • 48:13Program at Penn State.
  • 48:15This is Carol Fault in the middle and
  • 48:18just to tell you that this was not easy.
  • 48:21You may know that Carol Folt was
  • 48:23fired a couple of years ago because
  • 48:25she demanded that the infection and
  • 48:27demanded she went against the state
  • 48:30legislator at later and had the
  • 48:32granite base of a statue of a racist
  • 48:34Confederate removed from the campus.
  • 48:36And she wrote a letter to the
  • 48:39legislature saying, I will.
  • 48:40I've had this this removed.
  • 48:42I will step down from my office in
  • 48:44by the end of the semester and they.
  • 48:47Told her she could be out of
  • 48:50her office in two weeks.
  • 48:52She's now the chancellor USC.
  • 48:53So she's doing really well,
  • 48:55but I'm just telling you,
  • 48:57even when you're building programs like this,
  • 48:59there's always some fight.
  • 49:03So we're expanding.
  • 49:04We have now support from the
  • 49:06Chan Zuckerberg Initiative.
  • 49:07We're working with UC
  • 49:09Berkeley and UC San Diego.
  • 49:10My alma mater is doing this with with
  • 49:12their own money that they're raising.
  • 49:15Howard University is now part of this.
  • 49:17Since we've been working together,
  • 49:19we're sort of serving as a hub for
  • 49:21monthly meetings where we're working with
  • 49:23these other institutions to advise them.
  • 49:25And it's not just academic institutions.
  • 49:27We're also working with companies.
  • 49:28We've just we've been working
  • 49:30with Genentech for a few years.
  • 49:32These are some of our meyerhoff.
  • 49:34Graduate fellows who've gone to
  • 49:36Genentech either for part time or
  • 49:38full time positions and Alicia Dent.
  • 49:40I'm really excited about her because
  • 49:41they just hired her last summer into
  • 49:44a leadership development position so
  • 49:45they're not just hiring minorities
  • 49:47to take post doc positions and try to
  • 49:50become more diverse at the postdoc level.
  • 49:52They've hired her to spend one year at
  • 49:54the bench in one year and development
  • 49:57and one year and management with
  • 49:59the hope that she will eventually
  • 50:01take a management position and help
  • 50:03diversify management at Genentech.
  • 50:05So the conclusions I'll leave you
  • 50:06with is at the undergraduate level.
  • 50:08There are large numbers of minorities
  • 50:10that are interested in stem.
  • 50:11We're not retaining them.
  • 50:12We need to do better.
  • 50:14Yeah, we are cherry picking,
  • 50:15but look at all the cherries out there.
  • 50:17Why wouldn't you Cherry pick
  • 50:19our football teams?
  • 50:20Cherry pick.
  • 50:20We should be cherry picking in science too.
  • 50:23At least that somehow I'm not
  • 50:25just saying exclusively Cherry Pit
  • 50:27because UMBC does a lot of things
  • 50:29for students minority and majority
  • 50:31students who are struggling financially
  • 50:33so we do have other programs.
  • 50:35But the goal of this is to develop
  • 50:37leadership minority leadership in science.
  • 50:39And yeah,
  • 50:40high Achievers will succeed
  • 50:42without our support.
  • 50:43But they are less likely
  • 50:45to be retained in stem.
  • 50:47And this is a very different approach
  • 50:49to what most of the country is taking
  • 50:52today and has historically taken.
  • 50:54I encourage you to look at the
  • 50:57publications by Frank Dobbin at who
  • 50:59talks about why traditional diversity
  • 51:01training programs don't work through
  • 51:04diversity training according to his papers,
  • 51:06has worked when it's coupled with
  • 51:09other more defined actions that
  • 51:11are designed to actually change
  • 51:13institutional outcomes.
  • 51:14And So what he talks about is the
  • 51:17fact that you know people that
  • 51:19come out of diversity training,
  • 51:22learn something.
  • 51:23Yes, they feel like they they are empowered,
  • 51:26yes.
  • 51:26But then if you look at company or
  • 51:29University outcomes or metrics like
  • 51:31enrollments of minorities or graduation
  • 51:33rates of minorities or retention in stem.
  • 51:36We're not having the impact
  • 51:37that they need to have.
  • 51:40Graduate training the there are
  • 51:42there the the numbers that are
  • 51:45interested in PhD are growing.
  • 51:47Outreach is critical.
  • 51:48The most important thing we did was bring
  • 51:51undergraduates into UMBC to do summer
  • 51:53research and those students or their
  • 51:56peers at their minority serving institutions,
  • 51:58applied because they had
  • 52:00good summer experiences.
  • 52:02Key decisions are made by the faculty,
  • 52:04so unlike the undergrad program,
  • 52:05I think graduate diversity can be
  • 52:07and should be run by the faculty.
  • 52:09There really isn't a.
  • 52:11You don't need to wait for the
  • 52:14administration to do something.
  • 52:16And that's with just what I said here
  • 52:18and then in terms of replication,
  • 52:21we now know that meyerhof, like outcomes,
  • 52:23can immediately be achieved at large
  • 52:25predominantly majority institutions.
  • 52:27What it requires is like minded,
  • 52:29administrative and faculty leadership,
  • 52:30and that's pretty much it
  • 52:32commitment to diversity,
  • 52:33and it can be facilitated by
  • 52:35Inter institutional partnerships.
  • 52:36And that's where we're looking
  • 52:38for what you know, how.
  • 52:40What kind of role UMBC can
  • 52:42continue to play in the future,
  • 52:44and with that I am.
  • 52:46Happy to stop here and take any
  • 52:49questions that you may have.
  • 52:51Thank you.
  • 52:54Wonderful thank you Doctor Summers
  • 52:56that was just very inspiring.
  • 52:58The numbers and and all that
  • 53:00you've been able to achieve.
  • 53:01So why don't we open it up for
  • 53:04questions for Doctor Summers?
  • 53:06If anybody has, please go ahead and
  • 53:08ask them where a small enough group.
  • 53:11You can also put your question in
  • 53:13the chat an I will read that out.
  • 53:21I'll just go ahead and start since
  • 53:25I've got something on my mind.
  • 53:27So as you were talking like I was
  • 53:31thinking about one of our challenges
  • 53:34is since we don't do great,
  • 53:37we don't do graduate training here
  • 53:39in in in psychiatry is recruiting
  • 53:42a more diverse postdoctoral group,
  • 53:45and you know so.
  • 53:47Wondering what advice you would have
  • 53:49on how we should go out and do that.
  • 53:53We're obviously all we always
  • 53:54thinking about outreach,
  • 53:55but it just seems like you you're
  • 53:58training these wonderful students
  • 53:59and their PhD numbers are going up,
  • 54:02and that's proliferating.
  • 54:03We would love to get some of those
  • 54:05here because obviously what we
  • 54:07want to do is increase our PhD
  • 54:09numbers in terms of diversity.
  • 54:11But then really,
  • 54:12one of the things we do very
  • 54:14successfully is that builds
  • 54:16our pipeline for faculty.
  • 54:18So we keep them, you know,
  • 54:20in academic careers,
  • 54:21and so we'd love to do that.
  • 54:24And what would your
  • 54:25advice be on that? Yeah,
  • 54:27my advice would be to start by looking at
  • 54:30all of the MSD programs around the country.
  • 54:33the NIH, I MSD. And now they have a new
  • 54:36program called G Rise. Those programs.
  • 54:41R for students who are working on their pH.
  • 54:44D in stem and psychiatry in certain areas
  • 54:48of psychiatry are considered by NIH.
  • 54:51To be part of that stem.
  • 54:55The group and so for example,
  • 54:57in our Meyerhof Graduate Fellows program,
  • 54:59we have 100 and right now I think
  • 55:02we just had a couple of graduates,
  • 55:04so I think we're at like 106 enrolled PhD
  • 55:08students. Of which I believe probably.
  • 55:13Around 20 are psychology students. Wow.
  • 55:17So and many of them are doing clinical well.
  • 55:21I think all of them are doing
  • 55:23something that's semi clinically
  • 55:25related or clinically related.
  • 55:27Most of it is relatively related
  • 55:29to health disparities and not only
  • 55:32just minority health disparities,
  • 55:34but disparities with the aging
  • 55:36population as well and so.
  • 55:39My advice would probably be to have
  • 55:42some kind of letter or advertisement
  • 55:44or something that could be distributed
  • 55:47on a very regular basis to these
  • 55:50programs that would advertise
  • 55:52postdoctoral opportunities for the
  • 55:54students working in these areas,
  • 55:56and we have some students who
  • 55:59are doing combined work with,
  • 56:01you know, the Institute of Aging on.
  • 56:05That are doing psychology and
  • 56:07neurobiology work together,
  • 56:08and I suspect that there is some of
  • 56:10that that might be going on as well.
  • 56:13Now I may be mixing psychology and
  • 56:15psychiatry and and maybe there
  • 56:17is overlap and maybe there isn't,
  • 56:19I don't know.
  • 56:20I would that,
  • 56:22but that's probably where
  • 56:23I would start. Yeah,
  • 56:25an neuroscience is the other, you know,
  • 56:27we could think about neuroscience,
  • 56:29PHD's, or related neuroscience and by
  • 56:32engineering that that are also more and
  • 56:34more could could meet you know could
  • 56:37match up with some of our training
  • 56:39programs. Yeah, absolutely.
  • 56:40And we we do have those in.
  • 56:43There are several places around
  • 56:44the country that have federal
  • 56:46grants to promote inclusion.
  • 56:48You know DI that are really good.
  • 56:50Actually UNC has an extremely good.
  • 56:53I MSD granted and PhD program and now
  • 56:55that they have this new undergraduate,
  • 56:57not new anymore.
  • 56:58It's eight years old,
  • 56:59but their meyerhof,
  • 57:00like undergraduate program,
  • 57:01the whole campus is paying a
  • 57:04lot more attention to diversity.
  • 57:06The another place you could look
  • 57:08at that where I've interacted with
  • 57:10people there quite a bit is Baylor
  • 57:12College of Medicine and they have had
  • 57:15a very successful program as well.
  • 57:17I don't know how many are psychiatry,
  • 57:19but certainly you know they're doing a
  • 57:22terrific job with their PhD students.
  • 57:25Great.
  • 57:29This question from Cindy what components
  • 57:31of this can be applied to the recruitment
  • 57:34and retention of URM faculty?
  • 57:38Oh gosh. That's that's I have to say
  • 57:42that's been my biggest failure at UMBC.
  • 57:45I chaired the search for a new
  • 57:48biochemistry faculty last year.
  • 57:50Before Coben and.
  • 57:52We had 160 applicants,
  • 57:54of which two were black.
  • 57:57One was from Africa and
  • 57:59had had a language problem,
  • 58:00but we thought we could probably
  • 58:02get over that and we agreed to
  • 58:04make that person an offer and
  • 58:06we couldn't get that person.
  • 58:08This was somebody who's doing their pH,
  • 58:10their postdoc at Wash U.
  • 58:12The other African American African
  • 58:14American that applied had one
  • 58:16publication in the Department just
  • 58:18wouldn't pursue that individual.
  • 58:19I wanted to delay the recruitment
  • 58:22by year and do it again,
  • 58:24but with code when Covid came around,
  • 58:26the University said if you can't
  • 58:28find somebody in this pool,
  • 58:30you won't be able to recruit
  • 58:33again for awhile and so.
  • 58:36I think that.
  • 58:39Part of the problem is the pool is low.
  • 58:42Now if you're a Yale,
  • 58:43you know that we've we've made offers to
  • 58:46people that have gone to other schools,
  • 58:49Caltech, or other places,
  • 58:50or even places that are maybe
  • 58:52similar stature to UMBC.
  • 58:53But they have more resources and they can
  • 58:56make spousal hires and things like that.
  • 58:58So we just have not.
  • 59:01But we still have not had a tenured
  • 59:03black faculty member in chemistry and
  • 59:06biochemistry since I've been at UMBC.
  • 59:08So I so part of the issue I think
  • 59:10is in a Department like chemistry
  • 59:13you have different subgroups and
  • 59:15different subgroups argue that
  • 59:16they have a need in their area,
  • 59:19so so you end up looking in a very
  • 59:22specialized area like bio medicinal
  • 59:24chemistry and then the pool is
  • 59:26narrow down so much that you just
  • 59:29don't even get minority applicants.
  • 59:30So I think in my opinion,
  • 59:33if you really want to diversify,
  • 59:35you need to do something a
  • 59:37little more creative now.
  • 59:38What?
  • 59:39We just done is I was at a meeting last year.
  • 59:43I met a black postdoc who I thought
  • 59:46was terrific and so now we invited
  • 59:48her to give a Department seminar.
  • 59:50We went to the administration so we just
  • 59:52had this phenomenal seminar speaker.
  • 59:54There's no in-house fighting.
  • 59:56We all agree that if we could
  • 59:58get that person to come.
  • 59:59So now we're waiting for the
  • 01:00:02University to tell us if we will be
  • 01:00:05allowed to try to recruit that person
  • 01:00:07outside of a normal hiring cycle.
  • 01:00:09So I think that you know if
  • 01:00:12you're at Yale you you,
  • 01:00:13you have the institutions reputation
  • 01:00:15behind you and you may not have to be
  • 01:00:18as creative as we appear to have to be.
  • 01:00:20The other thing that I've heard people
  • 01:00:22are doing is making cluster hires
  • 01:00:24and so if in if in administration
  • 01:00:27decides to go that route,
  • 01:00:28they can on our campus.
  • 01:00:30We do have requirements for our advertising.
  • 01:00:32So before we can even run a normal search,
  • 01:00:35we have to submit the plan not only
  • 01:00:37to the Dean but to Addyi committee
  • 01:00:39that make sure we're targeting
  • 01:00:41the right groups.
  • 01:00:42And then once we have the application pool,
  • 01:00:45it has to be as diverse as we can get it.
  • 01:00:49An if it's not diverse enough.
  • 01:00:52We have to explain why we can.
  • 01:00:54We have had fairly diverse if you
  • 01:00:57consider other factors like first
  • 01:00:58generation college and is now applying
  • 01:01:00for a faculty position or different
  • 01:01:03gender orientation or transsexual person.
  • 01:01:05So we've we've been OK in other areas,
  • 01:01:09but we just haven't been able to recruit
  • 01:01:12African American faculty member and.
  • 01:01:14In most of our department's.
  • 01:01:16I'm sorry I don't have anything better to
  • 01:01:19offer along those lines.
  • 01:01:21I just wondered whether you
  • 01:01:23have data on your PHD's,
  • 01:01:25either in your campus or other places now,
  • 01:01:28or what they select because it's interesting.
  • 01:01:31I wonder if they are actually going
  • 01:01:34into academia an where you know we
  • 01:01:37and other places because I know this
  • 01:01:39is a broad problem of just not having
  • 01:01:42enough applications who from minority
  • 01:01:44applications for faculty positions an.
  • 01:01:46I'm wondering if they're actually
  • 01:01:48not going into academia.
  • 01:01:50That's a great question,
  • 01:01:52and it turns out that of our graduates
  • 01:01:55that I talked about and of those
  • 01:01:58that have completed a postdoc.
  • 01:02:03No, yeah of those that
  • 01:02:06have completed their PhD.
  • 01:02:08Yeah, about 15% are in academics.
  • 01:02:12Now, that's not that much different
  • 01:02:15from the other percentage of PHD's that
  • 01:02:18go into academics currently anyway.
  • 01:02:21We've talked to some of our
  • 01:02:23former students about this.
  • 01:02:25One of them said.
  • 01:02:27Now this is a person who went to Stanford.
  • 01:02:31Who was always whenever?
  • 01:02:32I'd look at the Stanford website,
  • 01:02:34this guy was on the was somehow
  • 01:02:36featured on their website, right?
  • 01:02:37So and he did. Well.
  • 01:02:39He published some papers and he
  • 01:02:40decided to go into policy and he came
  • 01:02:43back to UMBC and I said, well, why?
  • 01:02:45Why did you go into policy and
  • 01:02:47he said he said, look Mike,
  • 01:02:49I'm at Stanford.
  • 01:02:51There are all of these white and
  • 01:02:53Asian postdocs have been applying
  • 01:02:54for jobs and not getting jobs,
  • 01:02:56and if they can't get a job,
  • 01:02:58how am I going to get a job?
  • 01:03:00And then I see the article in
  • 01:03:01science and it says I'm not going
  • 01:03:03to be competitive for an NIH grant.
  • 01:03:05Anyway,
  • 01:03:05I want to have a big impact and
  • 01:03:07if I get stuck in a lab somewhere
  • 01:03:09and I can't be successful,
  • 01:03:11how am I going to have an impact?
  • 01:03:13So maybe if I go to work for
  • 01:03:15passive or some other organization,
  • 01:03:16maybe I can have a big impact?
  • 01:03:18Kristi Pullen, who I mentioned in my talk,
  • 01:03:20did the exact same thing.
  • 01:03:22She went to Harvard.
  • 01:03:24To do a Woodrow Wilson.
  • 01:03:26Postdoc in policy science so that she
  • 01:03:28could try to have a more immediate impact.
  • 01:03:30So I said to this one guy I said,
  • 01:03:33are you kidding me?
  • 01:03:34I said,
  • 01:03:35are you telling me if I gave you,
  • 01:03:37you know 3/4 of $1,000,000 in lab
  • 01:03:39space and said go have fun for
  • 01:03:41five years you wouldn't take it.
  • 01:03:42He said I would take it in a heartbeat.
  • 01:03:46So people are making some people
  • 01:03:48I can't shouldn't generalize,
  • 01:03:50but some of our students are making
  • 01:03:52decisions based on this negative
  • 01:03:54perception about academia and
  • 01:03:56their ability to be successful.
  • 01:03:58Even our students who go to
  • 01:04:02Berkeley and Stanford.
  • 01:04:03Are somehow still being feeling
  • 01:04:05discouraged or or unable to compete?
  • 01:04:07I mean we all have some sense
  • 01:04:09of impostor syndrome.
  • 01:04:10I certainly do micros bash.
  • 01:04:12Who won the Nobel Prize not too
  • 01:04:14long ago talks about how he
  • 01:04:16passed out before one of his HMI
  • 01:04:19reviews because he was so nervous.
  • 01:04:21You know, people,
  • 01:04:22you know,
  • 01:04:23maybe that's what motivates some of us.
  • 01:04:25But in terms of our of our minority students,
  • 01:04:28it's it's keeping them from some
  • 01:04:31of them anyway from pursuing these.
  • 01:04:33Academic positions.
  • 01:04:38Great, thank you. Other
  • 01:04:40questions or thoughts comments?
  • 01:04:45Even sharing your experience of
  • 01:04:47what you may have encountered.
  • 01:04:58Let me just follow up about the
  • 01:04:59NIH and this negative perception
  • 01:05:01that you're talking about.
  • 01:05:03I wonder if you've had?
  • 01:05:04I know, many of the institutes at
  • 01:05:06NIH are very interested in the work
  • 01:05:08you're doing and really sort of
  • 01:05:10building the pipeline and sort of
  • 01:05:12building this kind of work at each
  • 01:05:15stage of the pipeline, so to speak.
  • 01:05:19How are they interested in sort of
  • 01:05:21shifting that negative perception,
  • 01:05:23but also sort of programming
  • 01:05:25around around this grants idea?
  • 01:05:27You know the minorities and already
  • 01:05:29faculty not getting grants and what
  • 01:05:32what sort of creative ways are they
  • 01:05:34sort of talking about changing that
  • 01:05:36and then also changing the perception?
  • 01:05:39Yeah, so I think Jon
  • 01:05:41Lorsch is doing a really good job of that.
  • 01:05:44John is ahead of NIGMS.
  • 01:05:46He's been ahead there for quite awhile.
  • 01:05:51I've talked to them about about their,
  • 01:05:53the people it used to be called the
  • 01:05:55more Division I just finished serving
  • 01:05:57on NIGMS Advisory Council and I would
  • 01:05:59talk to the people in the more division
  • 01:06:02about because they're going around the
  • 01:06:04country saying you need to train your
  • 01:06:06PHD's for jobs outside of academia,
  • 01:06:08and that's been their message.
  • 01:06:09Both minorities and women here
  • 01:06:11that then you know,
  • 01:06:12it's like the Canary in the coal mine.
  • 01:06:15They're the first to leave there.
  • 01:06:17They're not dumb.
  • 01:06:18And so I've been talking to them about
  • 01:06:21how their message isn't helping us.
  • 01:06:23So that's one thing John has
  • 01:06:26been very proactive, he started.
  • 01:06:31A policy where which has hurt me financially,
  • 01:06:34but if you're an HMI investigator,
  • 01:06:36you can only have one NIH grant.
  • 01:06:38And if you are not in HMI investigator,
  • 01:06:41then you can have at most two NIH grants,
  • 01:06:44and you cannot rape.
  • 01:06:45Bring in more than $700,000 of total money.
  • 01:06:48So if you gave me money or up,
  • 01:06:51I got some private donor to give me money.
  • 01:06:54John counts that against me and so.
  • 01:06:57But what he's doing is trying to lower the.
  • 01:07:00Age of the first time NIH grant recipients
  • 01:07:03and he's trying to be proactive about
  • 01:07:06who gets the money now by by doing
  • 01:07:09those things he can fund more people.
  • 01:07:12But that wasn't enough,
  • 01:07:13and So what he's done is he started
  • 01:07:16this new program called Mira.
  • 01:07:18And what he's doing is saying if
  • 01:07:20you have multiple NIH grants,
  • 01:07:22you can combine them.
  • 01:07:24It would be one Myra Grant
  • 01:07:26and this Myra Grant then.
  • 01:07:28The property you get evaluated
  • 01:07:30based on what you've accomplished
  • 01:07:33and what you're planning to do,
  • 01:07:35but it's it's not.
  • 01:07:39You don't have to have a
  • 01:07:40lot of preliminary data,
  • 01:07:42it's more about you know what is the
  • 01:07:44broad impact of your science going to be.
  • 01:07:46In other words,
  • 01:07:47I don't know that I'm 100% in favor of
  • 01:07:50this because it puts a lot more control
  • 01:07:52in the hands of the leadership at NIH
  • 01:07:54and takes it away from study sections.
  • 01:07:57But what he's done is he's now
  • 01:07:59has a different study section
  • 01:08:00for Myra grants right.
  • 01:08:02And so a lot of people are applying
  • 01:08:04to Myra and the people on those
  • 01:08:06study sections are evaluating
  • 01:08:07the grants differently than they
  • 01:08:09might evaluate a narrow one.
  • 01:08:11If you look at the the percentage of
  • 01:08:14minorities that are getting my rewards,
  • 01:08:16it's much higher than the percentage of
  • 01:08:18minorities that are getting other awards.
  • 01:08:21The success rate of Myra is higher
  • 01:08:23than the success rate of ARO ones.
  • 01:08:25Now again this bothers me in a sense,
  • 01:08:28because the ARO ones have preliminary data,
  • 01:08:31there sometimes ranked by their study
  • 01:08:33sections better than them Iras,
  • 01:08:34but the mirrors are getting funded.
  • 01:08:36And So what I'm just saying is that this
  • 01:08:39is one of the ways that the leadership,
  • 01:08:42at least at NIGMS.
  • 01:08:44Is trying to encourage more minorities
  • 01:08:46to to look at academic positions?
  • 01:08:49Yeah,
  • 01:08:49but a lot of people don't
  • 01:08:51know those statistics.
  • 01:08:53They're they're on the NIGMS website,
  • 01:08:55but they don't realize that.
  • 01:08:58You know people are trying to reach out
  • 01:09:00and become more diverse and see more
  • 01:09:02success among their diverse scientists.
  • 01:09:05Yeah. Thank you. Other questions comments.
  • 01:09:09Rachel yes question. Thank you
  • 01:09:12doctor Summers. Great talk.
  • 01:09:14I had the opportunity to get to
  • 01:09:19know first hand about the Meyerhoff
  • 01:09:23Scholars program all through the 2000s.
  • 01:09:27We can talk more about that.
  • 01:09:29I had the pleasure of knowing Lamont,
  • 01:09:32however wonderful person and friend.
  • 01:09:35I wanted to know if you had any thoughts
  • 01:09:38about recreating your PhD or the graduate
  • 01:09:41aspect of the Meyerhoff experience.
  • 01:09:44For other institutions I know later will
  • 01:09:47talk about the undergraduate and I hope
  • 01:09:50that will get into the graduate aspects
  • 01:09:53and accoutrements of your success.
  • 01:09:56But if you could.
  • 01:09:57Discussed a little bit
  • 01:09:59about that, sure.
  • 01:10:01I mean, I think the graduate program
  • 01:10:03to me is was all it was all just
  • 01:10:06kind of common sense, it was.
  • 01:10:08We're going to have monthly meetings so
  • 01:10:10that we can bring our one psychology
  • 01:10:13student an R1 biology student in our
  • 01:10:15one chemistry student together so
  • 01:10:17that they could feel like they're in
  • 01:10:19a group and they have some kind of
  • 01:10:22support structure among themselves.
  • 01:10:24And that was the first year
  • 01:10:26and the next year.
  • 01:10:27I think it jumped to 8 total students in our
  • 01:10:30group and it was very personal back then.
  • 01:10:33I came to all the meetings basically,
  • 01:10:35and then I we would have a
  • 01:10:38retreat during the summer.
  • 01:10:39Where we would go off campus and
  • 01:10:41go white water rafting or hiking
  • 01:10:43and and I would basically say look.
  • 01:10:45I'm you know,
  • 01:10:46I'm a white male who was raised in the South.
  • 01:10:49You tell me what would make this
  • 01:10:51a great program and the students
  • 01:10:53took ownership of it.
  • 01:10:54How do we want to spend the money?
  • 01:10:57What do you want to do?
  • 01:10:58So I would say at the graduate
  • 01:11:01level it started off by me telling
  • 01:11:03the students that we had that,
  • 01:11:05you know, I know essentially nothing
  • 01:11:06about what you need.
  • 01:11:08Educate me and let me help you build this.
  • 01:11:11And it's kind of stayed that way.
  • 01:11:12Now the numbers are huge.
  • 01:11:14I don't know all the
  • 01:11:15students are just too many.
  • 01:11:16You get 100.
  • 01:11:18In 12 people in a room, and you know.
  • 01:11:21And that's now.
  • 01:11:22But now we do have more leadership.
  • 01:11:24That's that's going to come in next year.
  • 01:11:26And we're going to kind of
  • 01:11:28try to share responsibilities,
  • 01:11:29but so I'd say it starts by
  • 01:11:32taking the students you have.
  • 01:11:34Where did they come from?
  • 01:11:36Could they go back to their institutions
  • 01:11:38and talk about what they're doing?
  • 01:11:40We've done that with my alma mater.
  • 01:11:42We've had a bunch of students
  • 01:11:44who have now come to Maryland,
  • 01:11:46turned down,
  • 01:11:46wash you to come to Maryland
  • 01:11:48to do their MD PhD,
  • 01:11:49and now the guy is getting ready
  • 01:11:51to do his residency at Emory.
  • 01:11:53So just by by bringing in the minority
  • 01:11:56students you have in your graduate program,
  • 01:11:58where did they go?
  • 01:11:59Reaching out to those schools,
  • 01:12:01sending them back with some money
  • 01:12:03and letting them talk about it?
  • 01:12:04That's one thing you can do.
  • 01:12:07And then the most important thing for
  • 01:12:10us for building the application pool.
  • 01:12:14Was starting a summer REU.
  • 01:12:18Where we were and what we found
  • 01:12:20is that if we brought students
  • 01:12:21from Berkeley in other places,
  • 01:12:23they wouldn't come to our PhD
  • 01:12:25program where I'm talking about
  • 01:12:26bringing undergrads into do.
  • 01:12:28And are you? OK, so I know.
  • 01:12:31I mean I know you're asking
  • 01:12:34about the PhD program,
  • 01:12:35but if we brought undergraduates
  • 01:12:38in from nearby Msis.
  • 01:12:40The chances were higher that they
  • 01:12:42would come to our graduate program.
  • 01:12:45And so we were able to increase
  • 01:12:47the applications and increase
  • 01:12:49the matriculation to our PhD
  • 01:12:51program just by having
  • 01:12:52a summer Ari you and then making it good too.
  • 01:12:55So when they came in they
  • 01:12:57would get together as a group.
  • 01:12:59It wasn't one individual in one white
  • 01:13:01lab feeling alone all summer right?
  • 01:13:03There have to be intentional activities
  • 01:13:05to make it a good experience.
  • 01:13:07And then we would send them home AT
  • 01:13:09shirts that had their names on the
  • 01:13:12back and we call it SVTPAU NBC so
  • 01:13:14they'd wear them around their campus.
  • 01:13:17We would give their faculty that
  • 01:13:19would bring students to our or we
  • 01:13:21would have a seminar program at
  • 01:13:23the end of the summer and we would
  • 01:13:26invite the faculty from the HBC use
  • 01:13:28to bring other students who didn't do
  • 01:13:31our EU to come to see their friends,
  • 01:13:34give talks and to learn about our program.
  • 01:13:36So it was a very intentional outreach.
  • 01:13:39Two minority serving institutions.
  • 01:13:41To get them to come to our to a
  • 01:13:44summer undergraduate experience,
  • 01:13:46why do people go to minority
  • 01:13:47serving institutions?
  • 01:13:48It's because either the students
  • 01:13:50or their parents, or both,
  • 01:13:51want they want to be supported.
  • 01:13:53They want to be surrounded by
  • 01:13:54faculty to give a damn.
  • 01:13:56And so how are you going to have convinced
  • 01:13:59black families that Yale gives a damn?
  • 01:14:01So they've got to have some kind of
  • 01:14:03experience where you can bring them on
  • 01:14:05to campus and it be a good experience.
  • 01:14:07And of course,
  • 01:14:08it helped us a lot that we had Freeman
  • 01:14:11who could come and give a talk and.
  • 01:14:13You know the parents see Freeman
  • 01:14:15and that's all it takes.
  • 01:14:18Awesome thanks.
  • 01:14:21I have question could you talk
  • 01:14:23about any early experiences with
  • 01:14:25the program where you might have
  • 01:14:27encountered institutional resistance?
  • 01:14:29Certainly not from your president,
  • 01:14:30but like general counsel would say,
  • 01:14:33you know, how can you have a
  • 01:14:35program specifically for you?
  • 01:14:36Know this group initially and sort of
  • 01:14:39what was your experience with that,
  • 01:14:41and certainly have a president
  • 01:14:43that can help you overcome that,
  • 01:14:45but I'm just wondering your.
  • 01:14:48Experiences with that?
  • 01:14:49Yeah no, that's a great great.
  • 01:14:51Christian College Park had a
  • 01:14:53program called the Banneker Program
  • 01:14:55that's our flagship campus.
  • 01:14:57And when the legal decisions were
  • 01:14:59being meted out that you could not
  • 01:15:03have affirmative action programs,
  • 01:15:05you couldn't just count students.
  • 01:15:07Their program was basically dismantled there.
  • 01:15:09The Banneker program.
  • 01:15:11They still have a Banneker scholarship,
  • 01:15:13but it's mostly majority students now.
  • 01:15:16So Freeman was proactive.
  • 01:15:18He said, no, anybody can apply.
  • 01:15:20And we will take students that really
  • 01:15:23want to be part of this and so our
  • 01:15:26program does tend to be self selecting.
  • 01:15:29If we have a real high achieving
  • 01:15:32Asian student that comes in and
  • 01:15:34meets with our students and our
  • 01:15:36faculty and our administrators
  • 01:15:37and convinces all of as well,
  • 01:15:40this is somebody that that is is going
  • 01:15:42to have a positive impact on our
  • 01:15:45community then we want them in our program.
  • 01:15:50One of my this isn't meierhofer.
  • 01:15:52One of my former PhD students was
  • 01:15:54recruited to Harvard on the faculty.
  • 01:15:56This is Victoria de Souza and the first
  • 01:15:59thing they asked her to do was to run
  • 01:16:02their graduate program so they had
  • 01:16:04no minorities in their PhD program,
  • 01:16:06and after three years they were up
  • 01:16:08to 35% minority students because
  • 01:16:09she been in our program.
  • 01:16:11She knew the kinds of things
  • 01:16:13that we could do, and so.
  • 01:16:16To get to your question about the
  • 01:16:19legal issues Berkeley is doing
  • 01:16:20this and they have one of the
  • 01:16:22most recent during one of the most
  • 01:16:24restrictive states in the country.
  • 01:16:25They said initially we can't do this
  • 01:16:27here because we're not allowed to.
  • 01:16:29Well, you are allowed to you if you have
  • 01:16:32a program that accepts any students.
  • 01:16:34That's all that matters.
  • 01:16:36Now, if the focus is on social
  • 01:16:38justice and science,
  • 01:16:39then it's going to self select
  • 01:16:41for the majority students that
  • 01:16:43want to be part of that community.
  • 01:16:45And of course,
  • 01:16:46if the requirement is that they
  • 01:16:48have to be a high achiever,
  • 01:16:50then you know you're going to get
  • 01:16:51high achieving minority students and
  • 01:16:53high achieving majority students.
  • 01:16:58Thank you, sure.
  • 01:17:02We're coming to the end of our time.
  • 01:17:05Any other questions before
  • 01:17:06we let Doctor Summers go?
  • 01:17:08And now he's going to be meeting
  • 01:17:11with with Doctor Smith and Lattimore
  • 01:17:13and their group for a workshop.
  • 01:17:16Any other comments?
  • 01:17:22Well, this is a great discussion,
  • 01:17:25and of course the wonderful presentation
  • 01:17:27got us really thinking a number of
  • 01:17:30different ways about what we can do.
  • 01:17:32So thank you so much. Doctor Summers,
  • 01:17:35who really appreciate your time
  • 01:17:37this morning and I'm sure we'll be
  • 01:17:40reaching out with followups as well.
  • 01:17:43Though it's been a pleasure,
  • 01:17:44thank you so much.
  • 01:17:45I look forward to talking to
  • 01:17:46you later. Yes, thank you.