Skip to Main Content

Understanding Breast Cancer: Treatment Advances

October 21, 2021
  • 00:00Hi, I'm doctor Melanie Lynch and I'm the
  • 00:03director of breast surgery at Bridgeport
  • 00:05in the Yale Health system and I am so
  • 00:08excited to be here tonight to hear the
  • 00:11insights and advice from my dynamic
  • 00:13and smart colleagues in New Haven.
  • 00:16We will have three speakers tonight who will
  • 00:19discuss innovations in Breast Cancer Care.
  • 00:23And our first speaker will
  • 00:26be Doctor Elizabeth Berger.
  • 00:28She has both a Masters degree
  • 00:30and a medical degree,
  • 00:32and she's an assistant professor
  • 00:33of surgery and oncology.
  • 00:35Her medical degree comes from Loyola
  • 00:37University in Chicago and where she was
  • 00:40also a clinical research scholarship scholar,
  • 00:42and she completed her fellowship in
  • 00:44Breast Surgical Oncology at Memorial
  • 00:46Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,
  • 00:48where she was selected as a
  • 00:51breast cancer Alliance Fellow.
  • 00:53Her Master science comes from
  • 00:56Northwestern University.
  • 00:58Her research focuses in health
  • 01:00outcomes for breast cancer patients,
  • 01:02including quality care,
  • 01:03and she's going to discuss
  • 01:05innovations in breast cancer surgery.
  • 01:09Great thank you Doctor Lynch for
  • 01:10that very kind introduction and
  • 01:12I'm excited to be here tonight.
  • 01:13Thanks for everyone who's joined.
  • 01:16Let me share my screen.
  • 01:18And So what I hope to do tonight
  • 01:21is just provide some updates
  • 01:23in breast cancer surgery.
  • 01:24You know things in Breast Cancer Care
  • 01:26changes so frequently it's really hard,
  • 01:28I think to stay up to date,
  • 01:30time and so this is a a picture.
  • 01:34It's a kind of famous social media trend
  • 01:36that has been happening recently is you
  • 01:38know how it started and how how is.
  • 01:40Going so, Doctor William Halstead used to
  • 01:42perform the holstead mastectomy or the
  • 01:44radical mastectomy back in the late 1800s,
  • 01:47where you know the entire breast
  • 01:49as long as the as well as the PEC
  • 01:52major minor muscle would be more
  • 01:54removed and now Bernie Fisher,
  • 01:56who actually recently passed away,
  • 01:57who was instrumental in allowing
  • 02:00really significant advances in
  • 02:01breast cancer surgery for women,
  • 02:03said, you know in God we trust all
  • 02:05others must have data and he was,
  • 02:07like I said,
  • 02:08instrumental and allowing us
  • 02:10to really deescalate.
  • 02:11Our surgical operations for women
  • 02:14and allow them to just really remove
  • 02:17the area of tissue of the breast and
  • 02:20not compromise any kind of uncle
  • 02:22logic outcomes for our patients.
  • 02:24So we talked a lot about D escalation
  • 02:27of Breast Cancer Care and really
  • 02:29what we're trying to do is provide
  • 02:31as good of uncle logic outcomes
  • 02:33for patients with less toxicity,
  • 02:35less morbidity.
  • 02:37And unless you know disfigurement of.
  • 02:42Body and so in the 1970s is when we
  • 02:44started to think about do we really
  • 02:46have to do mastectomies for women or
  • 02:48could we just perform lumpectomy's an ad?
  • 02:51For instance radiation Doctor Nolan
  • 02:52will talk about that a little bit later
  • 02:54tonight and allow for similar outcomes,
  • 02:56and that these trials really demonstrated
  • 03:00that equivalency of survival and even
  • 03:03really recurrence with the two operations.
  • 03:05Then we thought we started thinking
  • 03:08in the late 1990s that maybe women
  • 03:11over a certain age.
  • 03:12You could deescalate even radiation
  • 03:14therapy for certain kinds of cancers.
  • 03:17We also have really significantly
  • 03:20deescalated axillary surgery,
  • 03:21so armpit surgery of the lymph nodes
  • 03:24and this has allowed women to spare the
  • 03:27morbidity of significant lymphoedema
  • 03:29in the arm range of motion problems.
  • 03:31Sensory changes of the arm.
  • 03:34And even into the 2000s,
  • 03:37in the present day,
  • 03:38the tailor X trial Dr.
  • 03:41Kanowitz will talk a little bit more about.
  • 03:42But we're thinking about even
  • 03:45deescalating chemotherapy.
  • 03:46For some women who have breast
  • 03:47cancer in a specific type,
  • 03:49and the comet trial is looking
  • 03:51at ductal carcinoma insight,
  • 03:52you or we call it pre cancer
  • 03:54or stage zero cancer,
  • 03:55depending upon what you read
  • 03:56and where you read it,
  • 03:57and maybe not even operating on
  • 04:00some patients who have DCIS.
  • 04:02So if a patient who has breast
  • 04:05cancer need surgery,
  • 04:06what are some of the updates recently?
  • 04:08You know that we are doing actively,
  • 04:10you know at smiling and across the country.
  • 04:13Some of the techniques and localization.
  • 04:15So finding the mass in the
  • 04:17breast and being able
  • 04:18to just do that one back to me have changed.
  • 04:20We know that we need to get healthy tissue,
  • 04:22around the lumpectomy.
  • 04:23So what are some of the ideas
  • 04:25of the of what margins mean?
  • 04:27****** sparing mastectomy?
  • 04:28So when a patient does need a mastectomy,
  • 04:30what, as far as what are we
  • 04:32doing for ****** sparing's?
  • 04:33And how are we managing the armpit?
  • 04:35The lymph nodes differently
  • 04:37from you know years ago?
  • 04:39And then I'll get into a very briefly.
  • 04:41You know, are we operating on women
  • 04:42who had stage four disease and you
  • 04:44know a lot of people have high risk
  • 04:46lesions that we're finding now.
  • 04:47With, you know,
  • 04:48improved screening mammograms and such.
  • 04:49And what do we do with those
  • 04:51high risk lesions?
  • 04:51So just briefly,
  • 04:52not all breast cancers are the same.
  • 04:54We know one in eight women in this
  • 04:57country will develop breast cancer,
  • 04:59but there's a wide wide range of their
  • 05:01diagnosis and included in those diagnosis.
  • 05:04Are these this principle
  • 05:06of receptors and you know,
  • 05:08in a in a normal cancer in a I'm
  • 05:10sorry a cancerous breast cell we often
  • 05:12think about what actually feeds the
  • 05:13breast cancer to cause it to grow.
  • 05:16The cell growth and so some breast
  • 05:17cancers have the estrogen receptor.
  • 05:19Some have the progesterone scepter.
  • 05:21Somehow this her two protein receptor.
  • 05:23But again you know each breast
  • 05:25cancer is an incredibly different
  • 05:27kind of breast cancer and it's
  • 05:29really unique to that individual.
  • 05:30And so the main stages of Breast
  • 05:33Cancer Care or a lot we do.
  • 05:35It's a very multi modality type of disease.
  • 05:38We think about surgery sometimes.
  • 05:40We oftentimes we think about chemotherapy.
  • 05:42We think about radiation and sometimes
  • 05:44we think about underpinned therapy.
  • 05:45If it's a hormonally driven cancer,
  • 05:48but as a surgeon,
  • 05:49I think surgery is the most important.
  • 05:51Just kidding, of course,
  • 05:53but I'm going to talk a little bit about
  • 05:55surgical advance advancement of surgery,
  • 05:57so when we think about
  • 05:59lumpectomy versus mastectomy's.
  • 06:01Some of the lumpectomy,
  • 06:02UM advances we have seen is,
  • 06:04how do we really localize the
  • 06:06lesion or find that lesion?
  • 06:08Because that little clip that we leave in
  • 06:10the breast is of only two millimeters,
  • 06:12and it would be like finding
  • 06:13a needle in a haystack if we,
  • 06:15as surgeons try to go in and
  • 06:16just find it without help.
  • 06:17So we used to use these wires.
  • 06:20Wires used to be put into the breast
  • 06:22and they still are at times when
  • 06:24they're needed or and or appropriate,
  • 06:26and the wires will be put in
  • 06:28the same day of surgery.
  • 06:29Sometimes the logistics get
  • 06:30a little bit challenging.
  • 06:31They can cause oh,
  • 06:32are delays at times if the wire
  • 06:34localization takes awhile,
  • 06:36they can get dislodged.
  • 06:37They're fairly uncomfortable as
  • 06:39far as you know.
  • 06:40You're getting wheeled down the day of
  • 06:42surgery to the radiology department,
  • 06:44etc.
  • 06:44And of course,
  • 06:45if something were to happen with
  • 06:47the case gets canceled,
  • 06:48then that wire must come out.
  • 06:49You have it the way I
  • 06:50would have to be placed.
  • 06:51Again, an addition another day.
  • 06:55You can kind of see the, UM, challenges.
  • 06:57Sometimes of a liar placement that have
  • 07:00to happen on the same day of surgery.
  • 07:03And now what we've done is really decoupled.
  • 07:05This idea of localization and surgery.
  • 07:08And So what we've allowed to do
  • 07:10is we can put these little tags
  • 07:12or seeds in next to the clip.
  • 07:15Here's a great example of A tag being
  • 07:18put in right next to that biopsy clip,
  • 07:20and the device gives off a signal.
  • 07:23This tag gives off a signal
  • 07:24to us in the operating room.
  • 07:26And it allows us to find the lesion.
  • 07:29UM, were sometimes able to do smaller
  • 07:31lumpectomy is because of that.
  • 07:32We tend to minimize over delays
  • 07:34because they can be put in days before,
  • 07:36for instance,
  • 07:37and so we can start right at 7:30
  • 07:39in the morning for operating cases.
  • 07:41And oftentimes in various studies,
  • 07:43it's shown to improve patient
  • 07:46satisfaction with with surgery.
  • 07:48So I try to explain often to my
  • 07:50patients about margins and I think
  • 07:52it's a challenging concept sometimes.
  • 07:53So you know when we think about
  • 07:55the cancer cells in the breast,
  • 07:56there is often healthy tissue
  • 07:58around the breast around.
  • 07:59I'm sorry,
  • 08:00the cancer cells and what we
  • 08:01always want to try to make sure to
  • 08:03do is at the edges of this piece
  • 08:06of tissue we take out.
  • 08:07We want to make sure we
  • 08:09have healthy breast tissue.
  • 08:11It is incredibly challenging and
  • 08:12you know a frustration of all
  • 08:15surgeons when you know we have some.
  • 08:17Cancer at the edges and oftentimes
  • 08:19it's it's cancer that we can't see.
  • 08:21We can't feel, and unfortunately you know,
  • 08:24it ends up being at the edge where
  • 08:26it requires a second operation to
  • 08:27go back and clean out the margins.
  • 08:29There's a lot being done as far
  • 08:32as trying to evaluate margins
  • 08:33intraoperatively so at the same
  • 08:36time of the operation.
  • 08:38And unfortunately you know to date
  • 08:41nothing has been demonstrated to be.
  • 08:44As good as we would like it to be,
  • 08:46to identify margin status
  • 08:48intraoperatively so you know.
  • 08:50Although it's a frustrating
  • 08:52conversation to have with patients
  • 08:53about how it takes about four to
  • 08:55five days to get these results back.
  • 08:56That's unfortunately where we're
  • 08:57at right now, but you know,
  • 08:59to be determined in the future if
  • 09:01we'll have updates as margin status.
  • 09:03So mastectomy is,
  • 09:04I think the general consensus sometimes
  • 09:06is that they're incredibly deforming,
  • 09:09and that you know I'm going to
  • 09:10leave me with it.
  • 09:11You know, a terrible cosmetic outcome,
  • 09:12but what we know now is that.
  • 09:14We can do a lot of things to you know,
  • 09:17allow women to hopefully feel you
  • 09:19know as as natural as possible,
  • 09:21especially with his ****** sparing approach.
  • 09:23And we do think a ****** sparing
  • 09:25approach is that you know a healthy
  • 09:27approach to doing a mastectomy.
  • 09:29This is a study looking at,
  • 09:32for instance,
  • 09:33women with genetic variants
  • 09:35and allowing them a
  • 09:37very very good outcome as
  • 09:38far as a risk reduction.
  • 09:40Actually one of our the authors
  • 09:41here is Doctor Green up.
  • 09:42One of our very own here at.
  • 09:44At yield and so it's a really nice
  • 09:47technique now for women where they're
  • 09:50able to were able to save their
  • 09:52******* during a mastectomy procedure.
  • 09:56A lot of women think about
  • 09:58removing their other breasts,
  • 09:59so the contralateral or the
  • 10:00other side breast when they have
  • 10:02a diagnosis of breast cancer.
  • 10:04And it's a you know it's a conversation
  • 10:06I often have with patients we all
  • 10:08probably often have with patients.
  • 10:10And you know,
  • 10:11I think it's always important to
  • 10:12remember that breast cancer does not
  • 10:14spread from one breast to the other.
  • 10:15Rest, we do know that when
  • 10:18women develop breast cancer,
  • 10:19they have a higher risk of developing
  • 10:21a breast cancer in the other breast.
  • 10:23But we also know that when we do a
  • 10:25contralateral or other sided mastectomy
  • 10:27does not improve their survival
  • 10:29from their original breast cancer.
  • 10:31There are of course reasons to pursue you
  • 10:34know contralateral prophylactic or surgery,
  • 10:36you know in the other breast without
  • 10:38breast cancer in it for many reasons.
  • 10:39But it's not always right
  • 10:42for every single woman.
  • 10:43So as far as doing armpit
  • 10:45surgery or maxillary surgery,
  • 10:47you know we often test these Sentinel
  • 10:50nodes using two different kinds of dyes.
  • 10:53One is blue.
  • 10:54You can see here.
  • 10:55I tell my patients all the time
  • 10:57the the lymph node lights up,
  • 10:59and it turns blue.
  • 11:00Or we use this Geiger counter here
  • 11:02and it really makes a noise in
  • 11:04the operating room and it beeps
  • 11:06really loudly and it tells us what
  • 11:08are the Sentinel lymph nodes?
  • 11:10It's just a fancy word for saying kind
  • 11:12of the first lymph nodes that drain.
  • 11:14And these are the two mechanisms of how
  • 11:16we find those lymph nodes and we remove them.
  • 11:19I often hate this word as biopsy
  • 11:21because all women we see have really
  • 11:23gone through breast biopsies before.
  • 11:24And it's not that we stick a needle
  • 11:26into the lymph node and tests it.
  • 11:28We actually remove those lymph nodes to
  • 11:30make sure that there's no cancer in them.
  • 11:33Like I said,
  • 11:34just from the start of the presentation
  • 11:36that we've really tried hard to
  • 11:38deescalate or do less access or
  • 11:40surgery for all the morbidity of it.
  • 11:42And this was a in,
  • 11:43you know.
  • 11:44Credibly powerful study done in the
  • 11:46early 2000s that demonstrated that
  • 11:48all women who have out some disease
  • 11:50in the lymph nodes don't need an
  • 11:52axillary lymph node dissection or a
  • 11:54removal of all the lymph nodes in the armpit.
  • 11:56And it's really allowed a lot of
  • 11:59women to spare an axillary lymph node
  • 12:02dissection for their breast cancers.
  • 12:04This is another trial that I think
  • 12:06Dr Kanos will get into further,
  • 12:08but this is even now looking at even
  • 12:09women who have positive lymph nodes
  • 12:12with hormone receptor positive disease.
  • 12:13So we estrogen and progesterone
  • 12:16positive diseases,
  • 12:17even women who have positive
  • 12:19lymph nodes might not necessarily
  • 12:21need chemotherapy all the time.
  • 12:23So we're giving chemotherapy
  • 12:24a lot more often now before
  • 12:27surgery to for various reasons,
  • 12:28for various kinds of cancers and
  • 12:31what we're realizing is surgeons
  • 12:32is that we can still offer that
  • 12:35Sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure
  • 12:37as I just showed for women.
  • 12:39Even who have chemotherapy first,
  • 12:42and we don't always have to take out
  • 12:44all the lymph nodes after chemotherapy.
  • 12:46So if we use those two different dyes,
  • 12:48the blue dye and the radioactive dye and
  • 12:51we remove at least three lymph nodes.
  • 12:53What we know is that that's
  • 12:55safe for our patients to do,
  • 12:56and if those lymph nodes
  • 12:57don't have cancer in them,
  • 12:58then we don't have to go on to an
  • 13:01axillary lymph node dissection right now,
  • 13:03the standard of care is that if
  • 13:05any lymph nodes after chemotherapy
  • 13:07still have cancer in them,
  • 13:09we would go on and remove
  • 13:10all the lymph nodes.
  • 13:11But a lot of my patients I talked to,
  • 13:14if they're an appropriate
  • 13:16candidate for this trial.
  • 13:17If there's an ongoing trial asking this
  • 13:20question as to whether some patients
  • 13:22who have a little bit of cancer.
  • 13:24Still left in the lymph nodes
  • 13:27after surgery and me and actually
  • 13:29lymph node dissection.
  • 13:31Or could they just get what we call
  • 13:34radiation after surgery or and you
  • 13:36know as Doctor Knowlton on the call she
  • 13:38will talk a lot more about radiation
  • 13:40but why I love Breast Cancer Care
  • 13:42is 'cause it's so multi modality
  • 13:43and multidisciplinary and we always
  • 13:45are talking to our colleagues in
  • 13:48the various specialties to try to
  • 13:50take the best care of our patients.
  • 13:52So stage four disease.
  • 13:53So what do I even mean by stage four?
  • 13:55Disease stage four diseases,
  • 13:57those women who have breast cancer
  • 14:00in other organs of their body?
  • 14:03For instance,
  • 14:03the liver or the lungs or the bones.
  • 14:07And there have been various
  • 14:10different data to suggest.
  • 14:12Either we should remove the tumor
  • 14:14in the breast if a woman has
  • 14:16cancer elsewhere in the body,
  • 14:17or we shouldn't remove it and there's
  • 14:20varying thoughts on that, but.
  • 14:22The recent very well known very
  • 14:26well known very well done,
  • 14:27randomized controlled trial done by
  • 14:29a woman Doctor Khan at Northwestern
  • 14:31really demonstrated that it's going
  • 14:32to be most important for women
  • 14:34who have stage four disease to
  • 14:36get on systemic therapy.
  • 14:37So some kind of therapy to treat their
  • 14:40whole body and that oftentimes it doesn't.
  • 14:42In fact,
  • 14:43it really doesn't improve their
  • 14:45survival to remove the original tumor.
  • 14:47There are, of course,
  • 14:48reasons to do surgery on patients
  • 14:50who have stage four disease.
  • 14:51If the.
  • 14:52Wound is if the breast has a bleeding wound,
  • 14:55or if there's pain,
  • 14:56or you know something palliative
  • 14:58to help local control,
  • 15:00but we do think that really
  • 15:02helping women who have stage
  • 15:04four disease to get on some kind
  • 15:07of medicine systemically is the
  • 15:09best for them up front right now.
  • 15:12And then last but not least,
  • 15:13you know there's a lot of questions
  • 15:15out there about high risk lesions,
  • 15:17and this is a very complicated slide.
  • 15:19Then I always told I was always told
  • 15:20don't say that out loud 'cause you should
  • 15:22change the slide if it's too complicated,
  • 15:24but you know there are a lot of women
  • 15:27are getting diagnosed with various kinds
  • 15:29of high risk lesions such as radial
  • 15:31scars or lobular carcinoma insight,
  • 15:33Chu ductal carcinoma insight two
  • 15:35versus lobular carcinoma inside shoe,
  • 15:37and what we know about a lot of
  • 15:39these high risk lesions or are.
  • 15:41A fair amount increase your risk
  • 15:43of developing a breast cancer,
  • 15:44but not all have to come out.
  • 15:46Some need to come out,
  • 15:47and that's a conversation you
  • 15:49know we often have with patients,
  • 15:51but not all need to come out and so it it.
  • 15:54It is constantly changing, getting updated.
  • 15:57And you know if you ever have questions
  • 15:59were obviously always available to answer
  • 16:01them and that's all we have for tonight.
  • 16:03So let me stop sharing my screen.
  • 16:05Thank you for the opportunity to
  • 16:07talk about the updates of surgery.
  • 16:09Doctor Berger, two quick
  • 16:12questions from the audience.
  • 16:13One was there ever a time when you
  • 16:16would use a wire localization instead
  • 16:17of A tag or a seed localization?
  • 16:21Yes, that's a great question,
  • 16:22and absolutely so I think a couple examples.
  • 16:26For instance, if we think that
  • 16:28after a biopsy a patient has a very
  • 16:31large hematoma associated blood
  • 16:33collection around their cancer,
  • 16:35it can be hard to put in that tag and
  • 16:37get it in a place where we want it.
  • 16:39Because there's a lot of fluid there,
  • 16:42so the wire, for instance is a lot tends
  • 16:45to be a little bit more accurate for
  • 16:48localising lesion if there's if there's
  • 16:50a fluid collection around the tumor,
  • 16:53and then you know a second big reason
  • 16:55sometimes is if there's a large area
  • 16:58in the breast that we're trying to
  • 17:00bracket or get the extent of the lesion.
  • 17:02Sometimes wires can be easier to understand.
  • 17:05The extent of the lesion and not
  • 17:07putting in two tags, just two wires.
  • 17:10Dumb and dumb, you know there's a few,
  • 17:14probably other examples that I'm not
  • 17:15maybe thinking off the top of my head,
  • 17:17but I would say those are,
  • 17:18you know, two of the bigger ones.
  • 17:19Yeah, sometimes when it's just too close
  • 17:21to the skin or something like that.
  • 17:23And then there's one other question.
  • 17:25How is it possible to have a
  • 17:26negative Sentinel lymph node but
  • 17:28a positive axillary lymph node?
  • 17:33Yeah, the terrible part about
  • 17:34cancer is that it likes to
  • 17:36spread and that sometimes you know
  • 17:38even if lymph nodes are negative,
  • 17:40cancer can be in the rest
  • 17:42of the body, even sometimes.
  • 17:43So, although we think that the process
  • 17:45is the cancer from the breast goes
  • 17:48to the Sentinel or the first lymph
  • 17:50nodes that drain the breast first,
  • 17:52cancer doesn't always behave by their rules,
  • 17:54so it does sometimes happen that way.
  • 17:58OK. Thank you, that was terrific.
  • 18:02So Doctor Kanowitz will be next,
  • 18:05and she's an assistant professor of
  • 18:07Clinical Medicine, medical oncology,
  • 18:08and she's the medical director of the
  • 18:11Smilow Cancer Hospital in North Haven.
  • 18:14She received her medical degree
  • 18:15from Cornell and completed her
  • 18:17fellowship in medical Oncology,
  • 18:18also at Memorial Sloan Kettering.
  • 18:20So this kind of a alumni reunion.
  • 18:25Prior to joining Neil Decker,
  • 18:26Canyon once was the medical director
  • 18:29from apology services at Bristol
  • 18:31Hospital Cancer Care Center.
  • 18:34And so doctor Kanowitz is going to talk to
  • 18:36us about innovations in medical oncology.
  • 18:41OK, I'm going to share my screen.
  • 18:51OK, I usually introduce myself
  • 18:53as I was born in Brooklyn.
  • 18:56I'm the product of the public
  • 18:59school education in New York City,
  • 19:02and then I went to Med school.
  • 19:04So thank you for inviting me to talk tonight.
  • 19:08It truly is a privilege to help
  • 19:11care for patients in this Community
  • 19:13and to work along with Doctor
  • 19:15Berger and Doctor Knowlton.
  • 19:20I'm a medical oncologist.
  • 19:22I prescribe systemic therapies.
  • 19:24These are medicines that traveled
  • 19:27throughout the body and treat
  • 19:29cancer cells wherever they are.
  • 19:31Why? Because breast cancer is both a
  • 19:34local disease confined to the breast,
  • 19:36but it's also a systemic disease.
  • 19:39How do we know this?
  • 19:41The year is 1968.
  • 19:44Breast cancer is curable
  • 19:47with radical surgery,
  • 19:49and we saw those slides from Doctor Berger.
  • 19:52Yet not all women remained cured.
  • 19:56Doctor Fisher,
  • 19:57who is a breast surgeon himself
  • 20:00postulated and then proved that breast
  • 20:03cancer is also a systemic disease,
  • 20:06and he thought that unless we
  • 20:08address microscopic cells that have
  • 20:10traveled through the bloodstream,
  • 20:13long term cure will be compromised.
  • 20:17No, this is not our oncology clinic.
  • 20:20During the height of the pandemic,
  • 20:22these are the battlefields of World War One.
  • 20:26What's war good for drug development,
  • 20:29nitrogen gas or chemical warfare
  • 20:33was noted to be toxic both to the
  • 20:36bone marrow and to blood cells.
  • 20:38And after the war it was the first
  • 20:42anti cancer agent used to treat
  • 20:45both leukemia and lymphoma cancers.
  • 20:48Of the bone marrow and the blood.
  • 20:51Let's go back to Doctor Fisher's time.
  • 20:56We now obviously have more effective
  • 21:00and safer chemotherapy drugs,
  • 21:02and we have his new theory.
  • 21:05A groundbreaking trial was designed
  • 21:08to test his hypothesis.
  • 21:10All women received curative surgery.
  • 21:13Half the group received chemotherapy.
  • 21:16Half the group didn't.
  • 21:18The original study performed in the
  • 21:2170s was actually performed in Europe.
  • 21:24American surgeons would not let their
  • 21:27patients participate because they
  • 21:29felt that they could cure breast
  • 21:32cancer and chemotherapy wasn't needed.
  • 21:34This is the 20 year.
  • 21:36Follow up with Doctor Fisher study
  • 21:39that proves breast cancer is a
  • 21:41systemic disease as well as locally.
  • 21:44Clearly,
  • 21:45the women who got advantor
  • 21:48postoperative chemotherapy did better,
  • 21:50and the value of participating in
  • 21:53clinical trials cannot be overstated.
  • 21:58This is your brain on drugs and
  • 22:01I mean your blood on drugs.
  • 22:03Germany had a lot of problems in the 1930s.
  • 22:06You guessed it, how were they
  • 22:09going to mass produce beer?
  • 22:12The process of industrial
  • 22:14fermentation grew into the fields of
  • 22:17biotechnology and genetic engineering.
  • 22:20This process was used for fuel,
  • 22:23explosives and medicines
  • 22:25like penicillin and insulin.
  • 22:28In the early 90s the same process was
  • 22:31used to create a white cell growth
  • 22:34factor and this then allowed for safe,
  • 22:37constant, safe,
  • 22:39high concentrations of chemotherapy.
  • 22:42The panel on the left is a sample of blood.
  • 22:46The panel on the right is the
  • 22:48same sample after the patient was
  • 22:50given white cell growth factor.
  • 22:52The purple cells are infection
  • 22:54fighting cells.
  • 22:58So now we can safely give high doses and
  • 23:01the thought is chi chemotherapy works,
  • 23:04maybe more. Chemotherapy is better.
  • 23:08The era of high dose chemotherapy
  • 23:11took place in the early 90s.
  • 23:14The goal was to eradicate every last
  • 23:17clone of breast cancer and then
  • 23:20help the immune system reconstitute
  • 23:22itself with this new growth factor,
  • 23:25women were treated on clinical trials
  • 23:28and yet many sought legal channels to
  • 23:32get this new promising approach. That is,
  • 23:35they sued their insurance company to get.
  • 23:39This new technology?
  • 23:41By the early 2000s,
  • 23:43the jury was in the clinical trial.
  • 23:47Data was reviewed,
  • 23:48but the verdict was disappointing.
  • 23:51This toxic approach did not improve outcomes,
  • 23:55and again, it points out how important
  • 23:58it is to participate in clinical trials.
  • 24:03That's how we learn how to move
  • 24:06the field forward.
  • 24:08So maybe there's a better,
  • 24:10more sophisticated way the human
  • 24:14Genome Project was completed in 2003.
  • 24:18It took 13 years to complete scientists
  • 24:23all over the world worked together.
  • 24:26Let me just repeat that.
  • 24:28They actually worked together,
  • 24:30and the entire human genome was identified.
  • 24:36Using the same technology,
  • 24:39a scientist at Stanford analyzed
  • 24:42breast cancer tissue and he was able
  • 24:46to identify distinct DNA patterns,
  • 24:49but more importantly,
  • 24:51he was able to correlate these
  • 24:54patterns with outcomes.
  • 24:56A risk assessment tool was
  • 24:59developed for prognosis,
  • 25:01gives us a better idea of what the
  • 25:04future looks like and prediction what.
  • 25:06What do we predict?
  • 25:09The best postoperative approach to be?
  • 25:13Prognostic and predictive factors are
  • 25:16universally used in the postoperative
  • 25:19management of breast cancer,
  • 25:21and the goal is to stratify
  • 25:23women into two groups,
  • 25:25those who will benefit from postoperative
  • 25:29systemic therapies and those for whom
  • 25:32the toxicities outweighed the benefits.
  • 25:36Classically,
  • 25:36we've used the size of the tumor,
  • 25:40the grade,
  • 25:41the lymph node involvement to
  • 25:44help guide us as to what to do.
  • 25:47Now we have Oncotype and five or
  • 25:50six other molecular studies where
  • 25:53we look at the DNA of the cancer to
  • 25:57predict the behavior of the tumor.
  • 25:59So the size of the tumor women
  • 26:02always ask what's my stage?
  • 26:04It's all about the behavior.
  • 26:06The biology size does not matter.
  • 26:09We've heard it before,
  • 26:10and you can quote me on that.
  • 26:13If the risk is low,
  • 26:15we use estrogen blocking tablets only.
  • 26:18No chemotherapy is warranted.
  • 26:20Dr Berger had mentioned some
  • 26:23of the studies using Oncotype,
  • 26:26Taylor X and RX Ponder so that
  • 26:30we use these to guide us.
  • 26:33You know, back in the old days,
  • 26:35a decade ago,
  • 26:36if the tumor was over half an inch,
  • 26:39we prescribed chemotherapy.
  • 26:45The excitement started in 1979.
  • 26:49The gene, her two, was identified
  • 26:52a scientist at Genentech,
  • 26:55a new fledgling pharmaceutical company,
  • 26:59discovered the gene and the
  • 27:01protein that the gene encodes for.
  • 27:06Genentech was just bought for $5
  • 27:10billion this past year so if you
  • 27:12were looking to buy it you lost out.
  • 27:17Doctor Dennis Slamon,
  • 27:19a medical oncologist,
  • 27:21ran into this scientist at
  • 27:24Genentech at the Denver Airport.
  • 27:27They were both returning to California
  • 27:31and they started talking and ultimately
  • 27:33they both started to work together
  • 27:35on the her two gene and hypothesized
  • 27:39that overexpression or overactivity
  • 27:42plays a role in breast cancer growth and.
  • 27:47It causes the cancer to grow
  • 27:50rapidly and spread.
  • 27:52Their goal was to work on a medication that
  • 27:56would target or block this growth signal.
  • 28:00They ran out of money.
  • 28:02What happened?
  • 28:03An executive at Genentech came to the
  • 28:06rescue when his mom was diagnosed
  • 28:09with her two positive breast cancer.
  • 28:14Harry Connick Junior played the
  • 28:16role of Doctor Dennis Slamon in
  • 28:19the lifetime made for TV movie
  • 28:22about the development of Herceptin.
  • 28:30So the left side is a a normal
  • 28:34normal cell and we can see that the.
  • 28:38That the her two receptors on the surface.
  • 28:41It sends a message to the brain of the
  • 28:45cell the nucleus hears or her two positive
  • 28:49or overexpressing breast cancer cell and.
  • 28:53And the message is there a lot of messages
  • 28:55for the cancer cell to grow and divide
  • 28:58being sent to the nucleus, Herceptin.
  • 29:01And obviously we we found the same
  • 29:05slide Elizabeth Herceptin blocks that
  • 29:08message being sent to the nucleus.
  • 29:11It shuts it down.
  • 29:13In the 1990s, clinical trials again,
  • 29:16clinical trials in advanced disease taught
  • 29:20us that Herceptin is highly effective.
  • 29:23Against her two overexpressing breast cancer,
  • 29:26both when given with chemotherapy and
  • 29:30also when given alone and in fact
  • 29:33it's so effective that it was looked
  • 29:36at in the postoperative setting in
  • 29:39the early 2000s there were clinical
  • 29:42trials all over the world comparing.
  • 29:46Postoperative chemotherapy,
  • 29:48with and without Herceptin.
  • 29:52This data was presented at a big
  • 29:56conference in 2004 in in this country.
  • 30:00And. I I was at that meeting,
  • 30:04everything stopped.
  • 30:05You couldn't get into the room
  • 30:07where the study was presented and
  • 30:10there were monitors all all over
  • 30:12the the pavilion all over the halls
  • 30:15and everyone was just in awe.
  • 30:18Adding.
  • 30:19Adding Herceptin trastuzumab to post
  • 30:22operative chemotherapy reduced the
  • 30:24odds of the cancer coming back by 50%.
  • 30:30There are now five or six.
  • 30:33Targeted anti her to drugs.
  • 30:37And these drugs and drug combinations
  • 30:40are used in a host of clinical settings.
  • 30:44These agents have tamed a very
  • 30:47aggressive breast cancer and really
  • 30:49changed the future for women diagnosed
  • 30:52with her two positive disease.
  • 30:55We're going to move on to another
  • 30:57class of systemic therapies,
  • 30:59anti estrogen therapy, or endocrine therapy.
  • 31:03So estrogen is made in the ovaries
  • 31:06and the adrenal gland and it's guided
  • 31:10by communication and feedback between
  • 31:12multiple organs, including the brain.
  • 31:16Again, to understand where we are now,
  • 31:19we're going to go back in time.
  • 31:21This story starts in late 1800s.
  • 31:24A scientist remove the ovaries of
  • 31:28lactating rabbit and lactation or
  • 31:31breast milk production stopped
  • 31:33while why stop there the next year,
  • 31:36he removed the ovaries of a woman.
  • 31:39It was a pre menopausal woman
  • 31:41with advanced stage,
  • 31:42four incurable breast cancer and we
  • 31:45saw that the breast cancer regressed.
  • 31:49Estrogen was discovered in the 1920s
  • 31:52and we subsequently learned about the
  • 31:56relationship of estrogen to breast tissue.
  • 31:59But it was clear that depriving breast
  • 32:03cancer from estrogen was therapeutic,
  • 32:06so over the next several decades,
  • 32:09women were subjected to some very
  • 32:12barbaric procedures to decrease estrogen.
  • 32:15They had their ovaries removed.
  • 32:17Adrenal glands removed.
  • 32:19And even the pituitary gland in the brain.
  • 32:26It wasn't until 1967 that
  • 32:30tamoxifen was synthesized.
  • 32:33It looks like estrogen and thereby
  • 32:37blocks true estrogen from stimulating
  • 32:40growth of breast cancer cells.
  • 32:43It was initially used to treat
  • 32:46advanced stage disease and in 1988,
  • 32:50just like the studies using
  • 32:53post operative chemotherapy,
  • 32:54we learned that it decreased.
  • 32:57The odds of the cancer coming
  • 32:59back outside of the breast,
  • 33:01just like chemotherapy did.
  • 33:03And again we learned this
  • 33:05through clinical trials,
  • 33:07participation in clinical trials
  • 33:10and tamoxifen is so effective that.
  • 33:15It was proven in late 90s that it
  • 33:18can be used as a preventive agent
  • 33:21for women who are at high risk for
  • 33:25the development of breast cancer.
  • 33:27There are now multiple generations
  • 33:30of anti estrogen therapies and
  • 33:33anti estrogen drugs are amongst
  • 33:35the most widely prescribed anti
  • 33:38cancer agents in the world.
  • 33:43The same way organs communicate to
  • 33:46produce hormones like estrogen.
  • 33:49There's a lot of communication within cells,
  • 33:53both healthy cells and cancer cells.
  • 34:00Walking or interrupting some of
  • 34:04these internal messages can overcome
  • 34:07resistance or enhance drug effectiveness.
  • 34:12So a pellissippi or pick ray blocks,
  • 34:16blocks and altered communication
  • 34:20gene and makes anti estrogen
  • 34:23therapy more effective everolimus.
  • 34:26Bypasses a resistance mechanism and makes
  • 34:31anti estrogen therapy effective again.
  • 34:39Just like in life, there is a
  • 34:41time and season for everything,
  • 34:43and the same is true for breast cancer cell.
  • 34:47There are times when the cell
  • 34:49is more susceptible to the
  • 34:52effects of anti estrogen therapy.
  • 34:55And there are drugs.
  • 34:58That do exactly that.
  • 35:00Set the stage for the cancer
  • 35:03cell being more effective.
  • 35:05We have a reenactment below and
  • 35:07and this is how I understand it.
  • 35:10So this is how I explain it to patients.
  • 35:12So whoops.
  • 35:15OK, so on the left panel
  • 35:18if I'm the cancer cell,
  • 35:20Paula is the anti estrogen drug.
  • 35:23She's trying to hurt me but I can
  • 35:26still defend myself on the right panel.
  • 35:29We can add in one of these cell
  • 35:33cycle inhibitors that puts the
  • 35:36the estrogen sensitive estrogen
  • 35:39sensitive cell in a particularly
  • 35:42vulnerable state for anti estrogen.
  • 35:45Therapy, so Amy,
  • 35:47who's who's holding my arms up,
  • 35:50makes me vulnerable to Paula anti
  • 35:54estrogen therapy and what we're
  • 35:57seeing are unprecedented responses
  • 36:00when we add cell cycle inhibitors
  • 36:04to anti estrogen therapy and
  • 36:08unprecedent durations of response.
  • 36:11Gamechanger these drugs are now being
  • 36:14looked at in the postoperative setting.
  • 36:20Contrary to popular belief,
  • 36:23most breast cancer is not inherited,
  • 36:26and in fact only about 10% of women
  • 36:30develop breast cancer because they've
  • 36:34inherited that vulnerability from a gene
  • 36:37like a mutated or altered BRCA gene.
  • 36:40BRCA is repair gene and when it's mutated?
  • 36:47It allows for the development
  • 36:49of breast cancer because it
  • 36:51no longer repairs the mistake.
  • 36:53Parked inhibitors reset this repair
  • 36:56process and this is yet another class of
  • 37:01systemic agents that we use for women
  • 37:05who have BRCA positive breast cancer.
  • 37:08We not only use it in the metastatic disease,
  • 37:11we now use it in the postoperative disease
  • 37:14in the postoperative currative setting.
  • 37:20Antibody drug conjugates.
  • 37:22Chemotherapy of the future. I ask.
  • 37:26Uhm, antibodies like Herceptin
  • 37:28not only bind and block the cell
  • 37:32surface proteins and block messages.
  • 37:36They can really act like FedEx or
  • 37:38Amazon and actually deliver packages.
  • 37:41So antibody drug conjugates are
  • 37:45antibodies where we attach chemotherapy,
  • 37:48and then we deliver that
  • 37:50chemotherapy not throughout the body,
  • 37:52but directly to the cancer cell.
  • 37:54So TDM one is Herceptin with the
  • 37:59chemotherapy drug attached to it.
  • 38:02Sacituzumab is another antibody to a surface.
  • 38:06Protein called trope 2 and it's attached
  • 38:09to a very potent chemotherapy drug
  • 38:12that we commonly use in colon cancer.
  • 38:22So I I think what I what I really
  • 38:26want to what I really want to
  • 38:29say is that the treatment today.
  • 38:33Is were clinical trials yesterday and
  • 38:35that's how we that's how we learn.
  • 38:39That's how we move the field forward.
  • 38:41So every time we participate
  • 38:44in clinical research.
  • 38:46We pay forward the benefits that
  • 38:48we have for people behind us.
  • 38:54And until every woman who's been diagnosed,
  • 38:57or man who's been diagnosed
  • 38:59with breast cancer is cured,
  • 39:01there's still a long way to go.
  • 39:11Needed to unmute myself there, sorry.
  • 39:13Add two quick questions.
  • 39:16The first comes from.
  • 39:20Doctor Knowlton and she's asking about
  • 39:22app Elicitive and if it's available
  • 39:24off trial and are you using it?
  • 39:27It is available off trial,
  • 39:30so it's used in in the metastatic
  • 39:33setting and there has to be.
  • 39:36There has to be a certain alteration
  • 39:39in the the pick three pathway,
  • 39:42so we commonly test not not only
  • 39:45do we do the Oncotype testing in
  • 39:48the post operative setting for
  • 39:51women whose disease has spread,
  • 39:54we also do molecular testing.
  • 39:58Looking for targeted agents and it's one
  • 40:00of the first things that we look for,
  • 40:03so we use it along with anti estrogen agents.
  • 40:07And yes it's an FDA approved drug.
  • 40:10And the second question is about
  • 40:12standard endocrine therapy in
  • 40:14combination with pick Ray from the
  • 40:16start as the first line therapy so.
  • 40:22Pic Ray has
  • 40:24a lot of side effects.
  • 40:26It's not a well tolerated
  • 40:29drug and it's exciting,
  • 40:31but I think we're finding right now
  • 40:35more exciting the cell cycle inhibitors.
  • 40:40So that's palbociclib.
  • 40:41We have all these liquid names right?
  • 40:44Palbociclib ribociclib abemaciclib
  • 40:49they look so exciting.
  • 40:51That they're all being looked at
  • 40:53in the postoperative setting up,
  • 40:56and it's a little early,
  • 40:58but I do think that pick
  • 41:00Ray will will be looked at.
  • 41:02I think part of the part of
  • 41:06the concern is some of these
  • 41:08alterations or mutations only
  • 41:11develop after someone's been
  • 41:13exposed to anti estrogen therapy.
  • 41:15We don't necessarily see them de Novo,
  • 41:19so it's something that the cell.
  • 41:21Learns to do too to overcome
  • 41:26the anti estrogen effects.
  • 41:28Good good, good question,
  • 41:31good questions yeah.
  • 41:33And and Doctor Knowlton,
  • 41:35our third speaker tonight,
  • 41:37excited to hear what she has to say
  • 41:39about radiation therapy in breast cancer.
  • 41:41Dr Knowlton is an associate
  • 41:43professor in clinical,
  • 41:44therapeutic radiology and medical
  • 41:46director of the Smilow Cancer
  • 41:48Hospital Care Center in Hamden.
  • 41:50She received her medical degree at
  • 41:52SUNY at Stony Brook and a Master of
  • 41:54Arts from NYU and then completed her
  • 41:57residency at Hahnemann University,
  • 41:59Drexel University and her special.
  • 42:02Realization in radiation
  • 42:03therapy is for breast cancer,
  • 42:04lung cancer and bone metastases,
  • 42:07and in 2019 she earned the
  • 42:09Smilow Luminary Award for
  • 42:10excellence in Patient Care.
  • 42:12So we're excited to hear
  • 42:14we have to say thank you,
  • 42:16thanks Doctor Lynch and thanks everyone.
  • 42:18And welcome. I see a lot of
  • 42:20patient names in the chat,
  • 42:21so thanks everyone for coming and if some
  • 42:25of you have seen me talk before at these,
  • 42:27I promise you there's some new slides.
  • 42:29If you bear with me alright,
  • 42:31I'm going to share my screen now.
  • 42:34OK, and from the beginning. Here we go.
  • 42:39OK so I so this is me and I have no
  • 42:44conflicts of interest to report.
  • 42:46So I know that I tried not to be too
  • 42:49repetitive from our our other panelists,
  • 42:53but here's the basics on treatment for
  • 42:56breast cancer, which we know often.
  • 42:58Surgery is the mainstay of care,
  • 43:01as both Doctor Berger and Doctor
  • 43:03Kanowitz discussed at some points.
  • 43:04Now, chemotherapy is becoming before surgery,
  • 43:08but I'm the radiation oncologist,
  • 43:09so I put the most basic format
  • 43:12down here where surgery can either
  • 43:14be breast conserving surgery.
  • 43:16Where the breast is maintained and only
  • 43:19the tumor is removed or mastectomy,
  • 43:22where the entire breast is removed and
  • 43:25there's obviously nodal surgery as well.
  • 43:28That's involved in Doctor Berger
  • 43:29talked a lot about the Sentinel lymph
  • 43:32node biopsy and axillary dissection.
  • 43:34And plus or minus chemo.
  • 43:35As mentioned,
  • 43:36the chemo can become come before
  • 43:38the surgery and then plus or
  • 43:41minus radiation therapy.
  • 43:42After breast conserving therapy, usually yes.
  • 43:45We offer radiation therapy but not always.
  • 43:49And after mastectomy sometimes A and
  • 43:50so and we will get into the details on
  • 43:53that and how that's been evolving as
  • 43:55part of this theme that you've been
  • 43:58hearing a little bit about D escalation
  • 44:00of care with the goal of reducing
  • 44:03toxicity while maintaining good outcomes.
  • 44:06And then there's hormonal
  • 44:08therapy or targeted therapy.
  • 44:10This would be the definitive
  • 44:13treatment pathway.
  • 44:14So what is radiation therapy?
  • 44:18So it's a field of medicine that
  • 44:20uses ionizing radiation to treat
  • 44:22a variety of medical conditions,
  • 44:24most often cancer.
  • 44:25What radiation really is is that the
  • 44:27packet of energy that moves through the
  • 44:30air with the wavelength and frequency
  • 44:32wavelength is how high and low does it go,
  • 44:35and frequency is how quickly does
  • 44:37it go through that weight length,
  • 44:39and that the wavelength and
  • 44:41frequency is what gives radiation.
  • 44:43It's properties,
  • 44:43so for example this radiation from the sun.
  • 44:47There's radiation from the microwave,
  • 44:48a light in your home is delivering radiation.
  • 44:51It could be a blue light,
  • 44:53and all of those different
  • 44:54ways that if we can see it,
  • 44:56if we can't,
  • 44:57it's all related to the wavelength
  • 44:58and frequency.
  • 44:59So ionizing radiation is radiation.
  • 45:01With enough energy and having those
  • 45:04properties from its wavelength and frequency
  • 45:07to remove an electron from an atom,
  • 45:09causing that atom to become charged.
  • 45:11And that's the basis for how it damages.
  • 45:14The cells and so the plan.
  • 45:16When you're treating somebody with
  • 45:18the radiation is to get enough
  • 45:20dose in there to kill whatever
  • 45:22cancer cells you're aiming to kill,
  • 45:24but but not damage the normal cells and
  • 45:27and those of you who've had radiation.
  • 45:30Oh yes, the normal cells do get damaged
  • 45:32because that's why you get skin irritation.
  • 45:35But the point is to allow
  • 45:36the normal cells to repair.
  • 45:38They are better at repairing
  • 45:41from the damage from ionizing
  • 45:43radiation than the cancer cells are.
  • 45:46Uhm? Sorry I can't.
  • 45:49I'm trying to fear we go OK, alright,
  • 45:50so radiation therapy and breast cancer or so.
  • 45:53The purpose is to eradicate residual
  • 45:56disease within the breast or
  • 45:58chest wall or the regional nodes.
  • 46:00So that is the reason why
  • 46:02following lumpectomy or the breast
  • 46:04conserving surgery that radiation
  • 46:06is usually offered because.
  • 46:08We know from multiple studies that
  • 46:10there is risk of having cancer cells
  • 46:12left behind even in the setting of
  • 46:15the most amazing lumpectomy ever,
  • 46:17with nice negative nodes.
  • 46:19And we treat higher risk patients
  • 46:21following mastectomy,
  • 46:23where we think that they are at
  • 46:25greater risk to have residual
  • 46:27cancer cells left behind.
  • 46:28And we see here in this third bullet point,
  • 46:30those would be patients with greater
  • 46:32than 5 centimeters of tumor within
  • 46:34the breast and or involved nodes.
  • 46:36And we always want to use evidence
  • 46:38based medicine,
  • 46:39so we want to base our treatments on studies,
  • 46:41not just on our feelings or what
  • 46:43we think the best thing to do in
  • 46:45our treatment is designed to treat
  • 46:47the breast or the chest wall,
  • 46:49plus or minus the regional lymph
  • 46:51nodes depending upon if that's
  • 46:53needed and to avoid the healthy
  • 46:55tissues as much as possible.
  • 46:56Even though I said that healthy
  • 46:59tissues have the ability to repair.
  • 47:01The heart and the lungs.
  • 47:02They don't need to be radiated.
  • 47:04They don't have Keith left behind in them,
  • 47:07so we want to avoid the heart and
  • 47:10the lungs to keep the toxicity down.
  • 47:12And as it says at the bottom,
  • 47:13a small amount of radiation
  • 47:15to the normal organs is safe,
  • 47:17but we try to avoid this as much as possible.
  • 47:21So if someone were to come to
  • 47:22see me in the office,
  • 47:24the first step would be besides meeting
  • 47:26a whole bunch of people before me.
  • 47:28The registered nurse to do an intake,
  • 47:31our social worker to introduce
  • 47:33themselves to you,
  • 47:35our advanced practice nurse.
  • 47:36Also to kind of lay the groundwork.
  • 47:38Then I would you would meet me and we
  • 47:41would do an exam and we would talk about.
  • 47:43We review your history.
  • 47:45Make sure that I'm understanding
  • 47:47everything that's happened and we
  • 47:49would review why the radiation is.
  • 47:51And if you've had breast conserving surgery,
  • 47:54we would talk about a little bit about
  • 47:56why that is and and how that help.
  • 47:58Radiation can improve outcomes.
  • 48:00If you had a mastectomy,
  • 48:02you had reasons to have the radiation,
  • 48:04such as involved nodes or a
  • 48:06large tumor within the chest.
  • 48:08We would discuss that as well.
  • 48:10And we would talk about the treatment
  • 48:13course and potential risks and the benefits.
  • 48:16And then you know,
  • 48:17if you were to agree to the radiation,
  • 48:20we would then schedule the CT simulation.
  • 48:23So that's the first step of our radiation.
  • 48:25Is the planning is to do a CAT scan of
  • 48:28the patient in the treatment position
  • 48:31so they can design the radiation.
  • 48:34When I first went into residency,
  • 48:37we were not using CAT scans.
  • 48:38Well they were just kind of becoming the.
  • 48:41The norm, but just about when I started,
  • 48:44we were using flora,
  • 48:45which is a type of X ray and it was
  • 48:48so it was much more rudimentary.
  • 48:49Even in my somewhat brief career,
  • 48:52I've seen such major changes,
  • 48:54but the CT scan is used to design
  • 48:56the radiation treatment plan and
  • 48:58we do it in the treatment position.
  • 49:00'cause if you think about it,
  • 49:01that's the position we do this scan and
  • 49:04that's the position we designed the plan in,
  • 49:06and that's the position we need to get you in
  • 49:09each day for the treatment and the treatment.
  • 49:11Position is designed to give us the best
  • 49:13access to treat what needs to be treated.
  • 49:15The breast, the chest wall,
  • 49:17the nodes and to stay off
  • 49:20of the healthy tissues.
  • 49:22There's no typically for
  • 49:24breast cancer treatments.
  • 49:25There's no dye given
  • 49:27during these CT simulation.
  • 49:29So the patient is typically
  • 49:30placed on a breast board,
  • 49:32with or without a mold underneath her,
  • 49:33so this is and you could see
  • 49:35in the top right that's.
  • 49:36It's a standard breast board,
  • 49:38so every day that a patient were
  • 49:40to come in for her treatments,
  • 49:42we would make sure that the breast
  • 49:44full at the same and that arm
  • 49:46bar that you see at the top that
  • 49:47was in the same position.
  • 49:49And then these this Ridge here at the
  • 49:51bottom is called the bus stop so that
  • 49:53you don't slide and everything needs
  • 49:55to be in the exact same position when
  • 49:57you come in for your treatment as it
  • 49:59was for the planning scan and then
  • 50:02we paste wires typically around the breast.
  • 50:05These are these are only.
  • 50:06Rudimentary field borders,
  • 50:08but they do have importance
  • 50:10'cause they're based on.
  • 50:12When we were feeling,
  • 50:13but we can make lots of adjustments
  • 50:15to fine tune them based on the
  • 50:17images that we get in the CAT scan.
  • 50:19And here this patient in the
  • 50:22bottom right has a scar wire
  • 50:25also over her lumpectomy scar.
  • 50:28So we placed wires around the
  • 50:30breast tissue and on any relevant
  • 50:32scars as a man and you will get
  • 50:35tattoos to help us set you up in
  • 50:38the perfect position each day.
  • 50:39Typically a tattoo on the right lateral
  • 50:42chest wall though between the breasts
  • 50:44at the lower end at the bottom.
  • 50:46And it maybe you can see this little dot
  • 50:48on my wrist is an old fashioned tattoo.
  • 50:51A lot of my patients in the audience you're
  • 50:53going to say what that's old fashioned.
  • 50:55I have that.
  • 50:55Yes it is now will that fashion.
  • 50:58Because now in the last 18 months,
  • 51:00we've piloted throughout our Hamden
  • 51:03and Greenwich Park.
  • 51:04But it's been taken on at the
  • 51:06other sites where we used tattoos
  • 51:08that are only able to be viewed
  • 51:10by the UV light so the patients
  • 51:12don't have to have these constant
  • 51:14reminders now of these tattoos on their
  • 51:17bodies of their previous radiation.
  • 51:19But we still have the benefit of the tattoo,
  • 51:22which is a mark that won't wash off.
  • 51:24And if a patient ever needs additional
  • 51:26radiation, it does help us if we
  • 51:28ever need to match prior fields.
  • 51:32So excuse me. So after we do that,
  • 51:36planning scan when we have to
  • 51:38design the plan. So what happens?
  • 51:40Well I have to draw on every slice of the CAT
  • 51:44scan which is done in 2 millimeter slices,
  • 51:48sometimes three, but typically two.
  • 51:50What constitutes the breast tissue?
  • 51:53What constitutes the tumor
  • 51:55cavity or the lumpectomy bed?
  • 51:57The various lymph node regions?
  • 52:01The heart. In the lungs,
  • 52:02so that the planning software
  • 52:04can recognize it.
  • 52:05So that's the first step.
  • 52:07Then when I've done that,
  • 52:08then I work with a certified medical
  • 52:11dosimetrist that someone a dosimetrist
  • 52:12is someone who has a four year
  • 52:15degree in radiation planning and
  • 52:17certified means nationally certified,
  • 52:18and that the certified medical assistant
  • 52:21I worked together to come up with a plan
  • 52:24using the planning software to give
  • 52:26an even dose to whatever needs to be treated.
  • 52:29The breast, the chest wall,
  • 52:30the nodes or not.
  • 52:31Meaning that we don't have hot
  • 52:33spots with extra radiation,
  • 52:35or you limit those,
  • 52:36and we obviously don't want cold spots
  • 52:38where there's two little that's given,
  • 52:40and we also want to analyze the
  • 52:42dose to the heart and the lungs,
  • 52:43and make sure that they are below
  • 52:46what's considered safe thresholds.
  • 52:48And let's say below sea threshold.
  • 52:51But we can do a a plan where we're
  • 52:53even get further below the safe
  • 52:55threshold for the heart and the
  • 52:57lungs you always want to do that.
  • 52:59There's this principle and radiation
  • 53:00oncology called ALARA as low as.
  • 53:02Reasonably achievable,
  • 53:03which means that you always want
  • 53:06to have your nontarget tissues
  • 53:09to be have their dose that they
  • 53:12receive as low as possible.
  • 53:14I'm so when we do when I'm eating a
  • 53:16patient in doing the physical exam,
  • 53:18looking for a lot of things,
  • 53:21and one of the things I'm thinking
  • 53:22about when I have the patient
  • 53:24lay back on the table and put her
  • 53:26arms up and feeling the breast,
  • 53:27my mind is spinning about.
  • 53:29What's the best position to
  • 53:31treat this patient in?
  • 53:33Is this patient going to be best
  • 53:35treated in the prone position,
  • 53:36lying on his or her for their stomach,
  • 53:38or supine lying on the back?
  • 53:41We can use different beam angles to come in.
  • 53:43We want to.
  • 53:44Angle the beam so that we stay
  • 53:47anterior and lateral to the heart.
  • 53:50We can use field and field which
  • 53:51is the most modern technique.
  • 53:53In fact another article came out just
  • 53:54the other day that I need to read.
  • 53:56It's sitting in my in basket but
  • 53:57showing in the old days you had one
  • 53:59beam from the medial and one from
  • 54:01the lateral to treat the breast
  • 54:02and you had some very minor ways
  • 54:04that you could change how the dose
  • 54:07was distributed within that beam.
  • 54:09Now while a patient is being treated,
  • 54:11there are leaves that are constantly
  • 54:13opening and closing to change the
  • 54:15shape of the beam and that'll help
  • 54:17us avoid hot spots and cold spots.
  • 54:20And it's been associated with a better
  • 54:22cosmetic outcome, so all of our sites
  • 54:25are using the field and field technique.
  • 54:29Well, one thing that we can do the
  • 54:31dosimetrist and I is design a custom
  • 54:33made heart block and the head of the
  • 54:36machine to make sure and I'll show
  • 54:38you some pictures of that to make sure
  • 54:40that the heart is not in the direct
  • 54:42beam and the use of deep inspiration
  • 54:43breath hold which I have some slides
  • 54:45coming up and I know many of you who
  • 54:47are treated with this technique.
  • 54:49So here's the supine position
  • 54:51IE lying on your back.
  • 54:53We see that breast board here raised up
  • 54:55the arm bars a little out of the field.
  • 54:58There's a bus stop.
  • 54:59Underneath this person's bottom,
  • 55:01so the under the sheet that you can't see.
  • 55:03And then of course,
  • 55:04there's the pillow under the knees.
  • 55:06So for this patient you know each
  • 55:07day that she gets treatment that
  • 55:09breast board is at the same height,
  • 55:11the same pillow,
  • 55:12under the knees everything is.
  • 55:13And then we line up her tattoos.
  • 55:16You can see that black X on the corner
  • 55:18there which would which is helping to
  • 55:20draw attention to where her tattoo is for us.
  • 55:22That's the tattoo is just
  • 55:24a little dot though.
  • 55:25But we line up the tattoos to
  • 55:27a laser grid in the treatment.
  • 55:29Room that's calibrated daily by
  • 55:31the medical physicist to make sure
  • 55:34that the patient is not rotated
  • 55:36and the position is spot on.
  • 55:38So here's an example of right breast
  • 55:40radiation in the supine position, IE.
  • 55:43Lying on the back and the beam edge.
  • 55:45You can see coming in here,
  • 55:47and there's very little dose spillage
  • 55:49that's deep to the beam edge because
  • 55:51it's set up in what we call a tangent.
  • 55:53It's not like two flashlights
  • 55:55coming into that patient.
  • 55:56What we do is we angle the beam
  • 55:58so that the edge of the beam is
  • 56:00what goes into treatment,
  • 56:01and that causes what we call a
  • 56:03non divergent posterior border
  • 56:05where very little dose will will.
  • 56:09We'll go behind or deep to those beams so
  • 56:12you can see in this right breast patient.
  • 56:13It's super easy to keep the
  • 56:15radiation off of the heart,
  • 56:16but we would still always use that olyra
  • 56:18if we could do something where we still
  • 56:20got the breast tissue in the way we liked,
  • 56:22but we could spare the heart more,
  • 56:24we would always go with that plan and
  • 56:26this patient does have a small liver
  • 56:28block you can see on the right photo to
  • 56:30keep her liver out of the radiation beam.
  • 56:35Here's a heart block, which is,
  • 56:37you know, one of our tried true ways.
  • 56:39Once we got the CT scan up going.
  • 56:42You know 1010 to 15 years ago too.
  • 56:46Had the direct beam,
  • 56:48you could see that those are those leaves
  • 56:49in the head of the machine that we can
  • 56:51shape to follow the edge of the heart.
  • 56:53You just have to be careful that
  • 56:55when you're you can't just go
  • 56:57crazy in designing the heart block
  • 56:58while we love sparing the heart,
  • 57:00we also want to make sure that if we go
  • 57:02are too generous with the heart block,
  • 57:04we won't treat the breast tissue properly.
  • 57:08And here's the prone position.
  • 57:10This is a patient laying on her
  • 57:12stomach in the prone position.
  • 57:15Some patients are excellent
  • 57:16candidates and some are not.
  • 57:18Who would be a poor candidate while
  • 57:20a patient that tells me that she's
  • 57:22highly uncomfortable lying on her
  • 57:23stomach but not be the best candidate.
  • 57:25There is certain positions of the tumor
  • 57:28and exceptionally medial tumor is not
  • 57:30always the best for prone positioning.
  • 57:32For example,
  • 57:33and we are not using prone
  • 57:35positioning at our institution.
  • 57:37If the nodes need to be treated.
  • 57:41So here's some pictures of some
  • 57:43radiation beams in the prone positioning,
  • 57:46so you could see for this patient when
  • 57:48you look on the picture on the left that
  • 57:50mean edges cutting right through and
  • 57:52that edge of the heart is right in there.
  • 57:55But we see in the prone bone we're
  • 57:57able to make the beam angle so
  • 58:00that the heart stayed behind it,
  • 58:02and another benefit of the prom for
  • 58:05some patients can be if they have a a
  • 58:08more pendulous breast with a larger.
  • 58:11Fold underneath,
  • 58:12that's an area that can get more
  • 58:14skin irritation from the radiation.
  • 58:16But if we treat the patient in the prone
  • 58:18position, it'll lift the breast up.
  • 58:21Helps a lot.
  • 58:22We can see here for this patient on
  • 58:25our left where the heart is going
  • 58:27into the to the to the field edge,
  • 58:30and here on our right with this
  • 58:32patient holding her breath the hardest
  • 58:34pulled completely out of the mean,
  • 58:36but sometimes you may have had treatment
  • 58:38with me and we did the breath hold,
  • 58:40but I in the end I ended up
  • 58:41treating you with the free.
  • 58:42Breathing thing,
  • 58:43or perhaps with your with
  • 58:45another radiation oncologist.
  • 58:46And that's because sometimes
  • 58:48it's really not needed.
  • 58:49The heart is sometimes nicely
  • 58:51out of the field even
  • 58:52without the DIBH,
  • 58:54and it does allow a shorter treatment
  • 58:56time on the treatment table if you
  • 58:58are treating with the free breathing.
  • 59:01So, so that's kind of the basics
  • 59:03about radiation and where we've come
  • 59:05and sort of the most modern techniques
  • 59:07to treat the breast and the nodes.
  • 59:10Try to keeping the event,
  • 59:11the doses even as possible and
  • 59:13sparing the lung and heart as most
  • 59:16as pop as most as we possibly can.
  • 59:19Umso D escalation of treatment for breast
  • 59:22cancer is interesting in radiation,
  • 59:24because of course it's related to toxicity,
  • 59:28but it's also related to how
  • 59:29many treatments you have to come
  • 59:31for and people might say, well,
  • 59:32how is that D escalation of treatment?
  • 59:34Well, you think about it,
  • 59:36it's less time away from a patient's family,
  • 59:38their personal life,
  • 59:39less time off from work and people can
  • 59:42have financial toxicity from their way
  • 59:45from their cancer treatment.
  • 59:47And so if we can help patients.
  • 59:49Finish their treatments and get back
  • 59:51to work or get back to doing the
  • 59:54things that they enjoy more quickly
  • 59:55without compromising outcomes.
  • 59:57That sounds like the best plan
  • 59:59so conventional whole breast
  • 01:00:02irradiation was five to six weeks,
  • 01:00:05so five weeks to the whole
  • 01:00:07breast and then a boost,
  • 01:00:08which is an additional treatment to
  • 01:00:10where the tumor was in 5 to 8 fractions.
  • 01:00:12So people were getting treated
  • 01:00:14for five to six weeks,
  • 01:00:16even if they had an early stage cancer.
  • 01:00:18Just following them back.
  • 01:00:20To me, however, now there's three
  • 01:00:24well done randomized trials,
  • 01:00:26all with 12 years of median fault.
  • 01:00:28Meaning half of the patients
  • 01:00:30have been followed for longer
  • 01:00:31that support a shorter course of
  • 01:00:33treatments for patients who receive
  • 01:00:35radiation to the breast alone,
  • 01:00:37and there's a 16 fraction regimen to the
  • 01:00:41breast that would use a four fraction boost,
  • 01:00:43or 15 fraction regimen.
  • 01:00:44That's what we use.
  • 01:00:46So most of our patients now,
  • 01:00:48if the nodes don't need to be treated,
  • 01:00:49are getting.
  • 01:00:50Treated in 15 or 19 treatments,
  • 01:00:53so three or four weeks as
  • 01:00:55opposed to the five to six weeks.
  • 01:00:57Uhm,
  • 01:00:58others other trials have found that
  • 01:01:02there's decreased the large tiles,
  • 01:01:05found no statistical difference
  • 01:01:07between outcomes and no statistical
  • 01:01:10difference between the side effects,
  • 01:01:13so they were unchanged,
  • 01:01:15although there were some quality of
  • 01:01:17life surveys that went along with it
  • 01:01:19that did find improved quality of life
  • 01:01:21for patients with the shorter course.
  • 01:01:23But some non randomized and smaller
  • 01:01:25trials have found decreased toxicity.
  • 01:01:28Obviously,
  • 01:01:28the decreased healthcare costs
  • 01:01:30and improved patient convenience
  • 01:01:32with the shorter course.
  • 01:01:34Uh,
  • 01:01:34so I talked about how at Yale
  • 01:01:36were doing the the 15 fractions
  • 01:01:38to the whole breast plus or
  • 01:01:41minus the four boost patients,
  • 01:01:43and this is typically without
  • 01:01:45additional nodal fields.
  • 01:01:46And when when the breast is intact,
  • 01:01:49that being said,
  • 01:01:50there are some ongoing studies to say hey,
  • 01:01:53is this safe to do?
  • 01:01:54If a patient had mastectomy?
  • 01:01:57If you need to treat the patients
  • 01:01:59nodes and they're all looking very
  • 01:02:02promising and in very select cases.
  • 01:02:04Following mastectomy,
  • 01:02:05I've started using the Hypo frac.
  • 01:02:09The shorter course of treatment,
  • 01:02:11the three to four weeks rather than the
  • 01:02:13five to six in the setting of trading.
  • 01:02:16The nodes or following mastectomy.
  • 01:02:20I talked about a boost so I just
  • 01:02:22wanted to put this on briefly
  • 01:02:23to show you a boost is typically
  • 01:02:25four or five extra fractions
  • 01:02:27to where the tumor was a man.
  • 01:02:29They are after the whole breast treatment.
  • 01:02:32They're sort of like the bonus they
  • 01:02:34the boost has been shown in the
  • 01:02:37setting of lumpectomy to be helpful
  • 01:02:39for patients of all ages from under
  • 01:02:4245 to go up to the into the 80s.
  • 01:02:45Really, however, the UM,
  • 01:02:48their update on the boost trials.
  • 01:02:50They were mostly done in the 90s.
  • 01:02:52There is the boost and no boost
  • 01:02:54trial and they'll be on trial.
  • 01:02:55They've been so those patients
  • 01:02:57have a lot of median
  • 01:02:58follow up now and they did publish a 20
  • 01:03:01year update and they've said that found
  • 01:03:04that it was most beneficial for while.
  • 01:03:06It did still benefit patients of all ages,
  • 01:03:08it was most significant to
  • 01:03:10benefit women age 60 and under.
  • 01:03:12I do tend to offer the boost for
  • 01:03:14pay if we're doing the modern
  • 01:03:16hypofractionation to offer the boost
  • 01:03:19for both patients under 70, we know.
  • 01:03:2170s The new 60 but I do talk about
  • 01:03:25it with people that I've as an
  • 01:03:28option and what are their goals?
  • 01:03:31So now we're getting even shorter,
  • 01:03:33Ultra Hypo fractionation.
  • 01:03:35We have the fast regimen which looked
  • 01:03:39at these five fraction courses.
  • 01:03:41They actually compare them back
  • 01:03:43to the older five week course.
  • 01:03:46The 25 fraction courses,
  • 01:03:48which just makes sense that 25 fraction
  • 01:03:50court has decades of data behind it,
  • 01:03:52so they were really comparing it to those.
  • 01:03:55Gold standard and these were once a week,
  • 01:03:58so once a week for five weeks and
  • 01:04:00at 10 years and we liked this
  • 01:04:02ten years in a randomized trial.
  • 01:04:04Which is the best type of trial to look for?
  • 01:04:07Good evidence?
  • 01:04:07There was no significant difference
  • 01:04:09in normal tissue effects and outcomes.
  • 01:04:12Local regional recurrence,
  • 01:04:13distant recurrence,
  • 01:04:14overall survival were the same,
  • 01:04:17so the NCCN,
  • 01:04:18which is a National Cancer
  • 01:04:21Consortium network,
  • 01:04:22has has updated their recommendations.
  • 01:04:25To say that we can use the fast regimen or
  • 01:04:28consider it at least for people over 50,
  • 01:04:31although I tend to be a little over
  • 01:04:3360 with early stage breast cancer,
  • 01:04:36meaning they have a DCIS or a
  • 01:04:38smaller tumor and negative nodes
  • 01:04:40who do not require a boost.
  • 01:04:42That is why I am I try to have my
  • 01:04:45patience that we consider this for be
  • 01:04:49over 60 because remember the boost was
  • 01:04:51really beneficial for everybody that
  • 01:04:53was under 60 and there's no boost.
  • 01:04:55Component to this fast regimen we have
  • 01:04:58not started using a Fast forward at Yale.
  • 01:05:01They are using it at some institution.
  • 01:05:03I know MD Anderson is using it,
  • 01:05:05for example,
  • 01:05:05where those five treatments rather than once
  • 01:05:08a week are just given Monday through Friday.
  • 01:05:11But we're not quite yet ready for that here.
  • 01:05:15We like to see a little MD Anderson said.
  • 01:05:17Awesome place, believe me,
  • 01:05:19but we would feel more comfortable
  • 01:05:21with a little bit longer data.
  • 01:05:23As you can see on my slide here,
  • 01:05:25there's just five years of data.
  • 01:05:27Rather than attend that we
  • 01:05:28have for the fast regimen and.
  • 01:05:31And so we'd like to wait a
  • 01:05:33little bit longer on that.
  • 01:05:35And the fast is used for selected
  • 01:05:37patients at Yale, the once a week.
  • 01:05:40Not the Fast forward yet.
  • 01:05:42Uhm, but what about omitting the radiation?
  • 01:05:45Maybe some people don't even need
  • 01:05:47the radiation, and that's true.
  • 01:05:49This CL GB 9343 is often quoted,
  • 01:05:52and if patients make this criteria,
  • 01:05:55there are 70 or greater their tumors,
  • 01:05:572 centimeters or less,
  • 01:05:59they have an estrogen receptor
  • 01:06:00positive cancer.
  • 01:06:01Their node native on their
  • 01:06:04surgical procedure,
  • 01:06:05or if they did not have any nodal surgery
  • 01:06:07on the exam and imaging and the patient.
  • 01:06:10This is starred because the patient needs.
  • 01:06:12Be willing and able to
  • 01:06:14take endocrine therapy.
  • 01:06:15The pill that doctor Kanowitz
  • 01:06:17discussed for five years.
  • 01:06:19We really not quite there yet,
  • 01:06:21especially with no Angevin treatment.
  • 01:06:25After a lumpectomy for surgery,
  • 01:06:27we do like to see some sort of
  • 01:06:30additional insurance policy,
  • 01:06:31whether it's.
  • 01:06:32Radiation, or the pill and the other
  • 01:06:36reason is too is that all patients on
  • 01:06:37this trial did take the pill for five years.
  • 01:06:40So at 10 years the local regional
  • 01:06:42recurrence was super low with the
  • 01:06:45tamoxifen only the endocrine pill,
  • 01:06:46only it was 10%.
  • 01:06:49A local regional recurrence,
  • 01:06:51so 90% of patients basically not
  • 01:06:54experiencing a local regional
  • 01:06:56recurrence are 98% of patients in
  • 01:06:59the radiation plus tamoxifen arm.
  • 01:07:01She might say, well, hey, it doesn't that.
  • 01:07:04Eight 8%. Make me have beating and it does.
  • 01:07:08It was statistically significant.
  • 01:07:09It does mean if you skip the radiation
  • 01:07:11of 8% greater chance of having the
  • 01:07:13cancer returned in the breast.
  • 01:07:14But frankly,
  • 01:07:15a 90% chance of going 10 years without
  • 01:07:17getting the breast cancer back in
  • 01:07:19the breast is pretty good odds.
  • 01:07:21But here's the real reason why
  • 01:07:23it's OK to omit the radiation.
  • 01:07:25It's because there was no difference
  • 01:07:26in the breast cancer specific survival,
  • 01:07:28which was excellent on both arms.
  • 01:07:31No difference in overall survival,
  • 01:07:33which was the same in many patients
  • 01:07:35in this age group.
  • 01:07:36Ended up dying of something else.
  • 01:07:38No difference in time to metastasis or
  • 01:07:40the development of distant metastasis.
  • 01:07:43So the 10 year probability of freedom
  • 01:07:45from metastasis was 95% in both arms,
  • 01:07:48so the radiation didn't do anything
  • 01:07:50to improve overall survival.
  • 01:07:51For this.
  • 01:07:52For these patients that meet this
  • 01:07:54criteria to prove overall survival
  • 01:07:56breast cancer specific survival or the
  • 01:07:59risk for cancer developing elsewhere.
  • 01:08:01We may see in the next few years
  • 01:08:04that we're opening up this idea
  • 01:08:06of not having the radiation after
  • 01:08:08lumpectomy to more patients.
  • 01:08:10The prime two trial enrolled
  • 01:08:13women 65 and older.
  • 01:08:14Although the number of patients aged
  • 01:08:1765 and 66 was quite low on the trial.
  • 01:08:20But 60, but still the upper 60s.
  • 01:08:22Now it's opening for them,
  • 01:08:23and it did allow some larger tumors.
  • 01:08:27Up to three centimeters.
  • 01:08:29They did have their 10 year update
  • 01:08:33recently at I believe it was at Astro
  • 01:08:35last year or San Antonio Breast conference.
  • 01:08:37I forget,
  • 01:08:38but the they have not published the
  • 01:08:41peer reviewed paper yet and we like to
  • 01:08:44wait for the paper rather than just the.
  • 01:08:47Presentation at the conference.
  • 01:08:50Doctor Berger talked about omitting
  • 01:08:53radiation in ductal carcinoma insight.
  • 01:08:55Two, so we are at Yale.
  • 01:08:58We have the comic trial that's open.
  • 01:09:00Our principal investigators,
  • 01:09:03Dr Golshan,
  • 01:09:04but it is looking now at withholding
  • 01:09:06even surgery in grade one and grade two.
  • 01:09:09Ductal carcinoma insight do.
  • 01:09:11And therefore,
  • 01:09:11if these patients don't have surgery,
  • 01:09:13they're not going to be having radiation.
  • 01:09:15Lord is the same trial open
  • 01:09:17over in Europe and there's
  • 01:09:19actually 4 international trials.
  • 01:09:21Comet Lord and two others
  • 01:09:23whose names are escaping me,
  • 01:09:24but I do know that the principal
  • 01:09:26investigators on all of them meet regularly,
  • 01:09:28and they're going to share their data,
  • 01:09:30which is going to give us a
  • 01:09:32lot of great information.
  • 01:09:34And so we're really looking at
  • 01:09:36can screen detected low risk
  • 01:09:38DCIS that's found on mammogram?
  • 01:09:40No symptoms with presentation like no
  • 01:09:42bloody ****** discharge or anything and
  • 01:09:44if it has to be grade one or grade two,
  • 01:09:46can it be managed successfully with just
  • 01:09:50active surveillance and no surgery?
  • 01:09:52Uhm, that's the end of my talk and
  • 01:09:55I'm happy to answer any questions.
  • 01:09:57And I'm sorry that we went over from the
  • 01:10:008:00 o'clock bravo that was wonderful.
  • 01:10:03Thanks.
  • 01:10:04There are a bunch of questions for you.
  • 01:10:07The first question is about
  • 01:10:09having a lumpectomy back in
  • 01:10:122009 with mammosite radiation.
  • 01:10:15And Mammosite isn't currently used as much,
  • 01:10:18and the long, long term safety
  • 01:10:21of mammosite still good is.
  • 01:10:23The date is still good.
  • 01:10:24And why isn't mammosite used anymore?
  • 01:10:26OK, that's a great question.
  • 01:10:29Well, so one of the reasons that we were the
  • 01:10:32mammoth site is perfectly fine treatment,
  • 01:10:34especially for well chosen patients in.
  • 01:10:37The suitable category for for
  • 01:10:39what we call partial breast,
  • 01:10:41where we treat just where the tumor was.
  • 01:10:43And that's patience with the lower
  • 01:10:45grade small or earlier stage cancer.
  • 01:10:48You know, no nodal involvement
  • 01:10:50and actually the outcomes,
  • 01:10:51as far as recurrence and control
  • 01:10:54of the cancer they have done well.
  • 01:10:58So why do we stop them?
  • 01:10:59Amosite?
  • 01:11:00Well, it is a bit of an invasive procedure.
  • 01:11:02For those of you who don't know it,
  • 01:11:03it has a device.
  • 01:11:05A balloon device that sits within the.
  • 01:11:09Tumor bed and you have a lumen that
  • 01:11:11escapes from the body and it's so it's
  • 01:11:14so nor attached in and the patient
  • 01:11:17has that device in her breast for
  • 01:11:19a week while she gets twice daily
  • 01:11:22radiation therapy for Monday through
  • 01:11:23Friday or for five days so well as
  • 01:11:26convenient that it was done with a week.
  • 01:11:29But it does have that invasive
  • 01:11:30component of having a foreign
  • 01:11:32body in the in the breast,
  • 01:11:34which can be uncomfortable for some people,
  • 01:11:36but the what was really the problem.
  • 01:11:39Was that the cosmetic outcome
  • 01:11:41was not so hot patients.
  • 01:11:44Some trials have not shown this,
  • 01:11:46but others have shown that there
  • 01:11:49is more fibrosis in the breast,
  • 01:11:51meaning firm tissue after the treatment.
  • 01:11:53Sometimes that can be uncomfortable
  • 01:11:56for patients.
  • 01:11:57The appearance of the breast
  • 01:11:59was not as good and now that we
  • 01:12:02have are embracing these shorter
  • 01:12:04courses of treatment for patients.
  • 01:12:07That don't would they don't require having
  • 01:12:10a something invasive in the breast.
  • 01:12:12We stopped offering the mammoth site
  • 01:12:14at at Yale because of that because we
  • 01:12:16were able to offer patients shorter
  • 01:12:18course treatments without requiring that.
  • 01:12:20But as far as cancer recurrence,
  • 01:12:23the data is still excellent for
  • 01:12:25well chosen patients,
  • 01:12:26and I think I did see that you
  • 01:12:27had a doctor carcinoma.
  • 01:12:28Insight two in the in the questions,
  • 01:12:31and so I would not. That should not.
  • 01:12:33That is not why we stopped it.
  • 01:12:34We did not stop it because
  • 01:12:36of concerns about recurrence.
  • 01:12:38OK, and then there's another
  • 01:12:40question about side effects.
  • 01:12:41First, what are the side effects
  • 01:12:45associated with the fast treatment
  • 01:12:47and is how does it compare to regular
  • 01:12:51radiation and then Part B is with?
  • 01:12:54How can you avoid the fight?
  • 01:12:55This side effect of a radiation burn?
  • 01:12:58You know these significant
  • 01:12:59changes to the soft tissue,
  • 01:13:02so it is true that the shorter course is
  • 01:13:05the three to four weeks while it wasn't.
  • 01:13:09On those larger trials, showing a
  • 01:13:11significant decrease in skin toxicity,
  • 01:13:13smaller trials have shown have shown
  • 01:13:15that there is less toxicity with
  • 01:13:16the shorter course going from three
  • 01:13:18to four weeks from the five to six,
  • 01:13:20and subsequently as well the fast
  • 01:13:22to the once a week for five weeks.
  • 01:13:26The data showed no significant difference.
  • 01:13:28However, I will the patients that
  • 01:13:31we observe they do tend to have
  • 01:13:34less side effects than.
  • 01:13:36Than acute side effects,
  • 01:13:37IE skin reaction then people that
  • 01:13:39are undergoing the longer course of
  • 01:13:41treatment just from what I see them
  • 01:13:43during their weekly skin checks and
  • 01:13:45see them for their follow up with me.
  • 01:13:47You know, two months afterwards.
  • 01:13:48I know we're not supposed to
  • 01:13:50use what observation ULL data,
  • 01:13:51but we've seen it,
  • 01:13:52but so I would say that that we are
  • 01:13:55seeing less less skin toxicity with
  • 01:13:57the shorter courses and so with
  • 01:14:00the fast having the least amount
  • 01:14:02of skin toxicity to prevent it.
  • 01:14:05Well, we prescribe.
  • 01:14:06A steroid cream called mometasone.
  • 01:14:09There's nothing to prevent it.
  • 01:14:10Everybody gets some skin irritation
  • 01:14:13to some degree.
  • 01:14:15What we can do in the planning and limit
  • 01:14:17those hotspots as much as possible,
  • 01:14:19which we talked about a little bit,
  • 01:14:20but then we do prescribe a
  • 01:14:23steroid cream called mometasone.
  • 01:14:24There was a well done randomized trial
  • 01:14:26looking at patients using mometasone.
  • 01:14:28This steroid cream once a day Monday
  • 01:14:30through Friday and the weekends for one
  • 01:14:33and up to one to two weeks afterwards.
  • 01:14:35It actually had no negative side
  • 01:14:37effects on the trial that showed
  • 01:14:39reduction in acute skin toxicity.
  • 01:14:41It doesn't mean it made it zero,
  • 01:14:43it was just reduction.
  • 01:14:44But you know, everyone's.
  • 01:14:46Different, their skin is different.
  • 01:14:48But we we also provide a
  • 01:14:50high quality moisture lotion.
  • 01:14:52You don't have to use ours,
  • 01:14:53we just like stuff that doesn't have
  • 01:14:55a lot of scent or is it heavy on
  • 01:14:59the antioxidants during treatment?
  • 01:15:01Uhm and then drinking water and
  • 01:15:04eating protein and allowing yourself
  • 01:15:06to rest and giving it time.
  • 01:15:13Great thank you.
  • 01:15:14Any other comments from
  • 01:15:16anybody on the panel? Uhm?
  • 01:15:21Doctor Berger's answer
  • 01:15:22on active surveillance,
  • 01:15:24which is also a hot topic too.
  • 01:15:27I don't think it went to Barbara, so I'll
  • 01:15:29send it to the person who asked, sorry.
  • 01:15:34Alright, well thank you so much and
  • 01:15:36thank you for everyone who joined
  • 01:15:39us tonight for this really great
  • 01:15:41forum and we're just so excited to
  • 01:15:44have such talented and dedicated
  • 01:15:45physicians in all of our care centers.
  • 01:15:48So thank you again for all of your
  • 01:15:51leadership and have a good night. Thank you.
  • 01:15:54Thanks everyone.