Marc Samsky, MD, FACC
Assistant ProfessorCards
About
Research
Publications
2024
American Heart Association Cardiogenic Shock Registry: Design and Implementation
Morrow D, Jessup M, Abraham W, Acker M, Aringo A, Batchelor W, Chikwe J, Costello S, Drakos S, Farmer S, Gelijns A, Gillette N, Hochman J, Isler M, Kapur N, Kilic A, Kormos R, Lewis E, Lindenfeld J, Lombardi P, Mancini D, Rao S, Rutan C, Samsky M, Krucoff M. American Heart Association Cardiogenic Shock Registry: Design and Implementation. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And Outcomes 2024, 17: e010637. PMID: 38887950, DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010637.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImprove quality of careQuality of careProcesses of careQuality improvement registryPragmatic randomized trialMonitoring of outcomesShock registryElectronic case record formPatient-level dataImplementation researchHealth systemImprovement registryCase record formClinical specialtiesParticipating hospitalsParticipating sitesIn-hospital survivalImprove qualityAssociational volunteeringRecord formCardiogenic shockRegistryPrecision medicine platformData structureComplications of heart diseaseAssociation Between Frailty and Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Jamil Y, Park D, Rao S, Ahmad Y, Sikand N, Bosworth H, Coles T, Damluji A, Nanna M, Samsky M. Association Between Frailty and Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. JACC Advances 2024, 3: 100949. PMID: 38938859, PMCID: PMC11198471, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100949.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute myocardial infarctionAMI-CSIn-hospital outcomesDo-not-resuscitate statusPatients admitted with acute myocardial infarctionOdds of in-hospital mortalitySkilled nursing facilityPrevalence of frailtyProportion of hospitalsAssociated with in-hospital outcomesIn-hospital adverse eventsCompare in-hospital outcomesRisk score cut-offNational Inpatient SampleNursing facilitiesIn-hospital mortalityScore cut-offAssociated with adverse outcomesInpatient SampleFrailtyCardiogenic shockIn-hospital morbidityMyocardial infarction complicationsNonfrail groupOddsComparative analysis of treatment options for chronic heart failure and depression: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
Soleimani H, Nasrollahizadeh A, Hajiqasemi M, Ebrahimzade M, Taheri H, Ebrahimi P, Ashraf H, Samsky M, Hosseini K. Comparative analysis of treatment options for chronic heart failure and depression: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Heart Failure Reviews 2024, 29: 841-852. PMID: 38613598, DOI: 10.1007/s10741-024-10403-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive behavioral therapyDepression scoresMeasures of depressionTreatment of depressionRandomized controlled trialsHeart failureStandardized mean differenceBehavioral therapyTreatment optionsAnalysis of treatment optionsDepressionEfficacious treatmentMeta-analysisBayesian network meta-analysisChronic heart failureHeart failure patientsNetwork meta-analysisFailure patientsPrimary outcomeWeb of Science databasesControlled trialsMean differencePatientsScoresSystematic reviewFrailty and In-Hospital Outcomes for Management of Cardiogenic Shock without Acute Myocardial Infarction
Park D, Jamil Y, Ahmad Y, Coles T, Bosworth H, Sikand N, Davila C, Babapour G, Damluji A, Rao S, Nanna M, Samsky M. Frailty and In-Hospital Outcomes for Management of Cardiogenic Shock without Acute Myocardial Infarction. Journal Of Clinical Medicine 2024, 13: 2078. PMID: 38610842, PMCID: PMC11012362, DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072078.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDo-not-resuscitate statusOdds of in-hospital mortalitySkilled nursing facilityIn-hospital adverse eventsRelationship of frailtyCompare in-hospital outcomesNon-frail groupRisk score cut-offNational Inpatient SampleAssociated with increased rates of morbidityNursing facilitiesMyocardial infarctionAssociated with increased ratesFrail adultsIn-hospital mortalityIn-hospital outcomesAcute myocardial infarctionFrail groupScore cut-offFrailtyInpatient SampleCardiogenic shockRisk factorsCardiovascular diseaseHospitalAssociation of cardiovascular diseases with cognitive performance in older adults
Park D, Jamil Y, Babapour G, Kim J, Campbell G, Akman Z, Kochar A, Sen S, Samsky M, Sikand N, Frampton J, Damluji A, Nanna M. Association of cardiovascular diseases with cognitive performance in older adults. American Heart Journal 2024, 273: 10-20. PMID: 38575050, PMCID: PMC11162917, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAnimal Fluency TestOlder adultsCERAD-DRDSST scoresCardiovascular diseaseNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyHealth and Nutrition Examination SurveyCongestive heart failureFree of cardiovascular diseaseFluency testCardiovascular disease subtypesNutrition Examination SurveyAssociation of cardiovascular diseaseAnimal Fluency test scoreCognitive performanceLower cognitive performanceCoronary heart diseaseHeart failureCVD subtypesExamination SurveyAssess cognitive performanceAdultsCognitive functionHeart diseaseScoresThe management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel
Williams S, Kalakoutas A, Olusanya S, Schrage B, Tavazzi G, Carnicelli A, Montero S, Vandenbriele C, Luk A, Lim H, Bhagra S, Ott S, Farrero M, Samsky M, Kennedy J, Sen S, Agrawal R, Rampersad P, Coniglio A, Pappalardo F, Barnett C, Proudfoot A. The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel. Critical Care 2024, 28: 105. PMID: 38566212, PMCID: PMC10988801, DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04884-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTemporary mechanical circulatory supportClinical practiceHF-CSCritical care admissionMulti-disciplinary panelRandomised controlled trialsClinical guidelinesAcutely decompensated chronic HFBackgroundObservational dataControlled trialsDecompensated chronic HFAppropriate methodologiesTrial designInternational expertsConclusionThis studyClinical trial designMechanical circulatory supportChronic HFCardiogenic shockClinical trialsAppropriate panelThoracic ultrasoundCirculatory supportLos AngelesPractice
2023
Prognostic Impact of Repeated NT-proBNP Measurements in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Fuery M, Leifer E, Samsky M, Sen S, O'Connor C, Fiuzat M, Ezekowitz J, Piña I, Whellan D, Mark D, Felker G, Desai N, Januzzi J, Ahmad T. Prognostic Impact of Repeated NT-proBNP Measurements in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. JACC Heart Failure 2023, 12: 479-487. PMID: 38127049, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.11.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNT-proBNP measurementsPrimary trial endpointChronic heart failureNT-proBNP levelsReduced ejection fractionTrial endpointsHeart failureEjection fractionN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurementBaseline NT-proBNP levelsChronic heart failure patientsNT-proBNP monitoringSecondary trial endpointsHeart failure hospitalizationNatriuretic peptide measurementHeart failure patientsCardiovascular deathFailure hospitalizationNT-proBNPFailure patientsPrognostic impactClinical outcomesPrognostic valueOutpatient sitesClinical studiesSafety of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors drugs among heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Soleimani H, Saeedian B, Pasebani Y, Babajani N, Yeganeh A, Bahirai P, Navid H, Amin A, Samsky M, Nanna M, Hosseini K. Safety of sodium‐glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors drugs among heart failure patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. ESC Heart Failure 2023, 11: 637-648. PMID: 38124239, PMCID: PMC10966218, DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14633.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIs There a Role for Risk Scores in the Management of Heart Failure? ∗
Abou Alaiwi S, Samsky M, Ahmad T. Is There a Role for Risk Scores in the Management of Heart Failure? ∗. JACC Heart Failure 2023, 12: 197-198. PMID: 38069995, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.10.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchStandardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC)
Waksman R, Pahuja M, van Diepen S, Proudfoot A, Morrow D, Spitzer E, Nichol G, Weisfeldt M, Moscucci M, Lawler P, Mebazaa A, Fan E, Dickert N, Samsky M, Kormos R, Piña I, Zuckerman B, Farb A, Sapirstein J, Simonton C, West N, Damluji A, Gilchrist I, Zeymer U, Thiele H, Cutlip D, Krucoff M, Abraham W. Standardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC). Circulation 2023, 148: 1113-1126. PMID: 37782695, PMCID: PMC11025346, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.123.064527.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
Academic Achievements and Community Involvement
Links & Media
News
- April 01, 2024
Yale Faculty Present Groundbreaking Clinical Research at the 2024 American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions
- September 14, 2023
Electronic Health Record Strategies Can Improve Care of Patients with Heart Failure
- July 10, 2023
Sarah Goldstein, MD: optimizing heart health in pregnant and postpartum women
- May 11, 2023
Discoveries & Impact (May 2023)