Skip to Main Content

Immuno-Oncology

October 26, 2020
  • 00:00We're going to start with a few
  • 00:03introductory remarks from the
  • 00:05head of our Cancer Center, Dr.
  • 00:07Fuchs, and then we'll go into a few
  • 00:09short presentations by really outstanding
  • 00:12panelists from our center and also
  • 00:14Doctor IRA Melman from Jeanetta.
  • 00:17And after that will be opening up
  • 00:19the program to questions and answers
  • 00:21and hopefully a freeform discussion
  • 00:24to cover some of these topics.
  • 00:26We really know.
  • 00:27We know that that in order to treat.
  • 00:31To effectively develop cures for cancer,
  • 00:33there has to be a collaboration between
  • 00:36industry, academics, government.
  • 00:39It's really very, very important,
  • 00:41and we designed this session specifically
  • 00:43to build connections between your medicine,
  • 00:46Yale science and industry leaders.
  • 00:48We've collected your questions in
  • 00:50advance and we invite you to submit
  • 00:53your questions at during the time
  • 00:55of discussion in the chat room.
  • 00:57We also encourage you to share
  • 01:00your questions with everyone.
  • 01:04Heading into engaging in the discussion,
  • 01:06we know that we have a wealth of
  • 01:09expertise in the audience today.
  • 01:11Not only do we have outstanding panelists,
  • 01:13we have an amazing list of
  • 01:16participants from industry.
  • 01:18Will review the chat room
  • 01:19throughout and will pull a number
  • 01:21of the questions for for ants.
  • 01:23For discussion in the question and
  • 01:25answer portion of the session will
  • 01:27also have a staff member monitoring
  • 01:29the chat room and if we're unable
  • 01:32to answer your question today,
  • 01:34will try and follow up as soon
  • 01:36as as possible.
  • 01:37And please also know that the
  • 01:39webinar is being recorded.
  • 01:40Let me now just welcome doctor Charlie Fuchs.
  • 01:43He's the head of our Cancer Center.
  • 01:45He's a Richard Sackler and Jonathan
  • 01:48Sackler Professor of Medicine.
  • 01:49And professor of chronic disease
  • 01:51Epidemiology.
  • 01:51As I said,
  • 01:52he's a director of the Yale Cancer
  • 01:55Center and also the physician
  • 01:57in chief of Smilow Hospital.
  • 02:00Charlie has brought an amazing vision
  • 02:02of building science at this Institute
  • 02:04is be immeasurably successful.
  • 02:06Charlie please.
  • 02:08Error, thank you and thank you
  • 02:10for your leadership and I want to
  • 02:14welcome or many attendees today to.
  • 02:16What is the 1st of a new series,
  • 02:20namely Yale engage cancer which is
  • 02:22really intended to be to stimulate
  • 02:25discussion and collaboration in what is
  • 02:28our mutual interest in combatting cancer?
  • 02:31And this first one, I think,
  • 02:33really highlights the great
  • 02:35depth at our center has.
  • 02:38Enemy know biology and Immuno Oncology.
  • 02:40Mario certainly are our
  • 02:42leader for the session.
  • 02:44Has has really had an incredibly
  • 02:46accomplished career in science and
  • 02:48drug development in Iowan recently.
  • 02:50The president of the Society
  • 02:52of immunotherapy and cancer.
  • 02:53But obviously, as you'll hear,
  • 02:55we have assembled Marios assembled
  • 02:57an extraordinary talent to team to
  • 03:00really engage in this discussion.
  • 03:02You know, we I joined the Kansas
  • 03:04center about four years ago,
  • 03:06and you know what attracted me here was the.
  • 03:10Great depth of talent and accomplishment.
  • 03:13The science here is really unparalleled
  • 03:16in terms of genetics, cell biology,
  • 03:18pharmacology among others,
  • 03:20and most notably,
  • 03:21today Immunobiology and beyond that
  • 03:23I think the clinical operation.
  • 03:26Frankly,
  • 03:26the 10th anniversary of swallow cancer
  • 03:30hospital has enabled an incredible
  • 03:32growth of a clinical operation it now sees.
  • 03:3648% of all cancer patients in the
  • 03:39state of Connecticut and is enabled
  • 03:41a fourfold increase in trials,
  • 03:43clinical trial enrollment,
  • 03:44and Moreover, actually this year.
  • 03:46Yale had studies that have that have enabled
  • 03:494 new drug approvals in the cancer space.
  • 03:52You know,
  • 03:53obviously,
  • 03:53we're in the midst of a pandemic,
  • 03:56and we're focused on kovid.
  • 03:58But we all recognize that
  • 04:00in the 21st century,
  • 04:02cancer is really the great landscape for
  • 04:04for what we want to accomplish in medicine.
  • 04:07And I think I owe.
  • 04:10Is an important leg that's going
  • 04:12to get us to where we need to be.
  • 04:16We really value the partnerships that
  • 04:18we develop at Yale with our colleagues
  • 04:21and industry and so many of you.
  • 04:23Perhaps all of you with
  • 04:25backgrounds and industry,
  • 04:26an biotech and related areas are obviously
  • 04:29sharing a mutual interest in this fight.
  • 04:32You know,
  • 04:32we welcome your participation in this forum.
  • 04:35But Moreover,
  • 04:36either during or even after the webinar,
  • 04:39we would like to.
  • 04:40Engage with you in terms of
  • 04:41conversations and collaborations.
  • 04:44'cause first and foremost,
  • 04:45we know it takes a village to
  • 04:48combat cancer and we hope with
  • 04:50this does beyond other things.
  • 04:52Is actually enable new collaboration.
  • 04:54So please reach out to me.
  • 04:56Mario or the other panelists because
  • 04:58we want this to be the beginning of
  • 05:01conversations and new engagements
  • 05:03as we work together to leverage
  • 05:05the great work in Immuno Oncology.
  • 05:07So Mario, thank you for allowing me to.
  • 05:11To share a few thoughts and I
  • 05:12look forward to this symposium.
  • 05:15Thank you Charlie.
  • 05:17I just again want to repeat that our
  • 05:19format today will be a combination
  • 05:21of brief introductory comments by
  • 05:23our panelists and then a moderated
  • 05:26discussion including your questions.
  • 05:28We've invited our faculty to
  • 05:29briefly address several questions,
  • 05:31including what their core expertise says,
  • 05:33what questions are driving their research,
  • 05:35how can we work with the corporate
  • 05:38sector in order to address this disease,
  • 05:40and finally, what types of resources,
  • 05:42capabilities,
  • 05:43and partnerships align with those brought
  • 05:45to bear by the corporate sector to advance.
  • 05:48This work remind all the speakers
  • 05:50that you have 5 minutes to speak
  • 05:52and then I will cut you off.
  • 05:55Very nicely because we want to get
  • 05:58on to the discussion afterwards.
  • 06:00After the Yale speakers,
  • 06:01I'll then introduce Doctor
  • 06:02IRA Melman from genetic.
  • 06:04So with that,
  • 06:05let me just go ahead and proceed.
  • 06:07Our first speaker will be
  • 06:09doctor Marcus Bosenberg.
  • 06:10He's The Professor of dermatology,
  • 06:12pathology and Immunobiology
  • 06:13at the El School of Medicine.
  • 06:15He's currently the interim director
  • 06:17of the Yale Center framing oncology
  • 06:19and he's also the director for
  • 06:21the Center for position cans
  • 06:23for modeling and the director of
  • 06:25the elsewhere in skin cancer.
  • 06:27And also the Co leader of the genetics,
  • 06:30genomics and epigenetics.
  • 06:31So I've now taken up almost all
  • 06:33of the five minutes with Retitles
  • 06:35Marcus and I'll turn it over to.
  • 06:40Thanks Mario would have the
  • 06:41next slide that be great thanks.
  • 06:43I had the great pleasure of working
  • 06:45with Mario on a regular basis
  • 06:47as part of the Melanoma team.
  • 06:49As a practicing dramatic
  • 06:50pathologist and I think you know,
  • 06:52the Yale Center for immuno
  • 06:54oncology in this session is
  • 06:55really focused on Immuno Oncology.
  • 06:57Is kind of at the center of a hub of a
  • 07:00number of very important pieces at Yale.
  • 07:03So doctor Fuchs really nicely
  • 07:04summarized some of the really
  • 07:06impact that the Cancer Center has.
  • 07:08I think many of you are aware
  • 07:10of the sort of world.
  • 07:12Leading world renowned capability of
  • 07:14the Immunobiology Department at Yale,
  • 07:16traditionally with real strengths in
  • 07:18basic immunology but now branching
  • 07:20out toward human translation.
  • 07:21Menology Ann.
  • 07:22Really one of my jobs is to try to
  • 07:25bring folks into the realm of IO from
  • 07:28that Department which has really been,
  • 07:32I think,
  • 07:32a great success so far.
  • 07:34A couple of the talks here from doctor
  • 07:38ring and Doctor Wisocky sort of are
  • 07:41related to some of those efforts.
  • 07:44Also kind of giving you a feel for
  • 07:46the landscape and this is really just
  • 07:49an introductory session with myself.
  • 07:51There's also the advanced cell therapy
  • 07:53lab that Diane Kraus directs and
  • 07:55had established an it's a full GNP
  • 07:58facility that can harvest to multithreading.
  • 08:00Lymphocytes expand and then allow
  • 08:02that product to be reinfused into
  • 08:04patients runs clinical trials.
  • 08:05This is a real opportunity for Yale
  • 08:08to move forward on the scientific
  • 08:10front with regard to cell therapies
  • 08:12and we're really positioned well.
  • 08:14To do that,
  • 08:15doctor Herbst will be talking
  • 08:17right after me about some of the
  • 08:20translation TLE efforts at Yale,
  • 08:22and I'll let him do so.
  • 08:24As doctor snow mentioned in my role
  • 08:27in as directing the Yale Sport and
  • 08:30skin cancer with Harriet Cougar,
  • 08:32there's really excellent access
  • 08:33to patient samples,
  • 08:35patient materials through now.
  • 08:36Doctor Hertz will explain 3
  • 08:38now spore grants at Yale,
  • 08:40and we're coordinating these efforts,
  • 08:42especially with regard to Iota
  • 08:44getting access to specimens.
  • 08:46Which I think will be important for
  • 08:49industrial academic collaborations
  • 08:50in my role now too.
  • 08:51I also tend to be at a lot of the
  • 08:53discussions related to industrial
  • 08:55academic collaborations between
  • 08:57other entities, aniele with respect.
  • 08:59And, you know, oncology Ann,
  • 09:00I really enjoy that interaction
  • 09:02an obviously try to move those
  • 09:04things forward in the way that's
  • 09:06most productive for both parties
  • 09:08in each of those interactions.
  • 09:10So if we can go on to the next slide,
  • 09:13I'll talk about the remaining thing on the.
  • 09:16We'll hear so,
  • 09:17and that's the Center for
  • 09:19precision cut cancer modeling,
  • 09:20which I also direct with vision
  • 09:22with Sammy and what this is,
  • 09:24is a state of the art
  • 09:26preclinical testing facility.
  • 09:27It's really focused on Immuno Oncology.
  • 09:30And we will do testing of agents
  • 09:31with respect to syngenetic models and
  • 09:33other things that have been developed
  • 09:36at Yale that are unique to Yale.
  • 09:38We have sponsored research
  • 09:39agreements with some members
  • 09:40who are on this call related to
  • 09:42things like class one deficient
  • 09:44models that were uniquely developed
  • 09:46at Yale that don't have to be
  • 09:48licensed out as a result of that,
  • 09:50and we have a lot of experience which
  • 09:52some of which will hear about in
  • 09:54later talks just after me looking at
  • 09:57responses to IO agents in these models,
  • 09:59what were particularly.
  • 10:00Cited about right now is the idea of
  • 10:03doing patient derived explant studies to
  • 10:05evaluate human immuno oncology agents.
  • 10:07So the idea here is you take
  • 10:09fragments of tumors,
  • 10:10embed them in a proprietary 3D matrix
  • 10:13and then use agents that might be
  • 10:15biologics that are using humans to
  • 10:18test responses in those samples and
  • 10:20on the right you can see this is
  • 10:22an example of a mouse based tumor,
  • 10:25but one in which when we gave a
  • 10:28checkpoint inhibitor we see a
  • 10:30compute complete curatives response.
  • 10:31And so we're looking at readouts
  • 10:33for these systems.
  • 10:34But the idea is to have personalized
  • 10:36immunotherapy where you can actually
  • 10:37look at different combinations in a
  • 10:39patient in real time and decide what
  • 10:41might work best for that patient.
  • 10:43And we're not fully there yet,
  • 10:44but we think we're pretty close and
  • 10:46hope to have this available for others
  • 10:48within the next six months to a year.
  • 10:51So I'll stop there and allow
  • 10:52the next speakers to go on.
  • 10:58Argus tanky, with the next
  • 11:00speaker is doctor Roy Herbst.
  • 11:02He's the head of medical oncology,
  • 11:04Yale Cancer Center and smile cancer
  • 11:06hospital and The Associated Cancer
  • 11:08Center director for Translational
  • 11:09research and a professor of Medicine
  • 11:11and professor of pharmacology, Roy.
  • 11:15Thanks Mary, and thanks to
  • 11:17everyone for being here today.
  • 11:19So in my role as the associate
  • 11:21director of Translational Research,
  • 11:23I just want to describe, you know,
  • 11:26a little bit about your disease
  • 11:28programs or so-called darts and what
  • 11:30you can see is UCR disease programs,
  • 11:33immunology, population Sciences,
  • 11:34Developmental Therapeutics,
  • 11:35microbiology, cell signaling,
  • 11:36radiation genetics,
  • 11:37and all of these disease
  • 11:39programs are amazing,
  • 11:40but we want to interact them with the
  • 11:43clinic with the clinical teams have.
  • 11:45Access to patient specimens move move
  • 11:47new drugs from the the lab to the clinic,
  • 11:50and I think we're doing that quite
  • 11:52well and we form these darts.
  • 11:54Diseased aligned research teams
  • 11:56and that's where we build our
  • 11:58industry alliances in our spores
  • 11:59and we have a number of industry
  • 12:02alliances right now with Genentech,
  • 12:03Astra Zeneca,
  • 12:04Eli Lilly to name a few and these
  • 12:06darts promote translational research
  • 12:08through the scientific discovery.
  • 12:09We test new discoveries in
  • 12:11our clinics as I mentioned and
  • 12:13really take ideas back and forth.
  • 12:15We've worked very hard this last year
  • 12:17too and to improve integration to
  • 12:19increase the number of investigator
  • 12:20trials that we have at Yale.
  • 12:22Now in this day and age,
  • 12:24investigator initiated trials can
  • 12:25be where we hold the Ind or it can
  • 12:28be a small trial with industry
  • 12:29where they hold the Ind.
  • 12:31But at least we are closely involved
  • 12:33in the correlative studies or it's
  • 12:34built on Yale Science and we want to
  • 12:36build clinical basic teams to move forward.
  • 12:39So in the next slide I'll just show you.
  • 12:43We've been very successful in this,
  • 12:45and you know,
  • 12:46there was already an existing
  • 12:48Melanoma spore here 10 years ago.
  • 12:50But now with the support of the darts and
  • 12:53with some monies that we were able to supply,
  • 12:56Marcus and Harry have renewed the skins for,
  • 12:59so it's a third renewal now.
  • 13:01A third span.
  • 13:02For that we formed a new
  • 13:04lung cancer spore myself,
  • 13:06with leaping as leaders.
  • 13:07We did this now six years ago.
  • 13:10We just renewed it building a large
  • 13:12part on the immunology from his lab.
  • 13:15One of the trials that really,
  • 13:17I think propelled this forward was a
  • 13:19signal 15 for which it was developed
  • 13:21in the lab paper nature medicine,
  • 13:23and then of course,
  • 13:24clinical trials ongoing.
  • 13:25Really proud that Barbara Burtness,
  • 13:27who actually was recruited
  • 13:28in the last 10 years,
  • 13:30built a head and neck program and
  • 13:32with support working with surgery,
  • 13:33working with some of the
  • 13:35great scientific leaders,
  • 13:36now hasn't had an export and we actually
  • 13:38have a group that's working in brain cancer.
  • 13:41They've submitted.
  • 13:42They're working on it.
  • 13:43Pat Larusso,
  • 13:44who I think you all know.
  • 13:46Or many of you will know has been working
  • 13:48on something in phase One South DNA repair,
  • 13:51so we have many many translations
  • 13:52from lab to clinic programs and these
  • 13:55are great opportunities for specimens
  • 13:56to work with industry for new drugs.
  • 13:58We these things will only survive if we
  • 14:01have alliances with the outside next slide.
  • 14:03So I just want to give one example
  • 14:05today and I know iris on the
  • 14:07phone and he's going to speak.
  • 14:09So I've known IRA for quite some
  • 14:11time longer than either of us.
  • 14:13Would like to know.
  • 14:14Actually took a course at
  • 14:15Rockefeller University as a student
  • 14:17when he was a guest lecture.
  • 14:19But of course, IRA has a history with Yale,
  • 14:21so I was approached nine years
  • 14:23ago with a drug called MPL 3280.
  • 14:25It was a PDL one inhibitor.
  • 14:27We already knew that these
  • 14:29drugs sort of work.
  • 14:30The PD one inhibitors cause Mario
  • 14:32his office right across the Hall,
  • 14:33but we studied this drug and you can
  • 14:35see on the left you know activity.
  • 14:37You know your complete response
  • 14:39in a patient but will yell was
  • 14:40able to offer along with many
  • 14:42colleagues from around the world.
  • 14:43It was a multi national study
  • 14:45but we were able to get biopsies
  • 14:47and this was the work of Katie
  • 14:48Poletti and Scott Gettinger and
  • 14:50others so we could actually define
  • 14:52the adaptive immune response.
  • 14:53So I think if we hit one more
  • 14:55time so we actually could see
  • 14:57what happened in a patient that.
  • 14:59Responded but we also could see what
  • 15:01happens in patients that didn't.
  • 15:02And you know,
  • 15:03this was an important observation.
  • 15:05Working closely with Iran,
  • 15:06the team danshen this was actually
  • 15:08published in nature and it really
  • 15:10defined some of the parameters
  • 15:11of immune resistance and now of
  • 15:13course the challenge is to use this
  • 15:16knowledge in the future prospectively
  • 15:17with combinations of agents,
  • 15:18and that's something we're doing
  • 15:21right now on the next slide.
  • 15:23And we had the opportunity to
  • 15:25take it further.
  • 15:26So then, you know,
  • 15:27as a lung cancer investigator and
  • 15:29having a very robust long group,
  • 15:31you know doing phase three all the
  • 15:33way from phase one with a spore.
  • 15:35As I mentioned,
  • 15:36we were the lead site for this trial.
  • 15:38The empower 110 trial which actually
  • 15:40look at this drug and PDL 3280
  • 15:42became a Tesla Zimride compared
  • 15:44with chemotherapy and this trial
  • 15:45if we hit again this trial just
  • 15:47recently reported in the New
  • 15:48England Journal of Medicine two
  • 15:50weeks ago was a positive result and
  • 15:52actually resulted in the drug being
  • 15:54approved in the frontline setting.
  • 15:55The reason I showed this,
  • 15:57if we go to the next hit is we
  • 15:59will look at some of the different
  • 16:01PDL one markers in this.
  • 16:02So we were able to move one metal up.
  • 16:05It wasn't the first drug approved
  • 16:06in this space the 2nd but were able
  • 16:08to look at SP142 and 22C3 which are
  • 16:10different biomarkers but even more
  • 16:11critical not known to many on this call.
  • 16:14Kurt shoppers now working with these
  • 16:15specimens with some amino quantitative
  • 16:16studies that he's developed here at Yale.
  • 16:18So now we have randomized data
  • 16:20that we can look at even more
  • 16:22exploratory biomarkers and then
  • 16:23on the very final slide we're
  • 16:24anxious to work with all of you we.
  • 16:27No, here this is very interesting story.
  • 16:29I forgot to put this in.
  • 16:31This is looking at tumor mutational burden.
  • 16:33This is blood based tumor mutational
  • 16:35burden as done by Foundation
  • 16:36Medicine and you can see when
  • 16:38you have TM be greater than 16.
  • 16:40You can see that in this trial.
  • 16:42That's a predictive marker
  • 16:44with significance for activity.
  • 16:45For intensive over chemotherapy.
  • 16:46So new markers being developed.
  • 16:48So then on the next slide.
  • 16:51This is what I, my final slide.
  • 16:52We have a whole office of Translational
  • 16:54research and this actually expands now
  • 16:56throughout the Cancer Center 'cause
  • 16:58we work with other teams but with Ed
  • 17:00Captain who's been just a wonderful
  • 17:01colleague and friend for now 6 1/2 years.
  • 17:03We've really built this office where
  • 17:05we have the ability to bring these
  • 17:07proposals in and then to execute you.
  • 17:09It's very easy to make the deal,
  • 17:11but to actually execute on the deal
  • 17:13is important so I'll stop there.
  • 17:14Happy to answer questions later.
  • 17:16Anxious to work with as many
  • 17:18collaborators as makes sense.
  • 17:19Thank you.
  • 17:20Right, thank you. I'd like to
  • 17:22introduce the next speaker ehrenring.
  • 17:24He's an assistant professor of email biology,
  • 17:26one of the most creative minds I've met.
  • 17:29Among all the wealth of talent that
  • 17:31we have here, Aaron, you have some
  • 17:33very interesting things to describe.
  • 17:35Please please proceed.
  • 17:37Yeah, thanks so much Mario.
  • 17:39So the focus of my research is to use
  • 17:41structure based protein engineering
  • 17:42to develop pharmacological tools
  • 17:44that we can use to dissecting probe
  • 17:47complicated immuno regulatory pathways.
  • 17:48That's a mouthful.
  • 17:49I should say what we're really
  • 17:51primarily focused on are these
  • 17:53proteins called cytokines,
  • 17:54which are small hormone like
  • 17:56molecules of the immune system
  • 17:58have exerted very powerful effects
  • 18:00on nearly all aspects of immune
  • 18:02Physiology and biology is really cool,
  • 18:04but what's really important
  • 18:05in the context of cancer?
  • 18:07Is the study kind for the very first
  • 18:10agents that prove the principle that the
  • 18:12immune system could be a target of cancer?
  • 18:15And that's evident from this this very
  • 18:17semanal report on the activity of high
  • 18:19dose interleukin two and Melanoma,
  • 18:20and you can see that a small fraction of
  • 18:23patients actually had very durable responses.
  • 18:25In fact, you could call them cures and you
  • 18:28see that first tail in the survival curve,
  • 18:30and I'll just note that you know
  • 18:32a major leader in this work was,
  • 18:35of course, our colleague,
  • 18:36my good friend Mario snow.
  • 18:38You know who's been leading the way so
  • 18:40we can advance the next slide, please.
  • 18:42So in the past four years,
  • 18:45my lab has gotten really interested
  • 18:47in one particular cytokine,
  • 18:49called Interleukin 18.
  • 18:50What makes this study kind compelling
  • 18:52is it has really strong activities in
  • 18:55vitro in a dish on two key cell types.
  • 18:58Tumor infiltrating T cells,
  • 19:00which recognize specific tumor
  • 19:01antigens in are proven to be
  • 19:03the some of the most important,
  • 19:05if not most important targets
  • 19:07in cancer immunotherapy.
  • 19:08I liked it.
  • 19:09Also stimulates another class of
  • 19:11cells called natural killer cells,
  • 19:13which are emerging.
  • 19:14As key immune effectors,
  • 19:15particularly in the setting of
  • 19:17immune checkpoint resistance,
  • 19:18as Roy was just alluding to in the
  • 19:20setting of image C Class one loss,
  • 19:23if you can advance one click
  • 19:25that was really shocking,
  • 19:26though,
  • 19:26as we dug into the biology violate
  • 19:28teams that have been tried in clinical
  • 19:31trials before GlaxoSmithKline had
  • 19:32taken it through a phase two trial
  • 19:34of over 60 Melanoma patients.
  • 19:35What they found was that it was
  • 19:37very well tolerated for cytokine,
  • 19:39but it completely bombed due
  • 19:41to lack of Efficacy.
  • 19:42Only one out of 60 three
  • 19:44patients had a partial response.
  • 19:46Next slide,
  • 19:46please.
  • 19:47So what we discovered in my lab
  • 19:49is that the activity of Alateen is
  • 19:52highly restricted by a molecule
  • 19:54produced by tumors within tumors
  • 19:56called Interleukin 18 binding protein.
  • 19:58This is an ultra high affinity inhibitor.
  • 20:00Violating that binds.
  • 20:01I'll 18 inhibits its ability to
  • 20:03interact with its receptor on,
  • 20:05till and NK cells.
  • 20:06And So what we did is we use directed
  • 20:09evolution to create a version of
  • 20:11violating that was completely
  • 20:12impervious to the decoy receptor,
  • 20:14but was still able to engage with
  • 20:17highlighting receptor on until and
  • 20:19what we found in mouse models with cancer.
  • 20:21This is a very close collaboration
  • 20:23with Marcus Bosenberg in the Center
  • 20:25for precision cancer modeling.
  • 20:27Is that just like in patients
  • 20:29natural wild type Interleukin 18?
  • 20:30That's the blue survival curve
  • 20:32here was entirely ineffective.
  • 20:33It had no ability to slow
  • 20:35tumor growth or cure mice.
  • 20:37Where's the decoy resistant variant?
  • 20:38Had single agent activity that could
  • 20:40clear two well established tumors from
  • 20:42the door to these mice with activity
  • 20:44that was commensurate in fact a bit
  • 20:46better than checkpoint immunotherapy.
  • 20:48And of course,
  • 20:49it synergized which equity mean therapy.
  • 20:51We describe these findings in that
  • 20:53recent publication in nature.
  • 20:54Earlier this summer.
  • 20:55Next slide, please.
  • 20:57Now, obviously we're tremendously
  • 20:59excited about the potential
  • 21:00impact of the decor Resistant
  • 21:02Valley Team D R18 in the clinic,
  • 21:04and we particularly want to
  • 21:05test it out here at Yale.
  • 21:07We have such a leading phase one unit
  • 21:09and an experience with set of kind
  • 21:12of new therapies instead of that.
  • 21:14And I recently started a company
  • 21:16called Simcha Therapeutics.
  • 21:17We've raised over $25,000,000 to advance
  • 21:19this molecule that was developed
  • 21:20here at Yale into clinical trials,
  • 21:22and I'm excited to say that there
  • 21:25will be dosing the first patient
  • 21:27in the first half of next year.
  • 21:29Next slide, please.
  • 21:32So finally I want to tell you about
  • 21:34some emerging research in my lab.
  • 21:36We're missing a slide,
  • 21:37so I'll just briefly mention it.
  • 21:39Here we go,
  • 21:40which is that one more forward,
  • 21:42which is that we're not just
  • 21:44interested in making pharmacologic
  • 21:45tools drugs against the immune system,
  • 21:47but we're also really interested in
  • 21:49developing technologies in profiling
  • 21:51the drugs that are naturally
  • 21:52produced by the immune system.
  • 21:53That is to say,
  • 21:55antibodies in one thing that's
  • 21:56becoming increasingly clear is that
  • 21:58immunotherapy doesn't just affect T cells,
  • 22:00but it also seems to be able to affect.
  • 22:03Other branch of the immune system.
  • 22:05B cells,
  • 22:05and he moral immunity,
  • 22:07and we hypothesize that that
  • 22:08many cancer patients,
  • 22:09particularly those true with immunotherapy,
  • 22:11may be making protective anti
  • 22:13cancer antibodies or antibodies
  • 22:14that activate the immune system
  • 22:15and we want to learn from these
  • 22:18clinical trials of nature.
  • 22:19Seeing what drugs patients made
  • 22:20and potentially get ideas for new
  • 22:22drug targets and potentially even
  • 22:24new therapies from these patients
  • 22:26and so that end we've developed
  • 22:28this technology called Reprap index
  • 22:29approach to management profiling
  • 22:30that we've used to discover new
  • 22:32auto antibody targets.
  • 22:33We've profiled extensively in
  • 22:35autoimmune diseases like this
  • 22:37one here shown called ape said,
  • 22:39but we're also now applying it
  • 22:41together with samples from the
  • 22:43various spores that we have here
  • 22:45at Yale of patients treated with
  • 22:48immunotherapy in monitored longitudinally.
  • 22:51So yeah,
  • 22:51thank you for your attention.
  • 22:55And thank you, that's it's amazing science.
  • 22:58It's my pleasure to introduce Grace Chan.
  • 23:00She's a relatively recent recruited.
  • 23:02Yeah, who's using really fascinating
  • 23:04work on circular RNAs and could lead to a
  • 23:08potential new target for immune modulation.
  • 23:11Grace please go ahead.
  • 23:15Hi everybody, I'm excited to great.
  • 23:17Excited to tell you about my research
  • 23:20program so we know that cells need
  • 23:23to be able to recognize pathogenic
  • 23:25RNA's to prevent infection but
  • 23:27also recognize their own self our
  • 23:30days to prevent autoimmunity.
  • 23:31And so my research program
  • 23:33has two main questions.
  • 23:35One we're trying to understand where the
  • 23:37molecular mechanisms for maintaining this
  • 23:39vital balance and recognition of self,
  • 23:42nonself and then also how can we capitalize
  • 23:45on this distinction to develop new?
  • 23:48Cancer therapies. And so we had.
  • 23:52Discovered that you carry out excels,
  • 23:54have a way to distinguish between
  • 23:57foreign circular RNAs and self
  • 23:59circular maze or circular RNAs.
  • 24:02Are this newly discovered class of
  • 24:04endogenous RNAs that are abundant
  • 24:06and ubiquitous in eukaryotes?
  • 24:08And so, with this distinction between
  • 24:11foreign and sell circular RNAs,
  • 24:13we hypothesize that we could
  • 24:15engineer foreign circular RNA's
  • 24:17to be a potent vaccine agg event.
  • 24:20And if you go to the next slide, please.
  • 24:24We found that if we deliver born circular
  • 24:27RNAs into mice and then challenged
  • 24:30with cancer b16 Melanoma cells,
  • 24:33we were able to protect the mice against
  • 24:36those subsequent sort of initiation of
  • 24:39the tumor as well as growth of the tumor,
  • 24:42and we're excited to work with
  • 24:45the Center for precision cancer
  • 24:47modeling to continue to investigate
  • 24:50one of the scope and effects of the
  • 24:53circular RNAs as a cancer vaccine.
  • 24:56Next please.
  • 24:57Another area of my program is to
  • 25:00understand what are the features of
  • 25:02the circular RNA that allows a cell to
  • 25:06distinguish between self and foreign,
  • 25:08and we identify the specific
  • 25:10RNA modification called N 6,
  • 25:12methyl adenosine or M6 say.
  • 25:14So we saw that self circular RNAs
  • 25:17associated with these enzymes that
  • 25:19recognize M6A or interact with M6A,
  • 25:22whereas these foreign circular
  • 25:23armies did not,
  • 25:25and so we thought we could target the.
  • 25:28An enzyme that installs this
  • 25:32modifications next please.
  • 25:34Next slide,
  • 25:36please.
  • 25:37And we saw that and breast cancer
  • 25:40epithelial cells type 3 interferons
  • 25:42were specifically upregulated when
  • 25:45M6A modification is decreased,
  • 25:47whereas type one interference are
  • 25:50not changed and so next please.
  • 25:54My program has been interested in both
  • 25:57uncovering the molecular mechanism
  • 25:59for how RNA modification controls
  • 26:02an immune response as well as to
  • 26:05understand if there are targets along
  • 26:07that pathway that we can identify two
  • 26:10to specifically target cancer cells.
  • 26:12Thank you.
  • 26:21Great, thank you.
  • 26:23I I I I don't think the next
  • 26:26speaker needs any introduction.
  • 26:28Doctor Who Saki has become world famous
  • 26:31was before but now really very well
  • 26:34known for all her work in COVID-19.
  • 26:37She's an outstanding immunologist and also
  • 26:39has a research interest in cancer also Kiko,
  • 26:43please, please go ahead.
  • 26:46Thank you Mario.
  • 26:47I'm delighted to be here.
  • 26:49So today I'm just going to start
  • 26:51with this principle guiding
  • 26:53effective cancer immunotherapy.
  • 26:55And I'm borrowing a page from Doctor
  • 26:58IRA Mehlman's cancer immunity cycle
  • 27:00book as any anyone on this call
  • 27:03probably has seen this but essentially
  • 27:05just wanted to highlight that there
  • 27:08are steps in immune surveillance
  • 27:10and clearance of cancer that is not
  • 27:14working very well and that's Why.
  • 27:16People develop cancer and some of
  • 27:18them are treatable with checkpoint
  • 27:21inhibitors while others are not.
  • 27:23So my laboratory has started to
  • 27:26really examine these fundamental
  • 27:28issues relating to all those stages of
  • 27:31recognition and clearance of cancer.
  • 27:33So the immune surveillance begins by
  • 27:36dendritic cells within the cancer.
  • 27:39Carrying the The Antigen to the
  • 27:41draining lymph node and that stimulates
  • 27:44T cells that are specific to cancer
  • 27:47antigens and those T cells can
  • 27:50divide and become effector cells.
  • 27:52They will migrate back to the site
  • 27:55of cancer to infiltrate into that
  • 27:57issue and that allows for T cells to
  • 28:00recognize cancer cells through specific
  • 28:03antigen and clearance of the cancer.
  • 28:06Using cytotoxic mechanisms and of course,
  • 28:09checkpoint inhibitors can.
  • 28:10Really engage in in this whole cycle
  • 28:13by allowing the effector function of
  • 28:16T cells to occur more more robustly.
  • 28:20Next slide, please.
  • 28:21So we began to sort of try to
  • 28:24understand why this immunity cycle
  • 28:27doesn't work in most cases,
  • 28:30and one of the issues that we
  • 28:33tackled recently,
  • 28:34which was this paper that
  • 28:36published earlier this year,
  • 28:38we discovered that the.
  • 28:40Lymphatics that are draining the brain,
  • 28:43which is the monagea lymphatics.
  • 28:46Do not do not drain that issue as well
  • 28:49as other lymphatics found in the skin.
  • 28:52For example an by increasing the
  • 28:55drainage through the meningeal
  • 28:57lymphatics by introducing into the
  • 28:59CSF or veg of see we can actually
  • 29:02increase the immune surveillance
  • 29:04and better priming for glioblastoma
  • 29:06and also other brain meds and so
  • 29:10this is so it's driven us to in new
  • 29:14technology we call in faxes where.
  • 29:16Doctor Alan Ring and I are
  • 29:18collaborating to make a better sort
  • 29:21of more specific agent that can
  • 29:23stimulate the meningeal lymphatics
  • 29:25to increase immune surveillance
  • 29:27in clearance of cancer.
  • 29:29Next please.
  • 29:32Next please.
  • 29:33The other key issue is the antigen,
  • 29:37so in addition to the mutation
  • 29:39load that accumulates in cancer,
  • 29:42there's also this other type of
  • 29:44antigen that we're focusing on,
  • 29:46which is the endogenous retrovirus
  • 29:49which Anderson at Nosiness.
  • 29:50Retroviruses are occupy 8% of our genome,
  • 29:53and many of them have coding capacity,
  • 29:57and many are mostly silenced
  • 29:59after developmental stage.
  • 30:00Early developmental stage,
  • 30:02but can be reactivated during
  • 30:04oncogenesis and so we're targeting
  • 30:06and what first identifying what
  • 30:08kinds of endogenous retroviruses
  • 30:09or reactivated in some cancers and
  • 30:12targeting this using a new tool
  • 30:15that we created called Earth map.
  • 30:17And this is also an ongoing collaboration
  • 30:21with Marcus Bosenberg's group as well
  • 30:24as Grace Chen to look at these or of
  • 30:28dysregulation in cancer tissues next please.
  • 30:31So once these thank you,
  • 30:33once these energies are
  • 30:35recognized by T cells,
  • 30:36diesel still have to migrate
  • 30:38back into the tumor tissue to
  • 30:40perform its cytolytic function.
  • 30:42And what we're trying to do is to
  • 30:45encourage this process by stimulating
  • 30:47the local micro environment using
  • 30:49short RNA that stimulates free guy,
  • 30:52which we call stem Blue Barney SLR.
  • 30:54This is a collaboration with
  • 30:56an appliance group here,
  • 30:58and we've just formed a new
  • 31:01company called rig immune.
  • 31:02Which is really inoculation of
  • 31:04this LR into the tumor to stimulate
  • 31:07not only T cell migration,
  • 31:09but also priming of tumor specific
  • 31:12T cell and possibly Rick Kumanan
  • 31:14clearance of this these tumors,
  • 31:17and finally,
  • 31:17in order for the checkpoint
  • 31:20inhibitors to work in,
  • 31:21you know privileged organs like
  • 31:23the brain we are allowing those
  • 31:26antibodies such as anti PD L1 to
  • 31:28come into that issue using a BBB
  • 31:31access technology we developed.
  • 31:33We call synaxis an.
  • 31:35It allows the baby to transient
  • 31:37Lee open to enable any kind of
  • 31:40macromolecules to come into the
  • 31:43brain for transition time period
  • 31:45for a better access.
  • 31:47An better clearance of glioblastoma
  • 31:49so I'll end there. Thank you.
  • 31:54OK, cool, thank you.
  • 31:56It's really outstanding science so it's
  • 31:58my pleasure to introduce our moment.
  • 32:00He's as you know, the vice president.
  • 32:03Cancer immunology for Genentech.
  • 32:04Professor of biochemistry
  • 32:05and biophysics at UCSF,
  • 32:06but formerly before all of those was
  • 32:09actually ahead of cell biology here at Yale.
  • 32:12Higher first of all, let me thank you
  • 32:14for agreeing to provide some comments.
  • 32:17We just like to ask you to to give you.
  • 32:20Give us briefly your thoughts
  • 32:22about challenges and opportunities
  • 32:23in Immuno Oncology.
  • 32:24Highlight those that you think might be
  • 32:27might benefit from collaborations with.
  • 32:29With academics for example.
  • 32:32Thanks Mario Dan Hyder. All my
  • 32:34friends who there is been alluded to.
  • 32:37I do have multiple connections to deal.
  • 32:39In fact, we've spent probably well
  • 32:42more than half of my adult life there,
  • 32:45so I left back in 2007.
  • 32:47Really for the purpose of trying
  • 32:49to accelerate this field,
  • 32:51feeling that what was really needed
  • 32:53in the first instance was the
  • 32:55production of experimental agents
  • 32:57that we could get into patients and
  • 33:00sample what is actually happening.
  • 33:02As a consequence of therapy,
  • 33:04in order to understand it.
  • 33:06As I think I often find myself
  • 33:08saying the only model for human
  • 33:10cancer is human cancer in the end,
  • 33:13and it's not to say that you
  • 33:15can't learn many,
  • 33:16many critical things from mice,
  • 33:18but if you actually want to reduce
  • 33:20to practice what it is you're
  • 33:22trying to do in the laboratory,
  • 33:24you need access not only to patients,
  • 33:26but to experimental drugs that
  • 33:28you can actually perform.
  • 33:29These types of critical studies in patients.
  • 33:31And it turns out that that's a very
  • 33:34difficult thing to do in academia.
  • 33:36And moving to a biotech company.
  • 33:38Large one is genetic really
  • 33:40provided that opportunity.
  • 33:41So that's something that the companies
  • 33:43do well and I think one reason I
  • 33:46chose or took the opportunity to
  • 33:49move to Genetec as opposed to other
  • 33:51places was be cause it is a very
  • 33:54highly researched based place.
  • 33:56In other words,
  • 33:57we are as serious I think as you are,
  • 34:00or I was well also faculty member in
  • 34:03pushing the field of basic research.
  • 34:06Particularly in this area, as as anyone.
  • 34:11Part of that was to try and breakdown.
  • 34:17With biomarker studies understanding
  • 34:18what the various steps in cancer had
  • 34:21to be overcome in order to generate
  • 34:23a productive immune response,
  • 34:25and Akiko is kindly already referred to this.
  • 34:29But again, the main reason was really
  • 34:32the production of agents that that we
  • 34:35could use to study these various steps
  • 34:37and so called cancer immunity cycle.
  • 34:40Now, OK, we've done that.
  • 34:42We have a variety of agents in the clinic
  • 34:45and they're starting to study them.
  • 34:48These range from the checkpoint
  • 34:50inhibitors such as the PD one,
  • 34:52blockers that Roy Herbst is
  • 34:54already brought to your attention
  • 34:57and everybody already knows.
  • 34:59Second generation checkpoint inhibitors.
  • 35:00The one that we have advanced
  • 35:03in something called Tigit.
  • 35:05We seem to be performing quite
  • 35:07well in the clinic thus far
  • 35:09in a variety of indications,
  • 35:10but I think more importantly,
  • 35:12the next major goal is going to
  • 35:14be to address those patients.
  • 35:16As Akiko was saying,
  • 35:17that do not exhibit much in the way
  • 35:20of response to checkpoint inhibitors.
  • 35:21In order to do this,
  • 35:23you need to have a holistic view of
  • 35:25various steps and potential rate limiting
  • 35:27steps that impede the progress of an
  • 35:30immune response in a cancer patient.
  • 35:32The one that I think we find.
  • 35:34Most daunting at the moment.
  • 35:36Certainly the most common is found
  • 35:39here between steps 5 and step 6,
  • 35:41which is the egress or.
  • 35:45Tumor reactive T cells.
  • 35:48Or other cells from the blood
  • 35:50got into the tumor because most
  • 35:52tumors are not just sitting there
  • 35:55waiting to receive these cells,
  • 35:57but rather are invested by a highly
  • 36:00immunosuppressive and physical blockade
  • 36:01in the form of the Peri Tumoral Strama,
  • 36:04which basically Christy
  • 36:05cells and inactivates them.
  • 36:07So I think one of the major scientific
  • 36:09challenges we have is to how to
  • 36:12overcome that stromal barrier,
  • 36:14and by doing so,
  • 36:15we feel we can probably unlock.
  • 36:18The benefits of even just first
  • 36:21generation checkpoint inhibitors to
  • 36:23as many as 50% more cancer patients
  • 36:25than are currently being addressed
  • 36:27with just checkpoint inhibitors alone
  • 36:29or in combination with chemotherapy
  • 36:31or other types of targeted therapy.
  • 36:33Now this is where the partnership
  • 36:36comes in because.
  • 36:38To add a company,
  • 36:40we don't have a medical school
  • 36:43or a hospital and less.
  • 36:45Happened to be in a John Le Carre novel
  • 36:49which didn't workout too well for them.
  • 36:52But traditional relationship
  • 36:55between companies and academic
  • 36:56institutions is to fill that gap.
  • 36:59In other words,
  • 37:00when trials are run of new
  • 37:02investigational agents,
  • 37:03they run at hospitals.
  • 37:04To a first approximation,
  • 37:06those hospitals are in academic centers,
  • 37:08but that's again a really one way
  • 37:11relationship that allows you to
  • 37:13generate some important clinical data
  • 37:15on the Efficacy and safety of a new agent,
  • 37:18but doesn't really allow
  • 37:20anybody to learn very much.
  • 37:22That can only be done by having
  • 37:25a joint enterprise that is still
  • 37:27as committed to pushing forward
  • 37:30and understanding the science that
  • 37:32underlies all of these events.
  • 37:34And do that in partnership.
  • 37:36Where where on the company size
  • 37:39early on the genetic side we can
  • 37:42bring to bear many assays and
  • 37:44resources and insights that we've
  • 37:47gotten from our experience by
  • 37:49treating thousands and thousands of
  • 37:51cancer patients with these agents,
  • 37:54together with the rare an insightful
  • 37:57cyantific insight that one can find
  • 37:59at a top academic institution,
  • 38:01and they all certainly for us.
  • 38:04Is it's always at the top of the
  • 38:07list and not only because of
  • 38:10my own filial loyalty,
  • 38:12but simply be cause the focus on
  • 38:14immunology and how that interfaces
  • 38:17with human biology at Yale has
  • 38:19really emerged over the last 10
  • 38:22years or so is really being quite.
  • 38:26Quite inspiring and I also find
  • 38:28it much more easy to deal with the
  • 38:31culture and the commitment of the
  • 38:33faculty and the administration to
  • 38:35actually advancing these types of studies.
  • 38:37Then I find in many of our other
  • 38:40partner institutions where often
  • 38:41unfortunately one finds a variety
  • 38:43of roadblocks.
  • 38:44So I think you know,
  • 38:46Yale provides a really good substrate to
  • 38:49actually get these kinds of studies done.
  • 38:52What's needed is to get together on
  • 38:55the types of samples that are needed,
  • 38:57what types of analytics are required,
  • 38:59and then in the matter of any good
  • 39:02collaboration each party brings to the
  • 39:04table what that party is best at doing.
  • 39:07And in our Case No.
  • 39:08We believe we have a lot of science to offer,
  • 39:12not just support and funding,
  • 39:14and in your case certainly got
  • 39:16more than just patients to offer.
  • 39:18There is a enormous amount of as I said,
  • 39:21scientific expertise and insight that.
  • 39:23Will turn out to be critical.
  • 39:25I think to solving these various problems.
  • 39:28So with that I think I probably
  • 39:31end my remarks and continue
  • 39:33on to the next next element.
  • 39:37Alright, thank you very much and
  • 39:38thank you for the kind words.
  • 39:40Let me please invite all the panelists
  • 39:42to turn on their microphones in their
  • 39:45in their videos and I want to remind
  • 39:47all the attendees to please submit your
  • 39:50questions through the chat feature.
  • 39:53I might I might just start.
  • 39:55I see a couple of questions,
  • 39:56but I might just start with just a
  • 39:58challenging question to the panelists
  • 40:00and any. Body can take this.
  • 40:02What do you think we've,
  • 40:04you know, as you know,
  • 40:05the problem in the clinic is that
  • 40:08a subset respond to anti PD one
  • 40:10and PDL one few combinations.
  • 40:13The majority of patients don't
  • 40:14respond obviously although
  • 40:15we've made enormous progress.
  • 40:17What do you think we've learned from
  • 40:20mechanisms of response to anti PD
  • 40:22one or video one that would drive?
  • 40:27Future targets future development.
  • 40:33Maybe I'll start with that one if that's OK,
  • 40:36Miro and I'll let others jump in.
  • 40:38So I think you know it's been a bit
  • 40:42frustrating on those fronts in that.
  • 40:45Mechanisms of resistance
  • 40:46have been determined,
  • 40:47one of which is loss of MH C Class
  • 40:51one or reduction of MH C Class one
  • 40:55through a variety of mechanisms.
  • 40:58You know there are some.
  • 40:59You know reasons why that you'd think
  • 41:02that might not result in an resistance,
  • 41:04because natural killer cells might
  • 41:06be able to kill those tumors
  • 41:08without that inhibitory signal.
  • 41:10I'd like to highlight for those of
  • 41:12you haven't followed Aaron rings,
  • 41:14I'll 18 story that this is one of the
  • 41:16few therapies that's actually effective
  • 41:18on both class one proficient in class,
  • 41:21one deficient tumors,
  • 41:22but that's still a pretty
  • 41:24small minority of cases.
  • 41:25I think there are also issues with.
  • 41:28Low mutation burden.
  • 41:29Lack of antigenicity.
  • 41:30I think I referred to T cell trafficking
  • 41:32as well and the reasons why T cells
  • 41:35traffic and actually I would say
  • 41:37that as a pathologist we don't know
  • 41:39if T cells were there and then left.
  • 41:42We typically get one snapshot
  • 41:44and we you know,
  • 41:45we know that they're not there when we look,
  • 41:48but I think there's a number of things
  • 41:50that we just simply don't understand
  • 41:52about how anti cancer immunity happens
  • 41:54even to the level of our the till
  • 41:57are the cells that are in the tumor.
  • 42:00Actually what's responding
  • 42:00to PD one blockade?
  • 42:02Or is it?
  • 42:03Something outside of that,
  • 42:04and those are pretty basic questions.
  • 42:06I think that's where yell could help
  • 42:08others workout how these things work.
  • 42:10So I think the mechanisms of resistance
  • 42:13are still need quite a bit of work.
  • 42:17If you do any of you think that there's a,
  • 42:20how would we approach those low mutation
  • 42:22tumors that the tumors that have load
  • 42:25the mutation burdens may be endogenous?
  • 42:26Retrovirus would be a target,
  • 42:28but are there other targets?
  • 42:30Or will we eventually need to
  • 42:32isolate out rare specific T cells
  • 42:34and clone out the T cell receptors?
  • 42:36What do you think are the
  • 42:38approaches to address those?
  • 42:39Those types of tumors?
  • 42:41Akiko, maybe I can ask you to address that,
  • 42:43since you are the world
  • 42:44expert on an 8 immunology.
  • 42:46Oh, thank you, yeah,
  • 42:48so that's the issue that you know.
  • 42:50First there has to be some sort of
  • 42:53antigen that T cells can recognize
  • 42:55unless we go into the NK type of therapy
  • 42:58that Aaron might want to comment later.
  • 43:00But but you know what?
  • 43:02We are kind of not looking at is
  • 43:05really the endogenous retrovirus.
  • 43:07Sodium in the cancer,
  • 43:09and whether those are many,
  • 43:11are coding capable sequences
  • 43:12that are dysregulated and up
  • 43:14regulated and expressed in cancer,
  • 43:16and so right now what we're
  • 43:18trying to do is to elude the
  • 43:21peptides from the MHC of cancers.
  • 43:23Different cancer cells.
  • 43:24Jeff issues.
  • 43:25You and I are actually collaborating
  • 43:27on this project so we can actually
  • 43:30identify if there are peptides that
  • 43:32are derived from herbs that can
  • 43:34become target of T cell recognition.
  • 43:37And can we? Take advantage of that.
  • 43:40And methods to upregulate those antigens?
  • 43:42I guess you're also working on it
  • 43:44at this time. Yes, Marcus.
  • 43:49I'm going to take a question from
  • 43:52the audience intermittently,
  • 43:53as we're addressing these questions.
  • 43:54One was are there treatments coming
  • 43:56along for for glioblastomas? Now?
  • 43:58I'm not a glioblastoma expert, but akiko.
  • 44:00I'll just turn that over to you
  • 44:02because I think your research
  • 44:04address is perhaps one of the
  • 44:06bigger problems in glioblastoma.
  • 44:08Right, so glioblastoma,
  • 44:10unlike other non non brain tumors,
  • 44:13have an extra layer of challenge,
  • 44:15which is the there's very little
  • 44:19immunosurveillance that's occurring
  • 44:21in the brain due to a limited
  • 44:24drainage by the meningeal lymphatics.
  • 44:27And the fact that you know,
  • 44:29you know priming T cells and T cells are
  • 44:32not migrating into the tissue either.
  • 44:34So one of the ways in which we're trying
  • 44:37to overcome this is to increase immune
  • 44:40surveillance by injecting veg FCI.
  • 44:42Referred to that in my slide and
  • 44:44we're calling it lymph axis and
  • 44:47essentially to increase the drainage.
  • 44:49An stimulation of T cells against you
  • 44:51manage and in the draining lymph node.
  • 44:54And once that happens, these diesels
  • 44:56can migrate back into the brain.
  • 44:59And tackle the CIMA.
  • 45:00Ran it.
  • 45:01It obviously works well with
  • 45:03checkpoint inhibitors as well,
  • 45:04so and we're also collaborating with
  • 45:07Aaron's lab to make a better reagent
  • 45:09that can more specifically stimulate
  • 45:12visit for three to be able to do this
  • 45:15efficiently without any side effects.
  • 45:17So that's one possible way that
  • 45:19we're trying to tackle this issue.
  • 45:22That's excellent Roy maybe.
  • 45:23Yeah, I was wondering if you
  • 45:25could address the brain tumors
  • 45:26for also that maybe that could be
  • 45:28a project in this war actually,
  • 45:30but but other other approaches not
  • 45:32only within immunology but also to
  • 45:34mention that there other Yale engage
  • 45:35sessions with other approaches
  • 45:36to glioblastoma is also right.
  • 45:38Well, there is this
  • 45:39more group and they are studying
  • 45:41that and I think he goes.
  • 45:43Approach would be a good one,
  • 45:45but I did want to mention Mario was
  • 45:46the need to personalize immunotherapy
  • 45:48and I think we're right on the
  • 45:50precipice of doing that in a place like
  • 45:53yellow should be able to do that so.
  • 45:55We already heard that you know,
  • 45:57if you don't have MHT one or you don't
  • 45:59have the adaptive immune response,
  • 46:01and that's being shown for 456 years now.
  • 46:03But what do you do if you have a cold tumor?
  • 46:06If you have a tumor that doesn't have HD one,
  • 46:08no capability had a paper on that.
  • 46:10It's about 5% of lung cancers,
  • 46:12so I'd like to propose that you
  • 46:14know what we need to do is we need
  • 46:16to dissect tumors out, you know.
  • 46:18And just like we would profile
  • 46:19a tumor in genetically,
  • 46:20we need to profile the immune
  • 46:22microenvironment and these cold tumors.
  • 46:23These tumors that might not be driven.
  • 46:26PDL one or perhaps ticket is involved
  • 46:27as we heard tomorrow we need to start
  • 46:30thinking about the right combinations,
  • 46:31but you know the biggest problem
  • 46:33is we're just flying blind and
  • 46:35the clinical world will do. That.
  • 46:37Will go on for years if not stopped.
  • 46:39You know just combining different
  • 46:41drugs and using them,
  • 46:42but I think you know right now
  • 46:44it's a perfect time and you and
  • 46:46I have talked about this.
  • 46:47It's very complicated in refractory setting.
  • 46:49Someone gets chemo immunotherapy
  • 46:50and then refractory.
  • 46:51There could be thousands of different
  • 46:53mechanisms put in the frontline
  • 46:54setting primary resistance and
  • 46:56we know that with Ateez Alisme,
  • 46:57Abbott Pembrolizumab.
  • 46:58Half the patients about will respond
  • 47:00when you have the high PD L1 Group,
  • 47:02the other half don't.
  • 47:02I would suggest that the group to
  • 47:04look for some of the mechanisms
  • 47:05we've heard about today.
  • 47:06I can't wait to get my hands on Aaron's drug,
  • 47:09you know,
  • 47:09and look at that and things like that.
  • 47:12You know, maybe I can ask her to comment,
  • 47:15because obviously that's a major.
  • 47:17You know you. You need to know what
  • 47:19the mechanisms of resistance are in
  • 47:21Biomarkers for development of your drugs.
  • 47:23So how do you approach that internally?
  • 47:25And also in collaboration
  • 47:26with academic institutions?
  • 47:28I think you know the the problem
  • 47:31of resistance has even a
  • 47:33darker aspect to it,
  • 47:34which is we don't really,
  • 47:36truly understand the mechanism of
  • 47:39why things work when they work.
  • 47:42Someone's were diluted to this,
  • 47:44but our understanding of how
  • 47:46these checkpoint inhibitors work.
  • 47:47Even Witcher vision Lee
  • 47:49was framed by off bias,
  • 47:51all based in the series of assumptions as
  • 47:54reversing this process of T cell exhaustion,
  • 47:57thereby acting in the tumor
  • 47:59to reactivate T cells,
  • 48:00either certainly is not the whole story.
  • 48:03In fact, maybe only marginally
  • 48:05true in some patients.
  • 48:06So if in fact the PD one PD,
  • 48:10L1 or Tigit Axis along
  • 48:12with simulate 4C28 Axis.
  • 48:14Full works in lymphoid tissues to
  • 48:16expand the T cell compartment.
  • 48:18Then that means we have the entire
  • 48:20mechanism of how PD one blockade works.
  • 48:23Not quite right if not incorrect.
  • 48:25If that's the case,
  • 48:27it's very difficult to know how
  • 48:29to improve upon that or how to
  • 48:31understand resistance mechanisms.
  • 48:33If you don't really know the mechanism
  • 48:35of immune mechanism that Modulated
  • 48:37as a consequence of your drug.
  • 48:39So I think it's important to.
  • 48:43You know,
  • 48:44even just as a basic science project,
  • 48:47be sure that we really understand
  • 48:49that all of the predictions associated
  • 48:51with a presumed mechanism of action
  • 48:54are actually correct before we
  • 48:56can really understand resistance,
  • 48:58you know.
  • 48:59That said,
  • 49:00there's certain aspects of
  • 49:02resistance that are that are
  • 49:04finding increasingly important.
  • 49:06We've invested very heavily
  • 49:08in tumor antigens,
  • 49:10particularly mutant knew antigens as well as.
  • 49:16Endogenous elements that Akiko is setting.
  • 49:19Chloe Arbiser line elements and
  • 49:21transposable elements as potential antigens,
  • 49:23'cause they certainly a
  • 49:25great antigens in mice,
  • 49:27but we find that you know the context
  • 49:30of our vaccine programs you see as
  • 49:33significant debilitating amount of MSE loss.
  • 49:36Sometimes it's a hard loss which
  • 49:39means loss of heterozygosity
  • 49:41for particular MA serial.
  • 49:42Other times it means soft loss which is
  • 49:46just simply transcriptional repression.
  • 49:48And you need to workout computational
  • 49:50workflows so that you could
  • 49:52actually examine patients on a
  • 49:53patient by patient basis to find
  • 49:55out not only what the range of
  • 49:57antigens are that they're making,
  • 49:58so that you can design an appropri.
  • 50:01Vaccine in fact,
  • 50:02that was that that's your goal.
  • 50:05Or design an appropriate
  • 50:06type of cell therapy,
  • 50:08but also to know how that
  • 50:11patient is reacting,
  • 50:12whether the patient responds or
  • 50:14doesn't respond at the genetic level
  • 50:17in the tumor in terms of whether
  • 50:20transcriptional patterns are different
  • 50:21that now create a resistance environment,
  • 50:24perhaps by losing irrelevant MSE molecule.
  • 50:27Or again bye bye genetic loss,
  • 50:30which is something that the tumors do.
  • 50:32Unfortunately very very well and has been
  • 50:35a real problem even be targeted therapies.
  • 50:38So you know,
  • 50:39again,
  • 50:39I think this type of work can really only
  • 50:42be done on a patient by patient basis,
  • 50:45and it's not something if we use
  • 50:47clinical sites just to run trials.
  • 50:49And if you use us just to give
  • 50:52you drugs to run clinical trials,
  • 50:54that's not going to work.
  • 50:56That's not new advanced the field.
  • 50:58I think there really does need to be.
  • 51:02An interface which is developing
  • 51:04but really needs to be.
  • 51:07Advanced around the science,
  • 51:08even forgetting about the clinical
  • 51:10development issues for the moment,
  • 51:12but just, you know,
  • 51:13really concentrated on the
  • 51:14science that that is controlling
  • 51:16response and lack of response,
  • 51:18either as primary resistance
  • 51:20or acquired resistance.
  • 51:23Thank you, I mean, you know.
  • 51:24Obviously I followed your work
  • 51:26about the way PD one worked and
  • 51:28the effects on CD 28 signaling,
  • 51:30and there's been a lot of data about
  • 51:32the need for new for it's the early
  • 51:34stem cells that are generating the
  • 51:35anti tumor response and not the
  • 51:38terminally differentiated cells.
  • 51:39There's a lot of data out there that
  • 51:41makes the whole mechanism of how anti
  • 51:43PD one works relatively confusing,
  • 51:44but I just want to address maybe
  • 51:46a couple of issues 'cause we have
  • 51:48some expertise on the panel,
  • 51:50one based on errands,
  • 51:51work on our 18 and again going back to Akiko.
  • 51:54And maybe grace on on innate immunity.
  • 51:57How do you?
  • 51:57How do you view the in patients
  • 52:00who lose class one and and maybe
  • 52:02don't have a lot of T cells?
  • 52:04How do you think that we can Co opt
  • 52:07innate immunity to treat those patients?
  • 52:09Let me just start with them because
  • 52:11I think he has some interesting
  • 52:13data with I'll 18 and it may be
  • 52:16good at Grayson Akiko and see what
  • 52:18their thoughts are about this.
  • 52:22And this is obviously a
  • 52:23topic that here at Yale,
  • 52:25we have a really keen an intense interest.
  • 52:28You know from some of the initial
  • 52:30observations that that loss of
  • 52:31beta 2 micro Glenn was for current
  • 52:33theme of patients who acquired
  • 52:36secondary resistance immunotherapy.
  • 52:37So Marcus and I have been working on
  • 52:40this problem looking for preclinical
  • 52:41agents that could that could treat
  • 52:44mouse tumors where we have deleted
  • 52:46MHT class one or take tumors that
  • 52:48naturally have loss of other components
  • 52:50of antigen presentation like tapasin.
  • 52:53As well and then we see you know,
  • 52:55as you may expect, that you know me loud.
  • 52:58Immunological dogma is that NK cells
  • 53:00should recognize these cells that have
  • 53:03lost image C Class one this marker itself.
  • 53:05But we know that the truthfully NK cells,
  • 53:08particularly the tumor micro environment,
  • 53:09become rapidly energic or exhausted,
  • 53:11depending on what terminology want to use.
  • 53:13This is work by David Relay and others.
  • 53:16And so it is clear preclinically that we can
  • 53:19reinvigorate some of those NK cell response.
  • 53:21But we started kind therapies.
  • 53:23Others have started to use.
  • 53:25Agents against NK cell receptors,
  • 53:27like agonists of the NK G2D.
  • 53:29That's like sort of as best you could say,
  • 53:31TC are equivalent and NK cells or inhibiting
  • 53:34key receptors like the anti NK G2A.
  • 53:36That's the Mona Lisa map drug.
  • 53:38It actually has some activity when
  • 53:40combined with monoclonal antibodies.
  • 53:41I think one thing that is underexplored,
  • 53:43but it's going to be a major challenge
  • 53:46in harnessing NK cell activity,
  • 53:48particularly against these tumors.
  • 53:49Last class one is a lot of these
  • 53:52preclinical models and work guilty of
  • 53:54it here at Yale are not amino edited.
  • 53:56So in the same way that tumors become
  • 53:58amino edited against T cells they can
  • 54:01become Immuno edited against NK cells.
  • 54:03In loss of self antigens is
  • 54:04not enough to drive killing.
  • 54:06Sorry.
  • 54:06Lots of markers himself like image C
  • 54:08Class one is not enough to drive killing.
  • 54:11You need you need other signals.
  • 54:13NK,
  • 54:13activator signals antagonist signals in
  • 54:15tumor cells appear to edit those out.
  • 54:17For a great example of that has been
  • 54:19seen in lymphoma where we know that
  • 54:21that you know class one loss is common.
  • 54:24But what usually Co occurs almost.
  • 54:26Always is loss of CD 2,
  • 54:28which is an important molecule
  • 54:29that drives NK cell killing,
  • 54:31and so I think really we need to think
  • 54:33about how can we do more than just
  • 54:36this inhibit or activate NK cells.
  • 54:38But how do we really direct the
  • 54:40tumor engagement?
  • 54:41I think there's some really exciting
  • 54:42programs like the dragon fight programs,
  • 54:44monoclonal antibodies.
  • 54:45Of course we're good at that and something
  • 54:48that we really keenly have our eye on,
  • 54:50something that Marcus and I are
  • 54:51working on at the Center for
  • 54:53precision cancer modeling.
  • 54:56And Grace, What do you think about your rig?
  • 54:59I agonist or that would they be
  • 55:02able to address this issue?
  • 55:03Yeah, I think these are really important
  • 55:06questions and highlights the point
  • 55:08that I read brought up about coupling
  • 55:10the basic science with the translation
  • 55:12all aspects right because we think
  • 55:15that there are potentially new types
  • 55:17of science that's happening within
  • 55:19different types of immune cells,
  • 55:21either in response to new antigens
  • 55:23or under normal conditions,
  • 55:24and that would be important to understand.
  • 55:27Or how we can then address in disease states.
  • 55:31So, for example, there's pulmonary
  • 55:33evidence that RNA modifications,
  • 55:35and specifically the N 6 methyl
  • 55:37adenosine that I mentioned.
  • 55:39The levels are different in, you know,
  • 55:42cancer situations versus healthy
  • 55:44situations and that they change in
  • 55:47different types of immune cells.
  • 55:49So given that Arnie modifications is
  • 55:51like an epic transcriptomic regulator,
  • 55:54it controls all sorts of different
  • 55:56aspects and within a cell.
  • 55:59M6A has been shown to control
  • 56:01the transcript stability as well
  • 56:04as its cellular localization,
  • 56:06as well as its ability to be translated.
  • 56:09So we have data showing that
  • 56:12depending on the level of M6A,
  • 56:15the Genomic Architecture is different,
  • 56:17and the Genomic confirmation then
  • 56:19affects the types of transcripts
  • 56:22that are being produced,
  • 56:24and subsequently the proteins that
  • 56:26could be expressed from those
  • 56:28transcripts and stuff we can identify.
  • 56:31Key aspects that are differentially
  • 56:34changing between cancer states or
  • 56:36healthy States and or the different
  • 56:39types of immune cells in a cancer state.
  • 56:42Potentially,
  • 56:42we have new targets to then go after
  • 56:45in sort of difficult situations.
  • 56:49Let me let akiko in an Marcus comment
  • 56:51'cause I you know this is an area that's
  • 56:54become a substantial interest to us,
  • 56:56including the myeloid component.
  • 56:57So maybe you can comment a little
  • 56:59bit on that. Akiko and Marcus.
  • 57:03Thank you so since the NK issue is so
  • 57:06nicely covered by air and I'm just going
  • 57:09to sort of mention another thing that it's
  • 57:13fundamental to immuno oncology Ann yet
  • 57:16really hasn't garnered enough attention,
  • 57:18which is the sort of immunosuppressive state.
  • 57:22Of tumor burden and this I learned kind of,
  • 57:25you know, through experiment.
  • 57:26So the rest of my lab does antiviral
  • 57:30immunity, and so we've been looking
  • 57:32at what happens to antiviral immunity
  • 57:34in mice that are bearing tumors an
  • 57:37they are really immuno suppressed.
  • 57:39They cannot generate diesel immunity.
  • 57:41In case else you know their
  • 57:44dendritic cells are wacky.
  • 57:45So I think before we can even start thinking
  • 57:49about how to improve immune oncology.
  • 57:52We have to deal with this impact
  • 57:53of tumor burden and what it's
  • 57:55doing to the immune system.
  • 57:57I don't think we understand that very well.
  • 57:59Or maybe I'm just being ignorant
  • 58:01of those facts,
  • 58:02but I feel like that's something
  • 58:03that we need to deal with no matter
  • 58:05what the immunotherapy is going
  • 58:07to be in order to really elicit
  • 58:09a robust immunity against tumors.
  • 58:13Marcus, if you could comment,
  • 58:14yeah, that's excellent.
  • 58:15Sure, yeah. I think it's really interesting.
  • 58:17IRA also had kind of touched on
  • 58:19this to talking about how I mean
  • 58:221 version of MHT class losses,
  • 58:23sort of by allelic beta,
  • 58:25two microglobulin loss and everything is gone
  • 58:27and you expect NK cells perhaps to hit those,
  • 58:30but it's probably more subtle than that.
  • 58:32Frequently have specific MHT class,
  • 58:33one alleles or even specific
  • 58:35antigens that are really important.
  • 58:36Antigens that are lost and it's really hard
  • 58:39to know how that happens along the way,
  • 58:41but I think one of the things
  • 58:43that's been surprising too.
  • 58:45I think many immuno oncology field.
  • 58:47Is the demonstration by a lot of different
  • 58:49approaches that interferon gamma
  • 58:51reception or interferon reception and
  • 58:53tumor cells is really critical for being
  • 58:55able to be killed by the immune system?
  • 58:57And it seems that one of the principle
  • 59:00things that that does is upregulate
  • 59:01MHC class one in the tumor cells
  • 59:04so the transcriptional regulation
  • 59:05of MFC class one in tumor cells is
  • 59:08really really important and some of
  • 59:10the approaches that people have been
  • 59:11referring to with innate immunity and
  • 59:14even things like cytosolic nucleic
  • 59:15acid sensing like Regai agonism.
  • 59:17And things like that were in our hands.
  • 59:20Irv reactivation is great at Reactivating.
  • 59:23You know interferon secretion
  • 59:25and sometimes type.
  • 59:26One interferon can substitute for
  • 59:28Interferon Gamma at least an upregulation
  • 59:31of MFC Class 1 SI think things that
  • 59:34are locally going to be inducing the T
  • 59:37cell tumor cell interaction in that fashion.
  • 59:40An override whatever local
  • 59:42immunosuppressive effects that are
  • 59:43there will really be critical.
  • 59:45I think one of the difficulties
  • 59:48that we've had.
  • 59:49In studying.
  • 59:50The tumor microenvironment is that
  • 59:52it's been very difficult.
  • 59:53For instance, I mean T regs have
  • 59:55a very well established role,
  • 59:57but other aspects, like whatever
  • 59:59versions one will call different MD.
  • 01:00:00Yes,
  • 01:00:01sees things like that,
  • 01:00:02so myeloid derived factors that
  • 01:00:04can be suppressive than tumor
  • 01:00:05environment or hard to entirely
  • 01:00:07get rid of in most contexts.
  • 01:00:09And you can't really study
  • 01:00:10them adequately in human.
  • 01:00:12So I think their roles an exactly what
  • 01:00:14they're doing has been harder to determine,
  • 01:00:16but.
  • 01:00:18I'd refer back to some comments about the
  • 01:00:21personalized immunotherapy and how you know,
  • 01:00:23with these explant assays you can
  • 01:00:25actually do these things and we can
  • 01:00:28keep tumors alive for over a month
  • 01:00:30with all the sto kiamat re preserved
  • 01:00:33and one could reconstitute tumors
  • 01:00:34to take out my load components.
  • 01:00:37So I think I'm very enthusiastic about
  • 01:00:39this approach to actually evaluate
  • 01:00:41how different cell types contribute
  • 01:00:43to localized immune suppression,
  • 01:00:44which hopefully will lead
  • 01:00:46to mechanistic advances,
  • 01:00:47an understanding.
  • 01:00:49Let me just ask you one more question
  • 01:00:51before I want to turn out back to Iran.
  • 01:00:54Ask him a couple of questions but
  • 01:00:56the do you think that there's a role
  • 01:00:58for purely non T cell dependent
  • 01:01:00mechanisms in cancer treatment?
  • 01:01:02Do you think that we could without
  • 01:01:04getting any T cell response,
  • 01:01:06activate NK cells, myeloid cells,
  • 01:01:08macrophages in a sufficient way
  • 01:01:10or modulate their function that
  • 01:01:11you could see significant anti
  • 01:01:13tumor activity in the clinic?
  • 01:01:16I think you know there's a couple examples,
  • 01:01:19so at the NK approaches, ankhar,
  • 01:01:21NK and things like that, I think that
  • 01:01:23it is likely to be possible to do that.
  • 01:01:28Other things that, for instance,
  • 01:01:30one of our researchers here at Yale Allies,
  • 01:01:32who is looking at using Carty with
  • 01:01:35myeloid cells, like with basophils,
  • 01:01:36another Excel types,
  • 01:01:37and that this approach might be
  • 01:01:39something that would be really,
  • 01:01:40really could work well,
  • 01:01:42and that's oppressive pathways.
  • 01:01:43Might not actually work as well
  • 01:01:44against a non T cell because that's
  • 01:01:47typically how the suppression
  • 01:01:48would be expected to work.
  • 01:01:50I think there's still some work
  • 01:01:51to be done in those areas,
  • 01:01:53but you know I I'm open to the
  • 01:01:56possibility that other things
  • 01:01:57can work and I think it's worth.
  • 01:01:59Pursuing it based on the preliminary
  • 01:02:01data that you're seeing in those areas.
  • 01:02:03So I am enthusiastic about that.
  • 01:02:07Interesting, so I just want to ask
  • 01:02:08you a question you you know you lead
  • 01:02:11development in a company and I wonder you
  • 01:02:13know that when you look at combinations,
  • 01:02:15all the combinations that we've done.
  • 01:02:17One is not overwhelmed by the by the
  • 01:02:19level of activity that's been observed.
  • 01:02:22Maybe it's because we don't
  • 01:02:23have the right biomarkers.
  • 01:02:24Have you taken home any any lessons
  • 01:02:26from the the three that seemed to
  • 01:02:28have worked CTA for chemotherapy
  • 01:02:30and vege perceptor Inhibitors,
  • 01:02:32which seem to be the ones that
  • 01:02:34are sort of at the forefront now,
  • 01:02:36notwithstanding the early Dec
  • 01:02:37with digit but but but those?
  • 01:02:39Those seem to have sort of
  • 01:02:41moved to the front,
  • 01:02:42which are not the ones that other than
  • 01:02:45CTA four chemotherapy and the veg F
  • 01:02:47Receptor Inhibitors would have been.
  • 01:02:49The top ones on my list 10 years ago.
  • 01:02:53No, you're actually right.
  • 01:02:55Mario. I mean when we decided
  • 01:02:58to go into using chemotherapy.
  • 01:03:02Theoretical pieces for that was not well,
  • 01:03:04Gee, maybe some of them if they're not.
  • 01:03:08Therefore, blade,
  • 01:03:09if you can choose those properties,
  • 01:03:11maybe they'll cause some type of information
  • 01:03:13or immunogenic cell death that will
  • 01:03:15somehow synergized with immunotherapy.
  • 01:03:16I think that's turned out not to be the case.
  • 01:03:20That my guess is now.
  • 01:03:22No looking having book
  • 01:03:25for epitope spreading and.
  • 01:03:28Expansion of TC Arts Fonality and stuff.
  • 01:03:30In lot of these patients.
  • 01:03:32I just think that's an additive
  • 01:03:34effect that you get a certain amount
  • 01:03:37of tumor debulking associated
  • 01:03:39with chemotherapy that then allows
  • 01:03:41the immunotherapy to do what it's
  • 01:03:43going to do almost separately.
  • 01:03:45So I think that the idea that at
  • 01:03:49least most conventional chemo.
  • 01:03:51Immunotherapy combinations are synergistic.
  • 01:03:53That's that's still waiting for
  • 01:03:56good evidence that case of.
  • 01:04:00Antagonist is an interesting
  • 01:04:02one where I think that is.
  • 01:04:04That's one of the examples where I
  • 01:04:07think we really need to look into that.
  • 01:04:11From a mechanistic POV in HTC for example,
  • 01:04:14the that particular combination is really
  • 01:04:17quite effective from surprisingly so,
  • 01:04:19especially considering
  • 01:04:19that in renal it's not.
  • 01:04:22So what's with that?
  • 01:04:23Because both of the system app on
  • 01:04:27it by itself is supposed to have.
  • 01:04:30Activity and in both of those indications,
  • 01:04:32so I take that to suggest that it's not
  • 01:04:36necessarily an additive phenomenon there,
  • 01:04:38but there's something that specific
  • 01:04:40that's going on in ACC that is
  • 01:04:43being addressed by the definition,
  • 01:04:46which could actually have to do
  • 01:04:48with myeloid cell suppression or
  • 01:04:50overcoming mile itself suppressions,
  • 01:04:52and certainly by Jeff is one way that
  • 01:04:55one can use to turn off dendritic cell
  • 01:04:58activity and antigen presentation,
  • 01:05:00so perhaps.
  • 01:05:01That's slowing down what aspect
  • 01:05:03of the problem.
  • 01:05:04So there again, is just a plea for saying,
  • 01:05:07You know,
  • 01:05:08we need to look into that from
  • 01:05:10mechanistic point of view,
  • 01:05:12better than we have thus far.
  • 01:05:16In terms of no future combinations. My.
  • 01:05:24What I keep trying to push is
  • 01:05:26to take a mechanistic approach,
  • 01:05:28look at the tumors and figure
  • 01:05:30out what what's wrong with them.
  • 01:05:32What is the rate limiting step here?
  • 01:05:34What is the rate limiting step
  • 01:05:35there and then try and pick apart
  • 01:05:38mechanisms associated with them,
  • 01:05:39and I think it markets are just saying and
  • 01:05:42I think it increasing number of cases.
  • 01:05:44It does look like the myeloid
  • 01:05:46compartment is playing a.
  • 01:05:48Important, but as yet poorly understood,
  • 01:05:50role in a lot of this,
  • 01:05:52and I think it's it's more than
  • 01:05:55high time to go back and look more
  • 01:05:58seriously at the myeloid compartment.
  • 01:06:01The whole field of so-called mileage
  • 01:06:03derived suppressor cells that I think is,
  • 01:06:05is still very very sketchy in
  • 01:06:07terms of the precision with which
  • 01:06:10those cells are described.
  • 01:06:11What they do and who they
  • 01:06:13are and how to modulate them.
  • 01:06:15So I think we have to kind
  • 01:06:18of back off in some way,
  • 01:06:20at least as scientists and understand
  • 01:06:22the basic immunology and cell
  • 01:06:24biology before really designing
  • 01:06:25and knowing precisely what agents
  • 01:06:27to bring forward in the interim.
  • 01:06:29Obviously we don't as.
  • 01:06:31Conditions don't want to wait
  • 01:06:32around for the basic scientists
  • 01:06:34to figure it all out for us,
  • 01:06:36assuming that they'll even do that.
  • 01:06:39But agents are coming out all the time
  • 01:06:41and I think crafting combinations of them,
  • 01:06:45which I find in companies,
  • 01:06:47is often akin to just throwing
  • 01:06:50spaghetti against the wall.
  • 01:06:52Still has to be.
  • 01:06:55In a fashion that has some some
  • 01:06:57logic associated with that,
  • 01:06:59and I think that's that's a struggle
  • 01:07:01in both of our communities to
  • 01:07:03just keep people from doing stuff
  • 01:07:06because it can be done and instead
  • 01:07:08spending your time and effort and
  • 01:07:11the commitment of patients to doing
  • 01:07:13those things that have the best
  • 01:07:15chance of working based on the
  • 01:07:17science as we currently understand it.
  • 01:07:21Thanks, Alright,
  • 01:07:22I'm glad you mentioned mileage,
  • 01:07:23so you're interested.
  • 01:07:24Also were very interested.
  • 01:07:25I think Marcus is prioritizing.
  • 01:07:26That is one of the areas of
  • 01:07:28research for the El Senor de
  • 01:07:30mean onkologie and we have.
  • 01:07:31You know, we can't bring everybody
  • 01:07:33onto the phone conversation.
  • 01:07:34We have a lot of expertise
  • 01:07:36here in immunobiology,
  • 01:07:36in that area that that again we
  • 01:07:38just can't fit everybody into
  • 01:07:40one hour and a half session.
  • 01:07:41So I just want to maybe just turn
  • 01:07:43to Roy for a second before you go
  • 01:07:46back to more of the basic science.
  • 01:07:48Well, there's a question
  • 01:07:49about rare tumor initiatives,
  • 01:07:50so I wanted to ask you 2 questions.
  • 01:07:52What do we do here about
  • 01:07:54rare tumors and what?
  • 01:07:55What are the efforts that we have?
  • 01:07:57And the other question that
  • 01:07:58I have for you is, you know.
  • 01:08:00Now, now that you've heard all this way,
  • 01:08:02where?
  • 01:08:02Where do you think the field
  • 01:08:04is headed in lung cancer?
  • 01:08:05For Immunobiology and even on Koleji.
  • 01:08:08Well, the second question is a
  • 01:08:10lot easier for me to answer than
  • 01:08:12the first rare tumors we send
  • 01:08:14them to Pat Larusso in phase one.
  • 01:08:16So we know where we're growing.
  • 01:08:18You know, the yell when I row is the
  • 01:08:21director of the deputy director of science.
  • 01:08:23You know we're seeing a couple
  • 01:08:25of 1000 patients now.
  • 01:08:26We have about eight 9000 a year
  • 01:08:28and we have a large number of
  • 01:08:30care centers 15 around the state,
  • 01:08:32so we are seeing you know,
  • 01:08:34like sarcoma is an issue.
  • 01:08:36You know we see enough of those now
  • 01:08:38that we probably need to form more
  • 01:08:40full fledged order that area and
  • 01:08:42certainly even more rare tumors.
  • 01:08:44You know, skin tumors you know
  • 01:08:45you see some of those, right?
  • 01:08:47Merkel cell tumor approved.
  • 01:08:49You know agents so as this happens,
  • 01:08:52we're getting to do more and more of
  • 01:08:54that where we're at the point now.
  • 01:08:56We're probably going to have to
  • 01:08:58set up a unknown tumor clinic or
  • 01:09:00something for the everything else,
  • 01:09:02'cause we're seeing more and more of that.
  • 01:09:05And we are moving towards a tumor agnostic,
  • 01:09:07you know,
  • 01:09:08sort of treatment with some of these agents.
  • 01:09:10You know,
  • 01:09:11the Pember Lizum app was just
  • 01:09:13approved based on AT MB,
  • 01:09:14so I think with more advanced Genomic
  • 01:09:16profiling and immune profiling.
  • 01:09:18I think that might be one way to deal
  • 01:09:20or deal with the more we are tumors.
  • 01:09:22As far as lung cancer.
  • 01:09:24No,
  • 01:09:24I've been doing this now for almost 25 years,
  • 01:09:27certainly in the area of targeted therapy.
  • 01:09:29I think we've done.
  • 01:09:31We're doing what we need to do.
  • 01:09:33I remember when we first with
  • 01:09:35John Mendelsohn started to look
  • 01:09:36at EGFR inhibitors.
  • 01:09:38We treated everyone we saw a 10% response.
  • 01:09:40We were thrilled drugs became approved.
  • 01:09:42It was seven years before the
  • 01:09:44EGFR mutation was developed,
  • 01:09:45and then once that happened, of course.
  • 01:09:48Still not a home run.
  • 01:09:49'cause of resistance.
  • 01:09:50But then we started to treat
  • 01:09:52patients in the frontline setting.
  • 01:09:54And now just recently there are
  • 01:09:56data now in the agement setting
  • 01:09:57with some of these agents where
  • 01:09:59perhaps they'll be more potent or.
  • 01:10:01Early on, before resistance develops,
  • 01:10:02I think we're at a point in
  • 01:10:04lung cancer immunotherapy.
  • 01:10:05We have to take a deep breath,
  • 01:10:07and it's hard because Iris said,
  • 01:10:09it's very hard for a company or
  • 01:10:10group not to just add on and
  • 01:10:13start to build combinations.
  • 01:10:14Who would have thought chemotherapy
  • 01:10:15combinations would have worked?
  • 01:10:16In fact, no.
  • 01:10:17I led the trial of a Tesla might
  • 01:10:19as a single agent.
  • 01:10:21I was offered the combo.
  • 01:10:22I didn't want it.
  • 01:10:23I talked to a few people here leaping.
  • 01:10:26I didn't think chemotherapy
  • 01:10:27would be the reason.
  • 01:10:28And I totally agree with IRA,
  • 01:10:30I think it's an additive approach.
  • 01:10:32They're not.
  • 01:10:32They're not antagonistic, but but still.
  • 01:10:34The thing that bothers me is in lung cancer.
  • 01:10:37We those are the agents,
  • 01:10:39you know, see TLA four.
  • 01:10:40A little bit vague, Jeff,
  • 01:10:42you know their number of Axl Mer TK.
  • 01:10:44We have some with Carla Rothlin.
  • 01:10:46We have some some expertise there.
  • 01:10:48I think some of these approaches
  • 01:10:50that we heard from Aaron,
  • 01:10:52you know, 50% of lung cancers,
  • 01:10:54maybe 60% when the ping and David rim
  • 01:10:56and Kurt look at them have no tail.
  • 01:10:59So so, so there's clearly a need to.
  • 01:11:02Personalized this therapy and I
  • 01:11:03think the next step really has to be,
  • 01:11:06and I know I was actually going
  • 01:11:08to ask you a question, Mario,
  • 01:11:10why don't we do more of this?
  • 01:11:12Why five years now after chemo immunotherapy?
  • 01:11:15I mean, do we not know what's going on?
  • 01:11:18What's the sweet spot?
  • 01:11:19Went to work when patients
  • 01:11:20become have primary resistance,
  • 01:11:22we need to obtain more samples
  • 01:11:24and it's very hard because those
  • 01:11:26studies are very in labor intensive.
  • 01:11:28Specially now in this covid area.
  • 01:11:30Or we just want to survive.
  • 01:11:32But we need samples, we need biopsies.
  • 01:11:34We need to take him to our labs pressing.
  • 01:11:36Pressing has to be quick,
  • 01:11:38but you know I reset the best model
  • 01:11:40sort of human and all the animal models
  • 01:11:42we've mentioned are fraught with issues.
  • 01:11:44So I would say right now.
  • 01:11:46Lung cancer. It's amazing.
  • 01:11:47You know you know therapy.
  • 01:11:48I just got the.
  • 01:11:50Five year results now with
  • 01:11:52with drugs 30% survival in an
  • 01:11:54untreated metastatic lung cancer,
  • 01:11:55no PDL 1 high but you know PDL 1 low.
  • 01:11:59It's a lot different and many patients
  • 01:12:01don't benefit klemen they want what
  • 01:12:03they see in the commercials and many
  • 01:12:05patients have acquired resistance.
  • 01:12:07This field is perfect for the alliance
  • 01:12:09between industry and academia to
  • 01:12:11you know of course you've got to
  • 01:12:13do the big phase three trials.
  • 01:12:15I would do that too if I was in the company,
  • 01:12:19but we've got it in.
  • 01:12:21Have a few studies.
  • 01:12:22That are really focusing on the mechanism
  • 01:12:24and either taking the new drugs and
  • 01:12:26like you know with Aaron's drug,
  • 01:12:27you know the first trials will have to
  • 01:12:29be just to show some activity in safety,
  • 01:12:32but then they have to move forward
  • 01:12:34with liepins drug, the cyclic 15.
  • 01:12:35There have been responses in the phase one.
  • 01:12:38But are there enough well that
  • 01:12:39time will tell,
  • 01:12:40but now it's time to develop an assay.
  • 01:12:42So what we've been able to do here at
  • 01:12:44Yale in partnership is we early on got
  • 01:12:47David Rimm working closely with next.
  • 01:12:49You're one of the companies that
  • 01:12:50John will tell you was developed
  • 01:12:52here and it's taken a few years
  • 01:12:53to develop a good bioassay.
  • 01:12:55But now we can start to treat patients
  • 01:12:57based on the biomarker because
  • 01:12:58science is going to prevail otherwise.
  • 01:13:00No,
  • 01:13:00it it's going to be random and there's just,
  • 01:13:03you know,
  • 01:13:03you and I talk about this all the time
  • 01:13:06in the Hall and we now and I see each other.
  • 01:13:09Occasionally now,
  • 01:13:09'cause we're all locked in their offices,
  • 01:13:11but every once in awhile
  • 01:13:12we bump into each other.
  • 01:13:13That's going to be the key thing.
  • 01:13:15How do we figure out resistance
  • 01:13:16and be proactive about
  • 01:13:17it?
  • 01:13:19Yeah, by the way,
  • 01:13:20I was wondering once we told you
  • 01:13:22not to bother with chemotherapy,
  • 01:13:23and I think that just reflects how
  • 01:13:25humbling it is to where you are.
  • 01:13:27The biggest influence bending and
  • 01:13:28mad at you for awhile.
  • 01:13:30Yeah yeah, yeah, the so we.
  • 01:13:31You know it's the biology is very
  • 01:13:33complex and one of the reasons
  • 01:13:35why I started that question is
  • 01:13:37that when I look at CTA four I can
  • 01:13:39think of 10 different reasons why
  • 01:13:40it might make anti PD one better.
  • 01:13:42But in any individual patient I
  • 01:13:44can't tell which of those mechanisms
  • 01:13:45might be active for chemotherapy.
  • 01:13:47I mean you could do be doing
  • 01:13:4910 different things.
  • 01:13:50I think the exploration of email
  • 01:13:52object is really important and
  • 01:13:54that's why I like this focus on
  • 01:13:55really going back to the tumor,
  • 01:13:57immunobiology and actually to
  • 01:13:58thank Charlie for his commitment
  • 01:14:00to recruiting people who who are
  • 01:14:02focusing on that area because I
  • 01:14:04think as we build our strength and
  • 01:14:05continue to build our strength in that
  • 01:14:07area and were very strong already,
  • 01:14:09we may actually get the answer
  • 01:14:11to some of these questions.
  • 01:14:12So let me just ask one question
  • 01:14:14here that I can answer because
  • 01:14:16I don't know is you know the
  • 01:14:18there was a question related to
  • 01:14:20nano particles in an Atom.
  • 01:14:21Articles fit in into the world of of baby no.
  • 01:14:25Biology and Immuno Oncology
  • 01:14:27or any of you in the capable
  • 01:14:30of addressing that question.
  • 01:14:32I'm not.
  • 01:14:35I can take a stab at it.
  • 01:14:38I don't know it entirely,
  • 01:14:40but I do know I think John is also
  • 01:14:43put some comments in the the chat
  • 01:14:46for attendees to look at as well.
  • 01:14:49So Mark Salzman's been a central player
  • 01:14:52in the Nanoparticle area at Yale,
  • 01:14:54and more broadly for a very long time,
  • 01:14:57and I believe with Mike Gerardi
  • 01:14:59is also recently started.
  • 01:15:01A company called stratify that also
  • 01:15:03is likely interested in using.
  • 01:15:05Anna particle based approaches
  • 01:15:06to enhance immunotherapy's.
  • 01:15:07So there certainly are efforts
  • 01:15:09along those lines and it's not just
  • 01:15:11mark that are additional people
  • 01:15:12at Yahoo are doing these things.
  • 01:15:14All the platforms tend to be quite
  • 01:15:16different and I think if one
  • 01:15:18actually follows up and looks at
  • 01:15:20Akiko's paper related to the rig
  • 01:15:22immune with Anna pile and we help
  • 01:15:24with some of those studies.
  • 01:15:25But looking at EPS copal affects
  • 01:15:27for nanoparticles I think part of
  • 01:15:29the difficulty has been getting
  • 01:15:31trafficking to tumors are not like
  • 01:15:33T cells which seem to be really
  • 01:15:34good at finding tumors.
  • 01:15:36Nanoparticles have a harder time
  • 01:15:38and tend to end up in macrophages,
  • 01:15:40so a lot of those efforts tended
  • 01:15:42to be intratumoral and then trying
  • 01:15:44to see these so-called abscopal
  • 01:15:46effects or distant effects for
  • 01:15:48intratumoral agents is one of the
  • 01:15:50challenges that frequently happens,
  • 01:15:51and again at the center position,
  • 01:15:54counseling were particularly well set
  • 01:15:55up to help those folks evaluate whether
  • 01:15:57they're seeing these abscopal affects,
  • 01:15:59but that's kind of,
  • 01:16:01I think,
  • 01:16:02a broader scope across yell as to
  • 01:16:04what's happening.
  • 01:16:06I think Mario is in the.
  • 01:16:09In the back scene area,
  • 01:16:11not a particles have been in use
  • 01:16:14and are increasingly being in use.
  • 01:16:17It certainly the RNA vaccine
  • 01:16:19we're developing with buying tech.
  • 01:16:21Is it basically an added
  • 01:16:23particle based approach,
  • 01:16:25as is the cold vaccine that
  • 01:16:28they're developing as well as.
  • 01:16:31Maderna there are a number of.
  • 01:16:36Ways of using them?
  • 01:16:37I think the first incarnation was
  • 01:16:39to try and use that particles.
  • 01:16:41That's kind of surrogate or artificial
  • 01:16:43antigen presenting cells so far that
  • 01:16:45hasn't really worked out that well
  • 01:16:47because Antigen presenting cells
  • 01:16:49are more than simply inert surface.
  • 01:16:51Is that present antigens.
  • 01:16:52They actually act and perform a complex
  • 01:16:55POD to do with the T cells and B
  • 01:16:58cells that they are presenting too,
  • 01:17:00but using them as delivery vehicles for
  • 01:17:02RNA has actually worked out pretty well,
  • 01:17:05but it also turns out.
  • 01:17:07Surprisingly,
  • 01:17:07when they work well,
  • 01:17:09they can also be quite toxic,
  • 01:17:12and I think a lot of the adverse
  • 01:17:15events associated with either the
  • 01:17:17cancer vaccines over the covid
  • 01:17:19vaccines can be attributed as much
  • 01:17:22to the data particle themselves and
  • 01:17:25its ability to trigger inflammasome
  • 01:17:27responses as the RNA another adjutants
  • 01:17:31that data particles contain.
  • 01:17:33I've worked with Mark and with
  • 01:17:35Tarek Fahmi and I actually get
  • 01:17:38a princely sum every month for
  • 01:17:40being on the patent that controls
  • 01:17:42these princely sum I think gets me
  • 01:17:45coffee at the corner coffee store.
  • 01:17:49But nevertheless, you know,
  • 01:17:50I think they're very interesting platforms,
  • 01:17:53but they haven't really been put
  • 01:17:55into into play it in a way that's
  • 01:17:58that really establishes what
  • 01:17:59the future is going to be.
  • 01:18:01That's not to say they shouldn't be studied.
  • 01:18:04One thing it hasn't come up that in
  • 01:18:07this context I'd like to make bring
  • 01:18:09up for the group's consideration
  • 01:18:11is actually self therapy.
  • 01:18:13When we think of cell therapy,
  • 01:18:15we think of car T cells, which I think are.
  • 01:18:19It can be extraordinarily effective
  • 01:18:21in heme onc setting, certain of them,
  • 01:18:24but thus far less so in solid tumor settings,
  • 01:18:27and it's probably wide variety
  • 01:18:29of reasons for that.
  • 01:18:31We have only ourselves recently
  • 01:18:33started getting into this area.
  • 01:18:35I'm not sure what Yale's
  • 01:18:38involvement has been,
  • 01:18:40but I do think despite my reluctance
  • 01:18:45to embrace cartis in our own shop,
  • 01:18:48I do think that.
  • 01:18:52Cells engineered cells are the
  • 01:18:54nanoparticles of the future in terms
  • 01:18:57of being able to engineer and design
  • 01:19:00them in ways that will allow them
  • 01:19:02not only to be therapeutic agents,
  • 01:19:05but also per say,
  • 01:19:06but also delivers of therapeutic
  • 01:19:09agents such that you can.
  • 01:19:12Get them to use.
  • 01:19:14Make use of their of the cells
  • 01:19:16ability to find out where it
  • 01:19:19is you would like it to go.
  • 01:19:22Get to that spot and then turn it
  • 01:19:24on to generate other activities,
  • 01:19:27possibly even the release and
  • 01:19:29secretion of Biotherapeutics,
  • 01:19:30which would change entirely business
  • 01:19:32of how we make drugs and the patients.
  • 01:19:35So I think this is this is an area that.
  • 01:19:41I find personally very exciting.
  • 01:19:43We are investing heavily in.
  • 01:19:47Looking at how to do I
  • 01:19:50PSC technology perhaps?
  • 01:19:52Diane sender at the Yelton can help push
  • 01:19:55this forward collaboratively because this
  • 01:19:57is just again at the very beginning, but.
  • 01:20:00But this is a place right?
  • 01:20:03I do see a very remarkable future.
  • 01:20:07Thank you for making it.
  • 01:20:08As a matter of fact, we we do have
  • 01:20:11a large clinical Carty program.
  • 01:20:13We've we've done a great deal of work
  • 01:20:15with til cells actually actually sending.
  • 01:20:17This sells out and infusing them here
  • 01:20:19so we have a very well oiled machine
  • 01:20:21for administering self therapy.
  • 01:20:23We've also done some cell generation
  • 01:20:24of our own and there's a huge amount
  • 01:20:27of work in Immunobiology looking at
  • 01:20:29targets within T cells that could
  • 01:20:31be used as intellectual property
  • 01:20:33for T cell Engineering.
  • 01:20:35So there is a nascent program here in in.
  • 01:20:38In some areas, in some well developed.
  • 01:20:42Well developed in other areas and
  • 01:20:44we are very interested in that.
  • 01:20:46And I mean we only have
  • 01:20:48about, I think 10 more minutes
  • 01:20:50and I just want to spend a few
  • 01:20:52minutes on an area that I think is
  • 01:20:55a particular strength here at Dale,
  • 01:20:57which is the animal modeling
  • 01:20:58and how important it is towards
  • 01:21:00Immunooncology and Marcus.
  • 01:21:01And perhaps you might make
  • 01:21:03some comments again,
  • 01:21:04because you just mentioned
  • 01:21:05some of the resource,
  • 01:21:07but there's a huge number of resources
  • 01:21:09related to animal modeling and how it
  • 01:21:11fits in with with testing.
  • 01:21:13Well, this has been a tough crowd
  • 01:21:15for traditional animal model I.
  • 01:21:17No IRA's point of view and respected
  • 01:21:20an remember seeing him at the
  • 01:21:22back of a city workshop that I
  • 01:21:24organized on animal modeling in IO.
  • 01:21:26I view that as a compliment even
  • 01:21:29if it wasn't intended to be one.
  • 01:21:32But what I would say is our lab
  • 01:21:34has developed a number of immuno
  • 01:21:36genic syngeneic lines that are
  • 01:21:38used widely including by Pharma.
  • 01:21:40These Yale University mouse, Melanoma,
  • 01:21:42Yum and Yum are lines that enable
  • 01:21:44people to see responses to checkpoints.
  • 01:21:47And sort of tune your system so you
  • 01:21:49can see either additive or synergistic
  • 01:21:51effects by adding a second agent.
  • 01:21:54Obviously that's harder to tell
  • 01:21:55whether that will happen in humans,
  • 01:21:57in which humans that will happen.
  • 01:21:59But to get some kind of enthusiasm
  • 01:22:01or not for your agent certainly
  • 01:22:04has been used on those purposes.
  • 01:22:06One of the things I'd like to
  • 01:22:08focus on is there's a recent nature
  • 01:22:10biotechnology paper by Nick Joshis lab,
  • 01:22:13so Joshi and it uses a very
  • 01:22:15controlled way of antigen delivery.
  • 01:22:17Digital model antigens from LCMV.
  • 01:22:18Both class one and Class 2,
  • 01:22:20but it allows for modeling of
  • 01:22:23immune related adverse events in
  • 01:22:24ways that we haven't really been
  • 01:22:26able to do to this point in time,
  • 01:22:29so you can specifically turn antigens on,
  • 01:22:31either in the context of a cancer
  • 01:22:33elsewhere or even without that,
  • 01:22:35and look at immune checkpoint
  • 01:22:37inhibitor induced.
  • 01:22:39IR A's that I think that has
  • 01:22:42been a big lack in this area.
  • 01:22:44There was recently an NCI
  • 01:22:46meeting related to that.
  • 01:22:48Also sort of suggesting the same Katie
  • 01:22:50Palitti who was had been at yell out
  • 01:22:53for about 10 years as well as very
  • 01:22:55active and lung cancer modeling.
  • 01:22:57So I do agree that we have great strengths.
  • 01:23:01Yeah I would again for this
  • 01:23:03particular group as well.
  • 01:23:04As for I think these other groups
  • 01:23:06that are developing these patients
  • 01:23:08arrive explant models including.
  • 01:23:10The National Cancer Institute in
  • 01:23:12Amsterdam and Daniella Talmon and Tom
  • 01:23:14Schumacher the big challenge in this
  • 01:23:16area has been A to keep things alive,
  • 01:23:18and I've mentioned that we can do that.
  • 01:23:20But also what the readouts are that
  • 01:23:23correspond to responses in human patients.
  • 01:23:25I think there's all sorts of biology
  • 01:23:27you can do in those systems,
  • 01:23:29but there's obviously a lot of
  • 01:23:31interest in personalized therapy.
  • 01:23:32To see how those responses are,
  • 01:23:34and they haven't published yet,
  • 01:23:35it will be interesting to see when people do.
  • 01:23:38Right now, it seems to be elicited cytokines.
  • 01:23:41Of certain profiles that seem
  • 01:23:42to be the best answer,
  • 01:23:44but I think there's more work
  • 01:23:46to be done on those areas,
  • 01:23:48but I would agree,
  • 01:23:49and the other thing that Yale
  • 01:23:50has an advantage is for these
  • 01:23:52different syngenetic models.
  • 01:23:53We've developed many crisper derived
  • 01:23:55genetic mutants like beta two microglia
  • 01:23:57knockout so forth that make it easy
  • 01:23:59for Pharma to come in and just
  • 01:24:01establish an SRA to look at class one.
  • 01:24:03Deficient models of a variety of types
  • 01:24:05that can be responsive to mu agent,
  • 01:24:08so it's kind of a broader swath of
  • 01:24:10and that's all centered really through
  • 01:24:12the center precision cancer modeling.
  • 01:24:14Nearly all of that except for next stuff.
  • 01:24:16Could you just mention briefly the
  • 01:24:18humanized mouse models and with what
  • 01:24:20they will might be, so that was a
  • 01:24:23fairly large mistake on my part.
  • 01:24:25So Richard Flavelle is probably developed.
  • 01:24:27You know, the I would argue amongst the
  • 01:24:30most advanced humanized mouse models.
  • 01:24:32These so called Mr G mice which have
  • 01:24:35not kins of human cytokines for various
  • 01:24:38cytokines that are really important for.
  • 01:24:41Full development and re engraftment
  • 01:24:43of different components of
  • 01:24:44the hematopoetic system,
  • 01:24:45and I think the real strength with the Mr.
  • 01:24:49G model is that it in graphs various
  • 01:24:52components of the myeloid derivatives
  • 01:24:54much better than most other models
  • 01:24:56have up to this point in time.
  • 01:24:59So there's two papers of note
  • 01:25:01related to that,
  • 01:25:02so one is related to modeling multiple
  • 01:25:05human multiple myeloma and mice,
  • 01:25:07which was done with MoD adopt
  • 01:25:09carp a couple years back.
  • 01:25:11And they would Stephanie Hellena
  • 01:25:13they've modeled MD's AML,
  • 01:25:15engraftment into these models.
  • 01:25:17The difficulty with a lot of these
  • 01:25:19models has been that to actually
  • 01:25:22test whether agents work on them,
  • 01:25:24they've been very,
  • 01:25:24very good to show that you can re in
  • 01:25:27Grafton get these different things to
  • 01:25:29work and you can look at additional
  • 01:25:31genetic changes that happen in those models,
  • 01:25:34but the remaining challenges to
  • 01:25:35use these to then say how is,
  • 01:25:37say an immune checkpoint or a new
  • 01:25:40therapy going to help in that context.
  • 01:25:42But the other issue until more
  • 01:25:44recently was that Regenerx on had
  • 01:25:46participated in the generation
  • 01:25:47of those models which made.
  • 01:25:49A little bit complex to work with other
  • 01:25:51companies and outside of Richard's lab,
  • 01:25:53but I think that's at least
  • 01:25:55possibly being solved,
  • 01:25:56and I wouldn't view that as
  • 01:25:57an impediment now.
  • 01:26:01OK, I'm going to ask one more question.
  • 01:26:03I don't see a whole lot of the questions
  • 01:26:06from the chat before I turn it back
  • 01:26:08over to Charlie for closing comments.
  • 01:26:11One challenging question,
  • 01:26:12you know every day I read a
  • 01:26:14new paper about another T cell
  • 01:26:16checkpoint inhibitor and you know,
  • 01:26:18I I probably can't count on,
  • 01:26:20you know 100 hands and fingers and toes.
  • 01:26:22How many things actually block T cell
  • 01:26:24function in the tumor microenvironment?
  • 01:26:26Or peripherally,
  • 01:26:27how does one know which those are
  • 01:26:29the critical non redundant targets?
  • 01:26:31For therapy.
  • 01:26:39How do you
  • 01:26:40know well? I mean, I just have
  • 01:26:43how OK I'll give you a hug.
  • 01:26:45You approach it.
  • 01:26:46How do you approach it?
  • 01:26:47Because I you know. I mean,
  • 01:26:49I can list 15 in the back of my head.
  • 01:26:52I don't know how to decide is it.
  • 01:26:54Is it true that they're all important?
  • 01:26:56It's just an individual patients?
  • 01:26:57Or are they are some of them
  • 01:26:59redundant or in the same pathway?
  • 01:27:01Or is biology not important that
  • 01:27:02some of this biology is just not
  • 01:27:04important in cancer but may be
  • 01:27:05important in other settings like
  • 01:27:07infectious disease or something else?
  • 01:27:10I'm. I mean, how do you know is
  • 01:27:14I think it's all tide up with the
  • 01:27:17beginning theme of this whole meeting,
  • 01:27:19which is you have to understand
  • 01:27:22mechanism and understand the science so.
  • 01:27:25Back and how long ago.
  • 01:27:2710 years ago when these things
  • 01:27:29were first being laid out.
  • 01:27:30I remember you know,
  • 01:27:32constructing a diagram with the
  • 01:27:34negative and positive regulators
  • 01:27:35that were known at the time and
  • 01:27:37which one should we look out,
  • 01:27:39which was which one should we look at?
  • 01:27:42And I think a lot of investigators and
  • 01:27:45companies went off just to look at them
  • 01:27:48all without really understanding what
  • 01:27:50the relative contributions of them were.
  • 01:27:52We decided to look at one which was tigit.
  • 01:27:55And you know,
  • 01:27:56that emerged as a consequence of perhaps
  • 01:27:59we're deluding ourselves into this,
  • 01:28:01but that emerged as a consequence
  • 01:28:04of increased understanding as
  • 01:28:05to how it is that PD one works.
  • 01:28:08So if the current hypothesis is
  • 01:28:10that PD one blockade causes an
  • 01:28:12increase in the number of this self
  • 01:28:14renewing stem light compartment.
  • 01:28:16That generates effector T cells.
  • 01:28:19Then what else is there?
  • 01:28:24If you're trying to add to that and forget
  • 01:28:27about the reversal of exhaustion business,
  • 01:28:29if you do that,
  • 01:28:30it turns out that the only other
  • 01:28:32negative regulator that's expressed
  • 01:28:34on the SCM compartment engine,
  • 01:28:36and so if that and it also turns out
  • 01:28:38that we haven't published this yet,
  • 01:28:41that PD one is actually
  • 01:28:43what regulates CD 226.
  • 01:28:45Enzymatically and tigit with a regular C226.
  • 01:28:48Only by competing for like end.
  • 01:28:51OK so that means that there's
  • 01:28:54a close Functional Association.
  • 01:28:55And so if you want to enhance
  • 01:28:58the function then you have to
  • 01:29:01go after both of those things.
  • 01:29:04Assuming you correct with respect to
  • 01:29:06understanding what is the target cell
  • 01:29:09type that that that you're dealing with.
  • 01:29:12No interesting if you look
  • 01:29:14at the exhausted cells.
  • 01:29:16There's lots of digit on them,
  • 01:29:18but there's no CD 226,
  • 01:29:20so unless you know there's another
  • 01:29:22element of the mechanism that we missing,
  • 01:29:25which is entirely possible.
  • 01:29:28Blockade in exhaust itself can't be
  • 01:29:32expected to reactivate its client.
  • 01:29:35A positive rate costimulatory
  • 01:29:37molecule that's a costimulatory
  • 01:29:38molecule isn't even there.
  • 01:29:41So you know those types of considerations.
  • 01:29:43I think you know one really
  • 01:29:44needs to think them through,
  • 01:29:46not just believe what's in the literature,
  • 01:29:48but set up your own systems,
  • 01:29:50often in mice to figure out.
  • 01:29:52And in fact,
  • 01:29:53if if your hypothesis holds any water.
  • 01:29:55'cause these are big decisions you make
  • 01:29:57you enter into a development program.
  • 01:29:59Whether you doing it in an academ.
  • 01:30:01Lab or industrial lab.
  • 01:30:03You know it takes 2 years at least
  • 01:30:05to select the best antibody and then
  • 01:30:07to grow it up and then you know,
  • 01:30:10put it in patients you're out.
  • 01:30:12You know,
  • 01:30:12with a huge investment of money
  • 01:30:14and time at least five years before
  • 01:30:16you know anything.
  • 01:30:18Yeah, we're actually gonna validating
  • 01:30:19some of those targets with some of
  • 01:30:21the resources that we have here.
  • 01:30:22Thank you. Alright,
  • 01:30:23it's always been a vexing question.
  • 01:30:24I could talk to you all all day.
  • 01:30:26Actually, it's my favorite thing to do,
  • 01:30:28but I think at this point I
  • 01:30:29want to turn it over back over
  • 01:30:31to Charlie for closing remarks,
  • 01:30:32and I want to thank all the
  • 01:30:34participants for all their comments.
  • 01:30:36Charlie, please go
  • 01:30:37ahead. Thank you and I just want to
  • 01:30:40thank all of our panelists for superb
  • 01:30:43discussion and obviously think IRA for
  • 01:30:45taking the time out to join us today.
  • 01:30:48You know, as you've heard,
  • 01:30:50we've had great advances,
  • 01:30:52probably unprecedented advances in io,
  • 01:30:54but clearly the next generation is
  • 01:30:56going to require innovation at a
  • 01:30:58level that builds on terrific science.
  • 01:31:01Outstanding science moves into the clinic,
  • 01:31:03and I'm I'm so proud of the fact
  • 01:31:06that everyone of our panelists.
  • 01:31:08Is innovating in that space and
  • 01:31:11many others who we said they
  • 01:31:13couldn't include in the forum.
  • 01:31:15In fact 1.0. I'll mention a city Chen,
  • 01:31:18one of our leading investigators who
  • 01:31:21company being launched tomorrow,
  • 01:31:22evolve immune therapeutics.
  • 01:31:24Looking at the T cell targeting space.
  • 01:31:26Just one of the many things that
  • 01:31:29are our investigators are leading.
  • 01:31:31You know,
  • 01:31:32I want to thank all the attendees
  • 01:31:35for joining us today and again
  • 01:31:37want to emphasize this should be
  • 01:31:40the beginning of the conversation.
  • 01:31:42Please reach out to us.
  • 01:31:44We will be following up with you because
  • 01:31:47we want to build more collaborations,
  • 01:31:50more conversations.
  • 01:31:50And finally want to thank Kathy Lynch
  • 01:31:54and her team for organizing this and
  • 01:31:57remind all of you that we actually
  • 01:31:59have two more forms of cancer engage
  • 01:32:02on November 5th or novel cancer
  • 01:32:05therapeutics and delivery system.
  • 01:32:06And then on December 9th,
  • 01:32:08defining mechanisms and biomarkers
  • 01:32:10of sensitivity and resistance to
  • 01:32:12answer Anti cancer treatments.
  • 01:32:14So really key topics beyond IO that
  • 01:32:16our investigators are leading.
  • 01:32:18So again thank all of you.
  • 01:32:20Mario, thank you for your leadership.
  • 01:32:23Any final. Large meal.
  • 01:32:25No, I want to thank you Charlie.
  • 01:32:27Thanks to all the panelists,
  • 01:32:29all the people who participated today.
  • 01:32:30Please contact us.
  • 01:32:31We are very interested in
  • 01:32:33developing collaborations.
  • 01:32:33We have an enormous wealth of talent here.
  • 01:32:35Hope will be working
  • 01:32:36with you in the future.
  • 01:32:38Thank you again.