Skip to Main Content

Child Study Center Grand Rounds 11.03.2020

March 29, 2021
  • 00:00Frameworks and it's something
  • 00:03very attractive to me.
  • 00:06And I'll tell you guys,
  • 00:08kind of a funny story.
  • 00:09So Jim said a little bit
  • 00:12about like my background.
  • 00:13So what what was my iconic kind of
  • 00:15teenage or adolescent rebellion?
  • 00:17Where did I go?
  • 00:19But I went to Jerusalem kind of link.
  • 00:25Feedback then.
  • 00:29See.
  • 00:33Max before you continue.
  • 00:34If I could ask everyone to mute
  • 00:36themselves or rose me if
  • 00:38you could just mute and Max.
  • 00:39Just be sure to unmute yourself.
  • 00:49Go ahead, Mike.
  • 00:52Yes, sorry, so I was saying,
  • 00:55yeah my my kind of young adult
  • 00:58rebellion was heading to Jerusalem
  • 01:00and kind of perhaps returning to
  • 01:03a little bit of the heritage,
  • 01:05religious heritage and identity
  • 01:07which my my parents have had,
  • 01:10and grandparents even had thrown off,
  • 01:12and I immerse myself within religious world.
  • 01:17I'm very interested in mental health
  • 01:20and how was practiced within Jerusalem
  • 01:23and I ended up actually having an
  • 01:27early position at a mental hospital
  • 01:30in Jerusalem where I was given so
  • 01:34fascinatingly complicated character
  • 01:35who is Ultra Orthodox Jew but who was
  • 01:40inked in Nazi tattoos and had had an
  • 01:44amazing renamed himself after SS figures.
  • 01:47Anyway, it's a complicated story.
  • 01:49It complicated clinical dynamic,
  • 01:50but I found using narrative I began
  • 01:53to open up our relationship and
  • 01:56this inspiration actually is what
  • 01:57brought me back and brought me back
  • 01:59to the US into Graduate School
  • 02:01trying to understand story,
  • 02:03trying to understand the dynamics,
  • 02:05and even we might say the structure of story.
  • 02:08Anne Anne.
  • 02:12Sorry this quote from Hannah Rent I
  • 02:15thought was compelling and in many
  • 02:18ways summed up my list drive this.
  • 02:20This appeal towards story she writes
  • 02:23storytelling reveals meaning without
  • 02:25committing the error of defining it.
  • 02:27And I think it's true and yet.
  • 02:31Unfortunately, stories both inspire us
  • 02:33and they have the power of dividing US
  • 02:36stories or something that it's very hard
  • 02:39not to be swayed by or even believe in.
  • 02:42And I think it's something we see now.
  • 02:44We see how our nation is divided.
  • 02:46Jim, very Inspirationally brought
  • 02:48forward the awareness that today is
  • 02:50Election Day that we have a lot of
  • 02:53power in our hands and we have power
  • 02:55to kind of shift this narrative there
  • 02:57to even maybe rewrite this narrative.
  • 02:59But nevertheless,
  • 02:59narratives have a lot of power,
  • 03:01and they have a lot of power.
  • 03:06Even though we know that their story,
  • 03:08it's hard for us not to believe in them
  • 03:11and to lose our ability to interpret them.
  • 03:18So how can we understand stories?
  • 03:21How can we look within story to appreciate,
  • 03:24sorry appreciate the narrative arc.
  • 03:2822 to leverage the beauty of creativity
  • 03:31to reauthor to use these frameworks,
  • 03:34which narrative psychology has offered us?
  • 03:40But not be trapped within. Dogmatic stances
  • 03:50so I proposed and this is kind of been the
  • 03:53lion share of my research is looking at
  • 03:57two different aspects of narrative looking
  • 04:01at linguistic information and story.
  • 04:04Looking at content versus form and this
  • 04:07is a kind of a classical dichotomy.
  • 04:10And when I say content, I mean.
  • 04:15Kind of the crude linguistic information,
  • 04:18not crude as to be disparaging,
  • 04:20but but kind of but words and
  • 04:23semantics in form.
  • 04:24I mean as in narrative structure.
  • 04:29And this is the work which brought
  • 04:32me to Dartmouth and to the VA where
  • 04:36I've been working with using.
  • 04:38Semantic analysis,
  • 04:39natural language processing,
  • 04:41parts of machine learning,
  • 04:43and artificial intelligence to look at
  • 04:47ways that we can evaluate suicide risk.
  • 04:51So within the VA.
  • 04:54There is like many large health systems.
  • 04:57There is a pretty sophisticated
  • 04:59electronic medical records system.
  • 05:01And so for every clinical consultation,
  • 05:05veterans are.
  • 05:08Parents records are kept and.
  • 05:12And in many individuals have
  • 05:14huge backlogs of notes,
  • 05:16so it's a question of what can be
  • 05:19done with notes other than you know.
  • 05:23Obviously clinicians reading them,
  • 05:24which takes a lot of time.
  • 05:27So a project which I launched with
  • 05:30my colleagues is to look at notes,
  • 05:33the semantics of notes for indicators of
  • 05:37psychosocial risk variables for suicide.
  • 05:39So as you guys may know,
  • 05:42veteran suicide is a huge problem.
  • 05:45There's been.
  • 05:47Something like 20 daily suicide
  • 05:49deaths of veterans in recent years,
  • 05:51and so the VA's been really pushing
  • 05:54and this this happened to be a project
  • 05:57which which we stepped forward and,
  • 05:59and we've had a lot of
  • 06:02really intriguing results.
  • 06:05So that was just some
  • 06:08recent paper that we made.
  • 06:11So in general it's really hard to
  • 06:13predict suicide for a variety of reasons.
  • 06:16People don't disclose it.
  • 06:17A lot of variables aren't so effective.
  • 06:21People aren't necessarily honest.
  • 06:23There's stigma you can imagine,
  • 06:25but the VA developed a pretty
  • 06:28sophisticated model algorithm for
  • 06:30predicting suicide and what we
  • 06:32did in those are based on kind of
  • 06:35standard demographic variables,
  • 06:37healthcare usage variables.
  • 06:38So what we did is we look we developed
  • 06:42a big data set of veterans that
  • 06:45died by suicide matched with those
  • 06:48that didn't die by suicide on.
  • 06:51Using the VA's current algorithm
  • 06:54such that every person
  • 06:59had equal suicide risk and then we
  • 07:02looked at their notes to decipher
  • 07:05if we could untangle any linguistic.
  • 07:08Variables which might give us
  • 07:12additional predictive clarity.
  • 07:14And what we found.
  • 07:17Some we did something kind of interesting.
  • 07:19Here. We also matched such that every person.
  • 07:23Every patient that died we matched
  • 07:25controls with patients at the
  • 07:28same psychotherapist, so we had.
  • 07:32Something like 218 veterans
  • 07:33that died by suicide and more
  • 07:36than 1000 veterans that did not,
  • 07:39but that were each share the same
  • 07:41psychotherapist and we ran this through
  • 07:44a variety of machine learning prompts,
  • 07:47and we found actually 8% improvement in
  • 07:50predictive accuracy and very interesting Lee.
  • 07:52We found a subtlety which was that as
  • 07:55opposed to a lot of like demographic
  • 07:58variables which don't particularly
  • 08:00change overtime, we found that.
  • 08:02Using linguistic variables
  • 08:04derived linguistic variables,
  • 08:05we could detect a lot of subtlety,
  • 08:08and changing overtime who was dying
  • 08:12when and fascinatingly we found
  • 08:15actually that that relative to when
  • 08:18people were diagnosed and started care.
  • 08:22The those that died sooner rather than
  • 08:27later corresponded very closely in
  • 08:30terms of Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
  • 08:34It was kind of a surprising find,
  • 08:37but it also makes sense,
  • 08:40and so this is just just pointing
  • 08:43to the subtlety of of information
  • 08:45we were able to derive.
  • 08:48Just out of this,
  • 08:49unknown,
  • 08:50otherwise not very used linguistic data.
  • 08:54And this is a project now,
  • 08:56which we're now expanding on and
  • 08:58actually doing a much larger sample of
  • 09:01all veterans as opposed to just ones
  • 09:03who were receiving mental health care.
  • 09:05So this is something we're replicating
  • 09:08now within the whole VA system.
  • 09:11So so now that was kind of
  • 09:131 important project for me.
  • 09:17And in that, so that was again
  • 09:20talking about about content.
  • 09:21I want to now transition
  • 09:23a little bit in top form,
  • 09:25so talking again about how
  • 09:27do we understand creativity,
  • 09:28not just in terms of semantics
  • 09:30but also form structure.
  • 09:35So one of the most basic understandings
  • 09:39of creativity is that there's.
  • 09:42Going back to Aristotle,
  • 09:44is there is a beginning,
  • 09:46middle and end with in all story.
  • 09:49There's kind of hallmarks structure.
  • 09:53And in many ways we can look
  • 09:56into that structure too.
  • 10:01To develop a more pronounced understanding
  • 10:04about about narrative arc right,
  • 10:06and what we typically see is
  • 10:10that there's a conflict in the
  • 10:13beginning and resolution at the end,
  • 10:16and between there's some
  • 10:19type of transformation.
  • 10:21And and I called it here conflict resolution.
  • 10:24And because in many ways what a story
  • 10:28does it, there's an incipient stress,
  • 10:30which in the end is resolved.
  • 10:37So. One way of measuring these
  • 10:41transformations is by looking at other
  • 10:44kind of fields of transformation.
  • 10:47How do we evaluate transformations?
  • 10:50So one model which has been impactful
  • 10:53for me and how I conceptualize this,
  • 10:57is using via Piaget the idea of the scale.
  • 11:03Of the foot, the two trades scale.
  • 11:07And looking at ways that
  • 11:09we can conceptualize,
  • 11:11shifting from conflict to resolution
  • 11:13and and so there's a couple of
  • 11:16important transformations which
  • 11:17many of you guys, I assume no.
  • 11:23One is reciprocity and others
  • 11:25negation and others correlation.
  • 11:27So the way I'm conceptualizing
  • 11:29these is reciprocity,
  • 11:31as adding a weight to the
  • 11:33other side of the scale, right?
  • 11:36There's the the the action of
  • 11:38identity is the initial stress.
  • 11:41Reciprocity is placing a
  • 11:42weight on the other side.
  • 11:45Negation is removing the initial weight in.
  • 11:48Correlation is shifting the fulcrum.
  • 11:51And these as kind of mechanistic
  • 11:55changes represent ways in which.
  • 11:58We can conceptualize and will
  • 12:00utilize in terms of looking a
  • 12:03little bit more finely at the acts
  • 12:05of what happens in plot and air.
  • 12:11And this is this kind of push tours
  • 12:15understanding of conflict in the Den.
  • 12:18The transformations of
  • 12:21conflict is work which.
  • 12:24Which actually my father really
  • 12:26started while a clinician in New
  • 12:29Haven and a researcher there,
  • 12:32he developed a model called conflict
  • 12:35analysis training and this is
  • 12:37essentially looking at how can we
  • 12:40evaluate patterns of conflict through
  • 12:43samples of narrative and creativity.
  • 12:46And this is something that
  • 12:48I've been working on in terms
  • 12:50of in my own doctoral work.
  • 12:52And then after that,
  • 12:54in terms of using this framework to
  • 12:56develop a self guided online assessment,
  • 12:59an intervention and recognizing that
  • 13:01creativity is a pretty accessible.
  • 13:05Tool that people that is not only
  • 13:07cathartic but it also has a certain.
  • 13:12Potential for diagnostic information.
  • 13:13So we've I've developed this as a
  • 13:16self guided online implementation.
  • 13:18When because it's online and self guided,
  • 13:21it's low, low cost and very accessible
  • 13:24and it combines an array of tasks
  • 13:27which will get into in just a moment.
  • 13:31So so conflict analysis?
  • 13:33What does it include includes?
  • 13:36And in inventory,
  • 13:38which gets into conflict,
  • 13:40resolving pattern identification,
  • 13:41questionnaires, metaphor,
  • 13:42tasks which are self report
  • 13:45and narrative drawing exercises
  • 13:47and then the feedback profile,
  • 13:49the feedback profile,
  • 13:51it's essentially extracts information
  • 13:53from the earlier two components and it
  • 13:57presents this information back to the
  • 14:00user in an interactive way such that
  • 14:03we can breakdown story from just again.
  • 14:06Just being a narrative
  • 14:08expression too instead being a.
  • 14:12And resource to push for for deeper
  • 14:15understanding and self understanding.
  • 14:22So just to give you a little bit
  • 14:25of a sample of what are these
  • 14:28items from the from our inventory
  • 14:31looking at things along the the
  • 14:35axis of dominance and submissiveness
  • 14:37and antagonism and cooperation.
  • 14:39Trying to help frame ways that which
  • 14:42will in turn used to interpret
  • 14:45the creativity and the creative
  • 14:48samples subsequently.
  • 14:49And so this is a self report.
  • 14:53Again in these, try to.
  • 14:57Utilizes a Wellness framework
  • 14:59rather than an illness framework.
  • 15:02Anne, Secondly,
  • 15:03the next component or the metaphor
  • 15:06task and these are tasks which
  • 15:09asked people to creatively.
  • 15:13Related stories in the Indies are guided
  • 15:17stories an and they mix in terms of
  • 15:21thinking about developmental and family
  • 15:24conflicts to more creative spontaneous.
  • 15:28Prompts and unlike traditional projectives.
  • 15:33We are not asking anybody
  • 15:35to interpret something,
  • 15:36but rather giving them a canvas
  • 15:39to create something afresh in and
  • 15:42then interpret it themselves.
  • 15:44And then Lastly,
  • 15:46this feedback profile is what I
  • 15:48mentioned before this organizes
  • 15:50all of the content and this is
  • 15:52something which provides then
  • 15:54inability for people to continue
  • 15:57to reflect on it's interactive,
  • 15:59and then it also can be automatically
  • 16:01emailed to clinicians or to work
  • 16:04for the user to keep themselves.
  • 16:09So these are just a couple of
  • 16:12papers we've been doing utilizing
  • 16:14this conflict analysis in a
  • 16:16bunch of in a bunch of clinical
  • 16:20contexts and Community context we
  • 16:23published recently a implementation
  • 16:25with a community sample online.
  • 16:27We also did a case review,
  • 16:30kind of in detail,
  • 16:32looking over how is it utilized
  • 16:34and we also did a psychology
  • 16:38implementation with cancer patients.
  • 16:40Kind of stepping in for providing
  • 16:42additional therapeutic resource
  • 16:43for an underserved population.
  • 16:49A recent study which we just completed
  • 16:52was actually at the VA in White
  • 16:54River Junction where we compared
  • 16:56utilizing this conflict analysis.
  • 16:58Creativity based intervention with
  • 17:00mindfulness intervention and we found,
  • 17:02although it was a very small sample
  • 17:05which was in our recruitment,
  • 17:07got curtailed because the unit
  • 17:09was closed because of covid.
  • 17:11But we found still even with a
  • 17:14different group only of five and
  • 17:17six people we found significant.
  • 17:19Therapeutic differences and
  • 17:22reasonably large effect sizes
  • 17:25for the conflict Analysis Group.
  • 17:29And we also found that clinicians
  • 17:32were really able easily to to
  • 17:36access this information and.
  • 17:38And we found that it would lead
  • 17:41to pronounce sense of treatment,
  • 17:43motivation and engagement.
  • 17:47So I just wanted to give you a little bit
  • 17:50of a sense of what this might look like.
  • 17:52This was one of one of our VA patients,
  • 17:55and again, this was an online context.
  • 17:57It was not actually working
  • 17:58with any clinician on this.
  • 17:59This is all done himself.
  • 18:02And so this is somebody who
  • 18:05is a 59 year old black man.
  • 18:07He was a marine.
  • 18:10He was receiving substance abuse care.
  • 18:13He was in an inpatient substance.
  • 18:16Monthlong substance recovery unit,
  • 18:18and he also had a anxiety disorder
  • 18:22diagnosis and what we what we found
  • 18:25in doing this intervention was.
  • 18:31That he had a very elevated, dominant,
  • 18:35cooperative stands, and we found that.
  • 18:39This this elevated dominance also
  • 18:42led to a pronounced sense of anxiety,
  • 18:45and that anxiety he dealt with by drinking.
  • 18:51And the stories, and we'll deal
  • 18:53with those just for a little bit.
  • 18:57Go into some of his.
  • 19:02Evolution and how did he?
  • 19:03How did he respond to early conflicts?
  • 19:06And how did those impact is later
  • 19:08conflicts later, identity ancient.
  • 19:10So this is a story that he wrote
  • 19:13about and this is just kind of
  • 19:15a synopsis, but I'll read it.
  • 19:20So this was a prompt. Was asking about
  • 19:22a conflict Xual childhood memory,
  • 19:24and he wrote about how I was crossing the
  • 19:26street following someone I looked up to,
  • 19:28I got hit by a car just
  • 19:30before it reached the curve.
  • 19:32I had a broken right leg and
  • 19:34hip and fractured left leg.
  • 19:36It was all my fault because I
  • 19:38was following someone else.
  • 19:39I didn't have confidence.
  • 19:40I looked up to some other guy I
  • 19:42shouldn't have looked up to him.
  • 19:44I shouldn't have run across.
  • 19:45I learned not to hesitate.
  • 19:46I learned that you got to take your shot.
  • 19:50I realized that I need to be more direct,
  • 19:52not just try to do things to please people.
  • 19:56In this message of individualism and
  • 19:58the need to be strong, the need.
  • 20:00To be differentiated, they need to be.
  • 20:04Very kind of classically male.
  • 20:09R is a role which which
  • 20:12runs throughout his story,
  • 20:13but I want to jump towards to
  • 20:16the end to the final prompt,
  • 20:19which was a short story metaphor.
  • 20:24In which he goes into a little bit of.
  • 20:29Which projects a very different
  • 20:31story but with very similar themes.
  • 20:34So this is a memory that he shares me.
  • 20:3759 year old male nervous
  • 20:39about being underwater,
  • 20:41my boss 30 or 38 year old female.
  • 20:44Good boss experience runs the show.
  • 20:48What happened going sailing with the
  • 20:50crew from the restaurant where I worked
  • 20:52the morning was calm and I was a little
  • 20:54nervous because I can't swim and it's
  • 20:55my first time in a sailboat ever.
  • 20:57It turned out to be OK after I
  • 20:59got over my fear of the water,
  • 21:01I learned how to sail and guide the boat.
  • 21:03We went out as far as we could
  • 21:05before turning around.
  • 21:05I had been in a boating accident
  • 21:07when I was younger,
  • 21:08so I don't joke around on the water.
  • 21:10I learned the dangers of how to stay
  • 21:12out of the way of the mass so as not
  • 21:14to be knocked into the water and the
  • 21:16proper technique of docking itself.
  • 21:18Change is understanding.
  • 21:19This shouldn't be afraid of the water.
  • 21:21Be more willing to take the backseat,
  • 21:23evaluate the situation,
  • 21:24more realized that there are multiple paths.
  • 21:26Multiple alternatives,
  • 21:27yes,
  • 21:27I'm afraid of trying new things
  • 21:29like being in rehab.
  • 21:30I've never been in rehab before.
  • 21:31It's like coming in from the rain.
  • 21:33It's not easy to get out of what
  • 21:35I know and try something new.
  • 21:37I'm still working on that.
  • 21:39I can go from zero to 100 quick,
  • 21:41but I'm working on ways to find a medium.
  • 21:44I want to deal with it,
  • 21:45not when it gets to 50 when it gets to 25.
  • 21:49I don't want it to get to 20.
  • 21:50I don't want it to feel that it
  • 21:52needs to resort to violence.
  • 21:53Violence is the last resort of a weak man.
  • 21:56So within this quick kind of
  • 21:59synopsis we can chart.
  • 22:04The evolution of from his childhood
  • 22:09role of being very quick too.
  • 22:13To go it alone will not hesitate that
  • 22:16you've got to take your shot that you
  • 22:19have to be more direct to instead coming
  • 22:22and being a little bit more able to.
  • 22:27To be OK with being scared,
  • 22:29being OK, being vulnerable,
  • 22:31recognizing that it's OK, not having
  • 22:33to get angry or resort to violence.
  • 22:36And again this,
  • 22:38just we just want to reiterate.
  • 22:40Maybe it wasn't clear enough, you know.
  • 22:43Again, this is an intervention with
  • 22:45somebody before really starting it's
  • 22:48designed before commencing psychotherapy,
  • 22:50so this is kind of a resource to prepare
  • 22:53both the individual and the clinician.
  • 22:57For being able to be have an understanding
  • 22:59of who this client is and where this
  • 23:02client might go in their opinion,
  • 23:04or how we can direct therapy to
  • 23:07offer this person the best resource.
  • 23:10And in writing about what? Anne.
  • 23:17What his kind of reviewing part of the
  • 23:19conclusion of the intervention offered this,
  • 23:21this this patient,
  • 23:22an opportunity to reflect on the exercises.
  • 23:24And he wrote there all about me.
  • 23:27The first is being more determined,
  • 23:28the 2nd about love, the 3rd about anger.
  • 23:31The 4th is about getting over fear.
  • 23:33We just looked at the 1st and
  • 23:35therefore I can be a caring person.
  • 23:37But I need to learn to be patient.
  • 23:40I used to be like I don't like when people
  • 23:43get too close to me or walk up next to me.
  • 23:47I would get up in their face.
  • 23:48I don't let anybody invade my space,
  • 23:50but I don't need to retaliate.
  • 23:52I can remove myself from the situation,
  • 23:54see there are other ways
  • 23:55of responding to a threat.
  • 23:56I was responding out of anger.
  • 23:58I was fooling myself. I can create walls.
  • 24:00Every wall has a gate.
  • 24:01Let people in and out.
  • 24:03If they're keeping everything out,
  • 24:04nothing is getting in.
  • 24:05You can't get anywhere or lose
  • 24:07anything if you don't give,
  • 24:08you can't receive.
  • 24:10So going back to what I was talking
  • 24:12about before about dominance
  • 24:14versus submissiveness here,
  • 24:15we see somebody who has again elevated
  • 24:18dominance and need for leadership
  • 24:20and need for controlling this.
  • 24:23But that creates an obstacle for him.
  • 24:25A boundary for him.
  • 24:27Such that he can receive.
  • 24:33And through this process.
  • 24:36He learns just I'm going to just
  • 24:39quickly read through a couple little
  • 24:40bit more of what he what he wrote.
  • 24:45He learned that he wants to be more
  • 24:46aware of emotions to go slower instead
  • 24:48of running and running out of gas.
  • 24:50Once they have trust,
  • 24:52be slower to speak and better at listening.
  • 24:55In reviewing the program overall,
  • 24:57he wrote it was eye opening and definitely
  • 24:59motivated me to be more objective.
  • 25:00The whole thing about this is one of
  • 25:02his metaphors was about perspective.
  • 25:04The dog can be out and about.
  • 25:06The deer can't do that.
  • 25:07I need to be honest with myself
  • 25:09and not be afraid of rejections.
  • 25:10I need to have no hidden agendas.
  • 25:12It's like crossing the street.
  • 25:14I need to be direct and cross cross it.
  • 25:16It's like when you meet women
  • 25:17when a man is drinking,
  • 25:19his courage is built up.
  • 25:20He can talk to any women when
  • 25:22he isn't drinking.
  • 25:23He will never speak to the woman he wants.
  • 25:26Drinking I can talk for real
  • 25:27if you don't approach her,
  • 25:28you might let the woman of
  • 25:31your dreams walk away.
  • 25:33Rejection would be the same,
  • 25:34but you're better off trying.
  • 25:35I need to see the rejection
  • 25:37is going to be rejection.
  • 25:38I shouldn't be afraid.
  • 25:39Sometimes I can't see the
  • 25:40forest from the trees.
  • 25:41I need to learn to be honest
  • 25:43and learn to take rejection,
  • 25:45not hide their dear.
  • 25:46Didn't ever want to be seen.
  • 25:47He is in real danger.
  • 25:48He needs to know that he can trust
  • 25:50some people not be too anxious.
  • 25:57So let me just step back for a second.
  • 26:01So I just wanted to be clear.
  • 26:06In terms of what we're doing here,
  • 26:09so yeah, so this intervention
  • 26:11pushes the envelope a little bit
  • 26:14in terms of what the boundary
  • 26:17between assessment and intervention
  • 26:19and what we're trying to do is.
  • 26:22Again, not not only utilized
  • 26:24creativity for cathartic purposes,
  • 26:26but unlock this kind of self reflection
  • 26:29and insight part that can be accessed
  • 26:32through it and towards that end we utilized.
  • 26:36A framework for interpretation and also.
  • 26:40A framework of technology to help
  • 26:43make that part accessible.
  • 26:44So what I was trying to show with that
  • 26:47case study is how very simply this
  • 26:49individual without any additional
  • 26:51care started very openly and quickly
  • 26:54addressing those relevant changes
  • 26:56that he hopes to make in his life.
  • 27:04So you know this. This relates.
  • 27:07I don't mean to skip over other
  • 27:09interventions and other models which
  • 27:11are trying to do similar things.
  • 27:14I assume many people are familiar with
  • 27:17therapeutic assessment which is advanced
  • 27:19by Steven Finn and his colleagues,
  • 27:21which offers a very interesting
  • 27:23model of using assessment as
  • 27:25part of therapeutic intervention.
  • 27:27But as opposed to what we're doing.
  • 27:31Therapeutic assessment in it.
  • 27:33In a typical sense,
  • 27:35relies on a classical assessments and
  • 27:38B like like the Ro Shack of MPI or
  • 27:42something like that and B requires a
  • 27:45lot of clinician time to breakdown and
  • 27:48break open the assessment to include
  • 27:51the person within the experience
  • 27:53when we're trying to do is instead
  • 27:57develop assessment resources which
  • 27:58were in and of themselves therapeutic.
  • 28:01Because of their ability to draw
  • 28:05from creativity and narrative.
  • 28:07Plus they have this additional feature
  • 28:11of being insight oriented and being
  • 28:14self guided and other comprable approaches.
  • 28:18The CRT borski which which similarly
  • 28:21tries to identify core patterns
  • 28:25through narrative processes.
  • 28:28The central difference between us and CRT is.
  • 28:33CRTS model similarly
  • 28:34requires clinicians efforts,
  • 28:36but it's also fairly nuanced and a
  • 28:39little bit complicated in terms of
  • 28:42understanding what the roles are.
  • 28:45Whereas here we're trying to use very
  • 28:49simple roles in terms of dominance.
  • 28:53And submissiveness and cooperation
  • 28:55and antagonism.
  • 28:57Recognizing that these are different
  • 29:00problem solving models which are
  • 29:03relatively straightforward and accessible.
  • 29:07Another important related approach has
  • 29:10been advanced by Pennebaker and Luke.
  • 29:12Pennebaker has been at the forefront
  • 29:16of utilizing narrative analysis
  • 29:18and semantic analysis to drive in.
  • 29:21At to kind of unlock text, and I think.
  • 29:26Again,
  • 29:26going going back to what I was
  • 29:30saying before about form content
  • 29:32versus form pennebaker's work is
  • 29:35primarily on the content level.
  • 29:38And less under under form level and
  • 29:40but I do think it's very important
  • 29:43and all of these work are very
  • 29:45relevant and have been central to
  • 29:47kind of the development of of the
  • 29:50work that we're doing and which
  • 29:52brings us up to our next steps.
  • 29:54So one thing which which will
  • 29:56be doing in terms of in terms of
  • 29:59the predictive analytic piece.
  • 30:00Is that we're working now with
  • 30:03a much larger via database,
  • 30:05and in the past we had something
  • 30:08like 250 veterans that died by
  • 30:11suicide and we looked at matched
  • 30:13controls of about 1000.
  • 30:15Now we're looking about.
  • 30:19Something like 18,000 veterans
  • 30:21that have died by suicide and
  • 30:23matched controls of again.
  • 30:27Again 5 to one.
  • 30:29So we're looking at a pretty big
  • 30:32number and we're looking at identifying
  • 30:35psychosocial risk variables within the text.
  • 30:38We're also preparing a larger
  • 30:41implementation of conflict analysis
  • 30:44intervention as a pre therapy intervention.
  • 30:47Seeing to what extent using this
  • 30:51approach increases treatment
  • 30:53motivation within a large sample of
  • 30:57veterans before starting therapy.
  • 31:00And the final aspect which we are pushing
  • 31:03for is the integration of these two things.
  • 31:07Bridging content and form.
  • 31:09And this is kind of refining.
  • 31:13Use of conflict analysis.
  • 31:16To not only be looking at.
  • 31:22Not only looking at form but
  • 31:25also looking at content,
  • 31:27so bringing in natural language,
  • 31:29processing an artificial
  • 31:30intelligence to to be able to
  • 31:33extract more detailed feedback,
  • 31:35more sensitive awareness about
  • 31:36the way that words are being used,
  • 31:40and share that information back
  • 31:42to patients in real time so as to
  • 31:45strengthen their their ability of
  • 31:47gaining personal information and
  • 31:49insight and self understanding
  • 31:51through the process.
  • 31:53As well as providing this information
  • 31:55in real time to clinicians to help
  • 31:58boost the efficacy of therapeutic care.
  • 32:03So just kind of in summary.
  • 32:09What? What we're trying to do is is first.
  • 32:15Inventing Wellness based
  • 32:16mental health resources.
  • 32:18Stepping outside of typical
  • 32:20diagnostic frameworks to instead be
  • 32:22able to relate to the person in the
  • 32:26person's own vocabulary utilizing
  • 32:28narrative forces utilizing narrative.
  • 32:30Resources recognizing that it works
  • 32:33really well an it in and people enjoy
  • 32:37it and but also pushing beyond it.
  • 32:41Beyond just catharsis 2, instead look
  • 32:45structurally and what is negative 2?
  • 32:50Leveraging narrative and creativity
  • 32:51to provide accessible, meaningful,
  • 32:53and culturally informed care
  • 32:54and this cultural informed care
  • 32:56part is an important point.
  • 32:58One of the things that we found in this,
  • 33:01in this resounds in the literature,
  • 33:03which is that.
  • 33:06Well as.
  • 33:09You know classical DSM diagnostic criteria
  • 33:11are normed and even normed on large
  • 33:14samples samples that are not necessarily
  • 33:17corresponding with everyone and,
  • 33:19and this is similarly a problem
  • 33:21with other assessment registers.
  • 33:23So part of what we're doing is by allowing
  • 33:26story into the assessment practice.
  • 33:29We are allowing people to tell
  • 33:31stories in their own words,
  • 33:33so in this is something which
  • 33:36we find corresponds and.
  • 33:38Across kind of the gamut of cultural context.
  • 33:43Lastly, we are furthering the
  • 33:44ability not just to tell stories,
  • 33:47but also to interpret stories to promote
  • 33:49personal and cultural understanding.
  • 33:51And again I began with this kind
  • 33:54of dichotomy's of of how narrative.
  • 33:57Although inspirational can lead
  • 33:58us to get stuck,
  • 34:00the meet us to belief lead us to.
  • 34:05Reinforcing things in a dogmatic way and.
  • 34:10I think that maybe the most important
  • 34:13part of what we're doing here is.
  • 34:16Trying to answer that critique by saying,
  • 34:19well, actually we can understand narrative.
  • 34:22We can break it down into structure.
  • 34:25We can break it down using technology,
  • 34:28but also breaking down using
  • 34:30classical physics,
  • 34:31physics and logic as I've tried to
  • 34:35demonstrate with the the metaphor of
  • 34:38scale to to look at transformations
  • 34:41present within story and and therein.
  • 34:44Be able to discern things in a in a,
  • 34:49in a direct and pragmatic way.
  • 34:52Bringing story into the fold as as
  • 34:55as a credible diagnostic resource
  • 34:57and something which can also move
  • 35:01our treatment methods forward.
  • 35:06So I. I can keep going,
  • 35:09but I was thinking that maybe
  • 35:11I would open up now it's about
  • 35:141/4 to the hour and start.
  • 35:16Maybe we can.
  • 35:17We can talk a little bit more in
  • 35:19detail and I would be happy to
  • 35:21answer questions and go into go
  • 35:23into things with a little more depth.
  • 35:30That sounds great and Max.
  • 35:31Do you want to just stop sharing so that
  • 35:33yeah there we go Jim, go ahead. Well,
  • 35:36thank you very much Max.
  • 35:38It's always a pleasure to hear
  • 35:40your presentation and I must say.
  • 35:43Given the audience,
  • 35:44the big question for many of us is.
  • 35:48How young have you actually
  • 35:51been able to sort of?
  • 35:53Provide some opportunity like this to
  • 35:56individuals who may not be veterans,
  • 35:58but who are certainly struggling with some
  • 36:00of the same issues you're talking about.
  • 36:03And if you haven't gone down that road,
  • 36:06what would need to happen?
  • 36:08And how appropriate do you think it
  • 36:11would be in terms of adolescents and
  • 36:13even perhaps younger individuals I guess
  • 36:16makes me think of the pictures that I had.
  • 36:19Some of the individuals that
  • 36:20were on the unit drawing for
  • 36:22May and also talking about,
  • 36:24but the whole issue about narrative.
  • 36:27Strikes me as being very potentially
  • 36:30important topic and I guess how
  • 36:32useful with this tool be and how
  • 36:35interested would you be in potentially
  • 36:37finding a way to have this be
  • 36:39something that could be used for a
  • 36:42younger generation of individuals
  • 36:43struggling with their mental health?
  • 36:49Now you're muted, you're muted.
  • 36:53OK, great, thank you for the
  • 36:55question and it's nice to.
  • 36:57To see your face again after being obstructed
  • 37:01by a PowerPoint for the last while.
  • 37:04It's a great question.
  • 37:05We have done a couple of pilot
  • 37:08implementations into school systems,
  • 37:10both in an elementary
  • 37:11school and in a high school.
  • 37:13In both of those context,
  • 37:15we refine some of the inventory
  • 37:17questions on some of the interpretive
  • 37:20guide questions so so I don't know
  • 37:22if I've made this clear enough,
  • 37:25but you know,
  • 37:25a big part of it is helping the people
  • 37:29interpret their own creativity.
  • 37:31So, so in that fashion,
  • 37:32we've had to refine some of the
  • 37:35information to make it more accessible.
  • 37:37In terms of self analysis but.
  • 37:41We had fairly successful small
  • 37:44implementations in schools.
  • 37:46We worked with mental health group
  • 37:49at a local high school and I think
  • 37:53also because it was an we use like
  • 37:57computers and iPads computer kids.
  • 38:01In some way we're more proficient and it
  • 38:04was easier to begin with than adults,
  • 38:06and they enjoyed. To the art part a lot.
  • 38:12So I think it was fairly productive
  • 38:14and I think it was something that
  • 38:16also because it was outside of kind
  • 38:19of the classical diagnostic context.
  • 38:21It was not really stigmatising
  • 38:22and I think it was even fun.
  • 38:24So I think those are pretty successful.
  • 38:27I haven't published anything about it,
  • 38:29but it was something I would
  • 38:30look forward to
  • 38:31doing again. Is there any plan
  • 38:33in terms of moving forward in
  • 38:35terms of being able to make this
  • 38:38available more widely and I guess,
  • 38:39especially with the revisions that
  • 38:41you made for the younger. Participants
  • 38:44I would love to.
  • 38:45I guess I got a little scared off just
  • 38:49by like implementation of IRB stuff
  • 38:53within within with kids and schools and I.
  • 38:57Working with veterans was complicated
  • 38:59enough but but I would love to,
  • 39:01and you know, perhaps there would be
  • 39:03something which we could you know.
  • 39:05I'm sure you guys have expertise with
  • 39:07navigating those research concerns well.
  • 39:09It's certainly gotten to
  • 39:10be more of a challenge
  • 39:12these days, but if you would be
  • 39:14willing to share some of the
  • 39:16material with Andreas and some
  • 39:17of the other people on our team,
  • 39:20I think we would have a great
  • 39:22interest in looking at that,
  • 39:23especially the revision revised
  • 39:25versions that you've been using for the.
  • 39:27For the student.
  • 39:30For the high schools.
  • 39:32I love you.
  • 39:36Max of first of all, thank you for for.
  • 39:40Really wonderful and and very
  • 39:42provocative in the good way.
  • 39:44Thought provoking presentation.
  • 39:45I really, really enjoyed it.
  • 39:47I guess a comment and a question that
  • 39:49the comment is that in some ways you are
  • 39:52bringing our past and our future together.
  • 39:55You know, I was thinking that you know,
  • 39:58thinking back to little Hans and two.
  • 40:00Fried going all that you know,
  • 40:03we could do even further back,
  • 40:05but story has been central to
  • 40:08psychiatry into psychotherapy and I
  • 40:10think that as a pendulum between.
  • 40:12Between the biological and the non
  • 40:14biological psychiatry has fought out.
  • 40:15We probably given up a lot on this
  • 40:17story so it is wonderful to see this
  • 40:20and other efforts to bring story back
  • 40:22because I think that so many of us went
  • 40:25into this field because we love stories.
  • 40:27So I think that's really terrific.
  • 40:28At the same time you're taking
  • 40:30us into the future with all this
  • 40:32big data AI data management.
  • 40:34I don't know if Pam Hoffman is around,
  • 40:36but she is our local.
  • 40:38Expert in AI applied to the EMR.
  • 40:40So you're bringing all of those things
  • 40:42together and I think that's that's terrific.
  • 40:45You know the VARB is scary,
  • 40:47I think with kids it's less scary,
  • 40:50so I think it's you know the other thing
  • 40:52going to our past we have been looking at
  • 40:56drawings it's Jim mentioned telling stories,
  • 40:58hearing stories.
  • 41:00Linda,
  • 41:01our chair at enough she is on but you
  • 41:03know we have a big effort with Scholastic
  • 41:06and with others to really explode.
  • 41:08The storytelling power of child psychiatry.
  • 41:11So I don't know.
  • 41:12That was a question.
  • 41:13It was like a admiring comment
  • 41:15and anything you want to.
  • 41:18I I admire that and I think that's
  • 41:21something which I think both yeah,
  • 41:23and in particular you know your your group.
  • 41:26It has held, you know,
  • 41:27I think that for myself I I didn't
  • 41:30have the luxury of, you know,
  • 41:32like clinical training or research
  • 41:34training in a space where that
  • 41:36was too much of an option.
  • 41:38And so it kind of existed on the fringe and
  • 41:41therefore is kind of an inspirational space.
  • 41:44But yes, you know I.
  • 41:46I feel like story can absolutely be used.
  • 41:49But you know, with the caveat
  • 41:51that we can also get lost in it,
  • 41:53and that's something which you know,
  • 41:55which I which I fear and that you know,
  • 41:58that's something which politically you know.
  • 41:59Again, it's Election Day.
  • 42:01It's something that like it's so we see
  • 42:04in our in our media we see in our society
  • 42:06people that take stories literally.
  • 42:08Ann, and so you know it's part of
  • 42:11the challenge is if we're going
  • 42:12to step into this game which
  • 42:14which I suggest that we do,
  • 42:16we need to be prepared to,
  • 42:17you know it's rules well.
  • 42:20Linda is here and she she's
  • 42:22she's going to say something.
  • 42:24Let me just add before that that the
  • 42:27other connection you started telling
  • 42:28us about your connection with Israel.
  • 42:30And I cannot but think back to the
  • 42:33suicide autopsy studies that were
  • 42:35done by our colleagues in Israel,
  • 42:37including Donald Cohen years
  • 42:38ago published in the archives.
  • 42:40So I think that you are also
  • 42:42following that kind of scholarship.
  • 42:44You know 30-40 years later
  • 42:46with AI and whatnot. But Linda.
  • 42:48No, thank you.
  • 42:49I'm axing I too,
  • 42:51just this was really,
  • 42:52really lovely and thank you
  • 42:54for bringing bringing story
  • 42:55into the center is under is
  • 42:57mentioned and would love
  • 42:59to talk with you more.
  • 43:00We have a really deep
  • 43:02collaboration with our Scholastic
  • 43:04colleagues who think about
  • 43:05story as promoting child development
  • 43:07as promoting children's resilience
  • 43:08even in difficult times. So we
  • 43:10love to love to think with you more about
  • 43:13that, introduce you to our scholastic
  • 43:16colleagues if you'd like to be wonderful.
  • 43:19I think there's the real opportunity there.
  • 43:22I mean it, it really is something that
  • 43:24we should fully take advantage of.
  • 43:27I would be honored, yeah?
  • 43:31Going to flock to. Thank
  • 43:34you. I think also there's this
  • 43:37resurgent interest certainly in myself,
  • 43:39but so many of our trainees,
  • 43:41medical students,
  • 43:42young residents on in qualitative studies,
  • 43:44and I think that it's a field of psychiatry
  • 43:47in general and shelter in particular.
  • 43:50We have not nearly paid
  • 43:52enough attention to this,
  • 43:53and I have to thank Jim for pointing
  • 43:56me in that direction later today.
  • 43:58Jim, I'm actually right before their
  • 44:01return start coming in were colleague
  • 44:03and really one of our heroes and.
  • 44:06Qualitative Teresa Betancourt
  • 44:07will be presenting her work on
  • 44:10refugees and something here in
  • 44:12Africa today at 5:00 o'clock.
  • 44:15At 434 thirty please join us.
  • 44:19So if you just look online,
  • 44:21it's one of the events that's coming
  • 44:23up and Teresa is this amazing
  • 44:25person who has been, you know,
  • 44:26taking stories and really trying to
  • 44:28interpret them from these colleagues.
  • 44:30But Interestingly,
  • 44:30her presentation this afternoon
  • 44:32and she is a good friend is going
  • 44:34to be focused on the work that
  • 44:36she's been doing with the refugee
  • 44:38population in the Boston area.
  • 44:41It will be fascinating for all
  • 44:42of us to participate in that
  • 44:44and wonderful colleague, and
  • 44:45I think also to make the point
  • 44:47for those of you who may not know
  • 44:49much about qualitative and Max
  • 44:51brought us in squarely into it.
  • 44:52But one of the real strengths
  • 44:54of it is that sample sizes do
  • 44:56not need to be gargantuan.
  • 44:58You know, we go into is and I don't know,
  • 45:00Max if you want to talk about
  • 45:02that because you talked about the
  • 45:04large samples that you're doing,
  • 45:06but maybe I'll let you
  • 45:07comment on that, right?
  • 45:08Well, it's yeah, I think you know it's it's.
  • 45:11Playful right now. How we have now.
  • 45:14The introduction of these
  • 45:17fairly sophisticated machine
  • 45:19learning technologies that make.
  • 45:21That transformed the idea of
  • 45:23qualitative research because we
  • 45:24can start playing with things in a
  • 45:27new depth and looking very closely.
  • 45:29Also with with big data.
  • 45:32And so able to kind of allow things
  • 45:35to emerge out of data in a classical,
  • 45:38qualitative way,
  • 45:38but in a much bigger sample.
  • 45:40Again, I'm not.
  • 45:41I'm not like a true blue
  • 45:43qualitative researcher,
  • 45:44so I don't mean to step on anybody's toes.
  • 45:48But but it does feel like
  • 45:49right now we have we're at an
  • 45:51interesting moment where we can
  • 45:53have a certain confluence method.
  • 45:59And I also think that there's an
  • 46:02interesting luxury that we have right now,
  • 46:04which is that utilizing these methods,
  • 46:06we can also give resources back to
  • 46:09patients so we can give feedback.
  • 46:11And I think that feedback, interactivity.
  • 46:15You know can facilitate new types of
  • 46:19connection that therapeutically we
  • 46:21have an imperative to take advantage.
  • 46:26So I guess there was one other thought.
  • 46:28I guess I've been participating to the degree
  • 46:31that I can with the Geneva Peace Week,
  • 46:33which is actually this
  • 46:34current week that we're in.
  • 46:36And it's interesting too.
  • 46:37I'm part of the early Childhood
  • 46:39Peace Consortium and the whole
  • 46:41issue about youth leaders,
  • 46:42but one of the points you made very early
  • 46:44on Max with something that I thought
  • 46:47we would just come back and touch on.
  • 46:49And it's interesting to think about doing
  • 46:51these interviews with individuals who are,
  • 46:53you know, veterans,
  • 46:54and so on and so forth.
  • 46:56But I guess there's a part of me
  • 46:58that would be fascinated to have
  • 47:00the same kind of interviews done
  • 47:02with some of our government leaders.
  • 47:04Yes, some individuals who actually
  • 47:06are leading the way in terms of how
  • 47:08they perceive themselves relative
  • 47:09to the others and and just for us
  • 47:12to potentially have fed knowledge
  • 47:14available to us.
  • 47:14But we need to make a bigger
  • 47:17change in this world.
  • 47:18And sadly I think many of the
  • 47:20people that are sort of politically
  • 47:22leading the way are leading us
  • 47:25sadly and it has a lot to do.
  • 47:27I'm sure with their early child
  • 47:28development and sort of where they can,
  • 47:31but we need to make a difference and I'm
  • 47:33not sure if you've actually had any.
  • 47:36Policy makers or government officials
  • 47:38take any of the information that
  • 47:41any of the sort of tools you have,
  • 47:44but I'd be fascinated if you had.
  • 47:46I haven't, but I did have,
  • 47:49and I had a final slide,
  • 47:51which I kind of backed out from showing,
  • 47:54which looked at some of the Twitter
  • 47:57postings of Biden versus Trump.
  • 47:59And looking how how clearly we can see,
  • 48:02you know you might call them
  • 48:04qualitative differences.
  • 48:05Or you might.
  • 48:06Call them psychological differences.
  • 48:08You know, without what I would call relation,
  • 48:10modality differences,
  • 48:11power differences.
  • 48:12Would you mind that Jim will second
  • 48:14the vote? Could you send? Could
  • 48:16you share that slide? I mean I can,
  • 48:18but I can. You know better.
  • 48:20We just talk about. I don't mean
  • 48:22to like drift into the, you know.
  • 48:28You know it's it's a time of
  • 48:30heightened emotion anyway,
  • 48:31you know, but but the point is that,
  • 48:33but certainly you know these patterns
  • 48:34are are we don't need this crap.
  • 48:36We don't need to be experts in AI.
  • 48:39To see you know fairly new on
  • 48:42psychological differences between
  • 48:43you know these candidates,
  • 48:45how they present themselves,
  • 48:47how they use words,
  • 48:48how they conceptualize self versus other.
  • 48:51Perfect answer, perfect answer
  • 48:53for the nuanced is the right word.
  • 48:56Either we have not. We don't
  • 48:59need totally overt and scary.
  • 49:03So Jim, do you want to close us off
  • 49:06with a final thank you and a word of Wisdom
  • 49:08as we head into the rest of the day?
  • 49:13Well, I would just say thank you very
  • 49:15much and I guess it makes me think of
  • 49:17the work that we've been doing with
  • 49:19the Israelis and Palestinians and
  • 49:21trying to bring them together with the.
  • 49:23And actually I was just on the
  • 49:25phone yesterday with Ernesto
  • 49:26Caffo and Foundation Child,
  • 49:27but there's so much more work that
  • 49:29we need to do around this globe
  • 49:31and thank you for leading the
  • 49:33way in some really creative ways.
  • 49:35Max, I appreciate it.
  • 49:37Thank thank you very much and it's
  • 49:39it's been an honor to talk them to
  • 49:42share and thanks for making time.
  • 49:44Sorry the mechanism of sharing information
  • 49:45over zoom is still a little clunky,
  • 49:48but we're trying to find our way.
  • 49:50Well, we were all in the
  • 49:52same world right now and.
  • 49:54I guess I will look forward to seeing
  • 49:57everybody next week with James
  • 49:58Swain and I'll be hopefully be.
  • 50:00Be able to share some interesting
  • 50:02realities about James's life, too.
  • 50:04I was at his marriage,
  • 50:05and certainly we've known him for many years.
  • 50:09So thank you all and thank you.
  • 50:12Well, alright take care.