Cardiologists use echocardiography to diagnose a range of functional or structural abnormalities of the heart. Using often over 100 videos and images that capture different parts of the heart, echocardiographers make dozens of measurements, such as the heart's size and shape, ventricle thickness, and the movement and function of each heart chamber, to assess patient heart health.
A new study in JAMA led by Yale School of Medicine (YSM) researchers finds that an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled tool can interpret echocardiograms with a high degree of accuracy in just a few minutes.
“Echocardiography is a cornerstone of cardiovascular care, but it requires a tremendous amount of clinical time from highly skilled readers to review these studies,” says Rohan Khera, MD, MS, assistant professor of medicine (cardiovascular medicine) at YSM and of biostatistics (health informatics) at Yale School of Public Health. Khera is the paper's senior author and director of the Cardiovascular Data Science Lab (CarDS). “We wanted to develop a technology that can assist these very busy echocardiographers to help improve accuracy and accelerate their workflow.”
The researchers found the AI tool, PanEcho, could perform 39 diagnostic tasks based on multi-view echocardiography and accurately detect conditions such as severe aortic stenosis, systolic dysfunction, and left ventricle ejection fraction, among others. This study builds on previous publications, including a 2023 publication in the European Heart Journal, that demonstrated the technology’s accuracy.
Greg Holste, MSE, a PhD student at the University of Texas Austin who is co-advised by Khera and is co-first author of the study, says, “We developed a tool that integrates information from many views of the heart to automatically identify the key measurements and abnormalities that a cardiologist would include in a complete report.”
PanEcho was developed using 999,727 echocardiographic videos collected from Yale New Haven Health patients between January 2016 and June 2022. Researchers then validated the tool using studies from 5,130 Yale New Haven Health patients as well as three external data cohorts from the Heart and Vascular Center of Semmelweis University in Budapest, Hungary; Stanford University Hospital; and Stanford Health Care.
“The tool can now measure and assess a wide range of heart conditions, making it much more attractive for future clinical use,” says Evangelos K. Oikonomou, MD, DPhil, clinical fellow (cardiovascular medicine) and co-first author of the study. “While it is highly accurate, it can be less interpretable than the read from a clinician. It’s still an algorithm and it requires human oversight.”