2022
Future Directions in Understanding and Interpreting Discrepant Reports of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Youth
Spears A, Gratch I, Nam R, Goger P, B. C. Future Directions in Understanding and Interpreting Discrepant Reports of Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Youth. Journal Of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 2022, 52: 134-146. PMID: 36473063, PMCID: PMC9898197, DOI: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2145567.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
Inconsistencies in Self-Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Across Assessment Methods
Deming C, Harris J, Castro-Ramirez F, Glenn J, B. C, Millner A, Nock M. Inconsistencies in Self-Reports of Suicidal Ideation and Attempts Across Assessment Methods. Psychological Assessment 2021, 33: 218-229. PMID: 33705163, DOI: 10.1037/pas0000976.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSuicidal ideationSuicide attemptsSelf-reports of suicidal ideationReports of suicidal ideationFollow-up assessmentEndorsement ratesRandom respondingSelf-report surveySuicide researchSelf-reportScreening interviewParticipants' reportsMultiple itemsIdeationParticipantsItemsInconsistent reportingStudy conditionsAssessment methodsSI/SAIn-personSuicideIn-person interviewsHomogeneous groupAssessment
2018
Cognition and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A systematic review of longitudinal studies
Cha C, Wilson K, Tezanos K, DiVasto K, Tolchin G. Cognition and self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Clinical Psychology Review 2018, 69: 97-111. PMID: 30166197, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.07.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNonsuicidal self-injurySelf-injurious thoughtsSITB outcomesCognitive processesSelf-injuryMechanisms of treatment changeRecurrent suicidal ideationCognitive risk factorsPotential cognitive mechanismsFeatures of cognitionSystematic review of longitudinal studiesCognitive deficitsSuicidal ideationSuicidal individualsBehavioral measuresReview of longitudinal studiesCognition literatureSuicide researchSITBsSelf-reportTreatment articlesCognitionLongitudinal studyDistal relationshipTreatment changes
2017
Understanding Suicide Risk Within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework: Insights, Challenges, and Future Research Considerations
Glenn C, B. C, Kleiman E, Nock M. Understanding Suicide Risk Within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework: Insights, Challenges, and Future Research Considerations. Clinical Psychological Science 2017, 5: 568-592. PMID: 28670505, PMCID: PMC5487002, DOI: 10.1177/2167702616686854.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSuicidal behaviorRDoC frameworkResearch Domain Criteria (RDoC) frameworkPrevention of suicidal behaviorResearch Domain CriteriaPsychiatric risk factorsStudy suicidal behaviorRDoC domainsSuicide riskRDoCSuicide researchSuicideProximal processesConstruct(sResearch considerationsPsychopathologyBehaviorResearch directionsInteraction of domainsResearchRisk factorsFrameworkAccounting for Diversity in Suicide Research: Sampling and Sample Reporting Practices in the United States
B. C, Tezanos K, Peros O, Ng M, Ribeiro J, Nock M, Franklin J. Accounting for Diversity in Suicide Research: Sampling and Sample Reporting Practices in the United States. Suicide And Life-Threatening Behavior 2017, 48: 131-139. PMID: 28276601, DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12344.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTransgender statusUnited States researchState researchVeteran statusYoung adult sampleReview longitudinal studiesParticipant raceMethodological practicesUnited StatesSuicide researchSuicidal thoughtsAdult samplesNon-HispanicIdentified many risk factorsPractice of samplingDiverse populationsReporting practicesSample characteristicsLongitudinal studyParticipant ageArticleParticipantsPracticeEthnicityRace