Prenatal Programming of Brain Development: The Role of Maternal Stress and Stress Biology

February 14, 2023

YCSC Grand Rounds February 14, 2023

Claudia Buss, PhD, Professor, Institute of Medical Psychology, Charité, Berlin

Information

ID: 9485
To Cite: DCA Citation Guide

Download Transcript

00:00So I was able to look at associations
00:04between maternal stress and brain phenotypes.
00:08So this was very exciting,
00:10but the one thing I wasn't so happy
00:13about was that we looked at the
00:16children's brain at 7 years age.
00:18And of course there's a lot happening
00:20in the post Natal period and
00:22there's a lot of interaction and
00:24also continuity in terms of free
00:26Natal stress and post Natal stress.
00:28So we don't really know if we
00:29look at something at 7 years age,
00:31is it something that's really related
00:33to the prenatal environment or is it
00:35really the post Natal environment that
00:37shapes this or at least moderates this?
00:38So I thought.
00:40I actually.
00:43I have to confirm something here. Got
00:46it that it's recorded but I
00:49don't see my cursor. We still
00:51have somebody who can.
00:52Karen, can you help me?
00:55See it's. Oh, I see. See the
00:59cursor is there on mission.
01:03There we go. OK. Thank you
01:07so much. So I thought.
01:14Umm.
01:18Moving forward, no. No. OK.
01:21I just wanted to get you to talk.
01:25Thank you. So I thought if we really wanted
01:28to see what our prenatal influences were,
01:30supposed Natal influences,
01:31what we should do is try to characterize
01:34the brain phenotypes shortly after
01:36birth because at this time point
01:38post Natal influences cannot yet
01:40have exerted their influences.
01:41So this is. This is what we set
01:45up together with my colleagues.
01:46Pathik, what ones on your entringer at
01:48the University of California, Irvine.
01:50We had this pregnancy cohort
01:53that where we did extremely.
01:57Deep phenotyping in terms of
01:59their stress and stress biology,
02:00applying ecological momentary or stress
02:04momentary assessments of stress in their
02:07home environment across four days in
02:10their home environment and we took,
02:12we collected a lot of biological
02:15samples and then we followed up these
02:18children and my specific focus was brain
02:21development based on multimodal MRI
02:24and also cognitive function whereas.
02:27Uh, my colleague Sonia entering ahead
02:29more focus on body composition and um,
02:32cellular aging.
02:33So this is like a pretty well characterized
02:36cohort and I will be mainly talking
02:38about results from this cohort today.
02:40Umm, where we have roughly, yeah,
02:44between, depending on the outcome,
02:46100 and 114 Mother,
02:4814 Mother child diets.
02:51We do have several other cohorts now.
02:54We are part of the ECHO consortium here in
02:57the US and contributed 2 cohorts to that.
03:01And we also have a pregnancy cohort
03:03in Berlin.
03:04And we are trying to harmonize our
03:06data collection in ways that we can
03:09eventually merge these cohorts.
03:10For either for mega analysis or at
03:13least for replication purposes and
03:15this is something that we will be
03:18focusing on to really address the
03:20replication crisis and and see where we
03:24stand with some of these initial findings.
03:28So when I started this work,
03:30there was quite a bit of evidence
03:33from epidemiological studies showing
03:35that there was an association between
03:37maternal stress during pregnancy and
03:39higher risk for neurodevelopmental
03:41disorders and psychiatric disorders,
03:43as well as cognitive impairment.
03:45But anything we knew about really changes
03:48in the brain was based on animal models.
03:51So as Kieran said earlier,
03:53we did publish the first study.
03:56Now 13 years ago,
03:58showing associations between maternal
04:00pregnancy specific anxiety and
04:02reductions in Gray matter volume
04:04in the children at 7 years age.
04:07And as you can see here,
04:09especially these pronounced reductions in
04:11Gray matter volume in the prefrontal cortex,
04:14but here also in the in the temporal cortex.
04:18And this is interesting because these
04:20are brain regions that support some of
04:22these cognitive functions that have
04:24been shown in epidemiological studies.
04:26To be associated with maternal stress.
04:28We then later when the sample was.
04:32Larger also looked at cortical thickness
04:34and whether there were associations,
04:36associations between maternal
04:38depressive symptoms during pregnancy
04:40and cortical thickness.
04:41And as you can see in blue are
04:44several regions in the brain where
04:46the cortex was thinner in children
04:48whose mothers had higher depressive
04:50symptoms during pregnancy.
04:52Again,
04:52very pronounced are the
04:54reductions here in the prefrontal
04:56cortex, and this is also
04:59what mediated an association,
05:01the association between.
05:02Maternal depressive symptoms and
05:04externalizing problems in her children.
05:07So this is something we have also
05:10started looking at in our newborns.
05:12In this other cohort, I told about,
05:14I talked about and here's one example
05:16where we were able to show that
05:19there is an association between
05:20higher perceived stress levels
05:22in the mother during pregnancy
05:24and smaller hippocampal volumes.
05:25And we of course also interested in
05:28whether this has done any kind of
05:30implications for cognitive function
05:32cognitive development later on.
05:33And interestingly,
05:34we didn't see a main effect
05:36of hippocampal volume.
05:38The birth and cognitive function
05:39here in this case at six months age,
05:41but it was an interaction with the
05:43environment and those children who
05:45had a larger hippocampal volume
05:47were better able to benefit from
05:49an enriched environment.
05:50So it really shows this concept
05:52of conditional probability.
05:54So certain phenotypes get established
05:56by certain experiences and then will
05:59determine how future experiences
06:01can shape further development,
06:04which I think is this is a
06:07nice example of that.
06:09And then this is some work I'm I'm
06:12working on with Kieran currently
06:15the the UCI children we have done
06:19gene DNA methylation analysis,
06:22longitudinal DNA methylation analysis
06:24that we are currently analyzing and
06:27something we have started looking
06:29into is we have generated this
06:31wholly epigenetic risk score that is
06:35supposedly based on this paper indicates.
06:38Exposure to glucocorticoids during
06:41fetal development and what we did,
06:45we created this polygenetic risk
06:47score and actually showed that
06:49it was associated with maternal
06:51depressive symptoms during pregnancy
06:53and also that it then predicted
06:55hippocampal volume in the newborn.
06:57So this is just an initial attempt
06:59to try to understand potential some
07:02of the epigenetic underpinnings of
07:04some of the associations we observe.
07:07Umm.
07:10I told you that when I started this work,
07:12Umm,
07:12we were the first who who published on this.
07:16But this has changed dramatically
07:18in the last decade.
07:20There are a lot of studies now in
07:22humans showing associations between
07:24various types of maternal distrust
07:27during pregnancy, depression,
07:29anxiety,
07:30but also perceived stress levels and.
07:34Sorry,
07:35it's too loud.
07:38The various forms of maternal
07:40distress levels and brain outcomes,
07:42and this has been work has been
07:44done in in fetuses and newborns,
07:46infants, children and also
07:48adolescents and young adults.
07:49And so there is accumulating
07:52evidence for this for sure.
07:54But the picture is very heterogeneous
07:56because people are suffering
07:58different types of stress,
07:59different brain outcomes.
08:00They are using different pipelines
08:03for analyzing the MRI data.
08:04So I think we don't have a.
08:07Very good picture in terms of
08:09what replicates and what is like
08:10a true effects and I think we are
08:12getting there and and and I will
08:14be talking about some of the steps
08:16that we need to take but at least I
08:18think what we what we can establish
08:20that there is from different
08:22independent research groups quite a
08:23bit of evidence for an association
08:26between maternal distress during
08:28pregnancy and brain development and.
08:31We are of course very interested
08:33in what is it that the fetus
08:35actually receives in terms of the
08:37the signal of maternal stress.
08:39Because I often get asked what kind of
08:42stress should we be paying attention to.
08:44And I think any kind of stress
08:46we should be paying attention to
08:49because we don't know what in an
08:51individual actually leads to the
08:54translation into a biological signal.
08:57So there might be coping strategies.
08:59There might be like, like.
09:01Certain other resilience factors
09:02that lead to the mother coping with
09:05stress well and not increasing like
09:08different stress biology components,
09:10but others where this might be the case.
09:12And here are some mechanisms that
09:14we think are really important and of
09:16course on the one hand it is cortisol.
09:19We know that maternal cortisol
09:21can pass through the placenta.
09:23There is an enzyme 11 beta HSD two
09:25that converts active cortisol into
09:27inactive cortisone and protects
09:29the fetus from an overexposure.
09:32It's just a partial barrier and
09:34a certain percentage of cortisol
09:35passes through.
09:36And something that Kieran has
09:38actually shown and has very early
09:40work is that this enzyme seems to
09:41be stress sensitive.
09:43So not only is there more cortisol
09:45when the mother is stressed,
09:47but potentially more of this
09:48higher levels can.
09:49Pass through and this will lead
09:52to an increase in cortisol in the
09:55fetal compartment.
09:56And then also there's placenta CRH.
10:00Placenta CRH is identical to the
10:02peptide produced by the hypothalamus,
10:05but there is one very important difference,
10:07and that is that it underlies
10:09a positive feedback loop.
10:10So when cortisol is high,
10:12it produces CRH production in
10:14the placenta and will further
10:16stimulate the maternal HP access,
10:19but also the fetal HP a access.
10:20So under levels of under
10:22conditions of chronic stress,
10:23this can lead to this feed forward.
10:26Cycle of elevated cortisol concentrations.
10:29We are also really interested in
10:32cytokines and inflammatory markers,
10:34not only because of the like very good
10:40evidence for infections during pregnancy,
10:43increasing risk for psychopathology
10:45and we have been of course now worried
10:48during the pandemic also what COVID-19,
10:51how COVID-19 infections during
10:53pregnancy might do to the fetal.
10:56Features and feature development,
10:59but these these these immune
11:02mediators are also stress sensitive.
11:04And This is why we are
11:05very interested in them.
11:06And there are some debate whether
11:08they can actually pass the placenta.
11:10I don't think the evidence
11:12is very convincing.
11:13But what definitely happens
11:16is that there's systemic,
11:18systemic inflammation in the mother.
11:20It will lead to inflammation in the placenta,
11:22and the placenta itself will produce
11:26cytokines into the fetal compartment and
11:29inflammatory mediators will be elevated.
11:33This is what I will be talking
11:34about on the next slides,
11:35variation of maternal cortisol and
11:37interleukin 6 concentrations and how
11:39it affects fetal brain development.
11:41But we've also done work on metabolic
11:45factors like free fatty acids.
11:47We have characterized insulin
11:49and glucose and we have looked
11:51at conditions like maternal pre
11:53pregnancy BMI and we also see that
11:55this has the capability of programming
11:57fetal brain development and there
11:59we have focused specifically on
12:01brain regions that are important.
12:03Our energy homeostasis and see
12:05associations for example between
12:07maternal pre pregnancy BMI and
12:10elevated free fatty acid concentrations
12:12and hypothalamic development and
12:14hypothalamic integrity that then
12:16predicts body composition and
12:19fat gain in the infant.
12:22So this is just another summary
12:24how we're thinking about it,
12:26that various conditions during
12:30early life in the mother when she
12:33is pregnant or even before she
12:35was pregnant can affect maternal
12:38placental fetal stress biology and
12:40thereby affect all the fundamental
12:43processes of brain development.
12:46And um,
12:46then affect cognitive and
12:48affective processes as well,
12:50as well as mental health outcomes.
12:53So Umm,
12:54I want to share some findings
12:56with you on the variation in
13:00maternal cortisol concentrations.
13:01And here in Michelle volume
13:03and seven-year old children,
13:05this was the first cohort again that
13:08I've referred to and what we saw was.
13:10Sorry,
13:10I don't know if you can see my
13:13cursor doesn't work very well that
13:15higher levels of maternal cortisol
13:16concentrations during pregnancy
13:17were associated with larger McKellar
13:19volumes and there was a sex specific effect.
13:22We only saw those in girls and not in boys.
13:24And these larger amygdala volumes
13:27also mediated and association between
13:29maternal cortisol and effective symptoms.
13:31And these seven-year old girls,
13:34when we looked at the newborns,
13:36there was a tendency for exactly the
13:38same effect on larger amygdala volumes.
13:40Only young girls, but not in boys.
13:42It was not quite significant,
13:44but.
13:44And what we did find was that elevated
13:47maternal cortisol was associated
13:49with stronger amygdala connectivity
13:52to brain regions involved in
13:55sensory processing and integration.
13:57And very specifically,
13:58for example,
13:59a stronger connectivity between
14:01amygdala and the anterior insula
14:04and this higher connectivity.
14:09Actually this is yet another another network
14:13where we see a stronger connectivity to
14:16the supramarginal gyrus and mediated the
14:19association between maternal cortisol
14:22concentrations and internalizing problems
14:24when the children were two years old.
14:27So I think this is really important that.
14:30We do see that the variation in
14:33brain phenotypes in the newborn
14:36actually do predict later behavior,
14:39later cognitive function,
14:39and I'll show you some more of that.
14:41So this variation that we see
14:44does seem to be meaningful.
14:47So, Umm, we did find that elevated
14:50material cortisol concentrations
14:51are associated with larger amygdala
14:53volumes and this was associated
14:55with more effective symptoms and
14:57also with increased the mitella
14:59connectivity with cortisol with
15:01cortical structures that were associated
15:04with higher internalizing problems.
15:06And this may support higher vigilance
15:08and offspring of mothers who experience
15:10high stress during pregnancy and
15:12therefore could increase the risk
15:14for effective and anxiety disorders,
15:16although eventually this might have.
15:18Or if an evolutionary purpose to
15:21prepare these children to a potential
15:24stressful extrauterine environment.
15:26Umm,
15:27we did see these interesting sex
15:30specific effects and we are not
15:33really clear why this is and we
15:35cannot say that in general females
15:37are more susceptible than males.
15:40There are a lot of examples where
15:42it seems like for certain exposure
15:44and certain outcomes males seem
15:45to be more susceptible.
15:47But what we continuously see when
15:49we look at variational cortisol,
15:51it seems like females are more
15:54susceptible and some reasons.
15:56Um could be, for example,
15:58that there are sex differences in
16:00the timing of glucocorticoid receptor
16:01expression in the fetal brain,
16:03and there is also sex differences in
16:06placental glucocorticoid receptor
16:07functioning.
16:08And also it has been shown in adults
16:10that chronic stress had different has
16:13different effects in males and females.
16:15So dendritic expansion in females
16:17but retraction in males.
16:19So we don't know yet why this is,
16:22but it's something that we consistently see.
16:25I will now talk about some of
16:28our findings in association with
16:31variation in maternal interleukin
16:346 concentrations and I already want
16:36to say we we looked at.
16:38Whether there is any moderation by
16:40fetal sex as well, and there was not.
16:42So here males and females seem to
16:45be equally affected by higher levels
16:47of interleukin 6 concentrations.
16:49So yeah,
16:50I already said a higher inflammatory
16:52measure is a risk factor for various
16:55neurodevelopmental disorders.
16:56And like various conditions like
17:00obesity and infection,
17:01as well as psychological stress are
17:04associated with higher interleukin
17:056 concentrations. Umm.
17:07It seems like Interleukin six really
17:10plays an important role because in
17:12an animal model, if you block Interleukin 6,
17:17if you give an sorry,
17:18if you give an interleukin 6 antibody,
17:21it blocks the effect of maternal
17:23immune activation.
17:24So it it really does seem to be
17:26to play a very specific role.
17:29As I said earlier,
17:30Interleukin 6,
17:31there's some evidence that it
17:32can pass the placenta,
17:33but there's definitely much more
17:35evidence that it will induce inflammation
17:36in the placenta and the placenta.
17:38Itself produces cytokines.
17:40And then of course there's
17:43really a lot of evidence,
17:45preclinical evidence for maternal
17:47immune activation during pregnancy,
17:49altering fetal brain development.
17:50So all I'm going to show
17:53you now is in the newborns.
17:55And again, we found our larger mikalah
18:00volume in those newborns whose mothers
18:03had higher interleukin 6 concentrations.
18:06And as I said earlier,
18:07there was no sex specific effect here.
18:10Umm. We also looked at a metal icon
18:14activity here and there was a stronger
18:18bilateral amygdala connectivity to brain
18:20regions involved in sensory processing,
18:23like the fusiform,
18:25the somatosensory cortex,
18:26the thalamus.
18:28Also brain areas involved in salience
18:32detection like the anterior insula,
18:35as well as learning and memory like
18:37the cottage and parahippocampal gyrus.
18:40And this is just to show you a scatter
18:45plot of one of these connections.
18:48This is the amygdala anterior
18:51insula connection and how it is
18:54associated with varying levels of
18:56interleukin 6 during pregnancy.
18:57And I should say I'm sorry
18:59I haven't said that yet.
19:01Here we are looking at average
19:03interleukin 6 concentrations.
19:04We collected maternal samples three times
19:07during pregnancy and because interlocken.
19:106 concentrations were so highly
19:13correlated across pregnancy,
19:14we calculated an average.
19:15We felt we are not really in the
19:18position of looking at timing specific
19:21effects because they are so highly
19:23correlated and we only have this
19:25one time measure in the newborn.
19:27So trying to draw any kind of conclusions
19:30of time specific effects I don't
19:33think would be warranted with this
19:35design and what the data looked like.
19:38And Umm,
19:39I have done all this,
19:41all this work with my collaborators
19:45Damien Fair and Alice Graham at back then,
19:48which is you,
19:51Damien Ferris now in Minnesota and.
19:55So they have really let all the efforts
19:57on the resting state analysis and
19:59then anything related to diffusion
20:01tensor imaging that I will be talking
20:04about as well as the brain anatomy
20:06we have done in collaboration with
20:08Martin Steiner and John Gilmore at
20:10the University of North Carolina.
20:11And the next slide I'm going to
20:14show you was really mainly led by by
20:17Damien and here we looked at whole
20:19brain connectivity in association
20:21in the new ones and association
20:23with higher maternal interleukin 6.
20:25Concentrations during pregnancy and
20:27saw associations within networks
20:30again and the salience network,
20:33the dorsal attention network as
20:34well as the visual network,
20:36but also various between network connections,
20:40as you can see here below.
20:43As an additional modality,
20:45we looked at diffusion tensor
20:46imaging and we were specifically
20:48interested in this track,
20:49the unsigned fasciculus,
20:51which is a pathway that connects
20:53the temporal lobe with the inferior
20:55frontal gyrus and has us by the
20:58amygdala and the hippocampus.
21:00And we did analysis along this tract
21:03of different diffusion parameters
21:05as you can see here.
21:07So this is the tract and what we
21:10saw bilaterally was that higher
21:12maternal interleukin.
21:13Six was associated with lower
21:16fracture anisotropy which is a
21:18measure of lower maturation of
21:20this tract and this was
21:22very specifically where around the track
21:24where it passes by the amygdala and I think
21:29this is interesting because it's it's a
21:33bilateral and this is just a scatter plot.
21:37This is here you can see what the tracks
21:39look like and what the results look like.
21:42So it's it's. It's really a pretty nice
21:46linear association and unfortunately only
21:48in a really small subgroup here we had
21:52repeated MRI scans at 12 month age as well.
21:56So we looked at whether there is also an
21:59association between maternal interleukin 6
22:01concentrations and these diffusion measures,
22:03so 12 month age, which was not the case,
22:05it was not significant anymore.
22:06But what had happened is that the
22:09there was accelerated maturation
22:10now over the first year of life,
22:13which I mean it's.
22:14Very small sample and it needs
22:15to be replicated.
22:16But I think it is really interesting
22:18in the if we think about like what
22:21we know about this brain overgrowth,
22:24for example in the context of autism
22:27spectrum disorders that has been shown.
22:29So there might be like an initial delay
22:32and then an overcompensation and maybe
22:35this is something that we see here.
22:39So this is a summary of the various
22:41findings with variation and maternal
22:43interleukin 6 concentrations.
22:45And for all these outcomes that
22:49we have looked at,
22:49we see associations with behavioral
22:52or cognitive function in the
22:54first two years of life.
22:56So this,
22:57it makes a lot of connectivity was
22:59associated with a measure of executive
23:02function response inhibition when
23:03the children were two years old.
23:06Does it make a lot of connectivity
23:08and especially this accelerated
23:09increase also during the first year
23:11of life was associated with cognitive
23:13impaired cognitive development
23:14based on the Bayley scales of infant
23:17development at one year age and the
23:20whole brain functional connectivity
23:22was predictive of working memory
23:24function that two years age.
23:26And because we had these various
23:29cognitive aspects that were altered in
23:33association with maternal interleukin.
23:36Six we wanted to see,
23:38although again it was like a
23:40small sample at four to five years
23:43whether we we have like for a very
23:46general cognitive measure here it's
23:48fluid intelligence and association
23:50between maternal and telekin.
23:526 And this measure of fluid intelligence
23:54which was the case and this was
23:57after adjusting from many variables
24:00that would like be qualified,
24:02would be indicators of the quality of
24:04the post Natal environment like the home.
24:06Environment maternal sensitivity,
24:08for example,
24:09and we also try to see whether we can
24:13identify some structural variation
24:15and in brain structure that might
24:18underlie this association and saw
24:21that potentially specifically again
24:23here in the prefrontal cortex,
24:25the horse triangularis might play
24:28a role in this association.
24:31There is more evidence now also
24:35from other groups,
24:37showing that maternal immune activation,
24:40here also in humans,
24:42is associated with neonatal brain
24:45connectivity here specifically
24:47the the salience network.
24:49This is an interesting study because
24:51it's a it's a real longitudinal
24:54study looking at maternal cytokine
24:56concentrations during pregnancy and brain
24:59circuitry 45 years later in adults.
25:02There is also evidence,
25:05at least in terms of neurodevelopmental
25:08delay from like very impressive
25:11Scandinavian birth records,
25:14and also some interesting.
25:17Studies in nonhuman primates.
25:21So to conclude,
25:22there is evidence for prenatal
25:24conditions like various forms
25:26of stress but also cortisol and
25:28inflamed inflammatory medias like
25:30interleukin 6 to be associated
25:32with fetal brain development.
25:33And showed you evidence for associations
25:35with the size of the hippocampus
25:37and amygdala as well as structural
25:39and functional connectivity of
25:41the amygdala and as well as global
25:44cortical volume and thickness
25:45and the functional connectome.
25:48And it really seems like neural
25:50phenotypes are being programmed.
25:52Increased risk for neurodevelopmental
25:54and psychiatric disorders and
25:56that potentially these stress
25:59sensitive biological mediators,
26:01variation and maternal stress
26:02biology do play a role for
26:05programming in the fetal brain.
26:08I think if we talk about MRI,
26:11we have to also acknowledge this paper.
26:13This is something that has
26:15been published last year and
26:17my collaborators Damian Ferron,
26:19Ellis Graham and Oscar Miranda Dominguez,
26:21who I work with closely,
26:22are all involved in this and.
26:25So I think there is a crisis,
26:29a replication crisis,
26:30something similar that has
26:32affected a genomics a while ago,
26:36where this study really suggests that if
26:38we want to look at brain wide associations,
26:41especially with certain phenotypes,
26:43especially when it's complex phenotypes
26:45like mental health outcomes,
26:47we need very large sample sizes
26:49because effect sizes are small and
26:51probably most studies that have been
26:53published are underpowered and they.
26:55Like,
26:56I think they showed the evidence for
26:58this very impressively in this study.
27:01They also did acknowledge that
27:03there are phenotypes where the
27:06associations are stronger,
27:07like cognitive phenotypes for example.
27:10But in general,
27:11I mean this raises really the question,
27:13what can we do with these smaller
27:15sample sizes and can we still,
27:17are they still worth it,
27:18can we still trust the results?
27:20And Umm.
27:20So we have of course done a lot
27:24of thinking and.
27:25What we what we feel about what
27:27we have published so far and what
27:30we can do going forward.
27:31And so I I still believe that we
27:35have a very good conceptual model
27:38and there's a lot of preclinical
27:41evidence kind of supporting the
27:43kind of analysis we have done
27:45and also like in support of the
27:48specific findings we have.
27:50But in the future we should
27:53still see whether we can do.
27:55Better whether there are
27:58opportunities for replication,
28:00whether we can work together more
28:02closely in terms of the specific
28:04protocols not only for data
28:06collection but especially also
28:08for processing the data they are,
28:11I think there are a lot of
28:14opportunities for collaboration.
28:15And there is this fetal infant
28:17toddler on your imaging group that
28:20that has been founded that really
28:23addresses some of these issues
28:27and were people who work in the
28:30field of Infinera imaging,
28:31come together and share their
28:33experiences and bring their protocols
28:35together. There's a lot of progress
28:38in freely available processing
28:41pipelines and a lot of advances.
28:43Then there are several.
28:45Consortia are trying to bring in,
28:47bring together the various infant samples.
28:49There are like this origin consortium
28:52that is led by Rebecca Nikaya in
28:55Michigan or also the Echo consortium.
28:57And then of course there are larger
29:01representative developmental in
29:02your imaging studies like the
29:04Baby Connectome project and very
29:06importantly coming up the HBCD
29:08study that I think would be very,
29:10very informative.
29:13Something that we have also
29:15think about is how can we huge,
29:17how can we use the larger consortia that
29:21are available right now to potentially
29:24inform the results in our smaller cohorts.
29:26And one of the things that we are trying
29:29to do now is to use the larger consortia
29:32like for example the ABC D study to
29:35calculate polling euro risk scores.
29:37So really in the sample of
29:40several thousand like ABC D.
29:43Um, look at associations with a certain
29:45outcome that we are interested in,
29:47like internalising problems,
29:48and then look at the functional connectivity
29:52that is associated with this outcome
29:54and then apply the weights from this
29:57larger consortium to our smaller samples.
30:00So really a very similar approach to
30:02polygenic risk scores and this is
30:04something we are currently working on and.
30:06We have done this for it makes a lot of
30:09connectivity and internalizing problems and
30:12we're actually able to then use this Poly.
30:16Pulling your risk score to predict
30:19emotional regulation and our infant cohort.
30:21So this is work in progress but this
30:24is and this is led by by Oscar Randos
30:29Dominguez and he he has yeah we I
30:32think we are making good progress to
30:35to see how we can utilize these larger
30:37cohorts and another example is for
30:40example these brain charts for human
30:42for the human lifespan that has been
30:44recently published based on like 100.
30:461000 individuals,
30:47something similar to growth charts so that
30:50you can see where does your data fall,
30:52how representative is it,
30:54and then you get percentiles
30:56based on the larger population,
30:58which I think probably is a good way of
31:01correcting your smaller sample sizes.
31:02So this is something we are
31:05currently working on.
31:07And I'm happy to discuss this further later.
31:10But before I come to the end,
31:12I want to talk about this 4th
31:14area that I wanted to address,
31:16which is maternal preconceptional
31:20stress experiences and specifically.
31:23Now it doesn't work again.
31:30This slide.
31:35Maybe I stay very long.
31:38Thank you so. The UM,
31:42maternal child adverse childhood experiences
31:44and how these might potentially get
31:48transmitted to the next generation.
31:51And so, I mean we're thinking of different
31:56forms of neglect and abuse experiences and.
32:01As we all know, this is a huge problem
32:03because prevalence rates are really,
32:05really high.
32:06I think it's also really important that
32:09people working and and and perinatal
32:12medicine know that this is like such
32:15a high prevalence and that they will
32:17encounter many women who have made
32:20these kind of experiences and that
32:22potentially 1/3 of the women that they
32:25see could have these kind of risk factors.
32:29What we know from like many studies
32:31is that there is an increased risk
32:35in the exposed individual for higher.
32:37For psychiatric disorders as well As
32:40for somatic disorders and metabolic
32:43function like obesity,
32:45and we also understand some of the
32:47mechanisms.
32:47We know that there are alterations
32:50in the endocrine stress system,
32:52but also a very well replicated
32:55finding is increased systemic
32:56inflammation in individuals exposed
32:59to childhood maltreatment.
33:01And what is accumulating more and more
33:03is that also the offspring of these
33:05mothers who themselves have not been.
33:08Victims of abuse also have a higher
33:11risk for neurodevelopmental disorders,
33:13behavioral problems,
33:14but also adverse birth outcomes and.
33:20Also obesity, for example,
33:22and what we have done in in the ongoing
33:27ECHO cohort is because several studies in
33:31smaller or larger samples have addressed
33:34the association between maternal childhood
33:37maltreatment and single health outcomes.
33:39And what these studies do not allow to
33:42address is what is the potential effect
33:45on comorbidity across disorder, so.
33:48We took advantage of this echo cohort
33:51where we had information on up to 4000
33:56Mother child diets and we're about like.
33:59A little more than a third of those
34:03mothers did report that they had been
34:05exposed to childhood maltreatment.
34:07And then we looked at these six outcomes,
34:10internalizing problems, asthma, obesity,
34:13autism spectrum disorders, ADHD analogy.
34:16And as you can see here,
34:19across many of these disorders,
34:22we see a very significant increase
34:24in the risk for these disorders
34:26in children whose mothers had been
34:28exposed to childhood maltreatment.
34:31The highest is for internalizing problems,
34:33but also for autism spectrum disorders.
34:37It's one.
34:38It's a 1.7 fold increase and a more
34:42than twofold increase for ADHD.
34:44And there's also an increase for asthma.
34:47We didn't find any association with allergy,
34:50and the only outcome where we found
34:53an association that was moderated
34:54by sex was obesity.
34:56So only female offspring whose mothers
34:58had been exposed to childhood trauma were.
35:02Had a higher risk for obesity and
35:05what was really interesting.
35:08Is that these mothers, these,
35:12these children clustered into different
35:15groups and there was one group that
35:18you see here who had who had diagnosis
35:21on various of these outcomes,
35:24especially the neurodevelopmental outcomes.
35:28ADHD,
35:28LG,
35:29but also asthma and also internalizing
35:32problems.
35:33And mothers of children in this group
35:35were twice as likely to have been exposed
35:38to childhood maltreatment then in the
35:40other lower risk groups with lower health,
35:43with the lower prevalence of health outcomes.
35:46And then we also did a latent class
35:49analysis to to look at whether different
35:52types of exposures of maternal childhood
35:55maltreatment were associated with
35:56specific outcomes and the child.
35:58But what our data suggested
36:00was that it was rather,
36:02um,
36:02a matter of severity,
36:04because it was those mothers who
36:06had been exposed to more than one
36:08type of abuse and neglect whose
36:11children had the highest risk of
36:13developing these disease outcomes.
36:16So this paper was just accepted for
36:19publication and will be out next week.
36:21Umm, it's not yet out.
36:23We are working on it. And so I want to.
36:29I'll be quick,
36:30I will.
36:31I will only talk like I try to finish
36:33in like 5 minutes and we'll talk a
36:35little bit of the Mecca about the mechanisms,
36:37what might underlie this
36:40intergenerational transmission.
36:41And there has been a lot of focus.
36:43On post Natal factors,
36:45because women exposed to childhood
36:48maltreatment have a higher risk
36:51for postpartum depression,
36:52they have more often bonding difficulties.
36:56They're like impaired maternal,
36:59maternal sensitivity,
37:00which of course are all risk factors
37:03for later pathology and the child.
37:06But the case we wanted to
37:08make is. And that's because of all
37:12the evidence for altered stress
37:15biology in the exposed individual.
37:17After childhood maltreatment,
37:18they will most likely carry
37:20those forward to pregnancy.
37:21It will not stop once they become pregnant.
37:24And I have just shown you that
37:25there's a lot of evidence that like
37:27variation in these biological mediators
37:29can then program the fetal brain.
37:31And this is what we're trying
37:34what we've tried.
37:35To summarize in this review and also
37:38recent another recent review how
37:40the various sequelae of maternal
37:43childhood maltreatment that you see
37:45here will affect the biological
37:47state during pregnancy and can can
37:50affect fetal brain development
37:53and even the maternal behavior.
37:56The post Natal environment that is
37:59being created by that will most
38:01likely be affected by stress biology
38:04during pregnancy and this is.
38:06Something else,
38:07uh Kieran and I are working on
38:09together whether there could be
38:11differences in estrogen sensitivity
38:13potentially that will maybe reduce
38:15estrogen sensitivity in these
38:17mothers who have been exposed to
38:19childhood maltreatment that might
38:21not allow her brain to adapt to
38:23this new situation to prepare for
38:26motherhood as well as in individuals
38:28with higher estrogen sensitivity.
38:30At least this is a working hypothesis
38:33that we are examining right now.
38:37Umm here's an overview of various
38:42associations between maternal
38:43childhood maltreatment and variation
38:46in stress biology during pregnancy.
38:49And so this is what we have
38:52contributed to as well.
38:53And indeed,
38:54there is evidence for higher cortisol
38:57concentrations during pregnancy,
38:58higher inflammation,
39:01steeper increase in this placental
39:02CRH over the course of gestation,
39:05but also other important.
39:06Andrew,
39:07current mediators like thyroid
39:08hormones that are very important
39:10for fetal brain development seem
39:13to be associated with higher
39:15maternal childhood maltreatment.
39:17And to to really make the case that
39:19the transmission already occurs
39:21prenatally and not just pro postnatally.
39:23We wanted to show that already in the
39:26neonatal brain we see associations
39:28with maternal childhood maltreatment
39:29and this was indeed the case.
39:31We saw that neonates newborns whose
39:34mothers were exposed to childhood.
39:37Treatment had actually overall
39:38smaller brain volumes and very
39:41specifically lower Gray matter volumes.
39:43When we looked at whether this was
39:45regional specific or more global effect,
39:46we really saw it was more of a global
39:49effect globally smaller brain.
39:51In these newborns whose mothers had
39:53been exposed to childhood maltreatment,
39:55so really making the point that
39:57it's then probably something like
40:00the post Natal environment that
40:02might also be affected will add
40:04on top of this this early already
40:07prenatally programmed phenotype.
40:09And we were interested in whether
40:12total brain volume and newborns
40:14was associated with cognitive
40:17performance and executive function
40:19and did not find any main effect.
40:22Um in two years and 4 1/2 years.
40:24But again,
40:25we saw a really interesting
40:27moderation by maternal sensitivity
40:29that we observed in a standardized
40:32place situation in a way that.
40:35Infants with larger brain volumes,
40:37we are more able to benefit and
40:40be affected by variation in
40:42maternal sensitivity,
40:43whereas this was reduced
40:46and individuals who are born
40:47with a smaller brain volume,
40:49and this was the case at two
40:51years and also a very similar
40:53pattern at four to five years.
40:57So potentially we want brain
40:59volume could be in Europe phenotype
41:01that indicates differential
41:03susceptibility to the environment.
41:06Umm. And this is something else
41:08we have recently been working on.
41:11This is diffusion tensor imaging
41:14data of our new cohorts that we
41:19recently that we recently established.
41:22And here what we see is that it
41:26seems so we look at diffusion tensor
41:29imaging and we look at this measure
41:33radial diffusivity where higher
41:35scores indicate lower maturity.
41:37And, um, we see that different
41:39forms of depression seem to be
41:42associated with different patterns.
41:44So depression depressed mothers who had
41:46been exposed to childhood maltreatment,
41:49their children at birth seem to have
41:52have a phenotype of delayed maturation,
41:55whereas those newborns whose mothers had
41:58been exposed to childhood maltreatment.
42:01But we're not exposed shelter maltreatment,
42:05sorry.
42:05And we're depressed during pregnancy rather.
42:07Go to pattern of accelerated maturation
42:10and I think this is this is interesting
42:13because we know that both delayed
42:15maturation but also accelerated
42:17maturation might have negative outcomes.
42:19So I think it is really important to
42:22consider both ends of the spectrum
42:24and that's why I thought this was
42:27actually a quite interesting finding.
42:30Umm.
42:32So this is just in terms of
42:34clinical application,
42:35this is something we've developed
42:38with my colleagues Christina,
42:40Hayem and Azania entering at the
42:43charity this kind of the cycle of
42:46biological embedding of child of
42:50adverse childhood experiences and.
42:53And also where potential targets could
42:56be for intervention to break the
42:59cycle after exposure to not even like
43:03to prevent the biological embedding.
43:05But if it has embedded,
43:06if it has already been embedded,
43:08is there a potential for reprogramming
43:10for compensation so that not like
43:13certain phenotypes get established but
43:16then I think what we can do in like
43:20caring natural care is really try to.
43:24Work here.
43:25Work on disrupting this vicious
43:27cycle of the intergenerational
43:29transmission by really trying to
43:32focus or identify women at risk.
43:36And and see how to support women who have
43:39been exposed to childhood maltreatment,
43:42and ideally already during the
43:44preconceptional period or during pregnancy.
43:47But then of course also providing
43:49support in the postpartum period.
43:52But as always,
43:53of course the the earlier the better.
43:57I'd like to just.
44:00Finished with this quote,
44:01it is easier to build strong
44:03children than repair broken men,
44:05so I think it is really important to
44:09understand the very early origins of.
44:13Susceptibility for mental health or
44:17adverse mental health conditions.
44:22Because we can take advantage
44:24of the great plasticity of the
44:27brain during development and yeah,
44:29and deliver targeted interventions to, yeah,
44:32take advantage of this high plasticity.
44:36I would like to close by of course.
44:40Thanking all my collaborators.
44:44Without whom, I couldn't have done this work,
44:47and I'd also like you for your attention.
45:00Thanks so much. Talk to us.
45:01Any questions for Doctor
45:03bus in the audience?
45:07We do have one question already and
45:09from zoom and if Lilia Benoit would
45:11like to to unmute maybe start your
45:14video and always interesting to discuss
45:16individual differences and potential
45:18moderating influences and Lilia, do you
45:20want to pose your question? Yes.
45:23Hi. Can you hear me? Yes, yes.
45:26OK. Thank you very much for for this talk.
45:28It's very, very interesting.
45:30And I'm not an expert at all in methylation.
45:35I'm Shawna Dawson, psychiatrist.
45:37But I'm more interested usually in behavior,
45:42family therapy, communication.
45:45And so it's always very unsettling
45:48for me because I have the
45:50impression that sometime sometimes.
45:52When we measure the outcome of
45:54the adverse childhood experiences,
45:56I do not see how we can measure the
46:00moderating effects of behaviors.
46:03And and the role model effect on the
46:06parent behavior toward the child.
46:09And so even maybe I'm just very biased
46:12because it's an area I don't know much about.
46:14But when I read sometimes obesity,
46:17ADHD, depression, inflammation,
46:18my impression is that all
46:20of these outcomes could be,
46:23might be directly transmitted
46:25just through behaviors like the
46:28maternal behavior towards herself.
46:30I don't know, using drugs.
46:33Being addictions,
46:33feeling depressed or the parental
46:36behavior towards a child,
46:37which is like repeating this
46:39circle of trauma.
46:40And so it's very puzzling
46:43for me because I'm just like,
46:45how I can, how can we measure,
46:46you know, or how could we compare,
46:48should we go back to very biological?
46:53Causation or.
46:54Or could we just say,
46:56oh,
46:56maybe it's just the behavior of being
46:58transmitted and we are actually
46:59measuring something else which is a.
47:02And the body signals of it.
47:06But actually this is not really
47:07the cause of transmission.
47:09I don't know if it's clear.
47:10I
47:10I think it is clear and I
47:12don't think it's an either or.
47:13I think the behavior that is
47:15altered in response to these
47:18adverse experiences will actually.
47:20Moderate or affect how much her
47:23biology is changed in response
47:26to childhood maltreatment.
47:28This is why I had this one figure.
47:30Sorry, I went through it very quickly with
47:33these various sequelae like drug exposure,
47:35like obesity, other risky behavior,
47:38but also her mental health.
47:40And it is indeed the case that
47:42the more risk factors they have.
47:45The higher or the the the the more
47:48pronounced are the differences in
47:50biological markers during pregnancy.
47:52For example,
47:53I don't think I mentioned that,
47:54but in our studies when we have
47:57looked at inflammatory markers
47:58during pregnancy in women who had
48:01adverse childhood experiences,
48:03we see it only elevated in those
48:05women who have also depressive
48:07symptoms during pregnancy.
48:09So I think these like what has
48:12established as a consequence,
48:14sorry, I'm looking at you,
48:15but I should be looking there.
48:17What has been established in terms of
48:20sequella of these adverse experiences
48:22are extremely important and these
48:25include behavioral alterations because
48:27because if certain phenotypes like
48:29depression has been established,
48:31this will affect her behavior
48:33towards her child most likely.
48:35And I think This is why it is so
48:38important that we identify these women
48:40because we cannot change anything
48:42about these experiences that the the
48:44the mothers or the parents made.
48:46But we can of course try to positively
48:49affect some of these sequella,
48:52and I think this will already this
48:54will already be very effective.
48:58Sorry. Thank you.
49:02That was really fascinating.
49:03Thank you so much.
49:04I I was wondering about your comment
49:07about girls only being affected.
49:10With obesity of girls,
49:12of these moms, what, what,
49:13what sense do you make of that?
49:18That that is difficult. I don't think
49:23we really know why this might be.
49:26It is interesting that also in exposed
49:28individuals it seems like that obesity risk
49:31is higher and exposed females than males.
49:34Umm. I really don't know.
49:36We have a good sense of this.
49:38I thought it was really interesting that
49:40this was the only outcome that we saw
49:44differential effects based on offspring sex.
49:48But I actually have to pass.
49:49I don't have a good idea.
49:50I can, I can say that it has been similar
49:54things have been shown in the in the
49:57as I said in the exposed person but.
50:00Yeah, we don't know.
50:01I think this is something to really
50:03something to really look look into.
50:05And I have to say that the
50:08few studies there are,
50:09they haven't always looked at sex
50:12differences and moderation by by sex.
50:14So I think we will have to see
50:17whether this this gets replicated
50:18and try to make sense of this.
50:22Thank you so much. Go catch. One
50:24last quick question.
50:28Yeah, amazing.
50:29Amazing talk and fascinating area.
50:33Quick question about the
50:35studies involving stress.
50:36Were you specifically targeting
50:38populations of parents with high
50:41stress levels due to whatever other
50:44factors that might be causing?
50:45Or were you targeting sort of
50:47more of a general population?
50:49And if if so,
50:51are they levels of stress that we
50:54should be particularly worried about?
50:55Can we quantify
50:56it? Can we know when to intervene
50:59can and when are we dealing
51:00with the natural variation?
51:03I think that's a it's an important
51:05question and very difficult to answer.
51:07So the the first part is very easy.
51:08So the initial studies we did
51:10and the data I presented today
51:12was just a normal population,
51:15so normal variation and stress
51:17our current ongoing work.
51:18We have enriched the cohorts for women
51:21exposed to childhood maltreatment.
51:23So they are slightly higher risk because
51:26we want to investigate this further
51:28and also start looking further into
51:31these the moderating role of these.
51:33So we have enriched.
51:35Our ongoing cohorts.
51:38What are levels that we should
51:39be paying attention to?
51:40I think this is really difficult
51:42because as I said it's not a one-on-one
51:45translation and actually there are
51:47a lot of studies that don't find
51:49associations between variation and
51:51psychological stress and biological
51:53mediators that they measure.
51:55And I think well obviously it doesn't
51:57mean that there is no association,
51:59I don't think it's it's measured correctly.
52:02So something that we have done
52:04for example in this but these
52:06ecological momentary assessments is.
52:08That we see that the intra individual
52:11variation in stress is what is
52:14associated with cortisol concentrations.
52:16Not the inter individual variation,
52:18but how much the individual
52:21varies around her or herself.
52:24Her own mean is what is important.
52:28So I think just based on
52:31questionnaire measures in screening,
52:34it would be hard to say,
52:35oh,
52:35this is what you should pay attention
52:37to and this is what you should not
52:39pay attention to because the how it
52:41gets translated into signals for the
52:43features might be very different based on,
52:46as I said,
52:47various resilience factors.
52:49But of course I think in general
52:51we should be paying attention
52:53to mental health and stress,
52:55especially in the enduring prenatal care.
52:58Because even if maybe it's not high
53:01enough to affect the fetus in a negative way,
53:04I mean you can do something for the mother.
53:06And I think in general it's still
53:08a problem that mental health issues
53:10are not very much the focus or
53:12at least are paying attention,
53:14being paid attention to enough during
53:17prenatal care and similarly the
53:20these adverse childhood experiences.
53:24I I always say I I really had a
53:27very difficult time to establish,
53:29um,
53:29the study and in Germany because
53:31I got a lot of feedback saying you
53:33cannot ask pregnant women about
53:35adverse childhood experiences.
53:37You will read,
53:38traumatize them and you should
53:39not do that to a pregnant woman.
53:41And I really had to argue that
53:43I think we're doing something
53:45good for the women because these
53:48thoughts will get illicit anyway,
53:50because now they are becoming parents.
53:52They will think about their own childhood.
53:54And it is important to do this in a very
53:56secure environment and then offer them help.
53:58And they are actually papers out
54:01there on exactly this topic saying
54:03that women would hope to be asked
54:06about these experiences,
54:08especially,
54:08for example,
54:09if it has been sexual abuse,
54:10because this can really affect
54:12a vaginal delivery and it's
54:13very important that these women can
54:15address these kind of concerns.
54:17Early on our studies, for example,
54:20we've had these cases and we went
54:22to the delivery room with them and.
54:24Some of them, it really helped them
54:26to prepare for that and sometimes I
54:28still have to do a cesarean section
54:30and others were then able to really
54:31try it and and go through with it.
54:33I think it's it's in general I would
54:36say we should start paying attention to
54:39stress and mental health issues in general.
54:43And even if even if it's not like
54:45a extremely higher or toxic level
54:47that it would affect the fetus,
54:49we can do something good for the
54:51for the pregnant woman and that
54:53will have a positive impact.
54:55But I cannot say, well,
54:57this is a cut off that you should pay
54:59attention to and others you you shouldn't.
55:01It's very difficult of course I
55:03think you're rallying cry for.
55:06The support for pregnant individuals
55:07is a great way to end this.
55:08Thank you again, Doctor Bush.