Skip to Main Content

Pathology Grand Rounds: November 17, 2022

November 18, 2022
  • 00:00Part so today I'm so happy
  • 00:03to introduce our term policy.
  • 00:05He's from university Iowa notice grant.
  • 00:08Grant Grant Speaker invited by GI pathology
  • 00:11and the middle of the Country Life.
  • 00:13So hard copies here.
  • 00:15We in collaboration invite him to come
  • 00:18here for talk so.
  • 00:21Directly from University Northwestern
  • 00:23University of Chicago in 2004. I'm Diana.
  • 00:28University of Virginia from 2004,
  • 00:312008 and then after that he did
  • 00:34one-year GFL in Ohio University.
  • 00:37After that in 2019,
  • 00:392009 right he moved to Harvard Medical
  • 00:42School for instructor for two years
  • 00:44and then he moved to University Iowa
  • 00:46and then from a senior professor as
  • 00:48a professor and I'm full professor.
  • 00:51And that the policy he published
  • 00:54more than 150 papers and then also
  • 00:56book book chapters and most of the
  • 00:59papers published and which chapters
  • 01:00in GI pathology even though chemistry
  • 01:03and the new tumor and that's why his
  • 01:06research focuses on immuno markers,
  • 01:09you know for for all the diseases
  • 01:12and also he has his research
  • 01:15in neuroendocrine tumor.
  • 01:16He has been joining a lot,
  • 01:18a lot of collaborative studies
  • 01:20you know for H.
  • 01:22OK, for Edge grants,
  • 01:23you know his collaborator for the
  • 01:26studies therefore you are consumer.
  • 01:28That's why you know he involves so many
  • 01:30professional societies especially for cap,
  • 01:33US cap and ASAP for cab.
  • 01:36He has been the even though his
  • 01:39country committee from member,
  • 01:41vice chair and chair and also he's a
  • 01:45international even though his commentary
  • 01:47Society Board of directors and also
  • 01:49involve other lot of committees.
  • 01:51US CAP and cap.
  • 01:53I will not mention all of them.
  • 01:55Or he has.
  • 01:58I have so many publications I
  • 02:00mentioned and I gave so many talks.
  • 02:02Also, you know you watch the talks
  • 02:03everywhere you ask cap cap SP.
  • 02:06So I cannot mention how many hits,
  • 02:08more than 100 pages.
  • 02:10So it's better to ask him to talk so.
  • 02:14So Andrew, test your.
  • 02:16Thank you.
  • 02:17Yes,
  • 02:17yeah.
  • 02:32This is this is literally my
  • 02:35favorite thing to do in the world.
  • 02:39Is to is to interact with folks,
  • 02:42with folks like you.
  • 02:44And I'm so privileged to to have this,
  • 02:48to have this position.
  • 02:50You know, the single most important
  • 02:54take home point from any talk is
  • 02:58that the purpose of this talk is to
  • 03:02make a connection with each of you.
  • 03:07I'm here for you and I
  • 03:11became whatever you want.
  • 03:14If you know me from Twitter,
  • 03:16I became IHC guy.
  • 03:18From from you here,
  • 03:20you know I and this talk is
  • 03:23gonna be about how to become,
  • 03:25how to become an act,
  • 03:26how to become an expert.
  • 03:27And the way to become an expert
  • 03:28is to say that you're an expert.
  • 03:30That's one of the, that's one of the,
  • 03:32that's one of the cheat codes.
  • 03:34Uh, I'm a pretty informal guy,
  • 03:37so I invite everybody to relax
  • 03:40and to try to be present.
  • 03:43And actually the hardest thing for
  • 03:45me as I get going is to be present
  • 03:49because it's it's it's anxiety
  • 03:51provoking to be to be in front of,
  • 03:54in front of all you guys.
  • 03:55One thing that I'll say is it
  • 03:58always astounds me that I have
  • 04:00this platform and that we all
  • 04:03and that we all come together.
  • 04:05Because I had a problematic
  • 04:07relationship with my father,
  • 04:09and if it wasn't for that,
  • 04:12I would probably be in fourth period
  • 04:15teaching chemistry right now.
  • 04:17And you know, I need to do it.
  • 04:19I need to do it better because of that.
  • 04:23Ohh boy. We lost. Somebody's.
  • 04:28Somebody's moving the screen around.
  • 04:31And the the other thing I'll
  • 04:33the other thing I'll say.
  • 04:38I've given this talk multiple times. And.
  • 04:41And the the last time I gave it was at
  • 04:44Mayo and I wanted to and I wanted to say,
  • 04:48but I was so dumbstruck by
  • 04:50what I encountered at Mayo,
  • 04:53which I'll briefly relate to you,
  • 04:55that this talk is, you know, if I gave
  • 05:00the talk that I actually came to give,
  • 05:02which I'm not sure that I will,
  • 05:04this talk is my love letter to
  • 05:07immunohistochemistry and I give lots
  • 05:10of kinds of immunohistochemistry.
  • 05:12Box I give.
  • 05:13I give ones that are love letters.
  • 05:16I give ones that are.
  • 05:17I call myself an immuno optimist and
  • 05:20immuno pessimist and an immune realist.
  • 05:22I give an immuno pessimist talk
  • 05:25this past weekend to the CAP CSA.
  • 05:28The title of the talk was
  • 05:30immunohistochemistry is in the
  • 05:32midst of a quality crisis and low.
  • 05:34Her two is a symptom and most of the
  • 05:37talks that I give are immuno realists
  • 05:39and I give a lot of nuts and bolts.
  • 05:42Didactic.
  • 05:42About diagnostic applications
  • 05:45of immunohistochemistry.
  • 05:50So this is this is the title of
  • 05:52the talk that I submitted next
  • 05:55generation immunohistochemistry how
  • 05:57to build highly effective diagnostic
  • 05:59tests in anatomic pathology.
  • 06:02But I think maybe this is this is
  • 06:04the talk that I'd like to to that I'd
  • 06:07like to try to give simultaneously.
  • 06:09On the invitation and advice of Zuchen,
  • 06:12who actually invited me to give
  • 06:14this talk three years ago,
  • 06:16and he said that my target audience
  • 06:19was trainees and young faculty.
  • 06:22And so how about to the next
  • 06:25generation of pathologists,
  • 06:26how to cultivate a highly successful
  • 06:29career in anatomic pathology?
  • 06:31You, you have the tools,
  • 06:33the most important,
  • 06:35the most important insight that
  • 06:36I can give you is to do this.
  • 06:39You have to know.
  • 06:40Yourself.
  • 06:43So if I give the straight talk,
  • 06:45this is the elevator pitch.
  • 06:48I can build an immunohistochemical
  • 06:50test to virtually any target,
  • 06:53and these 150 publications
  • 06:54are predicated in that,
  • 06:57and the value proposition is for all of you.
  • 07:00What ioffer you is at the end of this
  • 07:03lecture is probably too ambitious,
  • 07:06but my goal is to begin to
  • 07:08provide you the tools to be able
  • 07:10to build an immunohistochemical.
  • 07:12Test to any target every time I go
  • 07:14to a meeting and I've introduced
  • 07:18the new immunohistochemical marker.
  • 07:20The most common question that I
  • 07:23get from from you know world expert
  • 07:26end user diagnostic pathologist
  • 07:27is how did you do this?
  • 07:29Is this commercially,
  • 07:31is this commercially available?
  • 07:33Where do I get this and and the
  • 07:36answer is that there are dozens
  • 07:38if not hundreds of commercially
  • 07:41available antibodies.
  • 07:42To virtually every target,
  • 07:46because science is a $160 billion industry.
  • 07:51I can't remember David where I resourced it,
  • 07:55but Google, Google, I know the NIH.
  • 07:58The NIH, for example,
  • 08:02grants $40 billion of of award every year.
  • 08:08And so there's a good jillion
  • 08:10antibody companies and they make.
  • 08:13Immunohistology,
  • 08:13they make primary antibodies
  • 08:15to everything because some,
  • 08:17somewhere in some corner of the world,
  • 08:20somebody is studying, studying.
  • 08:23And so you can make an
  • 08:25immunohistochemical test at any target.
  • 08:30The biography, you know this is.
  • 08:32This is important because this is.
  • 08:34This is to answer the question
  • 08:36how to cultivate a successful
  • 08:38career in anatomic pathology,
  • 08:40and I'll say more specifically how
  • 08:44to cultivate a successful career in
  • 08:47anatomic pathology in the context of.
  • 08:51Constrained resources.
  • 08:51You know, I've worked at a bunch of
  • 08:55different places and there are very few
  • 08:58exceptional places with the best people
  • 09:00and the best cohorts and the best resources,
  • 09:03the vast majority.
  • 09:05The central mass of places are lovely places.
  • 09:10Iowa is a lovely place,
  • 09:12but even within the constraints,
  • 09:14the constraints of a lovely place
  • 09:17if you are smart and passionate.
  • 09:21And have a point of view.
  • 09:23You can have a wildly successful
  • 09:26career in anatomic pathology.
  • 09:28And So what did I decide to lean into?
  • 09:31I decided to lean into immunohistochemistry.
  • 09:34I started out in GI pathology.
  • 09:36I am a GI pathologist,
  • 09:38but I decided to lean into
  • 09:40immunohistochemistry for so many reasons.
  • 09:42And then another thing Zuchen mentioned is
  • 09:45I'm also a neuroendocrine tumor pathologist.
  • 09:48Every lovely place is.
  • 09:51Exceptional at something or a few things.
  • 09:55And the reason that I'm a
  • 09:57neuroendocrine tumor pathologist
  • 09:58is at the University of Iowa,
  • 10:00the most special group,
  • 10:02the most successful multidisciplinary group,
  • 10:05the most highly funded group is
  • 10:07the neuroendocrine tumor group.
  • 10:09And so if you go to a place and
  • 10:11you want to study pancreas cancer
  • 10:12or you want to study colon cancer,
  • 10:15I've studied all these different
  • 10:17things in different phases of my
  • 10:19career and they're the they're.
  • 10:21See or a B minus group in that tumor type,
  • 10:25it's a it's a losing proposition.
  • 10:27So one of the recommendations is
  • 10:30to survey the scene and identify
  • 10:33the the most talented,
  • 10:35most passionate individuals and
  • 10:37allow yourself with that group.
  • 10:41So I think you've already
  • 10:43gotten a sense of this.
  • 10:44I'm anybody is anybody familiar with
  • 10:48the Myers Briggs personality inventory.
  • 10:52I'm a union psychologist on the side and.
  • 10:57I'm an ENFP and ENFP's
  • 11:01are like functional ADHD.
  • 11:04And so this is how a normal
  • 11:06person tells this story.
  • 11:08And this is how I this is
  • 11:10how I tell the story.
  • 11:11It's I tell lots of stories.
  • 11:13It's very iterative.
  • 11:14I say that my my communication
  • 11:17is at times circumlocutory.
  • 11:19But it always comes around to a point.
  • 11:22So the value proposition and I and
  • 11:24I speak to lots of audiences today,
  • 11:26I'm mostly talking to
  • 11:28diagnostic pathology trainees,
  • 11:30but I also talked to base to
  • 11:32basic scientists quite a bit about
  • 11:35challenges in immunohistochemistry.
  • 11:37And I'll say that everybody
  • 11:39benefits from smart,
  • 11:40technically sound immunohistochemistry
  • 11:42and I'm offering to be your
  • 11:46immunohistochemistry concierge.
  • 11:47I I I warmly invite you to reach out to me.
  • 11:50I'm deeply interested in what.
  • 11:52You're interested in,
  • 11:54I'm deeply interested in helping to
  • 11:56advance your academic careers because
  • 11:59I want to interact with bright,
  • 12:00talented, passionate individuals.
  • 12:02And so this talk is really,
  • 12:04it's directed at everybody.
  • 12:06It's mainly directed at trainees.
  • 12:07I love to interact with local IHC
  • 12:10lab directors because I benefited
  • 12:12so much from interaction with
  • 12:14IHC lab directors when I was
  • 12:16a junior member on the CAP
  • 12:19Immunohistochemistry committee.
  • 12:20I I love interacting with clinical fact.
  • 12:22Faculty,
  • 12:23especially junior faculty who
  • 12:25want to do scholarship but have
  • 12:27limited time and limited resources.
  • 12:30And I have a tried and true
  • 12:32method to have a positive study
  • 12:35using what I call next generation
  • 12:38immunohistochemistry as a function of
  • 12:40what my chair at Brigham told me to be,
  • 12:44which was a translational
  • 12:45molecular pathologist.
  • 12:46And I also love to I love to
  • 12:48talk to scientists and I love
  • 12:50to collaborate with scientists.
  • 12:52For the scientists in the in the
  • 12:54room if you were going to read two
  • 12:56papers about if you were going to
  • 12:59read one paper about immunohistochemistry.
  • 13:01So this is and thank you David
  • 13:03for your work on this.
  • 13:04This is a this is a paper
  • 13:07that discusses validation of
  • 13:09immunohistochemical markers in the
  • 13:11research space and it's all about
  • 13:14diet it's all about specificity of
  • 13:16the antibody now for clinicians
  • 13:19like myself that don't have access to.
  • 13:22Gene editing technologies, for example,
  • 13:24to validate their immunostains.
  • 13:26How do I validate my immunostains?
  • 13:29Clinically,
  • 13:29diagnostically with with
  • 13:31large cohorts of of tumors,
  • 13:34gold standard diagnosis, H&E.
  • 13:36But for basic scientists
  • 13:38this is the way to go.
  • 13:41And then this paper is wonderful.
  • 13:42It's from my friend Angelo Dimarzo
  • 13:45that that really applies many of
  • 13:48the principles in the in the Yulin
  • 13:50paper and does it in a case based.
  • 13:57This is an incredibly important concept
  • 13:59and I talked about this in the in
  • 14:02the teaching session this morning.
  • 14:04This concept of fit for purpose
  • 14:06I and I stated it slightly
  • 14:08different in the unknown session.
  • 14:10I said that immunohistochemical assays are
  • 14:14not interchangeable between laboratories
  • 14:17and the quantity of the analyte,
  • 14:19which is something that we rarely measure,
  • 14:21and David's working on it
  • 14:23and my goal is to take that.
  • 14:25Of the clinical laboratory.
  • 14:26But the quantity of the analyte that
  • 14:30we're measuring by immunohistochemistry
  • 14:32indirectly is very variable among
  • 14:34tumor types that you might use the
  • 14:37same immuno for the example that I
  • 14:39gave this morning was got a got a 3,
  • 14:42there's a tiny amount of got a 3IN
  • 14:44para Feo relative to the amount
  • 14:46of peripheral got it 3IN breast
  • 14:49cancer in urothelial cancer and
  • 14:50so for immunohistochemistry to be
  • 14:53successful and the reason that.
  • 14:55Published studies vary so much is
  • 14:58that immunohistochemical assays
  • 14:59should be conceived of,
  • 15:01optimized and validated to
  • 15:03meet a specific purpose.
  • 15:05A single immunohistochemical assay is
  • 15:08generally poorly positioned to meet
  • 15:11multiple purposes and the the current
  • 15:14her two problem is an is an example.
  • 15:18And here's another wonderful example.
  • 15:20ER clinical IHC assays are optimized.
  • 15:25To select patients for endocrine therapy,
  • 15:28that's how they're optimized and
  • 15:30if you wanted to build an ER
  • 15:33assay to distinguish luminal from
  • 15:35triple negative breast cancer,
  • 15:37it would be a fundamentally
  • 15:39different assay and that's why.
  • 15:41Triple negative breast cancers
  • 15:43by gene expression profiling
  • 15:45sometimes maybe 5% of the time.
  • 15:477% of the time they have ER 1 + 1, two 310%.
  • 15:52This low ER problem that was addressed
  • 15:55in the last ASCO CAP guideline.
  • 15:58The original immunohistochemical assays
  • 16:00for ER were optimized to predict survival,
  • 16:04so they were they were prognostic.
  • 16:05But the the current immunohistochemical
  • 16:08assays optimized for this purpose.
  • 16:11Predict response to endocrine therapy
  • 16:14do pretty good but imperfectly for
  • 16:17this application and then this
  • 16:20application is disappears entirely.
  • 16:26Skip this. Everybody loves.
  • 16:27Everybody loves immunohistochemistry
  • 16:29because it's cheap.
  • 16:30It's widely available.
  • 16:31This is an important point that I want
  • 16:33to emphasize to people that want to
  • 16:36do research in immunohistochemistry
  • 16:37is there is a near endless supply of
  • 16:39commercially available primary antibodies.
  • 16:41You just have to be patient.
  • 16:43The first one might not work,
  • 16:44the second one might not work,
  • 16:46the fifth one might not work,
  • 16:47and then you have to decide
  • 16:49when to cut your losses.
  • 16:50These are the these are the advantages.
  • 16:52These are a lot of the challenges.
  • 16:54Yeah, it's not typically quantitative.
  • 16:56And David, it is work is working on this.
  • 16:59This is from my,
  • 17:00as the Chair of the College of American
  • 17:03Pathologists Immunohistochemistry
  • 17:04Committee responsible for putting out
  • 17:06a national and really international
  • 17:09proficiency testing program.
  • 17:11There's lack of,
  • 17:12there's lack of high quality material
  • 17:14for external quality assessment.
  • 17:16And then as a local IHC lab director,
  • 17:19this impacts my ability to have
  • 17:21high quality control material
  • 17:23and then this is the promise.
  • 17:25We want homogeneous,
  • 17:27controlled material of known
  • 17:29analyte concentration.
  • 17:30And there's a couple different
  • 17:33ways to skin this cat.
  • 17:35David working with my friend
  • 17:38Regan Fulton in Sausalito, CA.
  • 17:41You can combine isagenix cell lines
  • 17:44and you get the quantification
  • 17:46from however you do quantification.
  • 17:48Mass spec, for example.
  • 17:50And then there's another paradigm.
  • 17:52There's a guy called Steve Bogan,
  • 17:54and he has a.
  • 17:56Company called Boston Cell Standards
  • 17:58and he coats glass microbeads with
  • 18:01known concentrations of analyte
  • 18:03and that's traceable to to a
  • 18:05reference standard and I mentioned,
  • 18:08I said the immuno pessimist
  • 18:10talks immunohistochemistry is
  • 18:11in the midst of equality crisis.
  • 18:13It's mainly because of lack of
  • 18:16quantifiable reference material
  • 18:17and we are actively working on
  • 18:19this at the at the at the national
  • 18:22level and this is 1.
  • 18:31As next generation Immuno Histochemistry,
  • 18:34we'll talk about selection, optimization
  • 18:37and validation depending on time.
  • 18:44Presented a dry challenge.
  • 18:45One of my friends on your Roden,
  • 18:49who's a wonderful long, she's also
  • 18:51the director of the IHC lab at Mayo.
  • 18:54She said, Andrew, there's this,
  • 18:56she's a she loves thymoma.
  • 18:59There's this wonderful immunohistochemical
  • 19:00marker that was published in a paper
  • 19:03in MJ Surge Path 10 years ago,
  • 19:05and it's not commercially
  • 19:06available and I want to study it.
  • 19:09But we're stuck, and I and I can
  • 19:12solve her problem by finding many,
  • 19:15many commercially available
  • 19:17antibodies that target my babies.
  • 19:20So I do lots and lots of research
  • 19:23and immunohistochemistry,
  • 19:23and my favorite fun thing to do is make
  • 19:27novel diagnostic markers from from scratch.
  • 19:30And so OTC is in my lab,
  • 19:33the most sensitive Pato
  • 19:35cellular differentiation marker.
  • 19:37The other thing I like to do is repurpose.
  • 19:39Antibodies.
  • 19:40So IGF two which had emerged as a diagnostic
  • 19:44marker for adrenal cortical carcinoma.
  • 19:47I found a novel diagnostic application
  • 19:51in paraganglioma pheochromocytoma packs.
  • 19:54One, we talked about cross
  • 19:56reactivity this morning.
  • 19:57I said polyclonal packs 8 cross reacts
  • 20:00with other packs family transcription
  • 20:02factors including pack 6 and that's
  • 20:04why it's an adequate diagnostic marker
  • 20:07in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
  • 20:09And I was actually having dinner
  • 20:12with Anya at a Kappa HC committee
  • 20:14meeting four years ago.
  • 20:16And she said I want to do a course
  • 20:18about pitfalls and thoracic pathology.
  • 20:20Like, you know,
  • 20:21polyclonal Paxata is positive in thymomas,
  • 20:24but monoclonal paxata is negative.
  • 20:26And she said that.
  • 20:27And I,
  • 20:28from the example that I knew
  • 20:30from PAX 5 and pack six,
  • 20:32I knew that that there was some other
  • 20:35PAX family transcription factor
  • 20:37that was expressed in the thymus.
  • 20:40And I all you have to do is have pub,
  • 20:43pub,
  • 20:43Med and a few bioinformatics tools
  • 20:45that I will share with you to
  • 20:48be able to solve this in silico.
  • 20:51And then doing the clinical study
  • 20:53is a formality angler one is a
  • 20:55diagnostic marker for chondromyxoid
  • 20:57fibroma and it's based on the the
  • 21:00defining molecular genetic event
  • 21:01and that lesion hey one and then
  • 21:05specifically hay one immunohistochemistry
  • 21:07directed to the end terminus of the hay one.
  • 21:11Gene or I should say protein as a
  • 21:14diagnostic marker for mesenchymal
  • 21:16chondrosarcoma where a diagnostic
  • 21:18marker did not cry previously exist.
  • 21:22And then the last one got a four,
  • 21:24which I've brought up as a pan
  • 21:28GI marker expressed in the upper
  • 21:30tract and not in the colon.
  • 21:31So very complementary to SAP B2,
  • 21:34which is more of a lower GI colon
  • 21:36specific marker and I don't know
  • 21:38that we'll get to all these
  • 21:39specific examples and that's fine.
  • 21:41The concepts more important than
  • 21:43the than the detail.
  • 21:46So next generation immunohistochemistry,
  • 21:48this is my, this is my stick.
  • 21:52And this term I, I sort of Co developed
  • 21:56with with my very close friend that I
  • 21:59worked with incredibly closely at Brigham.
  • 22:02Jason hornick. Jason and I do next
  • 22:05generation immunohistochemistry.
  • 22:06He does it almost exclusively in
  • 22:08sarcoma and I do it in pan cancer
  • 22:11diagnostic applications because I'm
  • 22:12at Iowa right because he's at Brigham
  • 22:15and he could do next generation of.
  • 22:17Sarcoma and Iowa has a lovely
  • 22:20sarcoma program,
  • 22:21but it does not have an exceptional one.
  • 22:23And so I do next generation
  • 22:27immunohistochemistry and I'm not going
  • 22:28to restrict myself to any tumor type.
  • 22:30I'm going to pick off anything
  • 22:33that anything that I can.
  • 22:35And how do I find markers?
  • 22:37And I had lovely discussions this morning
  • 22:41about my passions for developmental biology.
  • 22:44I spend many Saturdays in the library
  • 22:47reading developmental biology papers,
  • 22:49trying to understand.
  • 22:50First thing I told you guys this morning
  • 22:53is tumors recapitulate cells and tissues
  • 22:55native to the organ in which they arise.
  • 22:58And so it behooves me to understand
  • 23:01the developmental biology of those
  • 23:03cells and tissues and from them.
  • 23:05I derive my diagnostic markers those
  • 23:07are my favorite are are querying the
  • 23:10developmental biology literature.
  • 23:12We also do protein correlates of
  • 23:14molecular genetic events and you
  • 23:16know we did we talked about TP53
  • 23:18and P53 immunohistochemistry RV one
  • 23:21and RV immunohistochemistry this
  • 23:23morning is exemplars.
  • 23:25And then you can also identify
  • 23:27markers identified by gene expression
  • 23:29profiling and I say that's cheating
  • 23:31and the reason I say it's cheating is.
  • 23:34Well, I can't do it.
  • 23:35I don't have the.
  • 23:36I don't have the resources to
  • 23:38do gene expression profiling.
  • 23:39I would rather use my brain to identify a
  • 23:42target than have something come up as the,
  • 23:45you know the the most differentially
  • 23:47expressed marker in some in some experiment
  • 23:50though I have used markers identify,
  • 23:52I have used that strategy
  • 23:55to identify markers.
  • 23:56You know,
  • 23:57this is me being an immuno optimist.
  • 23:58Our diagnostic markers keep getting better
  • 24:01and better and better and you know this.
  • 24:05I'm a sort of a goodwill hunting pathologist.
  • 24:07You wasted
  • 24:10$150,000 on an education or some some
  • 24:14fancy experiments for an education.
  • 24:16You could have got for $1.50 in
  • 24:19late fees at the Public Library.
  • 24:21So this is how I find diagnostic
  • 24:24markers and this is and I'll
  • 24:25say you know this is an example.
  • 24:27This is How I Met cute got a 3.
  • 24:31So this was the 1st paper that was
  • 24:33published in the diagnostic pathology
  • 24:35space that identified got a 3 as a
  • 24:38urothelial cancer diagnostic marker and
  • 24:40this used gene expression profiling.
  • 24:42This came out of Stanford.
  • 24:44John Higgins was the first author.
  • 24:46This is Rob West and Matt
  • 24:49Vander Reines work and they did.
  • 24:51Gene expression profiling of Gu tumor,
  • 24:53so they did kidney,
  • 24:56black bladder and and prostate and
  • 24:57got a three was identified as a
  • 25:00highly differentially expressed gene
  • 25:01in those tumor types and then you
  • 25:04validate it with immunohistochemistry.
  • 25:08Here's another one.
  • 25:10And the defining molecular genetic
  • 25:12event of a tumor is identified
  • 25:15through and through whole genome
  • 25:17or whole exome sequencing, Jason.
  • 25:20And I say the tumor type has been solved
  • 25:23and when the tumor type has been solved,
  • 25:26this is such fertile ground to
  • 25:28identify a diagnostic marker.
  • 25:30So, so, so this defining molecular
  • 25:33genetic event of solitary fibrous
  • 25:35tumor was described and within
  • 25:38a few months Jason and Chris.
  • 25:41Chris. Butcher and Leona Doyle,
  • 25:43wonderful junior now middle faculty,
  • 25:46used to be my resident and fellow
  • 25:48can published a diagnostic study,
  • 25:50and when the immunohistochemical
  • 25:52markers are identified in this fashion,
  • 25:55they are so damn specific.
  • 25:58They're so damn sensitive and specific.
  • 26:00So this is how stat six came to be.
  • 26:04And then I can take it to my lab.
  • 26:06So this was a case,
  • 26:08a spinal lesion that had a little
  • 26:10bit of carrot and positivity that
  • 26:12sat in the file for 10 years
  • 26:14diagnosed as synovial sarcoma.
  • 26:16I had identified this case.
  • 26:17I was doing a TLE one validation
  • 26:20several years ago and it was
  • 26:22TLE one negative and I looked at
  • 26:24this tumor and I actually didn't
  • 26:25think it was synovial sarcoma.
  • 26:27I thought it was a poorly differentiated
  • 26:30solitary fibrous tumor and in fact it is
  • 26:32and I and I say using next generation.
  • 26:35Immunohistochemistry.
  • 26:35You can elevate the ability of
  • 26:40already strong morphologist,
  • 26:42already strong diagnostic
  • 26:43surgical pathologists.
  • 26:44You give them incredibly sharp
  • 26:46tools and they can become
  • 26:48exceptional diagnostically.
  • 26:52And then hit my love letter to
  • 26:56transcription factors history.
  • 26:58Historically, our diagnostic armamentarium
  • 27:00was geared toward cytoplasmic and
  • 27:03membranous differentiation markers
  • 27:05that were empirically discovered.
  • 27:07We would like mince up some tissue
  • 27:09and put it in A and put it in a
  • 27:12rabbit and see and see what's stuck.
  • 27:15And so, you know,
  • 27:16here's a breast cancer with mammaglobin
  • 27:18and gross cystic disease fluid protein.
  • 27:21And remember this,
  • 27:22inside of plasmic differentiation markers,
  • 27:25their expression tends to be
  • 27:27markedly reduced in poorly
  • 27:29differentiated tumors as opposed to
  • 27:31lineage restricted transcription
  • 27:33factors that tend to not always,
  • 27:35but tend to be diffusely strongly
  • 27:38expressed independent of the
  • 27:39differentiation state status of the marker.
  • 27:42And I like to coin a lot of terms
  • 27:44and this is what I call the primacy.
  • 27:47Primacy either means first or best.
  • 27:49So this is for me the primacy because best.
  • 27:51Primacy of lineage restricted
  • 27:54transcription factors.
  • 27:55And immuno optimists,
  • 27:57immuno pessimists and immuno realists,
  • 27:59and really we should all be immuno realist.
  • 28:03Every new immunohistochemical
  • 28:04test is like a new technology.
  • 28:08This you may be familiar with is
  • 28:10the Gartner Hype cycle that's used
  • 28:13to describe new technologies.
  • 28:14When new technologies are described,
  • 28:17we're incredibly enthusiastic about them
  • 28:19and overly enthusiastic about them.
  • 28:21And then they start failing a
  • 28:23bit and then we keep studying.
  • 28:25Studying and studying and we've learned more,
  • 28:27and we learn advantages,
  • 28:29disadvantages, limitations,
  • 28:30pitfalls,
  • 28:30and we end up with this plateau
  • 28:33of productivity.
  • 28:34And I will say the reason that many
  • 28:39immunohistochemical tests historically
  • 28:41or new analytes have suffered from
  • 28:44this is from poor experimental design.
  • 28:48Immunohistochemical when you're introducing
  • 28:50a new diagnostic marker into the space,
  • 28:53it behooves one to examine.
  • 28:56All the lesions in the
  • 28:58differential diagnosis,
  • 28:59if it behooves one to look for potential
  • 29:03additional diagnostic utilities,
  • 29:04and you can do that by staining
  • 29:06a bunch of cases.
  • 29:07But you can also use publicly
  • 29:10available gene expression data
  • 29:12to do the experiment in silico,
  • 29:14and then and then to confirm it with
  • 29:16parents paraffin and this is these
  • 29:18are all papers published by Marku
  • 29:20Marku Miettinen, who's a personal hero,
  • 29:23and he bombs every new.
  • 29:26Immunohistochemical marker,
  • 29:27he studies them in thousands
  • 29:29and thousands of tumors.
  • 29:31So you know,
  • 29:32got a 3 and 2500 tumors 4 for example.
  • 29:37And again, exceptional,
  • 29:39lovely, you know,
  • 29:42doing what you can within the constraints
  • 29:45of the resources at your disposal.
  • 29:47And So what I've done at Iowa over the
  • 29:50last 11 years is do what Marku did.
  • 29:53And so I've developed tissue microarrays.
  • 29:55I, I,
  • 29:56you know,
  • 29:56boasted this morning that I have hundreds
  • 29:59of tissue microarrays of thousands
  • 30:01of tumors of every, of every type.
  • 30:03And I'm now able to do,
  • 30:06able to do this.
  • 30:09And so instead of doing this,
  • 30:12we start at the plateau of productivity.
  • 30:16We start with an informed
  • 30:18new diagnostic marker.
  • 30:24So stains I love most are oligo
  • 30:27specific transcription factors.
  • 30:29That, and I think a lot of people
  • 30:31expect to transcription factor to
  • 30:33have a single diagnostic application.
  • 30:36And I think that's entirely unrealistic
  • 30:38that the body is too efficient to
  • 30:42use a single transcription factor
  • 30:44for a single application it it
  • 30:47reuses things you know and and so.
  • 30:50It just behooves us to know the
  • 30:52different diagnostic applications
  • 30:53for all these different markers.
  • 30:56And so I say stains, I lovers,
  • 30:58Swiss army knives and sappy 2 is, you know,
  • 31:01an example that I'll share with you.
  • 31:03You know,
  • 31:04my approach to every diagnostic marker,
  • 31:07mainly transcription factors,
  • 31:09is I dig very deeply into the basic
  • 31:12science underpinning the marker,
  • 31:15especially the developmental biology because
  • 31:17that's my hop hobby and so sappy too.
  • 31:21You know,
  • 31:21pathologists learned about it about
  • 31:2310 years ago because it was actually
  • 31:25identified as a colon cancer marker in the
  • 31:28context of the human protein Atlas effort.
  • 31:30But every new diagnostic
  • 31:32marker if you go to Pub Med,
  • 31:35has a rich,
  • 31:36generally decades long history in the
  • 31:39developmental biology literature.
  • 31:41And so even though we met SAT B2 in 2011,
  • 31:45this was this was studied by
  • 31:47developmental biologists that's
  • 31:49involved in neuronal development.
  • 31:51Craniofacial development
  • 31:53and skeletal development.
  • 31:54And from the developmental
  • 31:56biology of the marker,
  • 31:58you can infer diagnostic applications
  • 32:00and then you can test them.
  • 32:02You can design the study to test them.
  • 32:05And so here's sat B2 doing the
  • 32:08most familiar SAT B2 thing.
  • 32:10This is a mucinous adenocarcinoma
  • 32:12that before I had sat B2 I would
  • 32:14have said had a lower GI phenotype.
  • 32:16It's homogeneous.
  • 32:17I say homogeneous for diffuse,
  • 32:19strong for CK20 and CDX 2.
  • 32:23And I would have said adenocarcinoma with
  • 32:26mucinous features and lower GI phenotype.
  • 32:28And this one's actually sappy,
  • 32:30too negative,
  • 32:31and this is actually an ampullary
  • 32:33adenocarcinoma.
  • 32:34So this is SATB 2 conferring
  • 32:37lower GI specificity.
  • 32:40Here's another diagnostic
  • 32:41application of SAT V2.
  • 32:43This is an undifferentiated
  • 32:46undifferentiated carcinoma.
  • 32:47Here's a carrot and in the
  • 32:49colon it's MLH 1 deficient.
  • 32:51So this is a this is a not quite a medullary.
  • 32:56It's an undifferentiated MSI high
  • 32:58cancer and it's CDX two negative
  • 33:00and MSI high colon cancers are
  • 33:03often CDX two negative because CDX
  • 33:052 actually has micro satellites in
  • 33:08its exons and is susceptible to.
  • 33:10Frameshift mutation and then
  • 33:12nonsense mediated decay so that it's.
  • 33:16It also explains why the tumors
  • 33:19are undifferentiated.
  • 33:20And here's sappy 2 in this case.
  • 33:22So SAP two has an additional diagnostic
  • 33:25application as an increased it adds
  • 33:29increased sensitivity to the detection
  • 33:32of undifferentiated colon cancer.
  • 33:34Here's another one.
  • 33:35This Jason did because he
  • 33:37was positioned to do it.
  • 33:38He's a sarcoma pathologist.
  • 33:40He did it with my resident Jay
  • 33:43Connor who's now the chief of
  • 33:45GI at at at Sinai in Toronto.
  • 33:48Is this so this was age-old question.
  • 33:51Is this osteoid or is it just
  • 33:54hyalinized stroma and sappy 2 is an
  • 33:58osteoblast differentiation marker.
  • 34:00We knew that from the developmental biology
  • 34:02literature and now this age-old question.
  • 34:04I can say emphatically yes,
  • 34:06this is an Austin.
  • 34:08This is osteoid.
  • 34:09Here's another diagnostic application
  • 34:11and this is where I had the opportunity
  • 34:13to contribute to literature because
  • 34:15this is where I was the best position.
  • 34:18I was best positioned to study this
  • 34:20marker in the neuroendocrine space.
  • 34:22And I had presented this morning that
  • 34:25SAT B2 is a wonderful marker of rectal,
  • 34:28also expressed by appendiceal
  • 34:30well differentiated neuroendocrine
  • 34:31tumors and it's not expressed by
  • 34:35pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
  • 34:36And then I had also shared that
  • 34:39this is important.
  • 34:39Because a lot of the transcriptional
  • 34:42machinery that drives pancreas net
  • 34:44development namely Pack 6 and islet
  • 34:47one that transcriptional machinery is
  • 34:49also operant in rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
  • 34:52And so this,
  • 34:53this gave me a tool to clearly distinguish
  • 34:56pancreatic and rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
  • 34:59And then I showed you the morphology,
  • 35:01right.
  • 35:01Everybody can everybody after this
  • 35:04morning's discussion could tell me that
  • 35:07this is type B trabecular paper clip rectal.
  • 35:10And then here's here's another diagnostic
  • 35:13application I shared this this morning.
  • 35:15How about PD neck?
  • 35:16And in PD neck,
  • 35:18sat B2 is a reasonably sensitive,
  • 35:21highly specific marker of cutaneous
  • 35:24neuroendocrine carcinoma,
  • 35:25Merkel cell carcinoma.
  • 35:30And, and there's more, right.
  • 35:32So here I'm being like a, you know,
  • 35:34immunohistochemistry used car salesman.
  • 35:36There's one more diagnostic application.
  • 35:38This is, this is a, this is an
  • 35:41undifferentiated round cell sarcoma.
  • 35:43That's Ewing sarcoma. Ish.
  • 35:46It's a little too pleomorphic to be a
  • 35:49Ewing sarcoma and it's CD 99 negative and
  • 35:53before I had the opportunity to validate
  • 35:56becor immunohistochemistry in my lab.
  • 36:00Because it was hard to come across
  • 36:0210B core rearranged sarcomas,
  • 36:03I use SAP B2 as a surrogate for B
  • 36:07core rearranged sarcomas because about
  • 36:1070% of B core rearranged sarcomas
  • 36:12are strongly sappy, too positive.
  • 36:14This was demonstrated by Christina
  • 36:16Antonescu in gene expression profiling
  • 36:19experiments and sort of tucked in,
  • 36:21you know, as a supplementary fig figure
  • 36:24in one of her papers from 10 years ago.
  • 36:27All right.
  • 36:28So I always ask will it Swiss army
  • 36:30knife and and the answer is yes.
  • 36:32Yes I want more more value with fewer mark,
  • 36:35fewer markers.
  • 36:37All right.
  • 36:37So that's next generation
  • 36:41immunohistochemistry onto optimization.
  • 36:44It's maybe we could say selection
  • 36:47optimization and validation and so,
  • 36:49so there's Twitter, so am I HC guy.
  • 36:53And the reason that I'm IHC guy is
  • 36:56I'm passionate about being connected
  • 36:58with people and having the opportunity
  • 37:01to share things that I'm passionate
  • 37:04about mainly immunohistochemistry.
  • 37:06I'm kind of a nerd and and so I use
  • 37:11this platform to to mentor IHC lab.
  • 37:14Directorship and different directors
  • 37:15are at different levels and I give
  • 37:18different directors different advice.
  • 37:20So this is my friend Frank Ingram,
  • 37:23who's Chuck Town MG,
  • 37:25very popular on Twitter and he took
  • 37:29over as a local icy lab director in
  • 37:33his community practice in Charlotte,
  • 37:36NC and he had no training in in
  • 37:40Immunohistochemistry Lab directorship.
  • 37:41Just like me, I had no formal.
  • 37:44Training in Immunohistochemistry
  • 37:45lab directorship and he said I
  • 37:48want to bring up God up, 3 packs,
  • 37:508 socks,
  • 37:5110 and erg to which I said Hallelujah,
  • 37:54like you must have those markers.
  • 37:56And I provide you know I I talk
  • 37:58a lot right and I write a lot.
  • 38:00So I provided him very detailed
  • 38:03instructions about how I would go about
  • 38:07value optimizing and then validating
  • 38:09what I consider to be pretty routine.
  • 38:12Tried and true robust.
  • 38:16Immunohistochemical markers.
  • 38:18And then here's another one of my
  • 38:19close friends. This is Phil Reese.
  • 38:21Phil Reese is operating at
  • 38:22A at a much higher level.
  • 38:24He's an IC lab.
  • 38:26He's the IHC lab director
  • 38:28at OHSU in Portland.
  • 38:30He took the lab over from Megan Troxell,
  • 38:32who's a Jedi Master of
  • 38:35Immunohistochemistry lab directorship.
  • 38:37And she and I have taught each other
  • 38:39a tremendous amount over the years.
  • 38:41And Phil was looking for something very,
  • 38:44very specific.
  • 38:46He wanted immunohistochemistry.
  • 38:48For Toxoplasma, which is a really,
  • 38:51really niche application and I said,
  • 38:54well,
  • 38:55I certainly don't do
  • 38:57immunohistochemistry for Toxoplasma.
  • 38:59But the one person in the world
  • 39:01that's the best person to talk to you
  • 39:05about Toxoplasma immunohistochemistry
  • 39:06is an unfortunately he passed
  • 39:09away about 18 months ago.
  • 39:11But Sharif Zaki, who was the chief of
  • 39:15IBD pathology at the NIH and I connected.
  • 39:18Fill with Sharif and Phil got what he needed.
  • 39:23So antibody selection you know I I'll
  • 39:26I'll say like all these examples that
  • 39:28I might get to one or two of your
  • 39:31got a three and your end terminus.
  • 39:34Hey one you know I'm selecting
  • 39:36antibodies I'm I'm trying to invent
  • 39:39new antibodies but but Chuck Frank,
  • 39:42Chuck Town, Frank knows from from you
  • 39:44know going to be going to meetings
  • 39:47listening to listening to lectures
  • 39:49what the you know cutting edge what
  • 39:51the advancing edge of diagnostic.
  • 39:53Pathology is and so that's
  • 39:55antibody selection.
  • 39:56What what immunohistochemical
  • 39:57marker do I want to bring up in my
  • 40:02lab for a diagnostic application
  • 40:04or for research application?
  • 40:06And then this is sort of the sequence
  • 40:09of events from maybe from easy to
  • 40:11hard that I go through and actually.
  • 40:14There's a few tricks of the trade that
  • 40:16I learned from David Rim on this list.
  • 40:18So so the easiest thing is to phone
  • 40:20a friend and you can always phone
  • 40:22you can always phone me phone a
  • 40:24friend works great for esoteric
  • 40:26antibodies so connecting fill the
  • 40:28Sharif was was really that was the
  • 40:30one step solution to that.
  • 40:32The published literature is great is great.
  • 40:35I often go to the public I just go to pubbed.
  • 40:39Has there been a been a paper
  • 40:42published with this marker.
  • 40:44What are the figures look like,
  • 40:45you know,
  • 40:45what are the,
  • 40:46what are the pictures look like?
  • 40:47Does this look good?
  • 40:48Does this look like an
  • 40:50immunohistochemical stain of high
  • 40:51quality that I would want in my lab?
  • 40:53And then Nordic QC is the Scandinavian
  • 40:56equivalent of the CAP Immunohistochemistry
  • 40:59committee and they published their very
  • 41:03transparent and they published very
  • 41:06detailed platform specific protocols
  • 41:08for what I refer to as diagnostic
  • 41:11workhorses so that they've got published.
  • 41:14Protocols and usually 10 different published
  • 41:17protocols that are again platform specific.
  • 41:19So you're running a doco auto
  • 41:21Stainer link 48 or you're running
  • 41:23a VENTANA benchmark ultra,
  • 41:25or you have a or you have a doco
  • 41:28omnis or you have a like a Bond 3.
  • 41:30For for about 150 to 200
  • 41:34different diagnostic antibodies.
  • 41:36So that's where I pointed frank for
  • 41:38packs 8 and socks 10 and erg and then and
  • 41:42then these are more shots in the dark.
  • 41:44So these are these are databases that
  • 41:46you can I usually end up when I'm
  • 41:48bringing up a brand new diagnostic
  • 41:50marker I end up with these databases.
  • 41:53Biocompare is pretty dumb.
  • 41:54It just spits out it just spits out a
  • 41:58list a list of vendors and you can click on.
  • 42:01You know,
  • 42:01you can click on the link and go
  • 42:03to the website,
  • 42:04but these are two that I learned
  • 42:06from David actually,
  • 42:08antibody pedia and bench and bench side.
  • 42:11And I I think I like benci the
  • 42:14most because bentsi does for
  • 42:16me it uses AI and does for
  • 42:19me what I used to do,
  • 42:21which is go through every paper
  • 42:23published and say look at the method
  • 42:25and is there an immunohistochemical
  • 42:27method and what's the clone and
  • 42:30aggregate all this information.
  • 42:31And bench side does it for you.
  • 42:34So this is what Nordic QC looks
  • 42:36like and these are examples,
  • 42:38so these are examples of these are all the
  • 42:41different like recommendable her to assays.
  • 42:46And you know it's not just the clone,
  • 42:48it's all the conditions of the test and
  • 42:51you click the link to the PDF and that's
  • 42:54a starting point for your optimization.
  • 42:56And then here's biocompare
  • 42:59antibody pedia ads.
  • 43:02Biocompare just gives you a list of
  • 43:03a list of vendors and you can click
  • 43:05links and go to their websites.
  • 43:07Antibody Pedia will vouch on and
  • 43:09you're looking for you're looking for.
  • 43:12Green Circles will vouch for the quality
  • 43:15of the experiments that were done to
  • 43:19validate the specificity of the antibody.
  • 43:21So all the way back to the beginning
  • 43:23when I said there's these two
  • 43:25papers for the basic scientists,
  • 43:27the one that Angelo de Marzo published,
  • 43:30this case based, and the Eulen 1.
  • 43:32That that David collaborated on and so many.
  • 43:35And then if you do it for a while,
  • 43:37you know some vendors are more scrupulous
  • 43:40with their science than others,
  • 43:42but this gives you a check.
  • 43:43And so we're looking for a green circle that
  • 43:46is referring to an enhanced by validation.
  • 43:49So.
  • 43:50So they're using some of these
  • 43:52techniques like like like you know,
  • 43:55either crisper cast and not to knock it
  • 43:57out or they're using small interfering
  • 43:59RNA to knock it down to validate.
  • 44:02The specificity of the antibody.
  • 44:05And then here is bench side,
  • 44:07which gives me which links to the papers
  • 44:10themselves and not just the papers,
  • 44:12but links to the figures of the papers.
  • 44:15So this is I used to use
  • 44:17biocompare and thank you David.
  • 44:19Now I go to Bankside 1st and
  • 44:21antibody pedia and benzite,
  • 44:23there's they're free for you,
  • 44:25I think you have.
  • 44:26They're free to academicians.
  • 44:27You have to like create a login, but totally,
  • 44:30totally free, incredibly powerful tools.
  • 44:33We're doing on time.
  • 44:35We're doing OK.
  • 44:36Ethical sourcing of primary antibodies.
  • 44:38I mentioned this briefly in
  • 44:40a few conversations.
  • 44:41I will not source an antibody
  • 44:44from Santa Cruz in my lab because
  • 44:48they committed gross animal abuse
  • 44:52and they actually they they they
  • 44:56lost their license to sell.
  • 45:00Animal products derived from animals
  • 45:02and and the loophole is that mice
  • 45:06don't qualify as animals so they so
  • 45:08they can't sell polyclonal's anymore.
  • 45:10They can't sell rabbit,
  • 45:11rabbit polyclonal or goat polyclonal
  • 45:13because those those are considered
  • 45:15animals by the by the government.
  • 45:17But mice aren't considered animals
  • 45:19and so Santa Cruz is still in
  • 45:22business but I won't source an
  • 45:24antibody from Santa Cruz.
  • 45:25Optimization you know I'll I'll sort
  • 45:27of move along because I want to get
  • 45:30to at least one specific example.
  • 45:32Optimization is the series
  • 45:34of experiments that we do to
  • 45:36optimize the signal to noise ratio.
  • 45:39And the way that I do optimization is
  • 45:42is is very guest check revised and
  • 45:45visually oriented and David has a awesome
  • 45:48scientific way to do optimization.
  • 45:50He optimizes the signal to noise
  • 45:52ratio but he he takes the human.
  • 45:55Right out of the equation.
  • 45:57And this here's an example,
  • 45:59you know these are the the
  • 46:02iterative specific experiments that
  • 46:04I perform to optimize a primary,
  • 46:06new primary antibody.
  • 46:07We mainly attend to the
  • 46:10primary antibody dilution,
  • 46:11the type of antigen retrieval and then the
  • 46:15primary antibody duration of incubation,
  • 46:18the choice of adding amplification to
  • 46:22detection or just straight detection
  • 46:24and then the duration of detection.
  • 46:28And then there's validation.
  • 46:29I talked about validation in
  • 46:30the research space.
  • 46:31This is validation in the clinical space.
  • 46:33So an IHC lab director is going to
  • 46:36pay attention to this White Paper,
  • 46:38principles of analytic validation
  • 46:40of immunohistochemical assays that
  • 46:42specifies the quantity and quality
  • 46:45of the cohorts that one should put
  • 46:47together to to to validate an antibody,
  • 46:50which is necessary to put it
  • 46:54into clinical use.
  • 46:56Here's validation in the research setting.
  • 46:58These are the different types of experiments.
  • 47:01And then let's, let's not do mine, let's do,
  • 47:05let's do annyas, let's do the dry,
  • 47:07let's do the dry challenge.
  • 47:08So Anya wanted proteasome subunit
  • 47:12beta 5T and I said I'm she said
  • 47:15this is not commercially available.
  • 47:17I am so interested in this analyte
  • 47:19and it's not commercially available
  • 47:21and I'm devastated.
  • 47:23And I said I'm sure that I'm sure that
  • 47:26I can make an immunohistochemical test
  • 47:29to proteasome subunit beta 5T and.
  • 47:31And we talked about it.
  • 47:32I was giving I,
  • 47:34I Co direct a week long immunohistochemistry
  • 47:37course and these are three of my
  • 47:40lovely faculty and this is this is
  • 47:42what we talked about at the at the
  • 47:44dinner table in Montreal this summer.
  • 47:46And so here's and then you just have
  • 47:49to trace it and I call this like
  • 47:52immunohistochemistry Sudoku right.
  • 47:53And I want to I want to get to the
  • 47:55solution and as few steps as possible.
  • 47:58So all she told me was proteosome
  • 48:00subunit beta 5T.
  • 48:01And I found this paper that she
  • 48:03was referring to.
  • 48:04So it's a Japanese group
  • 48:07and they created their own,
  • 48:09I believe polyclonal antibody to to
  • 48:13this proteosome subunit beta 5T.
  • 48:16Fascinatingly, you know proteasomes,
  • 48:18they're they're cool, they have,
  • 48:21they have lids,
  • 48:22they have a cylinder body and they
  • 48:25have bottoms, they have subunits.
  • 48:26And the thymus has its a unique proteosome,
  • 48:30totally different than the proteosome
  • 48:31and the whole rest of the body.
  • 48:33Because in the thymus,
  • 48:35you need to use the proteosome
  • 48:37to process antigens, to present,
  • 48:39to grow up, to grow up T cells.
  • 48:41So that's the,
  • 48:42that's the science behind this thing.
  • 48:44And then the first thing that
  • 48:46I had to solve is, well,
  • 48:48I needed to know what the gene was and
  • 48:50it wasn't clear what the gene was,
  • 48:52but just Googling around I found
  • 48:55a couple different.
  • 48:56So there's PSMB 5.
  • 48:58And then I started and then it turned
  • 49:02out to actually be PSMB 11 was was
  • 49:06the gene that encodes this proteasome
  • 49:10subunit beta beta 5T and the PSMB 5 is
  • 49:15actually the the T stands for thymus,
  • 49:19thymus specific. So I started with PSMB 5,
  • 49:22but that's not the thymus specific one.
  • 49:25So I found this paper and I found just
  • 49:28that there were only four papers.
  • 49:30That were published with immunohistochemistry
  • 49:33with this diagnostic analyte.
  • 49:36And I would just dig into the,
  • 49:38dig into the methods and and you have to dig
  • 49:42and then dig and dig it's detective work.
  • 49:45So the paper that Anya was referring to
  • 49:47that was published in AMJ Surge path,
  • 49:49they said C prior,
  • 49:50so I kept going back C prior, C prior,
  • 49:53here's some supplementary material
  • 49:55and it was a polyclonal that they
  • 49:58had produced in their lab that wasn't
  • 50:01commercialized and so was not available.
  • 50:03But that's OK because I said.
  • 50:06Basic science is $160 billion
  • 50:10annual industry,
  • 50:11and I said there are usually hundreds
  • 50:14of commercially available antibodies
  • 50:17to any immunohistochemical target.
  • 50:20And so I just started this is bio compared,
  • 50:23this is the dumb,
  • 50:24this is the dumb database and
  • 50:26this this antibody that Anya,
  • 50:29who is an expert,
  • 50:30she is the IHC lab director at Mayo,
  • 50:33said this is an antibody that is
  • 50:35not commercially available.
  • 50:37There are 63 different commercially
  • 50:40available antibodies to PSMB 11.
  • 50:44Now that's a problem because I can't test 63,
  • 50:47I can only test a few.
  • 50:51So then I applied it to let's use a,
  • 50:53let's use a finer screen.
  • 50:55And then so here's the antibody pedia.
  • 50:58And. And so again,
  • 51:00we're looking for the green circles and
  • 51:02so we've got some more promising targets.
  • 51:05And then here's the bench side.
  • 51:07And I ended up going with the bench side.
  • 51:10And I found from looking at these figures,
  • 51:13actually this figure here,
  • 51:15this is a figure that demonstrates
  • 51:18that I want to see which is nuclear.
  • 51:21The nuclear staining in
  • 51:23thymic epithelial cells.
  • 51:25And so this is the antibody.
  • 51:26This is the antibody that I that
  • 51:28I proposed to Anya that she get
  • 51:30and and work up in her lab for
  • 51:32this diagnostic application.
  • 51:34Now the icing on the cake is if in
  • 51:36the last couple of months we actually
  • 51:38had had the opportunity to do it.
  • 51:40I pushed and pushed to do it
  • 51:42for the uscap deadline and she,
  • 51:44because she's European,
  • 51:46was thoughtfully like on vacation
  • 51:48for six weeks in Germany. So.
  • 51:52And then actually this is,
  • 51:54you know, this is a really,
  • 51:55really good place to stop because
  • 51:58here's the next step I said you can you
  • 52:01can do all of the validation in silico,
  • 52:04in silico.
  • 52:05And so this is I guess who in the
  • 52:10room knows what C bio portal is.
  • 52:14Great.
  • 52:15So everybody in the room should
  • 52:18know what C bioportal is.
  • 52:21It is this for me,
  • 52:23it is the single most useful and
  • 52:27user-friendly bioinformatics tool
  • 52:30that you can use to analyze quickly
  • 52:35and so easily both molecular genetic
  • 52:38data and gene expression profiling
  • 52:41data and the main source of the data.
  • 52:46Is the TCG a date data sets and so
  • 52:49there are pan cancer datasets and
  • 52:52so you you go to the you go to C
  • 52:56bioportal and you you can click like
  • 52:58click a button and it says I want to
  • 53:01analyze all the TCG a tumor types
  • 53:03and it's like 30 tumor types and
  • 53:05then at the bottom you just type in the gene.
  • 53:08So I typed in PS:,
  • 53:10MB 11 and then you hit a couple buttons like
  • 53:13it changes a little bit from time to time.
  • 53:16You have to know where to click.
  • 53:17You click plots. And then I sorted
  • 53:20these plots by median gene expression.
  • 53:24And so in the TCG a data set.
  • 53:28This is expression of PSMB 11.
  • 53:31And it's nothing. Nothing.
  • 53:33Nothing. Nothing. Nothing.
  • 53:34Nothing. Oh my God. And guess what?
  • 53:37In the TCG a data set.
  • 53:39What does THYM mean?
  • 53:42It means thymoma.
  • 53:43So before Anya even does this experiment.
  • 53:47I,
  • 53:47I know that this is a a winner and
  • 53:49so a lot of the the diagnostic
  • 53:51markers that that I you know that I
  • 53:54ran out of time to share with you.
  • 53:56I do,
  • 53:57I do this and I and I do this
  • 53:59not only to sort of confirm
  • 54:01specificity but also to identify
  • 54:03additional diagnostic applications.
  • 54:06And so the the best example of that
  • 54:08is IGF 2 where it was published
  • 54:11in this adrenal cortical carcinoma
  • 54:13space, adrenal cortical carcinoma
  • 54:15versus adenoma and Jason?
  • 54:17My good friend said and I'll sort of
  • 54:19stop with this story you said what do
  • 54:21you know about this is this is how
  • 54:23he interacts with me what do you know
  • 54:25about IGF two and I said Ohh Sylvia
  • 54:27and Oscar published it there and you
  • 54:29know they're endocrine pathologist.
  • 54:31It works great for this diagnostic
  • 54:33application that I shared.
  • 54:34He said I brought this antibody
  • 54:36up and I'd love it and I want to
  • 54:38do a project with it and we'll
  • 54:40we'll what project can we do?
  • 54:43And and I and I I said well we
  • 54:45can't do the same project again.
  • 54:47And so I said, well, let's take a look.
  • 54:49Let's take a look at this in.
  • 54:54I'll just pull up the because I want to
  • 54:56show off see bio portal one more time.
  • 55:01And these are all the different,
  • 55:03you know, I I I use other tools to
  • 55:06visualize gene expression profiling
  • 55:07as well this GTX alumina and bio GPS.
  • 55:11I often just use Wikipedia.
  • 55:14But here's the C bio portal.
  • 55:16I clicked tcga pan Cancer Atlas
  • 55:19studies query by Gene, entered IGF 2.
  • 55:25And here's the plot.
  • 55:27And actually, so this is high.
  • 55:32And this is high.
  • 55:34And this is adrenal cortical carcinoma.
  • 55:38And this is paraganglioma pheochromocytoma.
  • 55:41And so by visualizing this,
  • 55:44I knew that IGF two would be highly
  • 55:47expressed in paraganglioma pheochromocytoma.
  • 55:50And then I just have to go do
  • 55:52the experiment to prove it.
  • 55:53What's not in the TCG a data set
  • 55:56next neuroendocrine tumor isn't.
  • 55:58So I didn't know that.
  • 56:00I didn't know if this meant
  • 56:02that IGF two was going to be a
  • 56:05general neuroendocrine marker or
  • 56:06perhaps it would be specific.
  • 56:08In the peripheral versus net differential
  • 56:11and it was the IT was the latter
  • 56:14that that I confirmed and IGF two.
  • 56:17We talked about analytic robustness
  • 56:19this morning with God at three and
  • 56:22paraganglioma pheochromocytoma and
  • 56:23I said TH is incredibly analytically
  • 56:26robust but it's only expressed
  • 56:28by sympathetic paragangliomas.
  • 56:32IGF two is incredibly analytically
  • 56:34robust that means it's expressed
  • 56:37even if the sample set on the bench.
  • 56:39For a month and it's nearly 100%
  • 56:42sensitive in Paraganglioma pheochromocytoma.
  • 56:45So again, like simple, simple tools,
  • 56:50C bio portal, Oh my God,
  • 56:52you know these databases. Me.
  • 56:54You know, talk, talk to me, workshop,
  • 56:57your workshop, your project.
  • 56:59There are hundreds of commercially
  • 57:01available antibodies to every analyte
  • 57:03that you might be interested in.
  • 57:05You can be a wildly successful
  • 57:08anatomic pathologist.
  • 57:09Even if your research budget
  • 57:12is $300.00 a year,
  • 57:13and I'll stop and take your and take your
  • 57:16questions, thank thank you very much.
  • 57:18I had a I had a blast.
  • 57:19I always have a blast.
  • 57:20I always have a blast.
  • 57:29Questions.
  • 57:32Maybe I start first.
  • 57:35Vision of publications.
  • 57:39One
  • 57:40is that this gene so good
  • 57:42for identified this protein.
  • 57:45I got all the states, yeah, never,
  • 57:48almost never to the original study.
  • 57:53All my sins are there. Yeah.
  • 57:54So in this situation, OK,
  • 57:57so the basic search research
  • 57:59on my thing doesn't work.
  • 58:01So, you know, I I I will say
  • 58:04because I'm very skeptical.
  • 58:05Very skeptical. There are.
  • 58:09I have had multiple instances where
  • 58:12a new biomarker is published in
  • 58:15the diagnostic pathology space,
  • 58:18usually in modern pathology.
  • 58:19And the one that comes to mind,
  • 58:22there was a one.
  • 58:24Like a wonderful appearing
  • 58:26immunohistochemical marker that
  • 58:28was published as the Diagnostic
  • 58:30marker of anaplastic thyroid cancer.
  • 58:33And they discovered it by gene
  • 58:35expression profiling and and I got the
  • 58:37antibody and it didn't and it didn't work.
  • 58:40So so many antibodies don't
  • 58:42work and that's the problem.
  • 58:44And that's the problem.
  • 58:46The problem many antibodies don't
  • 58:48work because foreign antibody to work
  • 58:51in immunohistochemistry is a mirror.
  • 58:53Is a miracle because those antigens
  • 58:56are so so deranged because of formal
  • 58:59and fixation and because of antigenic
  • 59:02degradation with cold ischemia time and.
  • 59:05And so I was disappointed,
  • 59:07like.
  • 59:07I'm skeptical.
  • 59:08I think that some science is that
  • 59:11one of the reasons that it doesn't
  • 59:13work is the science is fate, right?
  • 59:16The the immunohistochemical
  • 59:18results are are fate.
  • 59:20Another reason is you know.
  • 59:23That you know,
  • 59:24it's not necessarily that the
  • 59:26analyte is wrong.
  • 59:27It's maybe that's not the best antibody.
  • 59:30And so, like in that setting,
  • 59:32I would encourage you to not give up.
  • 59:36I would encourage you to at least
  • 59:38try a second and a third time.
  • 59:40And I would encourage you to
  • 59:42try the antibody pedia and the
  • 59:44bench and the bench side.
  • 59:46I trust that more than a single
  • 59:50published paper where the authors are.
  • 59:53Uh, conflicted.
  • 59:54They're incentivized to
  • 59:55have a positive result.
  • 59:57So.
  • 59:58So I trust those databases
  • 01:00:00more than any single paper.
  • 01:00:04And then there are,
  • 01:00:05you know,
  • 01:00:05there are vendors that I intrinsically
  • 01:00:07trust more because they do better
  • 01:00:10science and like 2 great vendors
  • 01:00:12for primary antibodies, abcam,
  • 01:00:14wonderful cell signaling, another standout.
  • 01:00:19There are many other, you know,
  • 01:00:21again like exceptional, lovely, right.
  • 01:00:23And these are exceptional.
  • 01:00:25And then I'll mention one other
  • 01:00:28thing that that you can try that
  • 01:00:31you can try that I can't try,
  • 01:00:33but I mentioned it.
  • 01:00:34Is Don Pot asked about albumin ish
  • 01:00:37this morning and albumin ish is only
  • 01:00:41automate automated on a like a bond three.
  • 01:00:43I don't have a like a bond 3.
  • 01:00:46If you have a like of bond three
  • 01:00:50you can make an RNA scope probe
  • 01:00:54to any to literally anything and
  • 01:00:57so and I've been workshopping
  • 01:00:59this idea with a guy called
  • 01:01:02Greg Sharvil who's a sarcoma.
  • 01:01:04Pathologists at Stanford and and
  • 01:01:07there are some, there are some,
  • 01:01:09even though the genetics are on point
  • 01:01:12and the gene expression is on point,
  • 01:01:14that will never succeed as
  • 01:01:17immunohistochemical assays because M,
  • 01:01:19RNA and protein are correlated.
  • 01:01:21But the R-squared is like
  • 01:01:24not .9 and so there are some.
  • 01:01:29You know,
  • 01:01:30some targets that are incredibly specific,
  • 01:01:32but there's such low abundance
  • 01:01:35that you can never,
  • 01:01:36even though we do signal amplification
  • 01:01:39and immunohistochemistry,
  • 01:01:40you can never get the
  • 01:01:42immunohistochemistry to work.
  • 01:01:44And for those analytes,
  • 01:01:46if you really are committed to a,
  • 01:01:49to a, to a specific target for a
  • 01:01:52specific diagnostic application,
  • 01:01:54I would encourage you to, you know,
  • 01:01:57first try a couple more immunos and try.
  • 01:01:59Try bench sign antibody pedia.
  • 01:02:01But but the next thing I would
  • 01:02:03encourage you to consider is
  • 01:02:05building an RNA scope assay to that,
  • 01:02:08to that, to that, to that target.
  • 01:02:10Because if the you know the M RNA don't lie,
  • 01:02:13the M RNA might not correlate with the
  • 01:02:15protein, but the M RNA don't lie so.
  • 01:02:19What's your quick?
  • 01:02:22The communist.
  • 01:02:25Sure.
  • 01:02:28Sure.
  • 01:02:31Yeah.
  • 01:02:361.
  • 01:02:39Sure. Yeah, I mean I, you, you,
  • 01:02:42you, you probably would not be
  • 01:02:44surprised that I give like.
  • 01:02:461st 1st it's really really hard
  • 01:02:48for me to give a 45 minute talk.
  • 01:02:50I usually I usually speak for two
  • 01:02:53or three hours at a time and and of
  • 01:02:56course I have hour and two hour and
  • 01:02:593 hour PDL 1 lectures and and I I
  • 01:03:03mentioned you know immuno optimist,
  • 01:03:04immuno pessimist,
  • 01:03:05immuno realist and you know I give a
  • 01:03:10PDL 1 lecture that is called PDL 1
  • 01:03:15immunohistochemistry like you know.
  • 01:03:17The Emperor has no clothes so uh
  • 01:03:21Pete and I I gave I gave a biomarker
  • 01:03:24lecture in a global in the global
  • 01:03:27health space this summer and there
  • 01:03:29were lots of questions about PDL
  • 01:03:32one and and and there's a YouTube
  • 01:03:34clip of me saying something like
  • 01:03:37PDL 1 immunohistochemistry sucks.
  • 01:03:39I hate it and it just loops and loops
  • 01:03:42and loops and so and so my my main take on.
  • 01:03:47PDL One immunohistochemistry is.
  • 01:03:50It's PDL one is super important.
  • 01:03:55It was a great, it was a great target,
  • 01:03:59like Nobel Prize, like totally warranted.
  • 01:04:02But it is an entirely unrealistic
  • 01:04:07expectation for, in that space,
  • 01:04:10a single analyte to reflect the
  • 01:04:13entire tumor immune microenvironment.
  • 01:04:17So PD1 immunohistochemistry is
  • 01:04:20an inaccurate diagnostic test.
  • 01:04:23It's about 60% sensitive, 60% specific.
  • 01:04:27It's a coin flip.
  • 01:04:29And they're ohh I I really, really,
  • 01:04:35I really, really hate capitalism.
  • 01:04:39And uh, Pharma really,
  • 01:04:42really loves capitalism.
  • 01:04:44And so, you know,
  • 01:04:47the the drug companies,
  • 01:04:49we're going to partner with
  • 01:04:51the device companies and jam a
  • 01:04:53companion diagnostic marker down
  • 01:04:55our throats and they don't really
  • 01:04:57care about the diagnostic accuracy.
  • 01:04:59So PD1 immunohistochemistry sucks.
  • 01:05:01I hate, I hate it.
  • 01:05:03That being said, I spend,
  • 01:05:05you know,
  • 01:05:06hours and hours of my life talking about it.
  • 01:05:09And I read every PDL 1 immunohistochemistry
  • 01:05:12at the University of Iowa and
  • 01:05:15PDL 1 immunohistochemistry.
  • 01:05:16You know this is a good example
  • 01:05:18of a bad of a bad marker.
  • 01:05:20There's biochemistry problems
  • 01:05:22and there's readout problems.
  • 01:05:24So like pathologist interpretation
  • 01:05:26problems and they're and they're unsolved.
  • 01:05:29And my like skepticism around
  • 01:05:32capitalism is pharma did not
  • 01:05:34consider the biochemistry or the
  • 01:05:37readout in developing the.
  • 01:05:40The this diagnostic marker because
  • 01:05:42they actually have no technical
  • 01:05:45expertise in immunohistochemistry.
  • 01:05:47So what's better than PDL one not TMB.
  • 01:05:51TMB is just as bad.
  • 01:05:53About 6060 MMR is wonderful
  • 01:05:56if you have an MRI,
  • 01:05:58MRI,
  • 01:05:59immunohistochemistry or MSI is very accurate.
  • 01:06:03Not 100%,
  • 01:06:04but very very very you know high
  • 01:06:08ninety 9899% accurate and.
  • 01:06:09Is very predictive,
  • 01:06:11not 100% percent predictive,
  • 01:06:12but very predictive of response
  • 01:06:14to checkpoint inhibition.
  • 01:06:15And then I've learned so much from
  • 01:06:18my collaboration and interaction
  • 01:06:20with David over the last five years.
  • 01:06:23The answer to the answer to the
  • 01:06:28checkpoint inhibitor predictive marker
  • 01:06:30is Multiplex immunofluorescence act.
  • 01:06:33Actually I said it's unrealistic for
  • 01:06:35a single analyte to integrate the
  • 01:06:38entire tumor immune microenvironment.
  • 01:06:40And there's a lovely meta analysis
  • 01:06:44that was published by Janis Tobb,
  • 01:06:47who's one of David's collaborators.
  • 01:06:48She's a Melanoma doctorate at Hopkins
  • 01:06:51that showed that the area under the
  • 01:06:55curve for Multiplex immunofluorescence
  • 01:06:58for this diagnostic application is
  • 01:07:01vastly superior to immunohistochemistry.
  • 01:07:04And then the problem is that's a huge
  • 01:07:07paradigm shift, like there is no training.
  • 01:07:11In Immunohistochemistry lab directorship,
  • 01:07:13I taught myself. I taught myself.
  • 01:07:16I try, you know, I really,
  • 01:07:18really care to try to teach you.
  • 01:07:21And then to try to teach people to
  • 01:07:23bring up Multiplex immunofluorescence
  • 01:07:25for this diagnostic application.
  • 01:07:27It's a really, really heavy lift.
  • 01:07:30But possibly, you know.
  • 01:07:34And this is perhaps controversial, possibly.
  • 01:07:37And my thoughts on this have
  • 01:07:39changed quite a bit over time.
  • 01:07:41Possibly every lab test should not
  • 01:07:44be offered by every lab and so,
  • 01:07:47so maybe the solution is Multiplex
  • 01:07:51immunofluorescence in 10 or
  • 01:07:5320 labs that have the the,
  • 01:07:55you know,
  • 01:07:56the resources and the expertise to deploy it.
  • 01:07:58So thank you for asking me about
  • 01:08:01my least favorite stain.
  • 01:08:17Yeah, I can and so I can, I can,
  • 01:08:20I can talk for half an hour about TRPS,
  • 01:08:221 TRPS. One is classic Gartner hype cycle.
  • 01:08:26The study that was the study that
  • 01:08:28was designed was highly flawed.
  • 01:08:30Highly flawed, yeah.
  • 01:08:31And that and that's on the.
  • 01:08:34Uh, that's on the authors. You know,
  • 01:08:37they should have designed the right study.
  • 01:08:39And it's also on the reviewers
  • 01:08:40for not identifying the flaw.
  • 01:08:42Like, briefly, TRP's like,
  • 01:08:43do you want me to talk about TRPS one?
  • 01:08:46Yeah.
  • 01:08:51Yeah.
  • 01:08:56That's it.
  • 01:09:01Yeah.
  • 01:09:05Yeah, sure.
  • 01:09:11This model and yeah.
  • 01:09:17Ohh yeah, yeah. So. So this is the,
  • 01:09:21I mean I said this is the in silico
  • 01:09:25validation and then the validation
  • 01:09:27is I always do it's this way is
  • 01:09:31actual validation and then I'll say
  • 01:09:34I say floor and then I do much more
  • 01:09:36and then I'll briefly just I'll
  • 01:09:39because it's a good example I'll
  • 01:09:42briefly describe how I validated TRPS
  • 01:09:44one and actually if you want to.
  • 01:09:47Know how I validated TRPS 1I tweeted
  • 01:09:50how I validated TRP PS1 because I
  • 01:09:53because I I thought the my findings
  • 01:09:56were sure were significant and so the
  • 01:09:58floor to to validate a diagnostic
  • 01:10:01marker is 10 expected positives
  • 01:10:03and 10 expected negatives.
  • 01:10:05And I almost never do the floor
  • 01:10:08because if you do the floor then
  • 01:10:10there's all kinds of diagnostic
  • 01:10:13pitfalls that you will never identify.
  • 01:10:16I mainly identify these.
  • 01:10:17Potential diagnostic pitfalls by looking
  • 01:10:19at this gene expression profiling data,
  • 01:10:22mainly using C bioportal.
  • 01:10:24So for my validations I use tissue
  • 01:10:28microarray almost you know a combination
  • 01:10:30of whole section and tissue microarray.
  • 01:10:32And for TRPS 1I validated TRPS
  • 01:10:36one in at least 100 breast cancers
  • 01:10:41and at least 100 non breast cancer
  • 01:10:45non breast cancers.
  • 01:10:47Mainly carcinomas,
  • 01:10:48but other tumor types as well.
  • 01:10:51Like it's imperative to validate
  • 01:10:54a new diagnostic marker in a fit
  • 01:10:58for purpose fashion and that means
  • 01:11:01in consideration of differential
  • 01:11:04diagnostic considerations.
  • 01:11:05And I'll tell you what happened
  • 01:11:07with the with the,
  • 01:11:08a couple things with the TRPS one
  • 01:11:12and then another thing that I talk
  • 01:11:14about when I'm doing my straight
  • 01:11:16didactic about immunohistochemistry.
  • 01:11:18Talk about added value of semi
  • 01:11:21quantitative IHC stain assessment.
  • 01:11:23Positive and negative is not enough,
  • 01:11:25you need to at least semi quantitate
  • 01:11:29the signal. In the tier.
  • 01:11:31So when I went to see Bioportal
  • 01:11:33actually I don't know can we go to,
  • 01:11:35can we go to,
  • 01:11:36let's go to see bio portal can
  • 01:11:38I can I back out of here.
  • 01:11:39So
  • 01:11:40maybe you can discuss it later by
  • 01:11:41yourself. Yeah, you're going to have
  • 01:11:43do we have more questions?
  • 01:11:46Let's hit another question.
  • 01:11:49Ohh no, I'm screwing everything up.
  • 01:11:52I think you know the question.
  • 01:11:53Later. Not sure
  • 01:11:56PRPS one, we'll talk about all.
  • 01:11:59We'll talk about all afternoon.
  • 01:12:00Thank you so much Andrew.
  • 01:12:02I think I'm going to eat.