2024
Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence.
Thai J, Sodagari F, Colwell A, Winograd J, Revzin M, Mahmoud H, Mozayan S, Chou S, Destounis S, Butler R. Multimodality Imaging of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Techniques, Complications, and Tumor Recurrence. RadioGraphics 2024, 44: e230070. PMID: 38573814, DOI: 10.1148/rg.230070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsBreast ImplantsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMammaplastyMastectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNipplesPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesConceptsTumor recurrencePostoperative evaluation of patientsFlap reconstruction methodsImplant-based reconstructionMultimodal imagingBreast reconstruction techniquesFat graft placementBreast cancer recurrenceTissue flap reconstructionEvaluation of patientsNipple-sparing techniquesTissue donor sitesFlap-based reconstructionNipple-areolar complex reconstructionDiagnostic breast imagingUnique patient populationAutologous tissue flapsAbnormal imaging appearancesBreast cancer screeningMastectomy optionLocal recurrenceOncoplastic surgeryDisease recurrenceFlap reconstructionReconstructed breast
2022
Optoacoustic Imaging With Decision Support for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A 15-Reader Retrospective Study.
Seiler S, Neuschler E, Butler R, Lavin P, Dogan B. Optoacoustic Imaging With Decision Support for Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A 15-Reader Retrospective Study. American Journal Of Roentgenology 2022, 220: 646-658. PMID: 36475811, DOI: 10.2214/ajr.22.28470.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
Raghu M, Durand MA, Andrejeva L, Goehler A, Michalski MH, Geisel JL, Hooley RJ, Horvath LJ, Butler R, Forman HP, Philpotts LE. Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time. Radiology 2016, 281: 54-61. PMID: 27139264, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016151999.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2012
Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41
Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in Patients with Mammographically Dense Breasts: Initial Experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012, 265: 59-69. PMID: 22723501, DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120621.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive predictive valueOverall positive predictive valueBI-RADS category 4BI-RADS category 3Breast ultrasonographyDense breastsBreast cancerOverall cancer detection rateHIPAA-compliant retrospective reviewData System (BI-RADS) category 1Occult breast cancerCancer detection rateWhole-breast ultrasonographyCategory 4Category 3Dense breast tissueBreast Imaging ReportingPostmenopausal patientsIntermediate riskRetrospective reviewRisk groupsUS examinationHigh riskGeneral populationLower risk