2023
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2023.
Moses K, Sprenkle P, Bahler C, Box G, Carlsson S, Catalona W, Dahl D, Dall'Era M, Davis J, Drake B, Epstein J, Etzioni R, Farrington T, Garraway I, Jarrard D, Kauffman E, Kaye D, Kibel A, LaGrange C, Maroni P, Ponsky L, Reys B, Salami S, Sanchez A, Seibert T, Shaneyfelt T, Smaldone M, Sonn G, Tyson M, Vapiwala N, Wake R, Washington S, Yu A, Yuh B, Berardi R, Freedman-Cass D. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2023. Journal Of The National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2023, 21: 236-246. PMID: 36898362, DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.0014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProstate cancer early detectionNCCN guidelinesCancer early detectionEarly detectionNCCN Guidelines InsightsNegative biopsy resultsEarly Detection ProgramSignificant prostate cancerIndolent diseaseBiopsy resultsAppropriate counselingProstate cancerMultiparametric MRIDetection programRecent updatesGuidelinesTesting protocol
2022
Prediction of Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Biopsies Using Machine Learning.
Paulson N, Zeevi T, Papademetris M, Leapman MS, Onofrey JA, Sprenkle PC, Humphrey PA, Staib LH, Levi AW. Prediction of Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Biopsies Using Machine Learning. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics 2022, 6: e2200016. PMID: 36179281, DOI: 10.1200/cci.22.00016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGrade group 2Prostate biopsyRadical prostatectomyAdverse outcomesGroup 2GG-2Core prostate biopsyProstate cancer outcomesPatient's clinical riskClinical risk assessmentCore needle biopsyOngoing clinical needAdverse outcome predictionRetrospective reviewAdverse pathologyCAPRA scoreEntire cohortCancer outcomesPathologic diagnosisNeedle biopsyClinical riskDisease outcomeProstate cancerBiopsyDisease oneMulti‐institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI‐RADS 3 lesions
Fang AM, Shumaker LA, Martin KD, Jackson JC, Fan RE, Khajir G, Patel HD, Soodana‐Prakash N, Vourganti S, Filson CP, Sonn GA, Sprenkle PC, Gupta GN, Punnen S, Rais‐Bahrami S. Multi‐institutional analysis of clinical and imaging risk factors for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI‐RADS 3 lesions. Cancer 2022, 128: 3287-3296. PMID: 35819253, DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34355.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPI-RADS 3 lesionsHigher prostate specific antigen densitySignificant prostate cancerProstate-specific antigen densityPrior negative biopsyNegative biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerPSA densityValidation cohortEquivocal lesionsAntigen densityResonance imagingMultivariable logistic regression modelData System (PI-RADS) 3 lesionsMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingElevated PSA densityMulti-institutional analysisDecision curve analysisProstate Imaging ReportingDetection of csPCaLogistic regression modelsMultivariable analysisSubsequent biopsyTraining cohort