2008
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures
McQuaid KR, Laine L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials of moderate sedation for routine endoscopic procedures. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2008, 67: 910-923. PMID: 18440381, DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.046.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsConscious SedationDigestive System DiseasesEndoscopy, Digestive SystemHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicConceptsModerate sedationPatient satisfactionAdverse eventsPhysician assessmentSystematic reviewSedation-related complicationsSerious adverse eventsPoor methodologic qualitySuperior patient satisfactionRoutine endoscopic proceduresComputerized bibliographic databasesActive regimenActive regimensLonger sedationRandomized trialsPatient assessmentMethodologic qualityAvailable agentsProcedure timeEndoscopic proceduresLower riskSedationMidazolamRegimensPropofol
2007
Is an evidence-based approach to creating guidelines always the right one?
Fried M, Quigley E, Hunt R, Guyatt G, Anderson B, Bjorkman D, Farthing M, Fedail S, Green-Thompson R, Hampton J, Krabshuis J, Laine L, Horton R. Is an evidence-based approach to creating guidelines always the right one? Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2007, 5: 60-61. PMID: 17998924, DOI: 10.1038/ncpgasthep0997.Peer-Reviewed Reviews, Practice Guidelines, Standards, and Consensus Statements