2002
Randomized trial of normal saline solution injection versus bipolar electrocoagulation for treatment of patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers: Is local tamponade enough?
Laine L, Estrada R. Randomized trial of normal saline solution injection versus bipolar electrocoagulation for treatment of patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers: Is local tamponade enough? Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2002, 55: 6-10. PMID: 11756906, DOI: 10.1067/mge.2002.120390.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsDouble-Blind MethodElectrocoagulationFemaleHemostasis, EndoscopicHumansInjections, IntralesionalMaleMiddle AgedPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageRecurrenceRisk FactorsSodium ChlorideConceptsSaline solution injectionSaline solution groupNormal saline solutionBipolar electrocoagulationLocal tamponadeNonbleeding visible vesselIndependent risk factorSolution injectionSolution groupTreatment of patientsSaline solutionMajor bleedingActive bleedingEndoscopic injectionHospital daysStandard therapyUlcer sizeLack of injuryClinical evidenceVisible vesselRisk factorsEffective treatmentPatientsBleedingUlcers
1990
Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers A prospective, randomized trial
Laine L. Multipolar electrocoagulation versus injection therapy in the treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers A prospective, randomized trial. Gastroenterology 1990, 99: 1303-1306. PMID: 2210238, DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)91154-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNonbleeding visible vesselMultipolar electrocoagulationInjection therapyVisible vesselEndoscopic evidenceActive bleedingBloody nasogastric aspirateUpper gastrointestinal bleedHigh-risk patientsUnstable vital signsIncidence of surgeryTreatment of patientsCost of hospitalizationUnits of bloodFurther bleedingGastrointestinal bleedHospital stayNasogastric aspirateClinical evidencePeptic ulcerComparable efficacyMortality ratePatientsBleedingUlcers