2024
Validation of an Electronic Health Record–Based Machine Learning Model Compared With Clinical Risk Scores for Gastrointestinal Bleeding
Shung D, Chan C, You K, Nakamura S, Saarinen T, Zheng N, Simonov M, Li D, Tsay C, Kawamura Y, Shen M, Hsiao A, Sekhon J, Laine L. Validation of an Electronic Health Record–Based Machine Learning Model Compared With Clinical Risk Scores for Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Gastroenterology 2024, 167: 1198-1212. PMID: 38971198, PMCID: PMC11493512, DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.06.030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchElectronic health recordsGlasgow-Blatchford scoreEmergency departmentVery-low-risk patientsRisk scoreOakland scoreMachine learning modelsStructured data fieldsClinical risk scoreGastrointestinal bleedingAll-cause mortalityHealth recordsLearning modelsManual data entrySecondary analysisRisk stratification scoresAssess proportionRed blood-cell transfusionPrimary outcomeProportion of patientsData entryOvert gastrointestinal bleedingPrimary analysisReceiver-operating-characteristic curveVery-low-risk
2023
Achieving Value by Risk Stratification With Machine Learning Model or Clinical Risk Score in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Cost Minimization Analysis
Shung D, Lin J, Laine L. Achieving Value by Risk Stratification With Machine Learning Model or Clinical Risk Score in Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Cost Minimization Analysis. The American Journal Of Gastroenterology 2023, 119: 371-373. PMID: 37753930, PMCID: PMC10872988, DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002520.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchUpper gastrointestinal bleedingCost-minimization analysisGastrointestinal bleedingUsual careTriage strategiesAcute upper gastrointestinal bleedingClinical risk scoreLow-risk patientsHealthcare payer perspectiveMinimization analysisRisk assessment toolRisk stratificationEmergency departmentPayer perspectiveRisk scoreBleedingAssessment toolCareRisk assessment modelMachine-learning strategiesPatientsCumulative savings
2020
ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study
Laursen SB, Oakland K, Laine L, Bieber V, Marmo R, Redondo-Cerezo E, Dalton HR, Ngu J, Schultz M, Soncini M, Gralnek I, Jairath V, Murray IA, Stanley AJ. ABC score: a new risk score that accurately predicts mortality in acute upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: an international multicentre study. Gut 2020, 70: 707-716. PMID: 32723845, DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLower gastrointestinal bleedingABC scoreLower riskHigher ABC scoresGastrointestinal bleedingRisk scoreMortality rateHospital mortality rateInternational cohort studyManagement of patientsNew risk scoreInternational multicentre studyLower ABC scoreLGIB patientsUGIB patientsComorbidity scoreCohort studyMulticentre studyBlood testsValidation cohortDevelopment cohortLGIBUGIBHigh riskPatients
2019
The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Saffouri E, Blackwell C, Laursen SB, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu J, Shultz M, Norton R, Stanley AJ. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2019, 51: 253-260. PMID: 31642558, DOI: 10.1111/apt.15541.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBlood TransfusionCohort StudiesEndoscopy, GastrointestinalFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexShockSurvival AnalysisUpper Gastrointestinal TractYoung AdultConceptsUpper gastrointestinal bleedingGlasgow-Blatchford scoreShock indexGastrointestinal bleedingABC scoreMajor transfusionAcute upper gastrointestinal bleedingUK National Confidential EnquiryAdmission Rockall scoreSevere gastrointestinal bleedingMajor clinical endpointsPredictors of outcomeNational Confidential EnquiryRockall scoreBlatchford scoreEndoscopic therapyConsecutive patientsHospital admissionConfidential EnquiryProspective studyClinical endpointsPatient outcomesRisk scoreDeath reportsBleedingMAP(ASH): A new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Redondo‐Cerezo E, Vadillo‐Calles F, Stanley AJ, Laursen S, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Jiménez‐Rosales R. MAP(ASH): A new scoring system for the prediction of intervention and mortality in upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Journal Of Gastroenterology And Hepatology 2019, 35: 82-89. PMID: 31359521, DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14811.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsUpper gastrointestinal bleedingGastrointestinal bleedingEndoscopic interventionGlasgow-Blatchford scoreSystolic blood pressureNew scoring systemBlatchford scoreProspective databaseBlood pressureRisk stratificationValidation cohortDevelopment cohortOriginal cohortEmergency roomMental statusRisk scoreClinical practiceFair discriminationScoring systemPatientsMortalityCohortNew scoreInterventionBleedingMachine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review
Shung D, Simonov M, Gentry M, Au B, Laine L. Machine Learning to Predict Outcomes in Patients with Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Systematic Review. Digestive Diseases And Sciences 2019, 64: 2078-2087. PMID: 31055722, DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05645-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical risk scoreUpper gastrointestinal bleedingGastrointestinal bleedingOutcomes of mortalityRisk scoreSystematic reviewOvert gastrointestinal bleedingAcute gastrointestinal bleedingPrognosis Studies toolRisk of biasFull-text studiesCurrent risk assessment toolsRisk assessment toolHospital stayHemostatic interventionRisk stratificationInclusion criteriaPrognostic performanceHigh riskIndependent reviewersConference abstractsLower riskMedian AUCPatientsMortality