2011
Measuring goodness of story narratives: Implications for traumatic brain injury
Lê K, Coelho C, Mozeiko J, Krueger F, Grafman J. Measuring goodness of story narratives: Implications for traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2011, 25: 748-760. DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2010.539696.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTraumatic brain injuryDiscourse deficitsNon-brain-injured adultsNon-brain-injuredMeasures of organisationSample of participantsMultivariate analysis of varianceCategories of storiesDiscourse impairmentDiscourse measuresStory retellingDiscourse of individualsStory grammarDiscourse scoresClinical populationsPerformance subgroupsStory completionParticipants' scoresBrain injuryDiscriminated groupsDeficitsClinical utilitySensitive measurePearson correlation coefficientAnalysis of variance
2003
Narrative and conversational discourse of adults with closed head injuries and non-brain-injured adults: A discriminant analysis
Coelho C, Youse K, Le K, Feinn R. Narrative and conversational discourse of adults with closed head injuries and non-brain-injured adults: A discriminant analysis. Aphasiology 2003, 17: 499-510. DOI: 10.1080/02687030344000111.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNon-brain-injured participantsNon-brain-injuredNon-brain-injured adultsNon-brain-injured groupClosed head injury groupClosed head injuryDiscriminant function analysisNarrative measuresDiscourse measuresConversational discourseDiscourse samplesParticipant groupsCHI participantsMeasures of grammatical complexityGroup membershipNarrative discourse measuresCognitive-communication impairmentsDiscourse abilitiesDiscourse performanceCohesive adequacyCommunication impairmentsGrammatical complexityInteractive nature of conversationDiscourse elicitationStory grammar