Featured Publications
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
Forrest JK, Ramlawi B, Deeb GM, Zahr F, Song HK, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti SJ, Michelena HI, Mangi AA, Skiles JA, Huang J, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-risk Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis. JAMA Cardiology 2020, 6: 50-57. PMID: 33031491, PMCID: PMC7542521, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4738.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementBicuspid aortic valve stenosisAortic valve replacementAortic valve stenosisLow-risk patientsDevice success rateValve replacementValve stenosisCause mortalityRandomized trialsAmerican Heart Association/American CollegeSevere bicuspid aortic valve stenosisHigh device success rateLow surgical risk patientsPrespecified primary end pointPrimary efficacy end pointEnd pointBicuspid aortic stenosisMean AV gradientThoracic Surgeons scoreEfficacy end pointPrimary end pointLow surgical riskMild paravalvular leakNew permanent pacemakerTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves From the STS/ACC TVT Registry
Forrest JK, Kaple RK, Ramlawi B, Gleason TG, Meduri CU, Yakubov SJ, Jilaihawi H, Liu F, Reardon MJ. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 13: 1749-1759. PMID: 32473890, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.03.022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsAortic valve stenosisBicuspid aortic valve stenosisTranscatheter aortic valve replacementEvolut PRO valveAortic valve replacementValve stenosisTVT RegistryCause mortalityValve replacementEvolut RBicuspid valveBicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic ValvesSTS/ACC TVT RegistryThoracic Surgeons/American CollegeTricuspid aortic valve stenosisCardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) RegistryTricuspid aortic stenosisRate of strokeSelf-expanding valvesLow complication rateTricuspid aortic valveAcceptable safety outcomesCardiac comorbiditiesEchocardiographic outcomesAortic stenosisEarly Outcomes With the Evolut PRO Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve With Pericardial Wrap
Forrest JK, Mangi AA, Popma JJ, Khabbaz K, Reardon MJ, Kleiman NS, Yakubov SJ, Watson D, Kodali S, George I, Tadros P, Zorn GL, Brown J, Kipperman R, Saul S, Qiao H, Oh JK, Williams MR. Early Outcomes With the Evolut PRO Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve With Pericardial Wrap. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2018, 11: 160-168. PMID: 29348010, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.10.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCause of DeathEchocardiographyFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleMitral Valve InsufficiencyPericardiumProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valveSevere symptomatic aortic stenosisEvolut PRO valveSymptomatic aortic stenosisTranscatheter aortic valveAortic stenosisParavalvular leakAortic valveValve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteriaIndependent echocardiographic core laboratoryTranscatheter aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve systemEchocardiographic core laboratoryPrimary safety endpointPrimary efficacy endpointRemainder of patientsAortic valve replacementProportion of patientsProsthetic valve regurgitationSupra-annular valveEffective orifice areaDisabling strokeCause mortalityEfficacy endpointSafety endpoint3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
Forrest J, Deeb G, Yakubov S, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Ramlawi B, Bajwa T, Teirstein P, DeFrain M, Muppala M, Rutkin B, Chawla A, Jenson B, Chetcuti S, Stoler R, Poulin M, Khabbaz K, Levack M, Goel K, Tchétché D, Lam K, Tonino P, Ito S, Oh J, Huang J, Popma J, Kleiman N, Reardon M, Investigators L, Sorajja P, Byrne T, Kirshner M, Bajwa T, Crouch J, Coselli J, Silva G, Hebeler R, Stoler R, Islam A, Rousou A, Poulin M, Khabbaz K, Bladergroen M, Fail P, Netherland D, Lam K, Tonino W, Sudre A, Berthoumieu P, Tchétché D, Khalili H, Hughes G, Harrison J, De A, Tsau P, van Mieghem N, Larbalestier R, Yong G, Agarwal S, Martin W, Park S, Kleiman N, Reardon M, Mohammadi S, Rodes-Cabau J, Sparling J, Elkins C, Ganzel B, Matthews R, Starnes V, Ando K, Chevalier B, Farge A, DeFrain M, Muppala M, Combs W, Bagur R, Chu M, Fontana G, Dev V, Leya F, Tuchek J, Inglessis I, Jassar A, Piazza N, Lacappelle K, Steinberg D, Katz M, Wang J, Kozina J, Slachman F, Merritt R, Chawla A, Jensen B, Alvarez J, Gooley R, Smith J, Ibrahim R, Cartier R, Rovin J, Fujita T, Rutkin B, Yakubov S, Song H, Zahr F, Miyagawa S, Rajagopal V, Kauten J, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Bhindi R, Brady P, Batra S, Davis T, Iskander A, Heimansohn D, Hermiller J, Takamisawa I, Haldis T, Yamazaki S, Teirstein P, Tada N, Saito S, Merhi W, Leung S, Muller D, Heijmen R, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Knight P, Ling F, Radhakrishnan S, Fremes S, Lehr E, Gafoor S, Noel T, Walton A, Resar J, Adams D, Sharma S, Lilly S, Tadros P, Zorn G, Dauerman H, Ittleman F, Horlick E, Feindel C, Welt F, Sharma V, Markowitz A, Carroll J, Fullerton D, Griffith B, Gupta A, de Marchena E, Salerno T, Chetcuti S, Deeb G, Sultan I, Goel K, Pasupati S, Kon N, Zhao D, Ramlawi B, Forrest J. 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2023, 81: 1663-1674. PMID: 36882136, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementLow-risk patientsCause mortalityPrimary endpointParavalvular regurgitationValve replacementEvolut Low Risk trialLow surgical risk patientsSurgical aortic valve replacementGreater paravalvular regurgitationLow-risk trialsData comparing outcomesLow-risk studiesSupra-annular valveEchocardiographic outcomesSecondary endpointsSurgery groupTAVR patientsRisk patientsSurgery patientsAortic stenosisPacemaker placementTreatment armsMean age
2024
3-Year Outcomes From the Evolut Low Risk TAVR Bicuspid Study
Zahr F, Ramlawi B, Reardon M, Deeb G, Yakubov S, Song H, Kleiman N, Chetcuti S, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Leung S, Merhi W, Rovin J, DeFrain M, Muppala M, Kauten J, Rajagopal V, Huang J, Ito S, Forrest J. 3-Year Outcomes From the Evolut Low Risk TAVR Bicuspid Study. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2024, 17: 1667-1675. PMID: 39048253, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.017.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBicuspid Aortic Valve DiseaseBioprosthesisFemaleHeart Valve DiseasesHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementRates of all-cause mortalityAll-cause mortalityAortic stenosisThoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scoreThoracic Surgeons Predicted RiskSevere paravalvular aortic regurgitationBicuspid aortic valve anatomyRisk of Mortality scoreEchocardiographic core laboratoryLow-surgical risk patientsAortic valve anatomyKaplan-Meier ratesLow surgical riskClinical events committeeAortic valve replacementSevere aortic stenosisParavalvular aortic regurgitationPermanent pacemaker implantationBicuspid aortic stenosisFavorable hemodynamic performanceEvaluated 3 yearsAttempted implantEchocardiographic outcomesAortic regurgitationReinterventions After CoreValve/Evolut Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis
Grubb K, Lisko J, O'Hair D, Merhi W, Forrest J, Mahoney P, Van Mieghem N, Windecker S, Yakubov S, Williams M, Chetcuti S, Deeb G, Kleiman N, Althouse A, Reardon M. Reinterventions After CoreValve/Evolut Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2024, 17: 1007-1016. PMID: 38573257, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.01.292.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansIncidenceMalePostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetreatmentRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsSurgical aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementIncidence of reinterventionAortic valve replacementCumulative incidence of reinterventionValve replacementValve reinterventionCumulative incidenceCoreValve transcatheter aortic valve replacementLow incidence of reinterventionSurgical aortic valve replacement patientsSingle-arm studyFirst-generation CoreValveEvolut R/ProParavalvular regurgitationReinterventionRandomized trialsLow incidenceCoreValvePooled dataTranscatheterIncidenceTreatmentYearsEndocarditis
2023
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Large Annuli Valves With the Supra-Annular, Self-Expandable Evolut Platform in a Real-World Registry
Dallan L, Tang G, Forrest J, Reardon M, Szeto W, Kodali S, Baeza C, Eisenberg R, Attizzani G. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Large Annuli Valves With the Supra-Annular, Self-Expandable Evolut Platform in a Real-World Registry. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 16: e012623. PMID: 36943929, PMCID: PMC10022658, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012623.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementCardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy RegistryThoracic Surgeons/American CollegeTranscatheter Valve Therapy RegistryValve replacementAortic stenosisAmerican CollegeMultivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modelsAnnulus sizeCox proportional hazards regression modelProportional hazards regression modelsAortic valve reinterventionTricuspid aortic stenosisReal-world registrySevere aortic stenosisBetter clinical outcomesTreatment of patientsHazards regression modelsComputed tomography angiographyLarge annulusValve reinterventionCause mortalityReadmission ratesValve procedures
2021
Composite Metric for Benchmarking Site Performance in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Desai ND, O’Brien S, Cohen DJ, Carroll J, Vemulapalli S, Arnold SV, Forrest JK, Thourani VH, Kirtane AJ, O’Neil B, Manandhar P, Shahian DM, Badhwar V, Bavaria JE. Composite Metric for Benchmarking Site Performance in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Circulation 2021, 144: 186-194. PMID: 33947202, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.051456.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisDisease ManagementFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRegistriesReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementValve replacementSerious complicationsCardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy RegistryThoracic Surgeons/American CollegeTranscatheter Valve Therapy RegistryAcute kidney injuryRetrospective cohort studyRisk-adjusted mortalityRisk-adjusted outcomesQuality of careSingle outcome measureComposite risk modelPerivalvular regurgitationTAVR outcomesKidney injuryPeriprocedural complicationsPerivalvular leakCohort studyAortic stenosisDevelopment cohortOutcome measuresAmerican CollegeComplicationsA Case of Presyncope After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Workman V, Forrest JK, Enriquez A. A Case of Presyncope After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Circulation 2021, 143: 857-861. PMID: 33617312, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.120.049693.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2020
Impact of Repositioning on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Self-Expandable Valve
Attizzani GF, Dallan LAP, Markowitz A, Yakubov SJ, Deeb GM, Reardon MJ, Forrest JK, Mangi AA, Huang J, Popma JJ. Impact of Repositioning on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With a Self-Expandable Valve. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 13: 1816-1824. PMID: 32763073, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.04.028.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyProsthesis DesignRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsEvolut RPrimary outcomeValve Academic Research Consortium-2Academic Research Consortium-2Evolut Low Risk trialPrior percutaneous coronary interventionTranscatheter aortic valve replacementEvolut PRO valveLow-risk trialsThoracic Surgeons scoreAortic valve replacementPercutaneous coronary interventionSelf-expandable valvesTranscatheter aortic valveDisabling strokeEvolut valvesSURTAVI trialCause mortalityTrial patientsCoronary interventionSecondary outcomesSurgeons scoreValve replacementClinical outcomesAortic valveThree Generations of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves A Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry
Forrest JK, Kaple RK, Tang GHL, Yakubov SJ, Nazif TM, Williams MR, Zhang A, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Three Generations of Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valves A Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2020, 13: 170-179. PMID: 31973793, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.08.035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisBioprosthesisFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHemodynamicsHumansMaleProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsEvolut PRO valveTranscatheter aortic valveTVT RegistryAortic regurgitationEvolut RAortic valveSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valveSTS/ACC TVT RegistryThoracic Surgeons/American CollegeMean aortic valve gradientTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) technologyCardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) RegistryTricuspid aortic stenosisAortic valve gradientSignificant aortic regurgitationMild aortic regurgitationSupra-annular valveTranscatheter valve technologyValve gradientHemodynamic statusAortic stenosisAortic annulusEarly outcomesEchocardiographic dataPatient risk
2019
The initial U.S. experience with the Tempo active fixation temporary pacing lead in structural heart interventions
Nazif TM, Chen S, Codner P, Grossman PM, Menees DS, Sanchez CE, Yakubov SJ, White J, Kapadia S, Whisenant BK, Forrest JK, Krishnaswamy A, Arshi A, Orford JL, Leon MB, Dizon JM, Kodali SK, Chetcuti SJ. The initial U.S. experience with the Tempo active fixation temporary pacing lead in structural heart interventions. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 95: 1051-1056. PMID: 31478304, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28476.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac Pacing, ArtificialCardiac Surgical ProceduresEquipment DesignFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePacemaker, ArtificialPatient SafetyPerioperative CareRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVentricular Function, RightConceptsTemporary cardiac pacingTemporary pacing leadStructural heart proceduresPacing leadsHeart proceduresCardiac pacingMulticenter retrospective studyMobilization of patientsRisk of perforationActive fixation mechanismStructural heart interventionsPericardial effusionRetrospective studyLead dislodgmentMean durationPace captureRight ventricleLead stabilitySignificant perforationPatientsHeart interventionsLead performancePacingCapture thresholdPerforation
2018
Trends in volume and risk profiles of patients undergoing isolated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Mori M, Bin Mahmood SU, Geirsson A, Yun JJ, Cleman MW, Forrest JK, Mangi AA. Trends in volume and risk profiles of patients undergoing isolated surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2018, 93: e337-e342. PMID: 30269424, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27855.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcademic Medical CentersAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveFemaleHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHospitals, High-VolumeHumansMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsSurgical aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementSTS-PROMSAVR volumeSAVR cohortValve replacementCase volumeTranscatheter aortic valve replacementRisk profileTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) programHigh-volume academic medical centerRisk categoriesStudy periodContemporary temporal trendsMedian STS PROMProportion of patientsRisk of mortalityLow-risk categoryAcademic medical centerPROM patientsTAVR cohortTAVR volumeTAVR patientsConsecutive patientsIntermediate riskVentricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: Incidence, treatment, and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries 1999–2014
Goldsweig AM, Wang Y, Forrest JK, Cleman MW, Minges KE, Mangi AA, Aronow HD, Krumholz HM, Curtis JP. Ventricular septal rupture complicating acute myocardial infarction: Incidence, treatment, and outcomes among medicare beneficiaries 1999–2014. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2018, 92: 1104-1115. PMID: 29513365, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.27576.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute myocardial infarctionVentricular septal ruptureTimely primary PCIMortality ratePrimary PCIPercutaneous repairSeptal ruptureMyocardial infarctionRetrospective cohort studyUnadjusted mortality ratesUnrepaired patientsVSR repairFatal complicationCohort studyAnnual incidenceMedicare feeService beneficiariesPatientsIncidenceStudy periodMortalityHospitalizationInfarctionRepairPCI
2017
1-Year Results in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Failed Surgical Bioprostheses
Deeb GM, Chetcuti SJ, Reardon MJ, Patel HJ, Grossman PM, Schreiber T, Forrest JK, Bajwa TK, O’Hair D, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Katz S, Hartman A, Dauerman HL, Schmoker J, Khabbaz K, Watson DR, Yakubov SJ, Oh JK, Li S, Kleiman NS, Adams DH, Popma JJ. 1-Year Results in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Failed Surgical Bioprostheses. JACC Cardiovascular Interventions 2017, 10: 1034-1044. PMID: 28521921, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.018.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisEchocardiographyFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHemodynamicsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis FailureQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionRecurrenceReoperationRisk FactorsTime FactorsTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeConceptsSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementMajor stroke rateAortic regurgitationValve replacementStroke rateValve hemodynamicsSevere native aortic valve stenosisSuccessful transcatheter aortic valve replacementNative aortic valve stenosisNew permanent pacemaker implantationSevere residual aortic regurgitationValve prosthesis-patient mismatchMean aortic gradientMean valve gradientResidual aortic regurgitationSevere aortic regurgitationProsthesis-patient mismatchCause mortality ratesIndependent core laboratoryModerate aortic regurgitationPermanent pacemaker implantationAortic valve stenosisAortic valve hemodynamics
2016
Neurologic Complications of Unprotected Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Neuro-TAVI Trial)
Lansky AJ, Brown D, Pena C, Pietras CG, Parise H, Ng VG, Meller S, Abrams KJ, Cleman M, Margolis P, Petrossian G, Brickman AM, Voros S, Moses J, Forrest JK. Neurologic Complications of Unprotected Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Neuro-TAVI Trial). The American Journal Of Cardiology 2016, 118: 1519-1526. PMID: 27645761, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBrainBrain IschemiaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceIntracranial EmbolismMalePostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival RateTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementUnited StatesConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve implantationAortic valve implantationNeurologic injuryValve implantationNeurologic impairmentMagnetic resonance imaging lesionsCognitive AssessmentMontreal Cognitive Assessment scoreCerebral ischemic lesionsNew neurologic impairmentSubclinical cerebral infarctsDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imagingTotal lesion volumeCognitive Assessment scoreMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMagnetic resonance imagingCerebral embolizationCerebral infarctsNeurologic complicationsCerebral infarctionImaging lesionsMost patientsOvert strokeConsecutive patientsIschemic lesionsRelationship of Annular Sizing Using Multidetector Computed Tomographic Imaging and Clinical Outcomes After Self-Expanding CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Popma JJ, Gleason TG, Yakubov SJ, Harrison JK, Forrest JK, Maini B, Ruiz CE, Pinto DS, Costa M, Resar J, Conte J, Crestanello J, Chang Y, Oh JK, Reardon MJ, Adams DH. Relationship of Annular Sizing Using Multidetector Computed Tomographic Imaging and Clinical Outcomes After Self-Expanding CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 9: e003282. PMID: 27369803, DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.115.003282.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsAortic ValveAortic Valve InsufficiencyAortic Valve StenosisClinical Decision-MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHeart Valve ProsthesisHumansMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyPatient SelectionPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsParavalvular aortic regurgitationSevere paravalvular aortic regurgitationSevere aortic stenosisAortic regurgitationValve replacementAortic stenosisClinical outcomesCoreValve transcatheter aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementSuboptimal surgical candidatesAortic valve replacementClinical end pointsTranscatheter valve replacementTranscatheter heart valve (THV) sizeLower ratesHigher DARPreprocedural multidetectorSurgical candidatesClinical eventsRegurgitationEchocardiographic laboratoryPatientsValve sizeAnnulus perimeterTHV sizingTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Women Versus Men (from the US CoreValve Trials)
Forrest JK, Adams DH, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Hermiller JB, Huang J, Skelding KA, Lansky A. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Women Versus Men (from the US CoreValve Trials). The American Journal Of Cardiology 2016, 118: 396-402. PMID: 27346591, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.05.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisCause of DeathComorbidityFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansIncidenceMaleMortalityPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageSeverity of Illness IndexSex FactorsStrokeTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftConceptsTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementCoreValve prosthesisValve replacementSevere symptomatic aortic stenosisSurgical aortic valve replacementLeft ventricular systolic functionWomen Versus MenMajor vascular complicationsSymptomatic aortic stenosisIncidence of strokeProcedure-related complicationsVentricular systolic functionCoronary artery diseaseLife-threatening bleedsSignificant baseline differencesGender-related differencesCause mortalityVascular complicationsBaseline characteristicsPatient characteristicsPrevious strokeSystolic functionAortic stenosisArtery diseaseImpact of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Use on Outcomes After Lower Extremity Endovascular Interventions From Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2006–2011)
Arora S, Panaich SS, Patel N, Patel NJ, Lahewala S, Thakkar B, Savani C, Jhamnani S, Singh V, Patel N, Patel S, Sonani R, Patel A, Tripathi B, Deshmukh A, Chothani A, Patel J, Bhatt P, Mohamad T, Remetz MS, Curtis JP, Attaran RR, Mena CI, Schreiber T, Grines C, Cleman M, Forrest JK, Badheka AO. Impact of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Use on Outcomes After Lower Extremity Endovascular Interventions From Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2006–2011). Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2016, 88: 605-616. PMID: 26914274, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26452.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmputation, SurgicalCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDrug CostsEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHospital CostsHospital MortalityHumansLimb SalvageLogistic ModelsLower ExtremityMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPeripheral Arterial DiseasePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexPropensity ScoreRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsGlycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitorsPeripheral endovascular interventionsHospital mortalityHospitalization costsEndovascular interventionGPI useAmputation rateUtilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample databaseTwo-level hierarchical multivariateIIb/IIIa inhibitorsNationwide Inpatient Sample databaseLower amputation ratesPaucity of dataHospital outcomesPostprocedural complicationsSecondary outcomesPropensity matchingStudy cohortHealthcare costsICD-9Multivariate analysisStudy outcomesSample databaseMortalityHierarchical multivariate
2015
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis
Thakkar B, Patel A, Mohamad B, Patel NJ, Bhatt P, Bhimani R, Patel A, Arora S, Savani C, Solanki S, Sonani R, Patel S, Patel N, Deshmukh A, Mohamad T, Grines C, Cleman M, Mangi A, Forrest J, Badheka AO. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with cirrhosis. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2015, 87: 955-962. PMID: 26699085, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26345.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisBlood TransfusionCardiac CatheterizationChi-Square DistributionCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHeart Valve ProsthesisHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHospital CostsHumansLength of StayLiver CirrhosisLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsSurgical aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementValve replacementNational Inpatient SampleCirrhosis patientsTAVR groupComplication rateICD-9-CM diagnosis codesICD-9-CM procedureHospital mortality rateSevere aortic stenosisHigh-risk patientsOpen heart surgeryYears of agePostprocedural lengthSAVR groupHospital outcomesOperative morbidityPortal hypertensionAortic stenosisCardiac surgeryCardiopulmonary bypassEsophageal varicesLiver cirrhosis