From “disappointing” to “fantastic”: Women's experiences with labor induction in a U.S. tertiary hospital
Danilack V, Siegel‐Reamer L, Lum L, Kesselring C, Brousseau E, Guthrie K. From “disappointing” to “fantastic”: Women's experiences with labor induction in a U.S. tertiary hospital. Birth 2023, 50: 959-967. PMID: 37475194, DOI: 10.1111/birt.12750.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLabor inductionSemi-structured qualitative interviewsQualitative interviewsPersonal toleranceSide effectsWay interventionsMother-baby unitFoley balloon catheterProcess of careQuality of careShape patient experiencesInterview questionsPerceptionInduction patientsTertiary hospitalBalloon catheterPatients' perceptionsDifferent interventionsSeries of interventionsPatient experienceHealth outcomesInterventionWomen's perceptionsBirthing processExpectationsChanges to Prenatal Care Visit Frequency and Telehealth
Konnyu K, Danilack V, Adam G, Peahl A, Cao W, Balk E. Changes to Prenatal Care Visit Frequency and Telehealth. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2023, 141: 299-323. PMID: 36649343, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005046.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRoutine prenatal careHealth care professionalsPrenatal careVisit scheduleTheoretical Domains FrameworkCare professionalsPrenatal care deliveryRoutine prenatal visitsHigh-risk pregnanciesGRADE-CERQual toolQuality of careCare visitsPrenatal visitQuantitative evidence synthesisCochrane DatabaseRoutine visitsClinic capacityTelevisitsSTUDY SELECTIONClinician's perspectiveCare modelPatientsPractice centerCare deliveryHealthcare Research