2022
Comparison of Early Pregnancy Loss Management Between States With Restrictive and Supportive Abortion Policies
Tal E, Paul R, Dorsey M, Madden T. Comparison of Early Pregnancy Loss Management Between States With Restrictive and Supportive Abortion Policies. Women's Health Issues 2022, 33: 126-132. PMID: 36379879, DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.10.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEarly pregnancy loss managementEarly pregnancy lossUterine aspirationMifepristone-misoprostolPregnancy lossAbortion careAbortion trainingRestrictive abortion policiesMultivariable logistic regressionAcademic medical centerPractice patternsMedical CenterInternet-based surveyLoss managementLogistic regressionCost-effective strategyCareAspirationManagementConfoundersOBGYNPhysiciansAbortion policyMissouri’s Abortion law: Access to care for Patients with Lethal Fetal Anomalies at a Midwest Tertiary care Center
Zahedi-Spung L, Huysman B, Madden T, Bebbington M, Raghuraman N, Stout M. Missouri’s Abortion law: Access to care for Patients with Lethal Fetal Anomalies at a Midwest Tertiary care Center. Maternal And Child Health Journal 2022, 27: 468-475. PMID: 36352286, PMCID: PMC9646264, DOI: 10.1007/s10995-022-03511-5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLethal fetal anomalyFetal anomaliesGestational ageFetal care centersCare centerTertiary care centerRetrospective cohort studyMedian latency timeMidwest tertiary care centerStatistically significant differenceCohort studyPatient characteristicsPatient populationPregnancyPatientsStudy populationSignificant differenceLatency timeAbortionAbortion careAbortion servicesAgeReferralGestationConclusionPatientsComparison of procedure time between manual and electric vacuum aspiration for pregnancy termination between 10-14 weeks: A randomized trial
Grentzer J, McNicholas C, Eisenberg D, Peipert J, Paul R, Madden T. Comparison of procedure time between manual and electric vacuum aspiration for pregnancy termination between 10-14 weeks: A randomized trial. Contraception 2022, 113: 108-112. PMID: 35417756, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.03.025.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2021
The Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Interpregnancy Interval
Keller J, Norton J, Zhang F, Paul R, Madden T, Raghuraman N, Stout M, Carter E. The Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Interpregnancy Interval. American Journal Of Perinatology 2021, 40: 1659-1664. PMID: 34891199, DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739413.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInterpregnancy intervalGroup prenatal carePrenatal careLARC uptakeInclusion criteriaMissouri MedicaidLogistic regressionBackward stepwise logistic regressionReversible contraception uptakePrior preterm birthRetrospective cohort studyTraditional prenatal careSignificant decreaseBirth certificate recordsCenteringPregnancy group prenatal careStepwise logistic regressionCohort studyPregnancy spacingPrenatal visitSecondary outcomesSingleton deliveriesPreterm birthPrimary outcomePotential confoundersMaternal ageDifferences in Financial and Social Burdens Experienced by Patients Traveling for Abortion Care
Addante A, Paul R, Dorsey M, McNicholas C, Madden T. Differences in Financial and Social Burdens Experienced by Patients Traveling for Abortion Care. Women's Health Issues 2021, 31: 426-431. PMID: 34266708, PMCID: PMC9059566, DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2021.06.002.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2020
Contraception and ectopic pregnancy risk: a prospective observational analysis
Schultheis P, Montoya M, Zhao Q, Archer J, Madden T, Peipert J. Contraception and ectopic pregnancy risk: a prospective observational analysis. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2020, 224: 228-229. PMID: 33049248, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.10.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansIntrauterine Devices, CopperIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedLevonorgestrelMedroxyprogesterone AcetatePregnancyPregnancy, EctopicProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTransdermal PatchDecisional conflict associated with clinicians discouraging particular contraceptive methods
Grant R, Paul R, Zeal C, Madden T, Politi M. Decisional conflict associated with clinicians discouraging particular contraceptive methods. Journal Of Evaluation In Clinical Practice 2020, 26: 1612-1619. PMID: 32026566, DOI: 10.1111/jep.13364.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsParticular contraceptive methodsContraceptive methodsSelf-reported outcomesDecisional conflictSide effectsPrimary self-reported outcomesSecondary self-report outcomesProportion of participantsYears of ageSelf-reported qualityContraceptive method selectionUse of contraceptionFemale sexPatient preferencesUnintended pregnancyEligible individualsClinicians' reasonsContraceptive attributesContraceptive featuresCliniciansContraceptive decisionsAnonymous surveyNulliparityPregnancyContraception
2019
Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design
Madden T, Paul R, Maddipati R, Buckel C, Goodman M, Peipert J. Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design. Contraception 2019, 100: 196-201. PMID: 31132346, PMCID: PMC6699922, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnplannedProgram EvaluationProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationUnintended pregnancy ratesUnintended pregnancyProvider educationContraceptive counselingLARC methodsContraceptive carePregnancy rateHealth centersCox proportional hazards regressionPerson baseline surveyKaplan-Meier survival functionProportional hazards regressionQualified health centersReversible contraceptive methodsTime-trend designUsual carePregnancy outcomesUninsured womenPatient counselingEnhanced careComprehensive counselingReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionCenter care
2018
Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis
Madden T, Barker A, Huntzberry K, Secura G, Peipert J, McBride T. Medicaid savings from the Contraceptive CHOICE Project: a cost-savings analysis. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2018, 219: 595.e1-595.e11. PMID: 30194049, PMCID: PMC6741429, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.043.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsTitle X programContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCost savingsValue of investmentCost-savings analysisCHOICE ProjectFederal poverty lineUnintended pregnancyMissouri's Medicaid programPoverty lineContraceptive costsComparison groupPolicy interventionsHousehold incomeMedicaid savingsTotal cost savingsGroup costsX programEffective reversible contraceptive methodsProspective cohort studyReproductive-age womenIncomeReversible contraceptive methodsSubstantial cost savingsState of Missouri
2017
Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of a Community: Increasing Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.
McNicholas C, Madden T. Meeting the Contraceptive Needs of a Community: Increasing Access to Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Missouri Medicine 2017, 114: 163-167. PMID: 30228573, PMCID: PMC6140203.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2016
Association of baseline bleeding pattern on amenorrhea with levonorgestrel intrauterine system use
Mejia M, McNicholas C, Madden T, Peipert J. Association of baseline bleeding pattern on amenorrhea with levonorgestrel intrauterine system use. Contraception 2016, 94: 556-560. PMID: 27364099, PMCID: PMC5077249, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLNG-IUS useEffect of baselineBleeding patternsMonths postinsertionLevonorgestrel intrauterine system useLikelihood of amenorrheaRates of amenorrheaHeavy menstrual bleedingHeavy menstrual flowMonths of enrollmentMultivariable logistic regressionIntrauterine system useIntrauterine system usersLNG-IUS usersContraceptive CHOICE ProjectMonths of useMenstrual bleedingModerate bleedingMultivariable analysisHeavy bleedingLNG-IUSMenstrual flowContraceptive counselingUnintended pregnancyBaseline bleeding
2015
Accuracy of information about the intrauterine device on the Internet
Madden T, Cortez S, Kuzemchak M, Kaphingst K, Politi M. Accuracy of information about the intrauterine device on the Internet. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 214: 499.e1-499.e6. PMID: 26546848, PMCID: PMC4808607, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.928.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsWeb sitesQuality of informationCommon search enginesMost Web sitesWorld Wide Web sitesSearch enginesInternetQuarter of sitesOutdated informationInternet resourcesAccuracy of informationSafety of IUDsOnline sourcesInaccurate informationOnline searchHealth informationInformationAccurate informationSearchEffective methodInconsistent qualityDevicesEngineQualityAccuracyContraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease
Lindley K, Madden T, Cahill A, Ludbrook P, Billadello J. Contraceptive Use and Unintended Pregnancy in Women With Congenital Heart Disease. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2015, 126: 363-369. PMID: 26241427, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000911.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAttitude to HealthContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansIntrauterine DevicesNeeds AssessmentPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularPregnancy, UnplannedReproductive HistorySex CounselingSexual BehaviorUnited StatesConceptsCongenital heart diseaseHeart diseaseUnintended pregnancyReversible contraceptionContraceptive useCongenital heart disease clinicCross-sectional studyTime of conceptionDisease clinicPrimary outcomeTotal pregnanciesPregnancy historyActive womenIntrauterine deviceCardiology practiceContraceptive methodsHigh incidenceSubdermal implantsContraception useMost womenPregnancySpecific counselingContraceptionDiseaseWomenPreventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
Birgisson N, Zhao Q, Secura G, Madden T, Peipert J. Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review. Journal Of Women's Health 2015, 24: 349-353. PMID: 25825986, PMCID: PMC4441000, DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5191.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectUnintended pregnancyLARC methodsRepeat abortionProspective cohort studyTeen pregnancyReversible contraceptive methodsCHOICE ProjectYears of ageNon-LARC methodsNon-LARC usersHealth care systemContraceptive method choiceWomen 14Cohort studyContraceptive counselingEffective contraceptionLARC usersContraceptive methodsPregnancyStudy participantsNational ratesGreater continuationCare systemAccess barriersFertility after Intrauterine Device Removal: A Pilot Study
Stoddard A, Xu H, Madden T, Allsworth J, Peipert J. Fertility after Intrauterine Device Removal: A Pilot Study. The European Journal Of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 2015, 20: 223-230. PMID: 25751567, PMCID: PMC4536198, DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2015.1010639.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-IUD usersIUD usersFormer IUD usersPregnancy rateContraceptive methodsIntrauterine device removalAfrican American raceActive women 18Years of ageContraceptive CHOICE ProjectAfrican American womenNulliparous womenWomen 18IUD useCox modelContraception useAmerican raceDevice removalHormonal IUDsPregnancyPilot studyHigh efficacyOnly variableWomenCHOICE Project
2014
The Contraceptive CHOICE Project Round Up
MCNICHOLAS C, MADDEN T, SECURA G, PEIPERT J. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project Round Up. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology 2014, 57: 635-643. PMID: 25286295, PMCID: PMC4216614, DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000070.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbortion, InducedAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIntrauterine DevicesPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultMaternal Age and Risk of Labor and Delivery Complications
Cavazos-Rehg P, Krauss M, Spitznagel E, Bommarito K, Madden T, Olsen M, Subramaniam H, Peipert J, Bierut L. Maternal Age and Risk of Labor and Delivery Complications. Maternal And Child Health Journal 2014, 19: 1202-1211. PMID: 25366100, PMCID: PMC4418963, DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1624-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsComplications of laborPoor fetal growthPregnant womenMaternal morbidityPreterm deliverySevere preeclampsiaFetal distressMild preeclampsiaFetal growthMaternal ageOlder womenGreater oddsUnited States Nationwide Inpatient SampleExtremes of ageNationwide Inpatient SampleYear old womanSeparate logistic regression modelsYears of ageRisk of laborLogistic regression modelsDelivery complicationsClinical confoundersPostpartum hemorrhageInpatient SampleSuch complicationsProvision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy
Secura G, Madden T, McNicholas C, Mullersman J, Buckel C, Zhao Q, Peipert J. Provision of No-Cost, Long-Acting Contraception and Teenage Pregnancy. New England Journal Of Medicine 2014, 371: 1316-1323. PMID: 25271604, PMCID: PMC4230891, DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1400506.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRate of pregnancyReversible contraceptionLARC methodsLarge prospective cohort studyTeenage pregnancyProspective cohort studyReversible contraceptive methodsYears of ageTeenage girlsSame age groupHealth care costsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyUnintended pregnancyIntrauterine deviceContraceptive methodsPregnancyWomen 15Care costsAge groupsNational ratesContraceptionTeenage birthsExperienced teensBirthAssociation of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion
Madden T, McNicholas C, Zhao Q, Secura G, Eisenberg D, Peipert J. Association of Age and Parity With Intrauterine Device Expulsion. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2014, 124: 718-726. PMID: 25198262, PMCID: PMC4172535, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000000475.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine Device ExpulsionIntrauterine Devices, CopperIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedKaplan-Meier EstimateLevonorgestrelMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisParityPregnancyPregnancy RateProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentTime FactorsYoung AdultPerformance of a checklist to exclude pregnancy at the time of contraceptive initiation among women with a negative urine pregnancy test
Min J, Buckel C, Secura G, Peipert J, Madden T. Performance of a checklist to exclude pregnancy at the time of contraceptive initiation among women with a negative urine pregnancy test. Contraception 2014, 91: 80-84. PMID: 25218500, PMCID: PMC4267981, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.08.002.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChecklistCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraindicationsDrug ImplantsFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansIllinoisIntrauterine DevicesLuteal PhaseMiddle AgedMissouriPatient CompliancePregnancyPregnancy TestsPregnancy Trimester, FirstPregnancy, UnplannedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultConceptsNegative urine pregnancy testUrine pregnancy testLuteal phase pregnanciesNegative predictive valuePregnancy checklistPregnancy testPositive predictive valuePredictive valueContraceptive initiationEarly pregnancyPositive urine pregnancy testHigh negative predictive valueInitiation of contraceptionSame-day initiationUrine pregnancy testingDays of enrollmentProspective cohort studyShort acting methodsContraceptive CHOICE ProjectCohort studyPositive screenReversible contraceptionPatient historyIntrauterine devicePregnancy testing