2022
Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendations: Contraceptive Care in the Context of Pandemic Response
Stifani B, Madden T, Micks E, Moayedi G, Tarleton J, Benson L. Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendations: Contraceptive Care in the Context of Pandemic Response. Contraception 2022, 113: 1-12. PMID: 35594989, PMCID: PMC9113767, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.05.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCOVID-19 infectionContraceptive careContraceptive methodsMild COVID-19 infectionDuration of therapyRelevant drug interactionsHormonal contraceptive usersCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemicRole of telehealthForm of telehealthDisease 2019 pandemicLow socioeconomic statusPandemic responseCHC useCHC usersSociety of FamilyTelemedicine visitsContraceptive usersPostpartum periodSevere infectionsClinical recommendationsContraceptive outcomesDrug interactionsHealth servicesPermanent contraception
2019
Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice
Paul R, Huysman B, Maddipati R, Madden T. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice. American Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynecology 2019, 222: s884.e1-s884.e9. PMID: 31838124, PMCID: PMC7781163, DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1266.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsBlack or African AmericanChoice BehaviorContraceptive Agents, HormonalContraceptives, OralDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansIntrauterine DevicesLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMarital StatusMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareRecognition, PsychologyWhite PeopleYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsContraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceDepo-medroxyprogesteroneContraceptive choicesReversible contraceptionDepo-medroxyprogesterone acetateHealth center populationHealthcare provider visitsHormonal intrauterine deviceHigh acceptabilityMultivariable Poisson regressionQualified health centersPreference-sensitive decisionsReversible contraception methodsCopper intrauterine deviceInterviewer-administered surveySpecific contraceptive methodsChi-square testProvider visitsContraceptive counselingContraceptive careHealth centersContraception methodsContraceptive methodsComparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design
Madden T, Paul R, Maddipati R, Buckel C, Goodman M, Peipert J. Comparison of unintended pregnancy at 12 months between two contraceptive care programs; a controlled time-trend design. Contraception 2019, 100: 196-201. PMID: 31132346, PMCID: PMC6699922, DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.05.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultContraceptionContraception BehaviorCounselingFamily Planning ServicesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy RatePregnancy, UnplannedProgram EvaluationProportional Hazards ModelsUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsHealthcare provider educationUnintended pregnancy ratesUnintended pregnancyProvider educationContraceptive counselingLARC methodsContraceptive carePregnancy rateHealth centersCox proportional hazards regressionPerson baseline surveyKaplan-Meier survival functionProportional hazards regressionQualified health centersReversible contraceptive methodsTime-trend designUsual carePregnancy outcomesUninsured womenPatient counselingEnhanced careComprehensive counselingReversible contraceptionContraceptive provisionCenter care