2021
Exome sequencing of early-onset patients supports genetic heterogeneity in colorectal cancer
Fernández-Rozadilla C, Álvarez-Barona M, Quintana I, López-Novo A, Amigo J, Cameselle-Teijeiro J, Roman E, Gonzalez D, Llor X, Bujanda L, Bessa X, Jover R, Balaguer F, Castells A, Castellví-Bel S, Capellá G, Carracedo A, Valle L, Ruiz-Ponte C. Exome sequencing of early-onset patients supports genetic heterogeneity in colorectal cancer. Scientific Reports 2021, 11: 11135. PMID: 34045552, PMCID: PMC8159954, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90590-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultColorectal NeoplasmsDNA HelicasesDNA Repair EnzymesDNA-Binding ProteinsExomeExome SequencingFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMethyltransferasesMiddle AgedPoly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsProtein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 13ConceptsEarly-onset CRC patientsColorectal cancerCRC patientsEarly-onset patientsGenetic variantsPotential risk allelesCRC onsetYoungest caseCRC developmentIndependent patientsPatientsTruncating variantsRisk allelesExome sequencingNovel genetic variantsRobust studiesTDG geneDisease developmentCandidate variantsCancerMolecular heterogeneityDiseaseComplex diseasesGenetic heterogeneityHigh-impact variants
2018
Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy
Murcia O, Juárez M, Rodríguez-Soler M, Hernández-Illán E, Giner-Calabuig M, Alustiza M, Egoavil C, Castillejo A, Alenda C, Barberá V, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Yuste A, Bujanda L, Clofent J, Andreu M, Castells A, Llor X, Zapater P, Jover R. Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy. PLOS ONE 2018, 13: e0203051. PMID: 30188916, PMCID: PMC6126803, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDisease-free survivalColorectal cancerMicrosatellite instabilityCIMP statusTNM stageKRAS mutationsBRAF mutationsMSS tumorsMolecular classificationAdvanced stage IIRetrospective observational studyPopulation-based cohortCpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) statusCancer molecular classificationSomatic KRASAdjuvant chemotherapyAdjuvant treatmentCRC patientsPrognostic implicationsWorse prognosisPrognostic valueClinical criteriaObservational studyMolecular subtypesMAIN OUTCOMEColorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability, and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy.
Murcia O, Juárez M, Hernández-Illán E, Rodriguez-Soler M, Giner-Calabuig M, Alustiza M, Egoavil C, Castillejo A, Alenda C, Mangas C, Barberá V, Yuste A, Bujanda L, Clofent J, Andreu M, Castells A, Llor X, Zapater P, Jover R. Colorectal cancer molecular classification using BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability, and CIMP status: Prognostic implications and response to chemotherapy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2018, 36: 668-668. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.668.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDisease-free survivalColorectal cancerMicrosatellite instabilityCIMP statusTNM stageKRAS mutationsBRAF mutationsMSS tumorsMolecular classificationAdvanced stage IIRetrospective observational studyPopulation-based cohortCpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) statusCancer molecular classificationSomatic KRASAdjuvant chemotherapyAdjuvant treatmentCRC patientsWorse prognosisPrognostic implicationsPrognostic valueClinical criteriaObservational studyMolecular subtypesMAIN OUTCOME
2016
Candidate predisposing germline copy number variants in early onset colorectal cancer patients
Brea-Fernandez AJ, Fernandez-Rozadilla C, Alvarez-Barona M, Azuara D, Ginesta MM, Clofent J, de Castro L, Gonzalez D, Andreu M, Bessa X, Llor X, Xicola R, Jover R, Castells A, Castellvi-Bel S, Capella G, Carracedo A, Ruiz-Ponte C. Candidate predisposing germline copy number variants in early onset colorectal cancer patients. Clinical And Translational Oncology 2016, 19: 625-632. PMID: 27888432, DOI: 10.1007/s12094-016-1576-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAge of OnsetColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA MethylationDNA Mutational AnalysisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic VariationGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLoss of HeterozygosityNerve Tissue ProteinsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionConceptsColorectal cancerEarly-onset colorectal cancer patientsEarly-onset CRC patientsMethods/patientsWeColorectal cancer patientsHereditary colorectal cancerIdentifiable germline mutationsCopy number variantsPenetrant copy number variantsSomatic mutation analysisCRC patientsGenome-wide copy number analysisCancer patientsReal-time quantitative PCRMultiplex ligation probe amplificationCRC tumorsColorectal carcinogenesisLoss of heterozygosityPatientsSLIT2 geneGenetic susceptibilityDuplex real-time quantitative PCREarly onsetGermline mutationsConclusionsThese findings
2015
Efficacy of Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil Therapy for Patients with EMAST-Positive Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer
Hamaya Y, Guarinos C, Tseng-Rogenski SS, Iwaizumi M, Das R, Jover R, Castells A, Llor X, Andreu M, Carethers JM. Efficacy of Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil Therapy for Patients with EMAST-Positive Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer. PLOS ONE 2015, 10: e0127591. PMID: 25996601, PMCID: PMC4440728, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127591.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsColorectal cancerStage II/III CRC patientsStage II/III colorectal cancerKaplan-Meier survival curvesSelected Tetranucleotide RepeatsSporadic colorectal cancerElevated microsatellite alterationsEMAST statusEfficacy of adjuvantsCRC patientsImproved survivalPatient outcomesSomatic dysfunctionPatientsMicrosatellite alterationsSurvival curvesCancerChemotherapySurvival dataSubsequent cytotoxicityEMASTSurvivalMMR functionSame extentCytotoxicity
2014
IGFBP3 Methylation Is a Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer
Perez-Carbonell L, Balaguer F, Toiyama Y, Egoavil C, Rojas E, Guarinos C, Andreu M, Llor X, Castells A, Jover R, Boland CR, Goel A. IGFBP3 Methylation Is a Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer. PLOS ONE 2014, 9: e104285. PMID: 25127039, PMCID: PMC4134211, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104285.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsCpG IslandsDNA MethylationFemaleHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Intestinal MucosaMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm StagingPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafTreatment OutcomeConceptsCRC patientsColorectal cancerPredictive biomarkersStage IICRC cohortPoor disease-free survivalDisease-free survivalIndependent risk factorPopulation-based cohortPotential clinical significancePromising diagnostic biomarkerFree survivalRisk factorsColonic tumorsCRC-specific genesClinical significanceNormal mucosaCancer-related genesPatientsDiagnostic biomarkersTumor tissueBiomarkersCohortCancerHuman cancers
2013
Genetic susceptibility variants associated with colorectal cancer prognosis
Abulí A, Lozano JJ, Rodríguez-Soler M, Jover R, Bessa X, Muñoz J, Esteban-Jurado C, Fernández-Rozadilla C, Carracedo A, Ruiz-Ponte C, Cubiella J, Balaguer F, Bujanda L, Reñé JM, Clofent J, Morillas JD, Nicolás-Pérez D, Xicola RM, Llor X, Piqué JM, Andreu M, Castells A, Castellví-Bel S. Genetic susceptibility variants associated with colorectal cancer prognosis. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34: 2286-2291. PMID: 23712746, DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgt179.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOutcome overall survivalColorectal cancerGenetic susceptibility variantsG alleleColorectal cancer prognosisDisease-free survivalRecurrence-free intervalSuch prognostic factorsBetter clinical outcomesCancer-related deathBetter OSOverall survivalCRC patientsPrognostic factorsClinical outcomesPatient survivalShorter survivalCRC cohortPredictive biomarkersIntensive treatmentLifestyle habitsHigh riskSusceptibility variantsCancer prognosisSomatic genetic factors
2012
Pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer: a genome-wide association study to predict toxicity after 5-fluorouracil or FOLFOX administration
Fernandez-Rozadilla C, Cazier JB, Moreno V, Crous-Bou M, Guinó E, Durán G, Lamas MJ, López R, Candamio S, Gallardo E, Paré L, Baiget M, Páez D, López-Fernández LA, Cortejoso L, García MI, Bujanda L, González D, Gonzalo V, Rodrigo L, Reñé JM, Jover R, Brea-Fernández A, Andreu M, Bessa X, Llor X, Xicola R, Palles C, Tomlinson I, Castellví-Bel S, Castells A, Ruiz-Ponte C, Carracedo A. Pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer: a genome-wide association study to predict toxicity after 5-fluorouracil or FOLFOX administration. The Pharmacogenomics Journal 2012, 13: 209-217. PMID: 22310351, DOI: 10.1038/tpj.2012.2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, PharmacologicalClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleFluorouracilGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotyping TechniquesHumansLeucovorinMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsPharmacogeneticsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTreatment OutcomeConceptsAdverse drug reactionsColorectal cancer patientsEvidence of associationFOLFOX administrationCRC patientsColorectal cancerCancer patientsDrug reactionsDrug AdministrationWide association studyPatientsVariable outcomesInter-individual variationAdministrationAssociation studiesGenome-wide scaleFirst studyWide screeningValidation setFOLFOXOxaliplatinGenetic basisCancer
2011
Evidence for classification of c.1852_1853AA>GC in MLH1 as a neutral variant for Lynch syndrome
Castillejo A, Guarinos C, Martinez-Canto A, Barbera VM, Egoavil C, Castillejo MI, Perez-Carbonell L, Sanchez-Heras AB, Segura A, Ochoa E, Lazaro R, Ruiz-Ponte C, Bujanda L, Andreu M, Castells A, Carracedo A, Llor X, Clofent J, Alenda C, Paya A, Jover R, Soto JL. Evidence for classification of c.1852_1853AA>GC in MLH1 as a neutral variant for Lynch syndrome. BMC Medical Genomics 2011, 12: 12. PMID: 21247423, PMCID: PMC3034663, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2350-12-12.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMicrosatellite instabilityLS familiesAmsterdam II criteriaPathogenic mutationsCase-case studyEarly-onset cancersCase-control comparisonBackgroundLynch syndromeCRC probandsHereditary CRCTumor DNA samplesCRC patientsSporadic CRCLS patientsClinical managementLynch syndromeClinical significanceOnset cancerCancer syndromesPositive casesMononucleotide markersControl populationPathogenic variantsSignificant associationMSH6 gene
2010
Colorectal cancer prognosis twenty years later
Bujanda L, Sarasqueta C, Hijona E, Hijona L, Cosme A, Gil I, Elorza JL, Asensio JI, Larburu S, Enríquez-Navascués JM, Jover R, Balaguer F, Llor X, Bessa X, Andreu M, Paya A, Castells A, Association G. Colorectal cancer prognosis twenty years later. World Journal Of Gastroenterology 2010, 16: 862-867. PMID: 20143465, PMCID: PMC2825333, DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i7.862.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGroup IIGroup ISurgical mortalityConsecutive CRC patientsGroup II patientsOverall median survivalAdministration of chemotherapyColorectal cancer patientsColorectal cancer survivalPost-surgical mortalityAverage followMedian survivalCRC patientsII patientsTumor stageCancer patientsCancer survivalPatientsChemotherapySurvivalMortalityYearsFollowAdministration
2009
Association of MUTYH and MSH6 germline mutations in colorectal cancer patients
Giráldez MD, Balaguer F, Caldés T, Sanchez-de-Abajo A, Gómez-Fernández N, Ruiz-Ponte C, Muñoz J, Garre P, Gonzalo V, Moreira L, Ocaña T, Clofent J, Carracedo A, Andreu M, Jover R, Llor X, Castells A, Castellví-Bel S, Gastrointestinal Oncology Group of the Spanish Gastroenterological Association. Association of MUTYH and MSH6 germline mutations in colorectal cancer patients. Familial Cancer 2009, 8: 525. PMID: 19685280, DOI: 10.1007/s10689-009-9282-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMonoallelic MUTYH mutationsCRC patientsMSH6 mutationsMUTYH mutationsCRC riskGermline mutationsMUTYH mutation carriersColorectal cancer patientsColorectal cancer riskMSH6 germline mutationsCancer patientsHealthy carriersMutation carriersCancer riskPatientsGroup IIGroup IMUTYHRiskMissense mutationsMSH6Repair processNonsense mutationMutationsDNA repair processes
2008
Comparison of predictive models, clinical criteria and molecular tumour screening for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome in a population-based cohort of colorectal cancer patients
Balmaña J, Balaguer F, Castellví-Bel S, Steyerberg EW, Andreu M, Llor X, Jover R, Castells A, Syngal S, Association F. Comparison of predictive models, clinical criteria and molecular tumour screening for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome in a population-based cohort of colorectal cancer patients. Journal Of Medical Genetics 2008, 45: 557. PMID: 18603628, DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2008.059311.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingHeterozygoteHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, GeneticMutL Protein Homolog 1MutS Homolog 2 ProteinNuclear ProteinsConceptsMLH1/MSH2 mutation carriersPositive predictive valueMSH2 mutation carriersMutation carriersMMR deficiencyClinical criteriaMismatch repair gene mutationsAmsterdam II criteriaColorectal cancer patientsIdentification of patientsPopulation-based cohortOverall discriminative abilityColorectal cancer cohortRepair gene mutationsGermline testingCRC patientsBethesda guidelinesCancer patientsLynch syndromeCancer cohortPredictive scorePredictive valueSimilar AUCMicrosatellite instabilityObserved prevalence
2007
A Prospective, Multicenter, Population-Based Study of BRAF Mutational Analysis for Lynch Syndrome Screening
Bessa X, Ballesté B, Andreu M, Castells A, Bellosillo B, Balaguer F, Castellví–bel S, Paya A, Jover R, Alenda C, Titó L, Martinez–Villacampa M, Vilella A, Xicola RM, Pons E, Llor X, Association G. A Prospective, Multicenter, Population-Based Study of BRAF Mutational Analysis for Lynch Syndrome Screening. Clinical Gastroenterology And Hepatology 2007, 6: 206-214. PMID: 18096441, DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.011.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAgedAged, 80 and overAmino Acid SubstitutionColorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutL Protein Homolog 1MutL ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticProspective StudiesProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafConceptsSporadic colorectal cancerColorectal cancerCRC patientsMMR deficiencyBRAF mutationsV600E mutationGenetic testingGermline mutationsHereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancerLynch syndrome screeningGermline genetic testingMLH1 germline mutationsPopulation-based studyGene mutation carriersMMR genes MLH1Nonpolyposis colorectal cancerBRAF V600E mutationBRAF mutational analysisMLH1 promoter methylationBRAF mutation analysisBRAF V600E mutation analysisMutation analysisBRAF analysisLynch syndromeFamily historyIdentification of MYH Mutation Carriers in Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Case-Control, Population-Based Study
Balaguer F, Castellví–Bel S, Castells A, Andreu M, Muñoz J, Gisbert JP, Llor X, Jover R, de Cid R, Gonzalo V, Bessa X, Xicola RM, Pons E, Alenda C, Payá A, Piqué JM, Association G. Identification of MYH Mutation Carriers in Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Case-Control, Population-Based Study. Clinical Gastroenterology And Hepatology 2007, 5: 379-387. PMID: 17368238, DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAge DistributionAgedAged, 80 and overBase Pair MismatchCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsConfidence IntervalsDNA GlycosylasesDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenes, APCGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGerm-Line MutationHeterozygoteHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPrognosisProspective StudiesReference ValuesRisk AssessmentSex DistributionSpainSurvival RateConceptsColorectal cancerMYH mutationsCRC patientsClinical criteriaMutation carriersMonoallelic carriersGermline MYH mutationsPrevious case-control studyAdditional pathogenic variantsPopulation-based studyBiallelic MYH mutationsCase-control studySynchronous colorectal adenomasCRC riskControl subjectsColorectal adenomasPreventive strategiesCase controlPathogenic variantsSignificant associationAbstractTextBiallelic mutationsMonoallelic mutationsConformation polymorphism analysisSignificant risk