1991
The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods.
Longo D, Duffey P, DeVita V, Wesley M, Hubbard S, Young R. The calculation of actual or received dose intensity: a comparison of published methods. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 1991, 9: 2042-51. PMID: 1941063, DOI: 10.1200/jco.1991.9.11.2042.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSouthwest Oncology GroupTreatment courseEntire treatment coursePatient's treatment coursePrognostic factorsTreatment outcomesAggressive histology lymphomaCombination chemotherapy programsClinical prognostic factorsNational Cancer Institute studyDistinct patient populationsDose-related variablesDose intensityOncology GroupChemotherapy programPrognostic significancePatient populationStudy populationInstitute studyOutcomesRecent reportsEntire populationPopulationCourseDI data
1982
Undifferentiated non‐Hodgkin'S lymphomas (Burkitt's and non‐Burkitt's types). The relevance of making this histologic distinction
Miliauskas J, Berard C, Young R, Garvin A, Edwards B, Devita V. Undifferentiated non‐Hodgkin'S lymphomas (Burkitt's and non‐Burkitt's types). The relevance of making this histologic distinction. Cancer 1982, 50: 2115-2121. PMID: 7127252, DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19821115)50:10<2115::aid-cncr2820501024>3.0.co;2-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBurkitt's lymphomaMedian ageStage IVPrimary siteHistologic distinctionIntra-abdominal involvementFive-year survivalNational Cancer InstituteMedian survivalBurkitt's typeRetrospective studyHodgkin's lymphomaPatient populationLonger survivalCancer InstituteLymphomaPatientsSurvivalDiseaseMonthsAgePresentationYearsCases