2024
Integrating 4 methods to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (In4M): protocol for a prospective cohort study
Thanarajasingam G, Kluetz P, Bhatnagar V, Brown A, Cathcart-Rake E, Diamond M, Faust L, Fiero M, Huntington S, Jeffery M, Jones L, Noble B, Paludo J, Powers B, Ross J, Ritchie J, Ruddy K, Schellhorn S, Tarver M, Dueck A, Gross C. Integrating 4 methods to evaluate physical function in patients with cancer (In4M): protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2024, 14: e074030. PMID: 38199641, PMCID: PMC10806877, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074030.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPhysical function assessmentPhysical functionFunctional assessmentEvaluation of physical functionElectronic health record dataEvaluate physical functionHealth record dataSpanish-speaking patientsDigital health technologiesBreast cancerProspective cohort studyClinician-reported outcomesCancer clinical trialsClinical decision-makingStudy questionnairePatient-centred evaluationHealth technologiesMeasure symptomsOncology practiceCohort studyRecord dataPatient's impressionMayo ClinicEnglish-speakingWearable sensors
2021
Bundling cancer subtypes in value-based care: A pilot analysis of lymphoma episodes in the Oncology Care Model.
Yue A, Chaudhry B, Schleicher S, Huntington S, Lyss A, Connor N, Tran L, Adelson K. Bundling cancer subtypes in value-based care: A pilot analysis of lymphoma episodes in the Oncology Care Model. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: e18850-e18850. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e18850.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommunity oncology practicesAcademic medical centerOncology Care ModelEpisode costsWaldenstrom's macroglobulinemiaCare modelCancer subtypesLarge community oncology practiceProportion of subtypesLarge academic medical centerICD-10 diagnosisIntensity of careValue-based careCohort studyClinical featuresCommon subtypeFrequent subtypeOncology practiceLymphoma populationLymphoma subtypesMedical CenterHeterogeneous diseaseInappropriate shiftIndividual subtypesSubtypes