Featured Publications
Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials
Oikonomou EK, Spatz ES, Suchard MA, Khera R. Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials. The Lancet Digital Health 2022, 4: e796-e805. PMID: 36307193, PMCID: PMC9768739, DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00170-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSystolic blood pressure controlBlood pressure controlIntensive systolic blood pressure controlType 2 diabetesPressure controlCardiovascular benefitsClinical trialsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsFirst major adverse cardiovascular eventLarge randomised clinical trialsACCORD-BP trialAdverse cardiovascular eventsRandomised clinical trialsSystolic blood pressureCox regression analysisTreatment effectsHazard ratio estimatesACCORD-BPBP trialCardiovascular eventsBlood pressurePrimary outcomeStandard treatmentBaseline variablesIndex patients
2024
Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes A Multinational, Federated Analysis of LEGEND-T2DM
Khera R, Aminorroaya A, Dhingra L, Thangaraj P, Pedroso Camargos A, Bu F, Ding X, Nishimura A, Anand T, Arshad F, Blacketer C, Chai Y, Chattopadhyay S, Cook M, Dorr D, Duarte-Salles T, DuVall S, Falconer T, French T, Hanchrow E, Kaur G, Lau W, Li J, Li K, Liu Y, Lu Y, Man K, Matheny M, Mathioudakis N, McLeggon J, McLemore M, Minty E, Morales D, Nagy P, Ostropolets A, Pistillo A, Phan T, Pratt N, Reyes C, Richter L, Ross J, Ruan E, Seager S, Simon K, Viernes B, Yang J, Yin C, You S, Zhou J, Ryan P, Schuemie M, Krumholz H, Hripcsak G, Suchard M. Comparative Effectiveness of Second-Line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes A Multinational, Federated Analysis of LEGEND-T2DM. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2024, 84: 904-917. PMID: 39197980, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.05.069.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsGLP-1 RAsSecond-line agentsGLP-1Antihyperglycemic agentsCardiovascular diseaseMACE riskGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistsSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorsPeptide-1 receptor agonistsDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitorsEffects of SGLT2isType 2 diabetes mellitusPeptidase-4 inhibitorsAdverse cardiovascular eventsCox proportional hazards modelsRandom-effects meta-analysisCardiovascular risk reductionTarget trial emulationProportional hazards modelReal-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program
Gonzalez P, Hebbe A, Hussain Y, Khera R, Banerjee S, Plomondon M, Waldo S, Pfau S, Curtis J, Shah S. Real-World Experience and Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Protected Versus Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the Veteran Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Program. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2024, 222: 39-50. PMID: 38677666, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.04.039.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchULM percutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneous coronary interventionPropensity-matched cohortMyocardial infarctionCoronary interventionAll-cause mortalityTracking programUS clinical practiceOne-year MACEOne-year outcomesIncidence of rehospitalizationAdverse cardiovascular eventsUnprotected left main coronary artery diseaseAcute coronary syndromeCoronary artery diseaseRates of MIMechanical circulatory supportLeft main percutaneous coronary interventionPCI patientsUrgent revascularizationPractice patternsCart programLeft main bifurcationPrimary outcomeMatched cohort
2022
Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEGEND-T2DM): a protocol for a series of multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies
Khera R, Schuemie MJ, Lu Y, Ostropolets A, Chen R, Hripcsak G, Ryan PB, Krumholz HM, Suchard MA. Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEGEND-T2DM): a protocol for a series of multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies. BMJ Open 2022, 12: e057977. PMID: 35680274, PMCID: PMC9185490, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057977.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLarge-scale Evidence GenerationType 2 diabetes mellitusCardiovascular effectivenessDiabetes mellitusSafety outcomesGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistsSodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitorsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsNew-user cohort designPeptide-1 receptor agonistsDipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitorsSafety studiesAdverse cardiovascular eventsPrimary cardiovascular outcomePeptidase-4 inhibitorsAnti-hyperglycaemic agentsElectronic health record data sourcesEvidence generationCardiovascular eventsCardiovascular outcomesCardiovascular riskActive comparatorTherapeutic optionsReceptor agonistDrug comparisonsPhenomapping-Derived Tool to Individualize the Effect of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes.
Oikonomou EK, Suchard MA, McGuire DK, Khera R. Phenomapping-Derived Tool to Individualize the Effect of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2022, 45: 965-974. PMID: 35120199, PMCID: PMC9016734, DOI: 10.2337/dc21-1765.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCanagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment StudyMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsType 2 diabetesHazard ratioSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitorsCardiovascular disease benefitAdverse cardiovascular eventsCotransporter 2 inhibitorsEffects of canagliflozinCanagliflozin dosesCanagliflozin's effectsCardiovascular eventsCardiovascular riskPatients 5Cardioprotective effectsSGLT2 inhibitorsDisease benefitBaseline variablesOriginal trialCanagliflozinType 2DiabetesPatientsRisk estimatesEffect estimates
2021
Association of Kidney Disease With Outcomes in COVID‐19: Results From the American Heart Association COVID‐19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry
Rao A, Ranka S, Ayers C, Hendren N, Rosenblatt A, Alger HM, Rutan C, Omar W, Khera R, Gupta K, Mody P, DeFilippi C, Das SR, Hedayati SS, de Lemos JA. Association of Kidney Disease With Outcomes in COVID‐19: Results From the American Heart Association COVID‐19 Cardiovascular Disease Registry. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2021, 10: e020910. PMID: 34107743, PMCID: PMC8477855, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.020910.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute kidney injuryMajor adverse cardiac eventsAdverse cardiac eventsChronic kidney diseaseCardiac eventsKidney diseaseCause mortalityAmerican Heart Association COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease RegistryCOVID-19Major adverse cardiovascular eventsEnd-stage kidney diseaseCardiovascular Disease RegistryLarge multicenter registryNonfatal heart failureSerial laboratory dataAdverse cardiovascular eventsNonfatal myocardial infarctionKey secondary outcomesCardiovascular disease outcomesPrimary exposure variableNonfatal strokeCardiogenic shockCardiovascular deathCardiovascular eventsCardiovascular outcomesA phenomapping-derived tool to personalize the selection of anatomical vs. functional testing in evaluating chest pain (ASSIST)
Oikonomou EK, Van Dijk D, Parise H, Suchard MA, de Lemos J, Antoniades C, Velazquez EJ, Miller EJ, Khera R. A phenomapping-derived tool to personalize the selection of anatomical vs. functional testing in evaluating chest pain (ASSIST). European Heart Journal 2021, 42: 2536-2548. PMID: 33881513, PMCID: PMC8488385, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab223.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStable chest painChest painPrimary endpointMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsNon-fatal myocardial infarctionAdverse cardiovascular eventsStudy's primary endpointCoronary artery diseaseClinical trial populationsCox regression modelParticipant-level dataSCOT-HEARTCardiovascular eventsCause mortalityHazard ratioPatients 5Artery diseaseFunctional testingPROMISE trialTrial populationMyocardial infarctionLower incidenceStudy populationPainCollected variables
2019
Education level and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in China
Huo X, Khera R, Zhang L, Herrin J, Bai X, Wang Q, Lu Y, Nasir K, Hu S, Li J, Li X, Zheng X, Masoudi FA, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM, Jiang L. Education level and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction in China. Heart 2019, 105: 946. PMID: 30661037, PMCID: PMC6582708, DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313752.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsLow educational attainmentAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) outcomesAdverse cardiovascular eventsFuture healthcare interventionsMyocardial infarction outcomesCardiovascular risk factorsRisk-adjusted analysisAcute myocardial infarctionMedian participant ageCardiovascular eventsCause mortalityAdverse eventsConsecutive patientsAMI outcomesChina PatientUnadjusted analysesMyocardial infarctionRisk factorsChinese cohortHigh riskEducational attainmentEducational attainment groupsHealthcare interventionsPatients
2018
Usefulness of a Simple Algorithm to Identify Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering
Wang S, Khera R, Das SR, Vigen R, Wang T, Luo X, Lu R, Zhan X, Xiao G, Vongpatanasin W, Xie Y. Usefulness of a Simple Algorithm to Identify Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2018, 122: 248-254. PMID: 29880288, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.03.361.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSystolic Blood Pressure Intervention TrialIntensive BP loweringUrinary albumin-creatinine ratioFavorable risk-benefit profileAlbumin-creatinine ratioBP loweringRisk-benefit profileHypertensive patientsBlood pressureMajor adverse cardiovascular event ratesAdverse cardiovascular event ratesIntensive blood pressure loweringMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsRemaining low-risk patientsSimple risk prediction modelIntensive blood pressureStandard BP loweringAdverse cardiovascular eventsBlood pressure loweringSerious adverse eventsCardiovascular event ratesLarge randomized trialsLow-risk patientsSubset of patientsCardiovascular disease risk