2024
Binding profiles for 961 Drosophila and C. elegans transcription factors reveal tissue-specific regulatory relationships.
Kudron M, Gewirtzman L, Victorsen A, Lear B, Vafeados D, Gao J, Xu J, Samanta S, Frink E, Tran-Pearson A, Hyunh C, Hammonds A, Fisher W, Wall M, Wesseling G, Hernandez V, Lin Z, Kasparian M, White K, Allada R, Gerstein M, Hillier L, Celniker S, Reinke V, Waterston R. Binding profiles for 961 Drosophila and C. elegans transcription factors reveal tissue-specific regulatory relationships. Genome Research 2024, gr.279037.124. PMID: 39438113, DOI: 10.1101/gr.279037.124.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHigh-occupancy targetC. elegans transcription factorsSingle cell RNA-seq dataRegulatory relationshipsTranscription factor (TFChromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing dataTF-target relationshipsChIP-seq dataConsensus sequence motifRNA-seq dataDrosophila melanogaster</i>Promote target gene expressionTarget gene expressionChIP-seqSequence motifsSequence dataRegulatory networksEvents in vivoStock CenterModel organismsTranscription factorsTF functionGene expressionBinding sitesCell types
2020
To mock or not: a comprehensive comparison of mock IP and DNA input for ChIP-seq
Xu J, Kudron MM, Victorsen A, Gao J, Ammouri HN, Navarro FCP, Gevirtzman L, Waterston RH, White KP, Reinke V, Gerstein M. To mock or not: a comprehensive comparison of mock IP and DNA input for ChIP-seq. Nucleic Acids Research 2020, 49: e17-e17. PMID: 33347581, PMCID: PMC7897498, DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1155.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMock immunoprecipitationsSpurious sitesDNA inputCell linesMultiple cell typesOpen chromatinChIP-seqChromatin immunoprecipitationGenomic activityWhole organismNonspecific interactionsIP experimentsImmunoprecipitationCell typesIP antibodyTechnical noiseAbundanceComplex samplesChromatinGenomeSitesGenesOrganismsLinesInteraction