2024
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
Park D, Hu J, Campbell G, Goldwag K, Kelsey M, Altin S, Gallegos-Kattán C, Nanna M. Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2024, 3: 101859. PMID: 39131993, PMCID: PMC11307649, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.101859.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMonths of DAPTDuration of dual antiplatelet therapyNet adverse clinical eventsType 2 diabetes mellitusDual antiplatelet therapyAcute coronary syndromeRandomized controlled trialsSensitivity analysis of trialsPercutaneous coronary interventionCoronary interventionNo significant differenceAntiplatelet therapyAnalysis of trialsCoronary syndromeControlled trialsMeta-analysis of patientsStent thrombosisMeta-analysisDAPT durationClinicians greater flexibilityStudy-level meta-analysisOptimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapyHigher risk of adverse eventsPostpercutaneous coronary interventionRisk of adverse eventsIntravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials
Sreenivasan J, Reddy R, Jamil Y, Malik A, Chamie D, Howard J, Nanna M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Ali Z, Moses J, Chen S, Chieffo A, Colombo A, Leon M, Lansky A, Ahmad Y. Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2024, 13: e031111. PMID: 38214263, PMCID: PMC10926835, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031111.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdverse cardiac eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionAngiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionTarget vessel revascularizationTarget-lesion revascularizationCardiac eventsCardiac deathImaging-guided percutaneous coronary interventionWeighted mean follow-up durationMeta-analysisPrimary outcomeMean follow-up durationStent thrombosisMeta-analysis of randomized trialsStudy-level meta-analysisComplex lesion subsetsIntravascular imagingAll-cause deathRandom-effects meta-analysisStandard of careIntention-to-treat principleUpdates of clinical guidelinesMixed-effects meta-regressionComplex percutaneous coronary interventionIntravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention
2019
A systematic review of randomized trials comparing double versus triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Sullivan AE, Nanna MG, Rao SV, Cantrell S, Gibson CM, Verheugt FWA, Peterson ED, Lopes RD, Alexander JH, Granger CB, Yee MK, Kong DF. A systematic review of randomized trials comparing double versus triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2019, 96: e102-e109. PMID: 31713326, PMCID: PMC7211549, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28535.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationCoronary ThrombosisDual Anti-Platelet TherapyFemaleFibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhageHumansMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsPercutaneous coronary interventionAcute coronary syndromeDouble therapyOral anticoagulationAtrial fibrillationTriple therapyAntithrombotic therapyCoronary syndromeCoronary interventionStent thrombosisMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsTriple antithrombotic therapyAdverse cardiovascular eventsDual antiplatelet therapyOptimal antithrombotic therapyGood safety profileRandom-effects modelIschemic outcomesAntiplatelet therapyCardiovascular eventsP2Y12 inhibitorsMedical managementRandomized trialsIntracranial hemorrhageSafety profile