1998
Efficacy of Coronary Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty in Small Coronary Arteries fn1fn1This study was supported in part by a grant from Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems, Inc., Warren, New Jersey.
Savage M, Fischman D, Rake R, Leon M, Schatz R, Penn I, Nobuyoshi M, Moses J, Hirshfeld J, Heuser R, Baim D, Cleman M, Brinker J, Gebhardt S, Goldberg S, Investigators F. Efficacy of Coronary Stenting Versus Balloon Angioplasty in Small Coronary Arteries fn1fn1This study was supported in part by a grant from Johnson & Johnson Interventional Systems, Inc., Warren, New Jersey. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 1998, 31: 307-311. PMID: 9462572, DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00511-1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryChi-Square DistributionCohort StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary DiseaseCoronary VesselsDisease-Free SurvivalElective Surgical ProceduresEquipment DesignFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceStentsSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationConceptsElective stent placementBalloon angioplastyCoronary arteryStent placementElective stent implantationJohnson Interventional SystemsPostprocedural lumen diameterPrimary end pointEvent-free survivalClinical event ratesSmall coronary arteriesQuantitative coronary angiographyPalmaz-Schatz stentsAngioplasty groupAngiographic characteristicsCoronary angiographyClinical outcomesNew lesionsProcedural successDiameter stenosisStent groupStent implantationAbrupt closurePatientsAngioplasty
1997
Acute and Long-Term Outcome After Palmaz-Schatz Stenting: Analysis From the New Approaches To Coronary Intervention (NACI) Registry
Carrozza J, Schatz R, George C, Leon M, King S, Hirshfeld J, Curry R, Ivanhoe R, Buchbinder M, Cleman M, Goldberg S, Ricci D, Popma J, Safian R, Baim D, Investigators F. Acute and Long-Term Outcome After Palmaz-Schatz Stenting: Analysis From the New Approaches To Coronary Intervention (NACI) Registry. The American Journal Of Cardiology 1997, 80: 78k-88k. PMID: 9409695, DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)00767-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPalmaz-Schatz stentsStent Restenosis StudyTarget lesion revascularizationCoronary Intervention RegistryRecent myocardial infarctionMinimum lumen diameterMyocardial infarctionLesion revascularizationIntervention RegistryProcedural successCoronary arteryHigh riskHigh incidenceLumen diameterSignificant left main stenosisLeft main coronary arteryQ-wave myocardial infarctionPalmaz-Schatz stentingDe novo lesionsLeft main stenosisSaphenous vein graftsCohort of patientsCongestive heart failureMain coronary arteryNative coronary arteries
1994
A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease
Fischman D, Leon M, Baim D, Schatz R, Savage M, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M, Cleman M, Heuser R, Almond D, Teirstein P, Fish R, Colombo A, Brinker J, Moses J, Shaknovich A, Hirshfeld J, Bailey S, Ellis S, Rake R, Goldberg S. A Randomized Comparison of Coronary-Stent Placement and Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease. New England Journal Of Medicine 1994, 331: 496-501. PMID: 8041414, DOI: 10.1056/nejm199408253310802.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStandard balloon angioplastyCoronary stent placementBalloon angioplastyLarger luminal diameterAngioplasty groupProcedural successStent groupLuminal diameterOriginal target lesionRecurrent myocardial ischemiaSymptomatic coronary diseaseCoronary artery diseaseLower ratesLarge immediate increasesCoronary eventsArtery diseaseCoronary angiographyCoronary diseaseStented lesionsClinical outcomesCoronary lesionsRandomized comparisonClinical eventsCoronary stenosisStent placement