2023
Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of 'Neurorights'.
Ligthart S, Ienca M, Meynen G, Molnar-Gabor F, Andorno R, Bublitz C, Catley P, Claydon L, Douglas T, Farahany N, Fins J, Goering S, Haselager P, Jotterand F, Lavazza A, McCay A, Wajnerman Paz A, Rainey S, Ryberg J, Kellmeyer P. Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of 'Neurorights'. Cambridge Quarterly Of Healthcare Ethics 2023, 32: 1-21. PMID: 37183686, DOI: 10.1017/s0963180123000245.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLegal foundationsCognitive libertyMental integrityMental privacyConstitutional legal frameworkCouncil of EuropePolicy discussionsLegal interpretationLegal frameworkInternational institutionsEthical frames of referenceInternational policiesNeurorightsLibertyEthical framePhilosophical assumptionsPolicyFrame of referenceGovernment guidelinesPrivacyLegalityCouncilDiscussionFoundationsActive interest
2022
Regulating Posttrial Access to In-Dwelling Class III Neural Devices
Wright M, Fins J. Regulating Posttrial Access to In-Dwelling Class III Neural Devices. 2022, 256-267. DOI: 10.1017/9781108975452.020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMedical device regulationRegulatory lawsDevice regulationCambridge CorePosttrial accessMedical devicesRegulatory concernsOpen AccessPatient privacyRegulationPublic healthMedical providersLawInnovative productsEUBookConcernsControversiesPrivacyPolicymakersAccessUSStakeholdersCambridgeMultidisciplinary evaluation
2021
Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies
Goering S, Klein E, Specker Sullivan L, Wexler A, Agüera y Arcas B, Bi G, Carmena J, Fins J, Friesen P, Gallant J, Huggins J, Kellmeyer P, Marblestone A, Mitchell C, Parens E, Pham M, Rubel A, Sadato N, Teicher M, Wasserman D, Whittaker M, Wolpaw J, Yuste R. Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies. Neuroethics 2021, 14: 365-386. PMID: 33942016, PMCID: PMC8081770, DOI: 10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2002
Patently Controversial: Markets, Morals, and the President's Proposal for Embryonic Stem Cell Research
Fins J, Schachter M. Patently Controversial: Markets, Morals, and the President's Proposal for Embryonic Stem Cell Research. Kennedy Institute Of Ethics Journal 2002, 12: 265-278. PMID: 12472079, DOI: 10.1353/ken.2002.0016.Peer-Reviewed Original Research