2023
Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Trial for Traumatic Brain Injury: Part II.
Fins J, Wright M, Shulman K, Henderson J, Schiff N. Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Trial for Traumatic Brain Injury: Part II. Cambridge Quarterly Of Healthcare Ethics 2023, 1-24. PMID: 37850455, DOI: 10.1017/s0963180123000518.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchFamily perspectiveTraumatic brain injuryOn-going careTrail-Making-TestDecision-making capacitySevere traumatic brain injuryBrain injurySupportive counselingStimulation trialsNarrative responsesPost-trial accessVoluntary informed consentPost-operative interviewsFamily membersSocial reintegrationMarkers of executive functionCognitive functionFamily dynamicsInformed consentPart BDeep brain stimulation trialsInterviewsExecutive functionDevice trialsTrials
2022
Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Traumatic Brain Injury Study: Part I
Fins J, Wright M, Henderson J, Schiff N. Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Traumatic Brain Injury Study: Part I. Cambridge Quarterly Of Healthcare Ethics 2022, 31: 419-443. PMID: 36398511, DOI: 10.1017/s0963180122000226.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCentral thalamic deep brain stimulationVoluntary informed consentTraumatic brain injuryDecision-making authorityBrain injuryDeep brain stimulationTherapeutic misconceptionCognitive restorationBrain stimulationAgency of subjectsInformed consentSevere traumatic brain injuryTraumatic brain injury studiesThalamic deep brain stimulationConsentTreatment of traumatic brain injuryEnrollment decisionsBrain injury studiesFamily perspectiveInterpersonal interactionsDecisionCognitive disabilitiesStudy enrollmentReturn to workSocial structure
2019
Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices
Hendriks S, Grady C, Ramos K, Chiong W, Fins J, Ford P, Goering S, Greely H, Hutchison K, Kelly M, Kim S, Klein E, Lisanby S, Mayberg H, Maslen H, Miller F, Rommelfanger K, Sheth S, Wexler A. Ethical Challenges of Risk, Informed Consent, and Posttrial Responsibilities in Human Research With Neural Devices. JAMA Neurology 2019, 76: 1506-1514. PMID: 31621797, PMCID: PMC9395156, DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3523.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEthical challengesEvaluation of capacityInformed consentDisclosure of informationConsent disclosureHuman researchEthical analysisEthical researchEthical frameworkResearch participantsConsentAnalysis of riskInnovative NeurotechnologiesInstitutional review boardReview boardSubject matter expertiseBenefit participantsStandard pillarsFundersFinancial burdenDisclosure
2008
Informed Consent Revisited: A Doctrine in the Service of Cancer Care
Schachter M, Fins J. Informed Consent Revisited: A Doctrine in the Service of Cancer Care. The Oncologist 2008, 13: 1109-1113. PMID: 18849321, DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0101.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLegal obligationsPatients' rightsEthical dutyDecisional autonomyPatient autonomyDoctrineConsentInformed consentOngoing discussionsProtectionAutonomyTreatment enterpriseObligationsRightsDutyDominionComplianceCancer carePsychosocial concernsCommitmentPaternityTherapeutic endeavorsDoctorsPhysiciansClinical responseIslam and Informed Consent: Notes from Doha
DEL POZO P, FINS J. Islam and Informed Consent: Notes from Doha. Cambridge Quarterly Of Healthcare Ethics 2008, 17: 273-279. PMID: 18495067, DOI: 10.1017/s096318010808033x.Peer-Reviewed Original Research