2021
Comparative outcomes of Riata and Fidelis lead management strategies: Results from the NCDR‐ICD Registry
Zeitler EP, Wang Y, Pokorney SD, Curtis J, Prutkin JM. Comparative outcomes of Riata and Fidelis lead management strategies: Results from the NCDR‐ICD Registry. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology 2021, 44: 1897-1906. PMID: 34520564, DOI: 10.1111/pace.14361.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPre-discharge complicationsNCDR ICD RegistryExtraction groupGenerator replacementElective generator changeGenerator replacement proceduresLead dwell timeMedtronic Sprint FidelisPeri-procedural riskOdds of deathLong-term outcomesMulti-centre populationElective generator replacementReal-world populationLead management strategiesHospital complicationsHospital mortalityICD RegistryTerm outcomesSprint FidelisAdjusted ratesComparative outcomesExtraction patientsComplicationsICD leadB-PO02-061 TRAJECTORIES OF MODEL-BASED ARRHYTHMIC AND OVERALL RISK IN ICD GENERATOR CHANGE PATIENTS IN THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY
Bilchick K, Wang Y, Curtis J, Levy W. B-PO02-061 TRAJECTORIES OF MODEL-BASED ARRHYTHMIC AND OVERALL RISK IN ICD GENERATOR CHANGE PATIENTS IN THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY. Heart Rhythm 2021, 18: s121. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.317.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNCDR ICD RegistryICD RegistryImpact of insurance status on ICD implantation practice patterns: Insights from the NCDR ICD registry
Ahmed I, Merchant FM, Curtis JP, Parzynski CS, Lampert R. Impact of insurance status on ICD implantation practice patterns: Insights from the NCDR ICD registry. American Heart Journal 2021, 235: 44-53. PMID: 33503408, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOptimal medical therapyInsurance statusNCDR ICD RegistryMedical therapyComplication rateICD RegistryUninsured patientsCardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillatorPrivate insurancePropensity-weighted analysisSingle-chamber devicesPrimary preventionMean ageICD implantsPractice patternsTreatment weightingImplantation practicePatientsInverse probabilityTherapyInsurance coverageFurther studiesRegistryMedicareStatus
2019
IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY IN THE UNITED STATES: INSIGHTS FROM THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY, AN NCDR® RESEARCH TO PRACTICE (R2P) PROJECT
Kutyifa V, Bao H, Cha Y, Hsu J, Varosy P, Masoudi F, Curtis J, Peterson P. IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY IN THE UNITED STATES: INSIGHTS FROM THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY, AN NCDR® RESEARCH TO PRACTICE (R2P) PROJECT. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2019, 73: 311. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(19)30919-2.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2017
Temporal Trends in and Factors Associated With Use of Single- Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads Data From the NCDR ICD Registry
Pokorney SD, Parzynski CS, Daubert JP, Hegland DD, Varosy PD, Curtis JP, Al-Khatib SM. Temporal Trends in and Factors Associated With Use of Single- Versus Dual-Coil Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads Data From the NCDR ICD Registry. JACC Clinical Electrophysiology 2017, 3: 612-619. PMID: 29759435, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDual-coil ICD leadsICD RegistryNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryICD leadHospital-level factorsDual-coil leadsNCDR ICD RegistrySingle-coil leadsDual-coil ICDHigh-use groupPatient characteristicsPatient factorsPatient groupPatient outcomesImplantable cardioverterMore ICDsLower mortalityPre-specified groupsHospitalICDStatistical differenceUse of SingleTemporal trendsSignificant differencesRegistry
2012
CONTEMPORARY PATTERNS OF PRACTICE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING DEFIBRILLATION TESTING VERSUS THOSE WHO DO NOT UNDERGO TESTING AT THE TIME OF INITIAL IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER IMPLANTATION: ANALYSIS OF THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY
Russo A, Wang Y, Curtis J, Al-Khatib S, Lampert R. CONTEMPORARY PATTERNS OF PRACTICE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING DEFIBRILLATION TESTING VERSUS THOSE WHO DO NOT UNDERGO TESTING AT THE TIME OF INITIAL IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER IMPLANTATION: ANALYSIS OF THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2012, 59: e704. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(12)60705-0.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
The Relation Between Hospital Procedure Volume and Complications of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation From the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry
Freeman JV, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Heidenreich PA, Hlatky MA. The Relation Between Hospital Procedure Volume and Complications of Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation From the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2010, 56: 1133-1139. PMID: 20863954, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.007.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdverse eventsProcedure volumeImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator RegistryHospital adverse outcomesInitial ICD implantationCardioverter-defibrillator implantationHigh-volume hospitalsLow-volume hospitalsPatients' clinical characteristicsBetter clinical outcomesHospital procedure volumeVolume-outcome relationshipNCDR ICD RegistryClinical characteristicsICD implantationICD RegistryProcedural complicationsClinical outcomesAdverse outcomesHospital characteristicsBiventricular ICDsImplant volumeHospitalRepresentative populationICDIMPACT OF THE MEDTRONIC FIDELIS LEAD RECALL ON UTILIZATION OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS: DATA FROM THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY
Bhatt P, Curtis J, Wang Y, Lampert R. IMPACT OF THE MEDTRONIC FIDELIS LEAD RECALL ON UTILIZATION OF IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS: DATA FROM THE NCDR ICD REGISTRY. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2010, 55: a14.e132. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)60133-7.Peer-Reviewed Original Research