2023
Left ventricular lead implantation failure in an unselected nationwide cohort
Friedman D, Qin L, Freeman J, Singh J, Curtis J, Piccini J, Al-Khatib S, Jackson K. Left ventricular lead implantation failure in an unselected nationwide cohort. Heart Rhythm 2023, 20: 1420-1428. PMID: 37406870, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.06.023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchImplant failureIndependent predictorsSleep apneaBlack raceFemale sexQRS durationHispanic ethnicityNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryYounger ageLeft bundle branch blockCoronary sinus dissectionPredictors of LVUnselected nationwide cohortVentricular lead implantationCardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) proceduresObstructive sleep apneaImplant failure rateSignificant independent predictorsBundle branch blockCoronary sinus accessCRT implantationDiaphragmatic stimulationNationwide cohortEjection fractionICD Registry
2022
Survival Probability and Survival Benefit Associated With Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Generator Changes
Bilchick KC, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Shadman R, Dardas TF, Anand I, Lund LH, Dahlström U, Sartipy U, Levy WC. Survival Probability and Survival Benefit Associated With Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Generator Changes. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2022, 11: e023743. PMID: 35766293, PMCID: PMC9333379, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.023743.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSeattle Heart Failure ModelHeart failure modelHeart failure patientsResynchronization therapyGenerator changeSurvival benefitWorse survivalFailure patientsNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryGC survivalSurvival Benefit AssociatedPrimary prevention indicationVentricular ejection fractionAnnual mortalityICD therapyConclusions PatientsPrevention indicationEjection fractionICD RegistryImproved survivalPrimary preventionPatient deathGreater effect sizeLVEFPatients
2020
Mortality and readmission in non-ischemic compared with ischemic cardiomyopathies after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation
Freeman J, Bjerre J, Parzynski C, Minges K, Ahmad T, Desai N, Enriquez A, Spatz E, Friedman D, Curtis J, Hlatky M, Higgins A. Mortality and readmission in non-ischemic compared with ischemic cardiomyopathies after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation. European Heart Journal 2020, 41: ehaa946.0788. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0788.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNon-ischemic cardiomyopathyImplantable cardioverter defibrillator implantationPrimary prevention ICDsCardioverter-defibrillator implantationIschemic cardiomyopathyICM patientsNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryCox proportional hazards regression modelPrimary prevention ICD implantationLeft ventricular ejection fractionProportional hazards regression modelsOne-year mortalityHeart failure readmissionVentricular ejection fractionKaplan-Meier curvesHazards regression modelsRisk of mortalityMedian followCause readmissionICD implantationEjection fractionHeart failureHospital readmissionICD RegistryPatient subgroupsComparison of Mortality and Readmission in Non-Ischemic Versus Ischemic Cardiomyopathy After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation
Higgins AY, Bjerre J, Parzynski CS, Minges KE, Ahmad T, Desai NR, Enriquez A, Spatz ES, Friedman DJ, Curtis JP, Hlatky MA, Freeman JV. Comparison of Mortality and Readmission in Non-Ischemic Versus Ischemic Cardiomyopathy After Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2020, 133: 116-125. PMID: 32862971, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.07.035.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNon-ischemic cardiomyopathyImplantable cardioverter defibrillator implantationCardioverter-defibrillator implantationICM patientsIschemic cardiomyopathyNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryCox proportional hazards regression modelPrimary prevention ICD implantationLeft ventricular ejection fractionProportional hazards regression modelsPrimary prevention ICDsRetrospective cohort studyVentricular ejection fractionKaplan-Meier curvesHazards regression modelsRisk of mortalityComparison of mortalityMedian followCohort studyICD implantationEjection fractionHeart failureHospital readmissionICD RegistryPatient subgroups
2018
Outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacement in patients with recovered left ventricular systolic function: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry
Thomas IC, Wang Y, See VY, Minges KE, Curtis JP, Hsu JC. Outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacement in patients with recovered left ventricular systolic function: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Heart Rhythm 2018, 16: 733-740. PMID: 30414460, DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.11.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLV ejection fractionNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryReduced LV ejection fractionICD generator replacementLeft ventricular systolic functionVentricular systolic functionHF readmissionSystolic functionGenerator replacementAdverse outcomesImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator ReplacementNational Cardiovascular Data RegistryLV systolic functionEjection fractionICD RegistryPeriprocedural eventsPrognostic associationAmerican CollegeHigh riskData registryLower riskMedicare beneficiariesPatientsReadmissionClinical encounters
2017
Addition of Blood Pressure and Weight Transmissions to Standard Remote Monitoring of Implantable Defibrillators and its Association with Mortality and Rehospitalization
Al-Chekakie MO, Bao H, Jones PW, Stein KM, Marzec L, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA, Curtis JP, Akar JG. Addition of Blood Pressure and Weight Transmissions to Standard Remote Monitoring of Implantable Defibrillators and its Association with Mortality and Rehospitalization. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And Outcomes 2017, 10: e003087. PMID: 28506978, DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.116.003087.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBlood pressure dataImplantable defibrillatorsRemote patient monitoringTransmission of weightHeart failure hospitalizationImpaired ejection fractionCardiac resynchronization therapyCox regression modelRisk of mortalityLogistic regression modelsRoutine weightCause hospitalizationFailure hospitalizationBlood pressureCardiovascular hospitalizationEjection fractionResynchronization therapyRegression modelsDevice implantationService patientsHospital characteristicsIndependent associationImproved outcomesLandmark analysisSimilar risk
2015
Does Age Influence Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Use and Outcome?
Heidenreich PA, Tsai V, Bao H, Curtis J, Goldstein M, Curtis L, Hernandez A, Peterson P, Turakhia MP, Masoudi FA. Does Age Influence Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Use and Outcome? JACC Heart Failure 2015, 3: 497-504. PMID: 25982109, DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.01.012.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLeft ventricular ejection fractionICD implantationOlder patientsTrial criteriaNew York Heart Association functional class IIIAge groupsSocial Security Death IndexPatients age 85Receipt of CRTFunctional class IIICardiac resynchronization therapyVentricular ejection fractionClinical trial criteriaDifferent age groupsPatient ageEjection fractionICD RegistryImproved survivalPrimary outcomeResynchronization therapyTherapy useDeath IndexMean ageClinical trialsRegistry dataCardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Women Versus Men
Zusterzeel R, Spatz ES, Curtis JP, Sanders WE, Selzman KA, Piña IL, Bao H, Ponirakis A, Varosy PD, Masoudi FA, Caños DA, Strauss DG. Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Women Versus Men. Circulation Cardiovascular Quality And Outcomes 2015, 8: s4-s11. PMID: 25714821, DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.114.001548.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overBundle-Branch BlockCardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric CountershockFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHeart Conduction SystemHeart FailureHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMalePropensity ScoreProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk FactorsSex FactorsStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesVentricular Function, LeftConceptsLeft bundle branch blockQRS durationImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorPatient sexDeath riskCardioverter defibrillatorBetter survivalMortality differencesNew York Heart Association class IIILeft ventricular ejection fractionWomen Versus MenCardiac resynchronization therapyVentricular ejection fractionRelative death riskBenefit of CRTLonger QRS durationShorter QRS durationBundle branch blockLower mortality riskEjection fractionHeart failureResynchronization therapyCardiac resynchronizationBranch blockMortality risk
2014
Clinical Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Medical Therapy Alone Among Patients With Heart Failure
Khazanie P, Hammill BG, Qualls LG, Fonarow GC, Hammill SC, Heidenreich PA, Al-Khatib SM, Piccini JP, Masoudi FA, Peterson PN, Curtis JP, Hernandez AF, Curtis LH. Clinical Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Medical Therapy Alone Among Patients With Heart Failure. Circulation Heart Failure 2014, 7: 926-934. PMID: 25227768, PMCID: PMC4244212, DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.113.000838.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute Decompensated Heart Failure National RegistryImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator RegistryHeart failureMedical therapyCardiovascular readmissionCause readmissionQRS durationNational Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator RegistryLeft ventricular ejection fractionCox proportional hazards modelHistorical control cohortOptimal medical therapyCardiac resynchronization therapyVentricular ejection fractionProportional hazards modelMultivariable adjustmentEjection fractionICD RegistryResynchronization therapyClinical effectivenessControl cohortNational registryClinical trialsLower riskHazards modelTemporal Trends in Patient Characteristics and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement in the United States, 2006–2010
Borne RT, Peterson PN, Greenlee R, Heidenreich PA, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Tzou WS, Varosy PD, Kremers MS, Masoudi FA. Temporal Trends in Patient Characteristics and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement in the United States, 2006–2010. Circulation 2014, 130: 845-853. PMID: 25095884, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.114.008653.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary prevention ICD implantationDevice-related complicationsPatient characteristicsICD implantationICD RegistryNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryPrimary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placementConcomitant cardiac resynchronization therapyLeft ventricular ejection fractionImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator placementMultivariable hierarchical logistic regressionCardiac resynchronization therapy devicesCardiac resynchronization therapyVentricular ejection fractionResynchronization therapy devicesCommunity practice settingsSingle-lead deviceHierarchical logistic regressionClinical characteristicsOlder patientsEjection fractionResynchronization therapyPrimary preventionPatient populationHospital characteristicsSurvival After Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Hess PL, Hellkamp AS, Peterson ED, Sanders GD, Al-Khalidi HR, Curtis LH, Hammill BG, Pun PH, Curtis JP, Anstrom KJ, Hammill SC, Al-Khatib SM. Survival After Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement Among Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease. Circulation Arrhythmia And Electrophysiology 2014, 7: 793-799. PMID: 25038119, PMCID: PMC4206571, DOI: 10.1161/circep.114.001455.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCause of DeathChi-Square DistributionComorbidityDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableElectric CountershockFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHeart FailureHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKidneyLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient SelectionPrimary PreventionProportional Hazards ModelsProsthesis DesignRegistriesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesConceptsChronic kidney diseasePrimary prevention ICD placementRisk of deathICD placementCKD severityKidney diseaseNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryPrimary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placementGlomerular filtration rate 30Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator candidatesEnd-stage renal diseaseImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator placementSocial Security Death Master FileHeart failure symptomsLow ejection fractionGlomerular filtration rateRate of deathDeath Master FileICD candidacyCKD stageDiabetes mellitusEjection fractionICD RegistryRenal diseaseSerum sodiumComparative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator versus defibrillator therapy alone: a cohort study.
Masoudi FA, Mi X, Curtis LH, Peterson PN, Curtis JP, Fonarow GC, Hammill SC, Heidenreich PA, Al-Khatib SM, Piccini JP, Qualls LG, Hernandez AF. Comparative effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator versus defibrillator therapy alone: a cohort study. Annals Of Internal Medicine 2014, 160: 603-11. PMID: 24798523, DOI: 10.7326/m13-1879.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac Resynchronization TherapyComparative Effectiveness ResearchDefibrillators, ImplantableElectrocardiographyHeart FailureHumansInfectionsPatient ReadmissionPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftConceptsReduced left ventricular ejection fractionLeft ventricular ejection fractionHeart failure readmissionVentricular ejection fractionCardiac resynchronization therapyICD therapyQRS durationLower riskCohort studyICD RegistryResynchronization therapyEjection fractionNational Cardiovascular Data Registry ICD RegistryImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapyLeft bundle branch blockPropensity-matched patientsRetrospective cohort studyCardioverter-defibrillator therapyDevice-related complicationsBundle branch blockDevice-related infectionsCardiovascular readmissionCause readmissionDefibrillator therapyICD implantation
2013
Temporal Trends in Quality of Care Among Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
Dodson JA, Lampert R, Wang Y, Hammill SC, Varosy P, Curtis JP. Temporal Trends in Quality of Care Among Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators. Circulation 2013, 129: 580-586. PMID: 24192798, PMCID: PMC3946506, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.003747.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOptimal medical therapyCardiac resynchronization therapyAdverse eventsEligible patientsQuality of careICD RegistryPotential confoundersNew York Heart Association class III/IVClass III/IVAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorAngiotensin receptor blockersVentricular ejection fractionNew ICD implantsImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorHierarchical logistic regressionCRT eligibilityReceptor blockersEjection fractionMedical therapyResynchronization therapyICD implantsObservational studyCardioverter defibrillatorΒ-blockersPatientsPatient, Physician, and Procedural Factors Influencing the Use of Defibrillation Testing during Initial Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Insertion: Findings from the NCDR®
RUSSO AM, WANG Y, AL‐KHATIB S, CURTIS JP, LAMPERT R. Patient, Physician, and Procedural Factors Influencing the Use of Defibrillation Testing during Initial Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Insertion: Findings from the NCDR®. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology 2013, 36: 1522-1531. PMID: 23981009, DOI: 10.1111/pace.12248.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsHospital adverse eventsDFT testingAdverse eventsImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertionLeft ventricular ejection fractionCardiac resynchronization therapy devicesPrimary prevention indicationVentricular ejection fractionResynchronization therapy devicesProspective randomized dataImplantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) technologyDefibrillation threshold testingPatterns of practiceMore comorbiditiesPrevention indicationDefibrillator insertionEjection fractionHeart failureAtrial arrhythmiasDefibrillation testingIndependent associationProcedural characteristicsTeaching hospitalDefibrillator technologyImplant procedure
2012
Electrophysiology Studies in Patients Undergoing ICD Implantation: Findings from the NCDR®
CHENG A, WANG Y, BERGER RD, CALKINS H, BUXTON AE, CURTIS JP, LAMPERT R. Electrophysiology Studies in Patients Undergoing ICD Implantation: Findings from the NCDR®. Pacing And Clinical Electrophysiology 2012, 35: 912-918. PMID: 22670627, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03441.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsICD implantationElectrophysiology studyEjection fractionSudden deathDe novo ICD implantationSecondary prevention ICD recipientsSudden death risk stratificationLeft ventricular ejection fractionImplantable cardioverter defibrillator implantationNarrow QRS intervalPrimary prevention ICDsDeath risk stratificationCardioverter-defibrillator implantationCongestive heart failureVentricular ejection fractionHigher ejection fractionHistory of syncopeMonomorphic ventricular tachycardiaLogistic regression analysisFuture ICD therapyHierarchical logistic regression analysisICD therapyClinical characteristicsComplication rateDefibrillator implantation
2011
Age Differences in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Use in U.S. Individuals
Tsai V, Goldstein MK, Hsia HH, Wang Y, Curtis J, Heidenreich PA, Registry O. Age Differences in Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator Use in U.S. Individuals. Journal Of The American Geriatrics Society 2011, 59: 1589-1595. PMID: 21883101, DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03542.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsICD RegistryICD useNonarrhythmic deathHigh riskImplantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) useHigh comorbid burdenPrior myocardial infarctionRisk of deathHigh-risk individualsRisk stratification systemOlder U.S. adultsYounger age groupsComorbid burdenICD implantationEjection fractionICD recipientsPrimary preventionRetrospective studyMyocardial infarctionMortality riskLower riskAge groupsU.S. adultsYounger groupOlder adults
2010
Acute Lead Dislodgements and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry
Cheng A, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Varosy PD. Acute Lead Dislodgements and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients Enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Registry. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2010, 56: 1651-1656. PMID: 21050975, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.037.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNational Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator RegistryImplantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator RegistryLead dislodgementAcute dislodgementHospital deathAdverse eventsNew York Heart Association functional class IV heart failureAtrial fibrillation/flutterCardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator deviceClass IV heart failureCommon adverse eventsIn-Hospital MortalityLow ejection fractionChronic lung diseaseMore comorbiditiesCardiac tamponadeMultivariate adjustmentEjection fractionHeart failureNonischemic cardiomyopathyAtrial fibrillationCerebrovascular diseaseCardiac arrestLung diseasePotential confoundersPrevalence and Predictors of Off-Label Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients Enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardiac-Defibrillator Registry
Fein AS, Wang Y, Curtis JP, Masoudi FA, Varosy PD, Reynolds MR, Registry C. Prevalence and Predictors of Off-Label Use of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients Enrolled in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Implantable Cardiac-Defibrillator Registry. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2010, 56: 766-773. PMID: 20797489, PMCID: PMC2958057, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNew York Heart Association functional classYork Heart Association functional classQRS interval durationLabel useConsensus guidelinesMultivariable hierarchical logistic regression modelsPrevious percutaneous coronary interventionAtrial fibrillation/flutterEvidence-based consensus guidelinesFunctional classGuideline-based indicationsPrimary prevention indicationCardiac resynchronization therapyPercutaneous coronary interventionOff-label useHierarchical logistic regression modelsInterval durationLogistic regression modelsStudy time frameApplication of CRTCoronary interventionPrevention indicationDiabetes mellitusEjection fractionResynchronization therapy
2007
Preventing tomorrow's sudden cardiac death today Part I: Current data on risk stratification for sudden cardiac death
Al-Khatib SM, Sanders GD, Bigger JT, Buxton AE, Califf RM, Carlson M, Curtis A, Curtis J, Fain E, Gersh BJ, Gold MR, Haghighi-Mood A, Hammill SC, Healey J, Hlatky M, Hohnloser S, Kim RJ, Lee K, Mark D, Mianulli M, Mitchell B, Prystowsky EN, Smith J, Steinhaus D, Zareba W, conference F. Preventing tomorrow's sudden cardiac death today Part I: Current data on risk stratification for sudden cardiac death. American Heart Journal 2007, 153: 941-950. PMID: 17540194, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.003.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSudden cardiac deathRisk stratificationCardiac deathHeart diseasePrevention of SCDLeft ventricular ejection fractionDuke Clinical Research InstituteOvert heart diseaseVentricular ejection fractionStructural heart diseaseHeart Rhythm SocietyClinical Research InstituteImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorCurrent dataEjection fractionSuch patientsSCD eventsCardioverter defibrillatorUS FoodDrug AdministrationPredictive valuePatientsDuke CenterClinical cardiologyEffective prevention
2003
The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure
Curtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang Y, Rathore SS, Ko DT, Jadbabaie F, Portnay EL, Marshalko SJ, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2003, 42: 736-742. PMID: 12932612, DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00789-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLeft ventricular ejection fractionVentricular ejection fractionHeart failureCause of deathLVEF groupHF patientsMultivariable adjustmentEjection fractionStable outpatientsAssociation of LVEFHigher left ventricular ejection fractionLow left ventricular ejection fractionDigitalis Investigation Group trialHigh LVEF groupStable HF patientsPrognostic importanceAbsolute riskPrognostic indicatorSinus rhythmGroup trialsMortality ratePatientsMortalityDeathOutpatients