2021
Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000 – 2019.
Leopold Z, Dave P, Menon A, Patel H, Srivastava A, Kim I, Jang T, Singer E. Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000 – 2019. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 356-356. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.356.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramPremier Healthcare DatabaseNational Cancer DatabaseNationwide Inpatient SampleAdministrative databasesUrologic oncologySEER-MedicareSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramStudy periodEnd Results (SEER) databaseQuality Improvement ProgramRepresentative study populationComparative effectiveness researchResults databaseGenitourinary malignanciesInpatient SampleBladder cancerCancer DatabaseProstate cancerInclusion criteriaStudy populationTreatment trendsAD useHealthcare databasesLarger sample sizeTrends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019
Leopold Z, Dave P, Menon A, Patel H, Srivastava A, Kim I, Jang T, Singer E. Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2021, 39: 487-492. PMID: 33551250, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdministrative databasesUrologic oncologyNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramPremier Healthcare DatabaseEnd Results (SEER) databaseNational Cancer DatabaseNationwide Inpatient SampleQuality Improvement ProgramRepresentative study populationComparative effectiveness researchGenitourinary malignanciesResults databaseSEER-MedicareInpatient SampleBladder cancerCancer DatabaseProstate cancerInclusion criteriaStudy populationTreatment trendsAD useHealthcare databasesLarger sample sizeStudy period
2009
Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies
Potdevin L, Ercolani M, Jeong J, Kim I. Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies. Journal Of Endourology 2009, 23: 1479-1484. PMID: 19694530, DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0369.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomyNerve sparingLaparoscopic radical prostatectomyInterfascial groupRadical prostatectomyAir groupPotency ratesBilateral nerve sparing procedureNerve sparing procedurePositive surgical marginsPT2 diseasePerioperative characteristicsContinence ratesPostoperative outcomesPT3 diseaseSparing proceduresComplication rateSurgical marginsImproved outcomesInterfascial techniqueRobotic approachPatientsProstatectomySparingStudy period