2011
Impact of Partin nomogram on presurgical planning: intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Jeong J, Choi E, Kang D, Lee D, Kim I. Impact of Partin nomogram on presurgical planning: intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Journal Of Robotic Surgery 2011, 5: 121-125. PMID: 27637538, DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0247-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPositive surgical margin rateRobot-assisted radical prostatectomySurgical margin rateNerve sparing approachNerve sparingCohort IIPartin nomogramRadical prostatectomyMargin rateBilateral nerveCohort ISparing approachOrgan-confined diseasePT3 prostate cancerPreoperative patient demographicsPatient demographicsPT3 diseaseProstate cancerPatientsProstatectomySparingPresurgical planningNomogramDiseaseSignificant differences
2009
Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies
Potdevin L, Ercolani M, Jeong J, Kim I. Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Comparing Interfascial and Intrafascial Nerve Sparing in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomies. Journal Of Endourology 2009, 23: 1479-1484. PMID: 19694530, DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0369.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomyNerve sparingLaparoscopic radical prostatectomyInterfascial groupRadical prostatectomyAir groupPotency ratesBilateral nerve sparing procedureNerve sparing procedurePositive surgical marginsPT2 diseasePerioperative characteristicsContinence ratesPostoperative outcomesPT3 diseaseSparing proceduresComplication rateSurgical marginsImproved outcomesInterfascial techniqueRobotic approachPatientsProstatectomySparingStudy period