2021
Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000 – 2019.
Leopold Z, Dave P, Menon A, Patel H, Srivastava A, Kim I, Jang T, Singer E. Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000 – 2019. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2021, 39: 356-356. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.356.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramPremier Healthcare DatabaseNational Cancer DatabaseNationwide Inpatient SampleAdministrative databasesUrologic oncologySEER-MedicareSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramStudy periodEnd Results (SEER) databaseQuality Improvement ProgramRepresentative study populationComparative effectiveness researchResults databaseGenitourinary malignanciesInpatient SampleBladder cancerCancer DatabaseProstate cancerInclusion criteriaStudy populationTreatment trendsAD useHealthcare databasesLarger sample sizeTrends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019
Leopold Z, Dave P, Menon A, Patel H, Srivastava A, Kim I, Jang T, Singer E. Trends in the use of administrative databases in urologic oncology: 2000–2019. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2021, 39: 487-492. PMID: 33551250, DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.01.014.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdministrative databasesUrologic oncologyNational Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramSurgical Quality Improvement ProgramPremier Healthcare DatabaseEnd Results (SEER) databaseNational Cancer DatabaseNationwide Inpatient SampleQuality Improvement ProgramRepresentative study populationComparative effectiveness researchGenitourinary malignanciesResults databaseSEER-MedicareInpatient SampleBladder cancerCancer DatabaseProstate cancerInclusion criteriaStudy populationTreatment trendsAD useHealthcare databasesLarger sample sizeStudy period
2017
Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open prostatectomy for men with low-risk prostate cancer
Parikh R, Patel A, Kim S, Kim I, Goyal S. Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open prostatectomy for men with low-risk prostate cancer. International Journal Of Surgery Oncology 2017, 2: e13. PMID: 29177226, PMCID: PMC5673152, DOI: 10.1097/ij9.0000000000000013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLow-risk prostate cancerLow-risk prostate cancer patientsNational Cancer DatabaseProstate cancer patientsProstate cancerCancer patientsCancer DatabaseMortality rateComparative effectivenessAcademic/research centersCharlson-Deyo comorbidity scoreHigh-volume hospitalsSurgical margin statusAbove inclusion criteriaRisk of deathCase-control studyComorbidity scoreMargin statusSurgery typeBlack patientsInsurance statusOpen prostatectomyOdds ratioInclusion criteriaClinicopathologic parameters
2013
Increased Incidence of Pathologically Nonorgan Confined Prostate Cancer in African-American Men Eligible for Active Surveillance
Ha Y, Salmasi A, Karellas M, Singer E, Kim J, Han M, Partin A, Kim W, Lee D, Kim I. Increased Incidence of Pathologically Nonorgan Confined Prostate Cancer in African-American Men Eligible for Active Surveillance. Urology 2013, 81: 831-836. PMID: 23465143, PMCID: PMC3978180, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.046.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkAA menRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate cancerNCCN criteriaBiopsy coresAS criteriaAS inclusion criteriaFinal surgical pathologyComprehensive Cancer NetworkPositive biopsy coresDatabase of menWorse clinicopathological featuresAfrican American menPathological upstagingAdvanced diseaseIndependent predictorsPathologic characteristicsClinicopathological featuresPreoperative PSAClinicopathologic findingsWA patientsInclusion criteriaPositive cores
2012
Risk of more advanced cancer at surgery in African American men eligible for active surveillance.
Salmasi A, Han M, Kim I. Risk of more advanced cancer at surgery in African American men eligible for active surveillance. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2012, 30: e15214-e15214. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e15214.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchActive surveillanceAdvanced cancerRadical prostatectomyProstate cancerNational Cancer InstituteAA menAfrican American menCaucasian manHigh riskCancer InstituteFavorable-risk prostate cancerPre-operative PSA levelLow-grade prostate cancerUnderwent radical prostatectomyRisk prostate cancerGrade prostate cancerJohns Hopkins Medical InstitutionsNCI criteriaPreoperative predictorsPSA levelsGrading of PCaPathological characteristicsSV involvementInclusion criteriaPositive cores
2011
Pathological findings following radical prostatectomy in patients who are candidates for active surveillance: impact of varying PSA levels.
Kang D, Jang T, Jeong J, Choi E, Johnson K, Lee D, Kim W, Kim I. Pathological findings following radical prostatectomy in patients who are candidates for active surveillance: impact of varying PSA levels. Asian Journal Of Andrology 2011, 13: 838-41. PMID: 21785442, PMCID: PMC3739560, DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.54.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsActive surveillance criteriaActive surveillancePSA levelsSurveillance criteriaRadical prostatectomyLow-risk prostate cancerProstate-specific antigen levelRate of upstagingRisk of upstagingActive surveillance protocolsAcceptable treatment optionRisk of upgradingProportion of menNational Cancer InstituteCalifornia San FranciscoRisk of menContext of PSAPathological findingsAntigen levelsBiochemical recurrencePathological characteristicsSurveillance protocolTreatment optionsProstate cancerInclusion criteria