2017
Feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview: Mixed-methods results from the DSM-5 international field trial
Lewis-Fernández R, Aggarwal NK, Lam PC, Galfalvy H, Weiss MG, Kirmayer LJ, Paralikar V, Deshpande SN, Díaz E, Nicasio AV, Boiler M, Alarcón RD, Rohlof H, Groen S, van Dijk RC, Jadhav S, Sarmukaddam S, Ndetei D, Scalco MZ, Bassiri K, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Ton H, Westermeyer J, Vega-Dienstmaier JM. Feasibility, acceptability and clinical utility of the Cultural Formulation Interview: Mixed-methods results from the DSM-5 international field trial. The British Journal Of Psychiatry 2017, 210: 290-297. PMID: 28104738, DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.193862.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCultural Formulation InterviewClinical utilityDSM-5 Cultural Formulation InterviewClinician-assessed outcomesRoutine clinical practiceFeasibility ratingsMixed-methods evaluationPatient ratingsClinical practiceTrial dataDiagnostic InterviewClinical toolInternational field trialDiagnostic assessmentPatientsDSM-5CliniciansCultural assessment toolMixed methods resultsAssessment toolDiagnostic sessionMixed methods dataQualitative interviewsSessionsAcceptability
2016
Using the Cultural Formulation Interview to Build Culturally Sensitive Services
Díaz E, Añez LM, Silva M, Paris M, Davidson L. Using the Cultural Formulation Interview to Build Culturally Sensitive Services. Psychiatric Services 2016, 68: 112-114. PMID: 27799018, DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600440.Peer-Reviewed Original Research