2021
Nivolumab in combination with cabozantinib for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a phase II and biomarker study
Barroso-Sousa R, Keenan TE, Li T, Tayob N, Trippa L, Pastorello RG, Richardson III ET, Dillon D, Amoozgar Z, Overmoyer B, Schnitt SJ, Winer EP, Mittendorf EA, Van Allen E, Duda DG, Tolaney SM. Nivolumab in combination with cabozantinib for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a phase II and biomarker study. Npj Breast Cancer 2021, 7: 110. PMID: 34433812, PMCID: PMC8387440, DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00287-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic triple-negative breast cancerTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesTriple-negative breast cancerObjective response ratePD-L1Primary endpointBreast cancerSingle-arm phase II studyHigh tumor-infiltrating lymphocytesLow tumor mutational burdenSafety of cabozantinibPhase II studyImmune checkpoint moleculesHigher pretreatment levelsTumor mutational burdenImmune gene expressionRECIST 1.1Checkpoint moleculesII studyImmunosuppressive cytokinesPartial responseNegative tumorsPositive tumorsTumor immunosuppressionRapid progression
2020
53. TUCATINIB VS PLACEBO ADDED TO TRASTUZUMAB AND CAPECITABINE FOR PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY TREATED HER2+ METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC) WITH BRAIN METASTASES (BM) (HER2CLIMB)
Lin N, Murthy R, Anders C, Borges V, Hurvitz S, Loi S, Abramson V, Bedard P, Oliveira M, Zelnack A, DiGiovanna M, Bachelot T, Chien A, O’Regan R, Wardley A, Mueller V, Carey L, McGoldrick S, An X, Winer E. 53. TUCATINIB VS PLACEBO ADDED TO TRASTUZUMAB AND CAPECITABINE FOR PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUSLY TREATED HER2+ METASTATIC BREAST CANCER (MBC) WITH BRAIN METASTASES (BM) (HER2CLIMB). Neuro-Oncology Advances 2020, 2: ii11-ii11. PMCID: PMC7401403, DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaa073.041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic breast cancerBrain metastasesCNS-PFSSecond progressionControl armEfficacy analysisBrain progressionExploratory efficacy analysesMedian CNS-PFSBaseline brain MRIMedian OSOverall deathRECIST 1.1Study therapyMedian timeInvestigator's evaluationIC diseaseLocal treatmentBreast cancerBrain MRIReduced riskCapecitabineTrastuzumabTucatinibHER2Tucatinib versus placebo added to trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with previously treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases (HER2CLIMB).
Lin N, Murthy R, Anders C, Borges V, Hurvitz S, Loi S, Abramson V, Bedard P, Oliveira M, Zelnak A, DiGiovanna M, Bachelot T, Chien A, O'Regan R, Wardley A, Müller V, Carey L, McGoldrick S, An G, Winer E. Tucatinib versus placebo added to trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with previously treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases (HER2CLIMB). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2020, 38: 1005-1005. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.1005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic breast cancerProgression-free survivalObjective response rateBrain metastasesOverall survivalCNS-PFSControl armSecond progressionEfficacy analysisBrain progressionLocal treatmentBreast cancerProlongation of PFSMedian progression-free survivalExploratory efficacy analysesMedian CNS-PFSMedian overall survivalBaseline brain MRIHER2 kinase inhibitorDeath overallRECIST 1.1Study therapyFree survivalInvestigator's evaluationIC disease
2019
A phase II study of cabozantinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in breast cancer patients with brain metastases
Leone JP, Duda DG, Hu J, Barry WT, Trippa L, Gerstner ER, Jain RK, Tan S, Lawler E, Winer EP, Lin NU, Tolaney SM. A phase II study of cabozantinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Breast Cancer Research And Treatment 2019, 179: 113-123. PMID: 31541381, DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05445-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBreast cancer brain metastasesObjective response rateCNS objective response ratePhase II studyCohort 2Cohort 1BCBM patientsBrain metastasesII studyCohort 3Central nervous system (CNS) objective response rateMost common grade 3/4 adverse eventsCommon grade 3/4 adverse eventsSingle-arm phase II studyGrade 3/4 adverse eventsSecondary objectiveTolerability of cabozantinibWhole brain radiationCancer brain metastasesProgression-free survivalBreast cancer patientsTumor blood volumeCabozantinib 60RECIST 1.1STie-2Nimbus: A phase II study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in metastatic hypermutated HER2-negative breast cancer.
Barroso-Sousa R, Trippa L, Lange P, Andrews C, McArthur H, Haley B, Rugo H, Emens L, Winer E, Mittendorf E, Tolaney S. Nimbus: A phase II study of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in metastatic hypermutated HER2-negative breast cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37: tps1115-tps1115. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps1115.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic breast cancerTumor mutational burdenHER2-negative breast cancerBreast cancerResponse rateObjective responseTrue response rateMetastatic HER2-negative breast cancerHER2-negative metastatic breast cancerFurther studiesCombination of nivolumabEfficacy of nivolumabPhase 2 studyPhase II studyProgression-free survivalOverall response rateMut/MbMutations/megabaseCancer gene panelRECIST 1.1II studyOverall survivalPrior linesPeripheral bloodDisease progression
2018
Phase II study of ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer
Stover DG, Gil Del Alcazar CR, Brock J, Guo H, Overmoyer B, Balko J, Xu Q, Bardia A, Tolaney SM, Gelman R, Lloyd M, Wang Y, Xu Y, Michor F, Wang V, Winer EP, Polyak K, Lin NU. Phase II study of ruxolitinib, a selective JAK1/2 inhibitor, in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Npj Breast Cancer 2018, 4: 10. PMID: 29761158, PMCID: PMC5935675, DOI: 10.1038/s41523-018-0060-z.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMetastatic triple-negative breast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerPhase II studyBreast cancerII studyObjective responseNon-randomized phase II studyIL-6/JAK2/STAT3Efficacy of ruxolitinibInfrequent grade 3Refractory patient populationPrimary efficacy endpointMetastatic breast cancerInflammatory breast cancerSelective JAK1/2 inhibitorArchival tumor tissueJAK2/STAT3Central immunohistochemistryCommon toxicitiesRECIST 1.1Efficacy endpointPrimary endpointProtocol therapyJAK1/2 inhibitorPatient population
2014
A randomized phase 2 trial comparing efficacy of the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the antiangiogenic cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
Liu J, Barry W, Birrer M, Lee J, Buckanovich R, Fleming G, Rimel B, Buss M, Nattam S, Hurteau J, Luo W, Quy P, Obermayer E, Whalen C, Lee H, Winer E, Kohn E, Ivy S, Matulonis U. A randomized phase 2 trial comparing efficacy of the combination of the PARP inhibitor olaparib and the antiangiogenic cediranib against olaparib alone in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2014, 32: lba5500-lba5500. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.18_suppl.lba5500.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalPartial responseComplete responseHazard ratioOvarian cancerRecurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancerMedian progression-free survivalPrior anti-angiogenic therapyPARP inhibitorsPlatinum-sensitive ovarian cancerRandomized phase 2 trialOpen-label studyRecurrent ovarian cancerPhase 2 trialPhase 1 studyExploratory subgroup analysisAnti-angiogenic therapyCombination of cediranibPARP inhibitor olaparibMeasurable diseaseRECIST 1.1Radiographic progressionPFS eventsPS 0Oral combination