2018
Crowdsourcing consensus: proposal of a novel method for assessing accuracy in echocardiography interpretation
Minter S, Armour A, Tinnemore A, Strub K, Crowley AL, Bloomfield GS, Alexander JH, Douglas PS, Kisslo JA, Velazquez EJ, Samad Z. Crowdsourcing consensus: proposal of a novel method for assessing accuracy in echocardiography interpretation. The International Journal Of Cardiovascular Imaging 2018, 34: 1725-1730. PMID: 30128849, DOI: 10.1007/s10554-018-1389-y.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStress echocardiography studyObstructive coronary diseaseGold standardWall motion abnormalitiesCoronary angiography dataCoronary diseaseStress echocardiographyEchocardiography studyHard outcomesMotion abnormalitiesStress echoSurvey participants' responsesClinical readsEchocardiographic interpretationImperfect gold standardIndependent consensusParticipants' responsesEchocardiographic imagesAngiography dataEchocardiography interpretationValidation surveyParticipantsEchocardiographyConsensusFirst survey
2016
Implementing a Continuous Quality Improvement Program in a High-Volume Clinical Echocardiography Laboratory
Samad Z, Minter S, Armour A, Tinnemore A, Sivak JA, Sedberry B, Strub K, Horan SM, Harrison JK, Kisslo J, Douglas PS, Velazquez EJ. Implementing a Continuous Quality Improvement Program in a High-Volume Clinical Echocardiography Laboratory. Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging 2016, 9: e003708. PMID: 26957220, DOI: 10.1161/circimaging.115.003708.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisCardiac CatheterizationCritical PathwaysEchocardiography, DopplerFeasibility StudiesHemodynamicsHospitals, High-VolumeHumansObserver VariationPatient Care TeamPractice Patterns, Physicians'Predictive Value of TestsProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexWorkflowConceptsAortic stenosisCatheterization dataContinuous quality improvementMean gradientAortic valve mean gradientCQI teamClinical echocardiography laboratoryGreater aortic stenosisProportion of patientsReferral of patientsPrimary outcome measureContinuous quality improvement programQuality Improvement ProgramAortic gradientCardiac catheterizationEchocardiographic diagnosisEchocardiography studyPractice patternsInvasive studiesOutcome measuresEchocardiography laboratoryValve hemodynamicsSecond sonographerCatheterizationCQI program
2007
Mitral regurgitation in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both: prognostic significance and relation to ventricular size and function
Amigoni M, Meris A, Thune JJ, Mangalat D, Skali H, Bourgoun M, Warnica JW, Barvik S, Arnold JM, Velazquez EJ, Van de Werf F, Ghali J, McMurray JJ, Køber L, Pfeffer MA, Solomon SD. Mitral regurgitation in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction, or both: prognostic significance and relation to ventricular size and function. European Heart Journal 2007, 28: 326-333. PMID: 17251259, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl464.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCardiac VolumeDisease ProgressionEchocardiography, Doppler, ColorElectrocardiographyFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitral Valve InsufficiencyMyocardial InfarctionObserver VariationPrognosisProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsVentricular Dysfunction, LeftVentricular RemodelingConceptsProgression of MRBaseline mitral regurgitationHeart failureMitral regurgitationAcute myocardial infarctionMyocardial infarctionVentricular sizeMR severityHigh-risk myocardial infarctionModerate-severe mitral regurgitationBaseline MR severityWorse LV functionEnd-systolic volumeLarger LV volumesRegurgitant jet areaAtrial area ratioCV mortalityHF hospitalizationCardiovascular outcomesSystolic dysfunctionVentricular dysfunctionEjection fractionIndependent predictorsClinical outcomesLV function