2024
Diuretic dosing and outcomes with torsemide and furosemide following hospitalization for heart failure: the TRANSFORM-HF trial
Nouhravesh N, Clare R, Wojdyla D, Anstrom K, Velazquez E, Greene S, Pitt B, Mentz R, Psotka M. Diuretic dosing and outcomes with torsemide and furosemide following hospitalization for heart failure: the TRANSFORM-HF trial. European Heart Journal 2024, 45: ehae666.1068. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1068.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchKCCQ-CSSTertile 1Diuretic doseHeart failureAll-cause mortalityTertile 3Tertile 2Diuretic strategyKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary ScoreDoses of loop diureticsHigh doses of furosemideComposite all-cause mortalityBaseline to monthDose of furosemideClinical summary scoreRisk of adverse eventsInteraction p valuePost hoc analysisFurosemide equivalentsLoop diureticsOpen-labelMedian ageNo significant differenceClinical outcomesStudy endpointDiuretic dosing and outcomes with torsemide and furosemide following hospitalization for heart failure: The TRANSFORM‐HF trial
Nouhravesh N, Greene S, Clare R, Wojdyla D, Anstrom K, Velazquez E, Pitt B, Mentz R, Psotka M. Diuretic dosing and outcomes with torsemide and furosemide following hospitalization for heart failure: The TRANSFORM‐HF trial. European Journal Of Heart Failure 2024 PMID: 39363809, DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3458.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchLoop diuretic doseDiuretic doseHeart failureDiuretic typeKCCQ-CSSClinical outcomesKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary ScoreGroup 2High dosesHigher loop diuretic dosesGroup 3High doses of furosemideDose group 2Associated with increased riskDose of furosemideClinical summary scoreSecondary clinical outcomesPatient-reported outcomesPost hoc analysisFurosemide equivalentsDose groupDischarge doseTRANSFORM-HFClinical eventsGroup 1Mechanistic Differences between Torsemide and Furosemide.
Rao V, Cox Z, Ivey-Miranda J, Neville D, Balkcom N, Moreno-Villagomez J, Ramos-Mastache D, Maulion C, Bellumkonda L, Tang W, Collins S, Velazquez E, Mentz R, Wilson F, Turner J, Wilcox C, Ellison D, Fang J, Testani J. Mechanistic Differences between Torsemide and Furosemide. Journal Of The American Society Of Nephrology 2024 PMID: 39196651, DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000481.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTorsemide groupDiuretic doseTubular site of actionHigher diuretic dosesDose of furosemideProportion of dosesOral furosemideSite of actionPrescribed doseNeurohormonal activationMechanistic substudyClinical outcomesPharmacodynamic advantagesKidney dysfunctionPharmacodynamic parametersKidney functionRandomized trialsNatriuresisTubular sitesFurosemideTorsemideDoseTRANSFORM-HFPlasma volumeBody weightImpact of baseline kidney dysfunction on oral diuretic efficacy following hospitalization for heart failure – insights from TRANSFORM‐HF
Martens P, Greene S, Mentz R, Li S, Wojdyla D, Kapelios C, Mullens W, Hall M, Ketema F, Kim D, Eisenstein E, Anstrom K, Fang J, Pitt B, Velazquez E, Tang W. Impact of baseline kidney dysfunction on oral diuretic efficacy following hospitalization for heart failure – insights from TRANSFORM‐HF. European Journal Of Heart Failure 2024, 26: 1242-1250. PMID: 38558520, DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.3207.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchEffect of torsemideBaseline renal functionRenal functionHeart failureKCCQ-CSSRandomized patientsKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary ScoreSpectrum of renal functionBaseline kidney dysfunctionCategories of estimated glomerular filtration rateTrial randomized patientsClinical summary scoreAdverse clinical outcomesGlomerular filtration rateAll-cause mortalityTreatment effect modificationModify treatment effectsPost hoc analysisPatient-reported outcomesDiuretic efficacyBaseline eGFRNo significant differenceClinical outcomesKidney dysfunctionFiltration rateTorsemide Versus Furosemide After Discharge in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: Findings From TRANSFORM-HF
Kapelios C, Greene S, Mentz R, Ikeaba U, Wojdyla D, Anstrom K, Eisenstein E, Pitt B, Velazquez E, Fang J, Investigators T. Torsemide Versus Furosemide After Discharge in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: Findings From TRANSFORM-HF. Circulation Heart Failure 2024, 17: e011246. PMID: 38436075, PMCID: PMC10950535, DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.123.011246.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLeft ventricular ejection fractionLVEF groupsKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary ScoreMildly reduced left ventricular ejection fractionBaseline left ventricular ejection fractionReduced left ventricular ejection fractionClinical summary scoreHeart failureNo significant differenceEjection fractionClinical outcomesLVEF spectrumSignificant differenceLeft ventricular ejection fraction dataEnd pointsSpectrum of ejection fractionEffect of torsemideRisk of clinical outcomesVentricular ejection fractionStudy end pointBaseline patient characteristicsClinical end pointsSummary scoreAll-cause mortalityPrevalence of comorbiditiesSacubitril/Valsartan in Patients Hospitalized With Decompensated Heart Failure
Morrow D, Velazquez E, Desai A, DeVore A, Lepage S, Park J, Sharma K, Solomon S, Starling R, Ward J, Williamson K, Zieroth S, Hernandez A, Mentz R, Braunwald E. Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients Hospitalized With Decompensated Heart Failure. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2024, 83: 1123-1132. PMID: 38508844, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.01.027.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsWorsening heart failureHeart failureEjection fractionNT-proBNPSpectrum of EFPIONEER-HFSpectrum of left ventricular ejection fractionRandomized trialsTime-averaged proportional changeN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptidePro-B-type natriuretic peptideLeft ventricular ejection fractionWorsening heart failure eventDecompensated heart failureVentricular ejection fractionPlasma NT-proBNPPIONEER-HF trialDouble-blindMedian ageMedian EFSNatriuretic peptideSymptomatic hypotensionBaseline characteristicsClinical outcomesPooled analysisEfficacy And Safety Of Sacubitril/valsartan In Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: A Prespecified, Pooled Individual Patient-level Analysis Of PIONEER-HF And PARAGLIDE-HF
Morrow D, Velazquez E, Desai A, DeVore A, Lepage S, Park J, Sharma K, Solomon S, Starling R, Ward J, Williamson K, Zieroth S, Hernandez A, Mentz R, Braunwald E. Efficacy And Safety Of Sacubitril/valsartan In Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure: A Prespecified, Pooled Individual Patient-level Analysis Of PIONEER-HF And PARAGLIDE-HF. Journal Of Cardiac Failure 2024, 30: 312-313. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.467.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSacubitril/valsartanPIONEER-HFHeart failurePooled analysisNT-proBNPControl therapyDe novo heart failurePlasma NT-proBNP levelsIndependent clinical events committeeIndividual patient-level analysisNovo heart failureNT-proBNP levelsClinical events committeePatient-level analysisCardiovascular deathHemodynamic stabilizationPrimary endpointSymptomatic hypotensionRenal functionMedian ageClinical outcomesRandomized trialsClinical effectsEvents committeeHF events
2023
Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pre-specified participant-level pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF
Vaduganathan M, Mentz R, Claggett B, Miao Z, Kulac I, Ward J, Hernandez A, Morrow D, Starling R, Velazquez E, Williamson K, Desai A, Zieroth S, Lefkowitz M, McMurray J, Braunwald E, Solomon S. Sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: a pre-specified participant-level pooled analysis of PARAGLIDE-HF and PARAGON-HF. European Heart Journal 2023, 44: 2982-2993. PMID: 37210743, PMCID: PMC10424880, DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad344.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSacubitril/valsartanRenal composite endpointPARAGON-HFHeart failureEjection fractionPooled analysisHF eventsRenal eventsCardiovascular deathComposite endpointLeft ventricular ejection fractionVentricular ejection fractionActive-controlled trialParticipant-level dataPrimary endpointSecondary endpointsClinical outcomesNatriuretic peptideLike patientsTreatment benefitCare settingsPatientsPrimary analysisLVEFValsartanRationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of the PARAGLIDE-HF Trial: Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Valsartan in HFmrEF and HFpEF With a Worsening Heart Failure Event
Mentz R, Ward J, Hernandez A, Lepage S, Morrow D, Sarwat S, Sharma K, Solomon S, Starling R, Velazquez E, Williamson K, Zieroth S, Braunwald E. Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of the PARAGLIDE-HF Trial: Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Valsartan in HFmrEF and HFpEF With a Worsening Heart Failure Event. Journal Of Cardiac Failure 2023, 29: 922-930. PMID: 36796671, DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.02.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSac/ValSacubitril/valsartanHeart failure eventsPARAGON-HF trialWHF eventNT-proBNPEjection fractionHeart failureClinical outcomesAmino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsTerminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsB-type natriuretic peptide levelsDe novo HFChronic heart failureNatriuretic peptide levelsPrimary efficacy endpointPg/mLEfficacy endpointSafety endpointSecondary endpointsSymptomatic hypotensionBaseline characteristicsRenal functionStable patientsBlack patients
2022
PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes
Ahmad Y, Petrie M, Jolicoeur E, Madhavan M, Velazquez E, Moses J, Lansky A, Stone G. PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2022, 1: 100020. PMID: 39132568, PMCID: PMC11307477, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100020.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPercutaneous coronary interventionLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionCoronary artery diseaseHeart failureComplete revascularizationMedical therapyClinical outcomesClinical trialsCoronary artery bypassVentricular systolic dysfunctionClinical trial evidenceHigh operative riskHigh-risk patientsMajor cardiac surgeryExtent of revascularizationMinority of patientsFuture clinical trialsArtery bypassCause mortalityPeriprocedural complicationsSystolic dysfunctionCoronary interventionOperative riskArtery diseaseCardiac surgery
2020
Initiation of Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition After Acute Decompensated Heart Failure
DeVore AD, Braunwald E, Morrow DA, Duffy CI, Ambrosy AP, Chakraborty H, McCague K, Rocha R, Velazquez EJ. Initiation of Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition After Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. JAMA Cardiology 2020, 5: 202-207. PMID: 31825471, PMCID: PMC6990764, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4665.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAcute DiseaseAgedAminobutyratesAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsBiphenyl CompoundsDrug CombinationsEnalaprilFemaleHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatriuretic Peptide, BrainNeprilysinPatient DischargePeptide FragmentsTetrazolesValsartanConceptsAcute decompensated heart failureSacubitril/valsartanNT-proBNP levelsDecompensated heart failureOpen-label studyReduced ejection fractionHospital initiationHeart failurePIONEER-HFEjection fractionWeek 8N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsPro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsOpen-label extension phaseAngiotensin-Neprilysin InhibitionHeart failure rehospitalizationPIONEER-HF trialWeek 8 visitNatriuretic peptide levelsActive-controlled trialCardiovascular deathComposite outcomeHemodynamic stabilityRecent hospitalizationClinical outcomes
2019
Association between systolic ejection time and outcomes in heart failure by ejection fraction
Patel PA, Ambrosy AP, Phelan M, Alenezi F, Chiswell K, Van Dyke MK, Tomfohr J, Honarpour N, Velazquez EJ. Association between systolic ejection time and outcomes in heart failure by ejection fraction. European Journal Of Heart Failure 2019, 22: 1174-1182. PMID: 31863532, PMCID: PMC7493053, DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1659.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSystolic ejection timeEjection fractionHeart failureClinical outcomesVentricular systolic ejection timeOutpatient transthoracic echocardiogramReduced ejection fractionTertiary referral centerMultivariable logistic regressionHFrEF patientsHF patientsReferral centerTransthoracic echocardiogramAmbulatory patientsHF populationEjection timeEligibility criteriaLogistic regressionPatientsOutcomesAssociationHFpEFEchocardiogramBiomarker Profile of Left Atrial Myopathy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the RELAX Trial
Patel RB, Alenezi F, Sun JL, Alhanti B, Vaduganathan M, Oh JK, Redfield MM, Butler J, Hernandez AF, Velazquez EJ, Shah SJ. Biomarker Profile of Left Atrial Myopathy in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Insights From the RELAX Trial. Journal Of Cardiac Failure 2019, 26: 270-275. PMID: 31857197, PMCID: PMC7078046, DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.12.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLA reservoir strainLA myopathyHeart failureNT-proBNPEjection fractionLA reservoirReservoir strainLA strainN-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptidePro-B-type natriuretic peptideAtrial mechanical dysfunctionEjection Fraction trialLA contractile strainLower LA reservoirJugular venous pressurePoor clinical outcomePhosphodiesterase-5 inhibitionAssociation of LAAtrial myopathyBaseline echocardiogramRELAX trialNeurohormonal activationExercise capacityVenous pressureClinical outcomesSacubitril/Valsartan Initiated in Black Patients Admitted for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Reduced NT-proBNP, was Safe and Led to Improved Clinical Outcomes- A Secondary Analysis of the PIONEER-HF Trial
Velazquez E, Ambrosy A, Morrow D, McCague K, Duffy C, O'Brien T, Rocha R, DeVore A, Braunwald E. Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiated in Black Patients Admitted for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Reduced NT-proBNP, was Safe and Led to Improved Clinical Outcomes- A Secondary Analysis of the PIONEER-HF Trial. Journal Of Cardiac Failure 2019, 25: s80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.07.227.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAcute decompensated HFPIONEER-HF trialHeart failureNT-proBNPBlack patientsPg/mLAngioedema eventsHospital initiationClinical outcomesAcute decompensated heart failureAngiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorPre-specified subgroup analysisPrior heart failureACEI/ARBDecompensated heart failureNatriuretic peptide levelsSacubitril/valsartanImproved clinical outcomesSelf-reported raceCV deathEnalapril armHemodynamic stabilizationSymptomatic hypotensionRenal functionNeprilysin inhibitorRenal Effects of Intensive Volume Removal in Heart Failure Patients With Preexisting Worsening Renal Function
Rao VS, Ahmad T, Brisco-Bacik MA, Bonventre JV, Wilson FP, Siew ED, Felker GM, Anstrom KK, Mahoney DD, Bart BA, Tang WHW, Velazquez EJ, Testani JM. Renal Effects of Intensive Volume Removal in Heart Failure Patients With Preexisting Worsening Renal Function. Circulation Heart Failure 2019, 12: e005552. PMID: 31163974, PMCID: PMC6585463, DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.118.005552.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRenal tubular injury biomarkersTubular injury biomarkersHeart failure patientsAcute decompensated heart failure patientsDecompensated heart failure patientsTubular injury markersInjury biomarkersFailure patientsRenal functionInjury markersAcute decompensated heart failureVolume removalCARRESS-HF trialRenal function recoveryDecompensated heart failureRenal tubular injuryRenal effectsSerum creatinineTubular injuryBiomarker substudyHeart failurePharmacological therapyClinical outcomesFunction recoveryHigh incidenceClinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Randomly Assigned to Sacubitril/Valsartan or Enalapril in the PIONEER-HF Trial
Morrow DA, Velazquez EJ, DeVore AD, Desai AS, Duffy CI, Ambrosy AP, Gurmu Y, McCague K, Rocha R, Braunwald E. Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Randomly Assigned to Sacubitril/Valsartan or Enalapril in the PIONEER-HF Trial. Circulation 2019, 139: 2285-2288. PMID: 30955360, DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.118.039331.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchTrends in cardiorespiratory fitness: The evolution of exercise treadmill testing at a single Academic Medical Center from 1970 to 2012
Kelly JP, Andonian BJ, Patel MJ, Huang Z, Shaw LK, McGarrah RW, Borges-Neto S, Velazquez EJ, Kraus WE. Trends in cardiorespiratory fitness: The evolution of exercise treadmill testing at a single Academic Medical Center from 1970 to 2012. American Heart Journal 2019, 210: 88-97. PMID: 30743212, PMCID: PMC6441626, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.01.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsExercise treadmill testingCardiorespiratory fitnessTreadmill testingMetabolic equivalentsSingle academic medical centerStandard Bruce protocolMaximal treadmill speedDuke University HospitalAcademic medical centerBaseline comorbiditiesEligible patientsNuclear perfusionBruce protocolClinical outcomesStress echocardiographyUniversity HospitalMedical CenterMedical care environmentClinical practiceRamp protocolMaximal exertionPatientsTreadmill speedPowerful predictorCare environment
2017
Adverse Remodeling and Reverse Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction
Bhatt AS, Ambrosy AP, Velazquez EJ. Adverse Remodeling and Reverse Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction. Current Cardiology Reports 2017, 19: 71. PMID: 28660552, DOI: 10.1007/s11886-017-0876-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdverse LV remodelingMyocardial infarctionLV remodelingAdverse remodelingNeurohormonal regulationLeft ventricleCurrent evidence-based therapiesPost-MI heart failurePoor clinical outcomeAdverse cardiac remodelingPost-MI settingDevice-based therapiesEvidence-based therapiesNeurohormonal blockadeEarly revascularizationPathophysiological considerationsHeart failureVentricular dyssynchronyClinical outcomesEjection fractionMultiple imaging modalitiesCardiac remodelingTreatment strategiesReviewThe purposeInfarctionComparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus and With Versus Without Angina Pectoris (from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease)
Banks A, Broderick S, Chiswell K, Shaw L, Devore A, Fiuzat M, O'Connor C, Felker GM, Velazquez E, Mentz R. Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Versus Without Diabetes Mellitus and With Versus Without Angina Pectoris (from the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease). The American Journal Of Cardiology 2017, 119: 1703-1709. PMID: 28395884, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.053.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCoronary artery diseaseAngina pectorisDiabetes mellitusDM statusCause mortalityMultivariable Cox regressionOutcomes of patientsDifferent prognostic implicationsSeverity of diseaseAP statusCV hospitalizationClinical characteristicsArtery diseaseCoronary angiographyDM patientsClinical outcomesCox regressionPrognostic implicationsPrognostic utilityRevascularizationSimilar riskPatientsRisk adjustmentMortalityPectoris
2015
Importance of Angina in Patients With Coronary Disease, Heart Failure, and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Insights From STICH
Jolicœur EM, Dunning A, Castelvecchio S, Dabrowski R, Waclawiw MA, Petrie MC, Stewart R, Jhund PS, Desvigne-Nickens P, Panza JA, Bonow RO, Sun B, San TR, Al-Khalidi HR, Rouleau JL, Velazquez EJ, Cleland JGF. Importance of Angina in Patients With Coronary Disease, Heart Failure, and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Insights From STICH. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2015, 66: 2092-2100. PMID: 26541919, PMCID: PMC4655599, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.08.882.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCoronary artery diseaseLV systolic dysfunctionGreater survival benefitMedical therapySystolic dysfunctionCause mortalitySurvival benefitWorse prognosisCoronary artery bypass graft surgeryLeft ventricular systolic dysfunctionArtery bypass graft surgeryLong-term clinical outcomesGreater prognostic benefitBypass graft surgeryVentricular systolic dysfunctionEffect of CABGMultivariable CoxSTICH trialGraft surgeryPrognostic benefitArtery diseaseCoronary diseaseEjection fractionHeart failureClinical outcomes