2024
Torsemide vs Furosemide Among Patients With New-Onset vs Worsening Chronic Heart Failure
Krim S, Anand S, Greene S, Chen A, Wojdyla D, Vilaro J, Haught H, Herre J, Eisenstein E, Anstrom K, Pitt B, Velazquez E, Mentz R. Torsemide vs Furosemide Among Patients With New-Onset vs Worsening Chronic Heart Failure. JAMA Cardiology 2024, 9: 182-188. PMID: 37955908, PMCID: PMC10644243, DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4776.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDe novo heart failureNovo heart failureChronic heart failureHeart failurePatient-reported outcomesCause mortalityHF typeKansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary scoreHigher glomerular filtration rateSignificant differencesHeart Failure TrialGlomerular filtration rateClinical summary scoreDiuretic strategyFirst rehospitalizationCause hospitalizationNew onsetTotal hospitalizationsClinical characteristicsClinical profileEjection fractionLoop diureticsFailure TrialHospitalization outcomesNatriuretic peptide
2023
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Worsening Heart Failure
Mentz R, Ward J, Hernandez A, Lepage S, Morrow D, Sarwat S, Sharma K, Starling R, Velazquez E, Williamson K, Desai A, Zieroth S, Solomon S, Braunwald E, Investigators P. Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Worsening Heart Failure. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2023, 82: 1-12. PMID: 37212758, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.04.019.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSacubitril/valsartanEjection fractionWHF eventNT-proBNPSymptomatic hypotensionHeart failureAmino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptideTerminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptidePro-B-type natriuretic peptidePlasma NT-proBNP levelsAngiotensin-Neprilysin InhibitionNT-proBNP changesNT-proBNP levelsUrgent HF visitsChronic heart failureHeart failure eventsLarge treatment effectsHF hospitalizationHF visitsCardiovascular deathPrimary endpointRenal functionClinical benefitNatriuretic peptideWeek 4Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of the PARAGLIDE-HF Trial: Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Valsartan in HFmrEF and HFpEF With a Worsening Heart Failure Event
Mentz R, Ward J, Hernandez A, Lepage S, Morrow D, Sarwat S, Sharma K, Solomon S, Starling R, Velazquez E, Williamson K, Zieroth S, Braunwald E. Rationale, Design and Baseline Characteristics of the PARAGLIDE-HF Trial: Sacubitril/Valsartan vs Valsartan in HFmrEF and HFpEF With a Worsening Heart Failure Event. Journal Of Cardiac Failure 2023, 29: 922-930. PMID: 36796671, DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.02.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSac/ValSacubitril/valsartanHeart failure eventsPARAGON-HF trialWHF eventNT-proBNPEjection fractionHeart failureClinical outcomesAmino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsTerminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levelsB-type natriuretic peptide levelsDe novo HFChronic heart failureNatriuretic peptide levelsPrimary efficacy endpointPg/mLEfficacy endpointSafety endpointSecondary endpointsSymptomatic hypotensionBaseline characteristicsRenal functionStable patientsBlack patients
2017
Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: outcomes following an acute heart failure hospitalization
Buggey J, Alenezi F, Yoon HJ, Phelan M, DeVore AD, Khouri MG, Schulte PJ, Velazquez EJ. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: outcomes following an acute heart failure hospitalization. ESC Heart Failure 2017, 4: 432-439. PMID: 29154416, PMCID: PMC5695196, DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12159.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAcute heart failure hospitalizationVentricular global longitudinal strainAbnormal LV-GLSLV-GLSHeart failure hospitalizationGlobal longitudinal strainAcute HFpEFFailure hospitalizationEjection fractionHeart failureLongitudinal strainCox proportional hazards modelDuke University Medical CenterComposite of mortalityMedian LV-GLSWorse LV-GLSChronic heart failureWorse clinical outcomesMyocardial systolic dysfunctionSpeckle-tracking analysisProportional hazards modelUniversity Medical CenterMultivariable adjustmentSystolic dysfunctionBaseline characteristics
2004
Multinational economic evaluation of valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT)
Reed SD, Friedman JY, Velazquez EJ, Gnanasakthy A, Califf RM, Schulman KA. Multinational economic evaluation of valsartan in patients with chronic heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). American Heart Journal 2004, 148: 122-128. PMID: 15215801, DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.12.040.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHealth ResourcesHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTetrazolesValineValsartanConceptsValsartan Heart Failure TrialHeart failure hospitalizationHeart Failure TrialHeart failureACE inhibitorsFailure hospitalizationFailure TrialNew York Heart Association class IIIncremental costChronic heart failureMean incremental costOutpatient physician servicesBackground therapyCardiovascular medicationsNet incremental costClinical benefitPrescribed therapyClinical signsAmbulance transportationPatientsUnit cost estimatesHealth outcomesPlaceboValsartanClass II