2015
Analgesic Access for Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Patients
Shah AA, Zogg CK, Zafar SN, Schneider EB, Cooper LA, Chapital AB, Peterson SM, Havens JM, Thorpe RJ, Roter DL, Castillo RC, Salim A, Haider AH. Analgesic Access for Acute Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department Among Racial/Ethnic Minority Patients. Medical Care 2015, 53: 1000-1009. PMID: 26569642, DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000444.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAbdominal PainAcute PainAdolescentAdultAgedAnalgesicsBlack or African AmericanDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresEmergency Service, HospitalEthnicityFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealthcare DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedNarcoticsRacial GroupsResidence CharacteristicsRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsTime FactorsWhite PeopleYoung AdultConceptsAcute abdominal painLower risk-adjusted oddsRisk-adjusted oddsAbdominal painRace/ethnicityEmergency departmentMinority patientsEthnic disparitiesNontraumatic acute abdominal painRisk-adjusted multivariable analysisNon-Hispanic black patientsNon-Hispanic white patientsRace/ethnicity-based differencesEthnic group patientsModerate-severe painPatient-reported painPatients 18 yearsProportion of patientsSubsequent inpatient admissionSurgery of TraumaRisk-adjusted differencesED wait timesNon-Hispanic blacksEthnic minority patientsUniform definition
2014
Benchmarking trauma centers on mortality alone does not reflect quality of care
Hashmi Z, Schneider E, Castillo R, Haut E, Zafar S, Cornwell E, MacKenzie E, Latif A, Haider A. Benchmarking trauma centers on mortality alone does not reflect quality of care. Journal Of Trauma And Acute Care Surgery 2014, 76: 1184-1191. PMID: 24747447, DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000000215.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedBenchmarkingCause of DeathDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospital MortalityHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Health CareReimbursement, IncentiveRisk AdjustmentSensitivity and SpecificitySurvival AnalysisTrauma CentersUnited StatesWounds and InjuriesWounds, NonpenetratingWounds, PenetratingYoung AdultConceptsInjury Severity ScoreTrauma centerNational Trauma Data BankPatients 16 yearsHigh complication rateRisk of deathTrauma Data BankHospital performance rankingsQuality of careUnadjusted morbidityPerformance statusComplication rateMajor complicationsMorbidity outcomesMortality outcomesSeverity scoreMorbidity ratioMortality ratioEpidemiologic studiesMorbidityMorbidity analysisMortality rateLevel IIIPoor concordanceComplications
2013
Influence of Patient, Physician, and Hospital Factors on 30-Day Readmission Following Pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States
Hyder O, Dodson R, Nathan H, Schneider E, Weiss M, Cameron J, Choti M, Makary M, Hirose K, Wolfgang C, Herman J, Pawlik T. Influence of Patient, Physician, and Hospital Factors on 30-Day Readmission Following Pancreatoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surgery 2013, 148: 1095-1102. PMID: 24108580, PMCID: PMC3983984, DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2509.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelCohort StudiesComorbidityCross InfectionFemaleHealth Care SurveysHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMedicareOutcome Assessment, Health CarePancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSEER ProgramSurvival RateTime FactorsUnited StatesWorkloadConceptsPancreatoduodenectomy proceduresMedical comorbiditiesHospital factorsSurgeon volumeMedicare dataPopulation-based cancer registry dataPreoperative medical comorbiditiesRetrospective cohort studyDays of dischargeHospital-level factorsLow-volume hospitalsPatient-related factorsChance of readmissionLength of stayInfluence of patientCancer registry dataPancreatoduodenectomy patientsHospital morbidityCohort studyHospital volumeHospital readmissionMedian agePhysician factorsDistinct hospitalsPatient levelTrends in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Pediatric Patients
Monn M, Bahler C, Schneider E, Whittam B, Misseri R, Rink R, Sundaram C. Trends in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Pediatric Patients. Urology 2013, 81: 1336-1341. PMID: 23522294, DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRobotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplastyNationwide Inpatient SampleLaparoscopic pyeloplastyPediatric pyeloplastyPediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplastyMultiple logistic regressionYears of agePediatric patientsInpatient SampleInvasive techniquesPyeloplastyAge-related trendsRobotic pyeloplastyNational ratesLogistic regressionPatientsOlder childrenRobotic techniquesRobotic assistanceIncidenceTotal numberOverall increaseYears
2012
Variations in surgical outcomes associated with hospital compliance with safety practices
Brooke B, Dominici F, Pronovost P, Makary M, Schneider E, Pawlik T. Variations in surgical outcomes associated with hospital compliance with safety practices. Surgery 2012, 151: 651-659. PMID: 22261296, PMCID: PMC3414538, DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.12.001.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Care SurveysHospitalsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SafetyPostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareSurgical Procedures, OperativeUnited StatesConceptsHigh-risk operationsHospital compliancePostoperative complicationsSafe practiceOpen aortic aneurysm repairHospital-level confoundersRisk-adjusted oddsAortic aneurysm repairRandom effects logistic regression modelEffects logistic regression modelsCross-sectional analysisLogistic regression modelsSafety practicesNationwide hospitalsAneurysm repairRate of failureSurgical outcomesGastrectomy proceduresDecreased oddsComplicationsHospitalDecreased likelihoodHospital qualityLeapfrog GroupPatient safety