Clinical Implications of Respiratory Failure in Patients Receiving Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure
Miller PE, Caraballo C, Ravindra NG, Mezzacappa C, McCullough M, Gruen J, Levin A, Reinhardt S, Ali A, Desai NR, Ahmad T. Clinical Implications of Respiratory Failure in Patients Receiving Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices for End-Stage Heart Failure. Circulation Heart Failure 2019, 12: e006369. PMID: 31707800, DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.119.006369.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleFrailtyHealth StatusHeart FailureHeart-Assist DevicesHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLungMaleMiddle AgedProsthesis DesignQuality of LifeRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRespiratory InsufficiencyRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftConceptsMechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 patientsVentricular assist device implantationProfile 1 patientsAssist device implantationRespiratory failureInteragency RegistryLVAD implantationCirculatory supportDevice implantationMechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1Right ventricular assist device implantationLeft ventricular assist device implantationAdvanced heart failure patientsEnd-stage heart failureMechanically Assisted Circulatory SupportAdvanced heart failure populationHeart failure populationHeart failure patientsLandmark clinical trialsMechanical circulatory supportContinuous-flow LVADVentricular assist devicePostimplant complicationsFailure patientsLVAD placementClinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry
Berg DD, Barnett CF, Kenigsberg BB, Papolos A, Alviar CL, Baird-Zars VM, Barsness GW, Bohula EA, Brennan J, Burke JA, Carnicelli AP, Chaudhry SP, Cremer PC, Daniels LB, DeFilippis AP, Gerber DA, Granger CB, Hollenberg S, Horowitz JM, Gladden JD, Katz JN, Keeley EC, Keller N, Kontos MC, Lawler PR, Menon V, Metkus TS, Miller PE, Nativi-Nicolau J, Newby LK, Park JG, Phreaner N, Roswell RO, Schulman SP, Sinha SS, Snell RJ, Solomon MA, Teuteberg JJ, Tymchak W, van Diepen S, Morrow DA. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry. Circulation Heart Failure 2019, 12: e006635. PMID: 31707801, PMCID: PMC7008928, DOI: 10.1161/circheartfailure.119.006635.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAgedCardiologistsCoronary Care UnitsExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHeart-Assist DevicesHemodynamicsHumansIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingMaleMiddle AgedNorth AmericaPatient AdmissionPractice Patterns, Physicians'Recovery of FunctionRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexShock, CardiogenicTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeConceptsIntraaortic balloon pumpTemporary MCSCardiogenic shockIllness severityBalloon pumpPractice patternsAcute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shockCritical Care Cardiology Trials Network RegistryLower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoresSequential Organ Failure Assessment scoreTemporary mechanical circulatory support devicesVeno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenationIntraaortic balloon pump useOrgan Failure Assessment scoreTemporary mechanical circulatory supportCardiac intensive care unitInfarction-related cardiogenic shockMechanical circulatory support devicesOverall practice patternsTemporary MCS devicesExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationSevere metabolic derangementHospital-level variationIntensive care unitMechanical circulatory support