2023
Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography‐guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression
Park D, An S, Jolly N, Attanasio S, Yadav N, Gutierrez J, Nanna M, Rao S, Vij A. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography‐guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression. Catheterization And Cardiovascular Interventions 2023, 102: 440-450. PMID: 37483068, PMCID: PMC10908343, DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30784.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMajor adverse cardiovascular eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionOptical coherence tomographyCoronary angiographyIntravascular ultrasoundCoronary interventionCardiac deathClinical outcomesClinical efficacyConventional angiography-guided PCIAngiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionCoherence tomographyUse of IVUSSuperiority of OCTAdverse cardiovascular eventsRandomized clinical trialsConventional coronary angiographyImaging modalitiesComparative clinical efficacyBest imaging modalityIntracoronary imaging modalityLesion revascularizationPCI guidanceCardiovascular eventsCause mortality
2022
Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Park D, An S, Attanasio S, Jolly N, Malhotra S, Doukky R, Samsky M, Sen S, Ahmad T, Nanna M, Vij A. Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors, Angiotensin Receptor Blockers, and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. The American Journal Of Cardiology 2022, 187: 84-92. PMID: 36459752, PMCID: PMC10958453, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.10.026.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsBayes TheoremDeathHeart FailureHumansHypotensionNeprilysinNetwork Meta-AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReceptors, AngiotensinStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeVentricular Dysfunction, LeftConceptsAngiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitorAngiotensin receptor blockersReduced ejection fractionHeart failureEjection fractionHigh riskCause mortalityReceptor blockersCardiac deathLower riskEnzyme inhibitorsMajor adverse cardiac eventsAngiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitorsAdverse cardiac eventsEfficacy end pointNetwork meta-analysis approachImproved clinical outcomesRandomized clinical trialsP scoreCardiac eventsAngiotensin receptorsClinical outcomesNeprilysin inhibitorClinical benefitRecent trialsSystematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Park D, An S, Jolly N, Attanasio S, Yadav N, Rao S, Vij A. Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2022, 11: e025394. PMID: 35723005, PMCID: PMC9238651, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.122.025394.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchAdverse cardiac eventsTarget lesion revascularizationTarget vessel revascularizationRandomized clinical trialsCardiac eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionCardiac deathLesion revascularizationConventional meta-analysisVessel revascularizationStent thrombosisMyocardial infarctionMeta-analysisRelative riskProvisional stentingClinical trialsHigher rates of restenosisAssociated with lower procedural successCoronary interventionAssociated with lower riskPooled relative riskBayesian network meta-analysesFrequentist network meta-analysisAll-cause mortalityLower procedural success