2021
Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey
Albert TJ, Bradley J, Starks H, Redinger J, Arundel C, Beard A, Caputo L, Chun J, Gunderson CG, Heppe D, Jagannath A, Kent K, Krug M, Laudate J, Palaniappan V, Pensiero A, Sargsyan Z, Sladek E, Tuck M, Cornia PB. Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Virtual Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey. Journal Of General Internal Medicine 2021, 37: 1422-1428. PMID: 34173198, PMCID: PMC8231750, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06963-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsCOVID-19HumansInternship and ResidencyPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesTeaching RoundsConceptsMorning reportCOVID-19 pandemicVirtual platformUnique educational benefitsAudience response systemResidency programsGraduate Medical EducationIM residency programsInternal medicine residency programsInternal Medicine Residents’ PerceptionsTeaching strategiesLearning environmentEducational experienceOverall educationEducational benefitsEducational formatMedical educationMedicine residency programsVirtual formatThird-year residentsEducational conferencesMain MeasuresTheMost respondentsTraining programChat boxInternal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey
Albert TJ, Redinger J, Starks H, Bradley J, Gunderson CG, Heppe D, Kent K, Krug M, Kwan B, Laudate J, Pensiero A, Raymond G, Sladek E, Sweigart JR, Cornia PB. Internal Medicine Residents’ Perceptions of Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey. Journal Of General Internal Medicine 2021, 36: 647-653. PMID: 33443704, PMCID: PMC7947099, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06351-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansInternship and ResidencyPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesTeaching RoundsConceptsMorning reportLearning environmentClinical reasoningLearner-centric pedagogyInclusive learning environmentsEvidence-based teachingResident duty hour limitationsGraduate Medical EducationMultiple-choice questionsHigh-quality casesInternal Medicine Residents’ PerceptionsTeaching strategiesDuty hour limitationsMedical educatorsEducational activitiesLevel of trainingLittle contemporary evidenceEducational topicsMedical educationMedical studentsPARTICIPANTSInternal medicine residentsEducational conferencesMain MeasuresTheResidency programsTeaching
2019
Eating Disorder Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Characteristics of the SCOFF
Kutz AM, Marsh AG, Gunderson CG, Maguen S, Masheb RM. Eating Disorder Screening: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Characteristics of the SCOFF. Journal Of General Internal Medicine 2019, 35: 885-893. PMID: 31705473, PMCID: PMC7080881, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05478-6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAnorexia NervosaDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningSurveys and QuestionnairesConceptsBulimia nervosaSystematic reviewAnorexia nervosaStudy qualityMeta-AnalysisDSM-5Young womenDiagnostic accuracyScreening toolTrial RegistrationThis studyDiagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 toolCase-control studyPreferred Reporting ItemsDiagnostic test characteristicsCommunity-based settingsUseful screening toolNew screening toolRace/ethnicityBackgroundEating disordersClinical characteristicsPrimary careSubgroup analysisFood questionnaireGeneral populationPubMed search