2020
Quantitative imaging of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft demonstrates longitudinal compositional changes and relationships with clinical outcomes at 2 years after ACL reconstruction
Lansdown DA, Xiao W, Zhang AL, Allen CR, Feeley BT, Li X, Majumdar S, Ma CB. Quantitative imaging of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft demonstrates longitudinal compositional changes and relationships with clinical outcomes at 2 years after ACL reconstruction. Journal Of Orthopaedic Research® 2020, 38: 1289-1295. PMID: 31868948, PMCID: PMC7433779, DOI: 10.1002/jor.24572.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2019
Partial Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical, Functional, and Radiographic Outcomes
Chambers CC, Monroe EJ, Allen CR, Pandya NK. Partial Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical, Functional, and Radiographic Outcomes. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2019, 47: 1353-1360. PMID: 30995077, DOI: 10.1177/0363546519836423.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMechanical lateral distal femoral angleMedial proximal tibial angleTransphyseal ACL reconstructionMechanical axis deviationACL reconstructionGraft failureGrowth disturbanceReoperation rateACL injuryRadiographic outcomesFunctional outcomePediatric International Knee Documentation Committee scoreInternational Knee Documentation Committee scoreSubsequent revision ACL reconstructionAnterior cruciate ligament injuryLateral distal femoral angleOptimal reconstruction techniquePostoperative growth disturbanceGraft failure rateCruciate ligament injuryGood functional outcomeProximal tibial angleSubset of patientsRevision ACL reconstructionDistal femoral angle
2014
A comprehensive in vivo kinematic, quantitative MRI and functional evaluation following ACL reconstruction — A comparison between mini-two incision and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel drilling
Lansdown DA, Allen C, Zaid M, Wu S, Subburaj K, Souza R, Feeley BT, Li X, Ma CB. A comprehensive in vivo kinematic, quantitative MRI and functional evaluation following ACL reconstruction — A comparison between mini-two incision and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel drilling. The Knee 2014, 22: 547-553. PMID: 25982298, PMCID: PMC4472567, DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.12.005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnteromedial portal techniqueACL reconstructionFemoral tunnel drillingMT groupContralateral kneeNormal kneesEarly cartilage degenerationKnee kinematicsCartilage degenerationMarx Activity Rating ScaleTunnel drillingAM groupCentral medial tibiaKOOS symptom scoresPatient's contralateral kneeSignificant early differencesAnatomic ACL reconstructionActivity Rating ScaleNormal knee kinematicsKOOS surveysSymptom scoresFemoral tunnelControl subjectsTibial positionPortal technique
2013
Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions
Chen JL, Allen CR, Stephens TE, Haas AK, Huston LJ, Wright RW, Feeley BT, Albright J, Amendola A, Anderson A, Andrish J, Annunziata C, Arciero R, Bach B, Baker C, Bartolozzi A, Baumgarten K, Bechler J, Berg J, Bernas G, Brockmeier S, Brophy R, Bush-Joseph C, Butler J, Campbell J, Carey J, Carpenter J, Cole B, Cooper D, Cooper J, Cox C, Creighton R, Dahm D, David T, DeBerardino T, Dunn W, Flanigan D, Frederick R, Ganley T, Gatt C, Gecha S, Giffin J, Hame S, Hannafin J, Harner C, Harris N, Hechtman K, Hershman E, Hoellrich R, Hosea T, Johnson D, Johnson T, Jones M, Kaeding C, Kamath G, Klootwyk T, Lantz B, Levy B, Ma C, Maiers G, Mann B, Marx R, Matava M, Mathien G, McAllister D, McCarty E, McCormack R, Miller B, Nissen C, O’Neill D, Owens M, Parker R, Purnell M, Ramappa A, Rauh M, Rettig A, Sekiya J, Shea K, Sherman O, Slauterbeck J, Smith M, Spang J, Spindler K, Stuart M, Svoboda L, Taft T, Tenuta C, Tingstad E, Vidal A, Viskontas D, White R, Williams J, Wolcott M, Wolf B, York J. Differences in Mechanisms of Failure, Intraoperative Findings, and Surgical Characteristics Between Single- and Multiple-Revision ACL Reconstructions. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2013, 41: 1571-1578. PMID: 23698386, PMCID: PMC3839418, DOI: 10.1177/0363546513487980.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMarx activity levelACL reconstructionChondral injuriesRecurrent injuryPatellofemoral compartmentCommon causeActivity levelsAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionACL graft injuryCruciate ligament reconstructionPrimary outcome variableCase-control studyGradual-onset injuriesLevel of evidenceFirst-time revisionsGraft injuryAssociated injuriesSurgical characteristicsIntraoperative findingsLigament reconstructionPrimary revisionGraft selectionGraft typeMeniscal injurySudden onset
2010
Descriptive Epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort
Wright R, Huston L, Spindler K, Dunn W, Haas A, Allen C, Cooper D, DeBerardino T, Lantz B, Mann B, Stuart M. Descriptive Epidemiology of the Multicenter ACL Revision Study (MARS) Cohort. The American Journal Of Sports Medicine 2010, 38: 1979-1986. PMID: 20889962, PMCID: PMC3655411, DOI: 10.1177/0363546510378645.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesCanadaChildCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKnee InjuriesMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOrthopedic ProceduresOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesReoperationSports MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment FailureUnited StatesYoung AdultConceptsRevision ACL reconstructionPatient demographicsACL reconstructionGraft choiceWorse outcomesRevision anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMulticenter prospective longitudinal studyAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionPatient-based outcome measuresConcomitant knee injuriesCruciate ligament reconstructionInstitutional review board approvalIntra-articular injuriesTime of injuryCross-sectional studyLevel of evidenceProspective longitudinal studyReview board approvalACL reconstruction methodsReconstruction cohortTraumatic reinjuriesPrevious graftProspective cohortClinical featuresClinical outcomes
2001
Potential complication of bioabsorbable screw fixation for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee
Scioscia T, Giffin J, Allen C, Harner C. Potential complication of bioabsorbable screw fixation for osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Arthroscopy The Journal Of Arthroscopic And Related Surgery 2001, 17: 1-5. PMID: 11172259, DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.17995.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsBioabsorbable screw fixationOsteochondritis dissecansScrew fixationCartilage damageIntra-articular loose bodiesMedial femoral condyleAcute episodePotential complicationsArthroscopic examinationBioabsorbable screwsLoose bodiesTibial plateauFemoral condyleCase 1DissecansKneeScrew headScrewsFixationPainComplicationsPatientsSurgeryEffusionDamage