2022
Phase I/randomized phase II trial of TRC105 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: North Central Cancer Treatment Group N1174 (Alliance)
Galanis E, Anderson SK, Twohy E, Butowski NA, Hormigo A, Schiff D, Omuro A, Jaeckle KA, Kumar S, Kaufmann TJ, Geyer S, Kumthekar PU, Campian J, Giannini C, Buckner JC, Wen PY. Phase I/randomized phase II trial of TRC105 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma: North Central Cancer Treatment Group N1174 (Alliance). Neuro-Oncology Advances 2022, 4: vdac041. PMID: 35664553, PMCID: PMC9154335, DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdac041.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalRandomized phase II trialPhase II trialBevacizumab monotherapyRecurrent glioblastomaII trialTreatment armsMedian progression-free survivalLimited effective treatment optionsPhase IQuestionable survival benefitEarly clinical dataEffective treatment optionPhase IIQuality of lifeCombination armPrimary endpointAdverse eventsSurvival benefitLife scoresPoor prognosisTreatment optionsMechanisms of resistanceBevacizumabClinical data
2018
Radiographic patterns of recurrence and pathologic correlation in malignant gliomas treated with bevacizumab
Thomas A, Rosenblum M, Karimi S, DeAngelis LM, Omuro A, Kaley TJ. Radiographic patterns of recurrence and pathologic correlation in malignant gliomas treated with bevacizumab. CNS Oncology 2018, 07: 7-13. PMID: 29388793, PMCID: PMC6001559, DOI: 10.2217/cns-2017-0025.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMalignant gliomasRecurrence patternsDiffusion-weighted imaging abnormalitiesDiffusion-weighted imagingStandard clinical settingMG patientsImaging abnormalitiesMRI abnormalitiesPathologic findingsTumor recurrenceRadiographic patternsPathologic correlationBevacizumabClinical settingNecrosisPatientsRecurrenceRecent reportsTumorsGliomasAbnormalitiesLeptomeningealSurgery
2017
NCCTG N1174: Phase I/comparative randomized phase (Ph) II trial of TRC105 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) (Alliance).
Galanis E, Anderson S, Butowski N, Hormigo A, Schiff D, Tran D, Omuro A, Jaeckle K, Kumar S, Kaufmann T, Buckner J, Twohy E, Giannini C, Wen P. NCCTG N1174: Phase I/comparative randomized phase (Ph) II trial of TRC105 plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) (Alliance). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35: 2023-2023. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.2023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProgression-free survivalII trialMedian progression-free survivalRandomized phase II trialPhase II trialGlioma stem cellsOverall survivalOverall incidenceRecurrent glioblastomaMultiple time pointsVEGF inhibitionGrade 3GBM patientsPositive subsetSingle agentI cohortResponse rateHumanized antibodyFlow cytometryEndothelial cellsTime pointsTGFβ receptorsGlioblastomaBevacizumabCD105
2015
QOL-07DESCRIPTION OF CLINICAL AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTS FROM A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED TRIAL EVALUATING NIVOLUMAB MONOTHERAPY VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: CHECKMATE-143
Nayak L, Brandes A, Omuro A, Rieger J, Wick A, Phuphanich S, Sumrall A, Sahebjam S, Ahluwalia M, de Souza P, Sepulveda J, Maio M, Grauer O, Vlahovic G, Baehring J, Dastani H, Latek R, Coric V, Reardon D. QOL-07DESCRIPTION OF CLINICAL AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES ASSESSMENTS FROM A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED TRIAL EVALUATING NIVOLUMAB MONOTHERAPY VERSUS BEVACIZUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA: CHECKMATE-143. Neuro-Oncology 2015, 17: v189-v189. PMCID: PMC4639164, DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nov230.07.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMulticenter Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Glioma (S43.005)
Neil E, Clarke J, Beal K, Gutin P, Igor B, Kaley T, Lassman A, Perezic-Mustafa M, Young R, Omuro A. Multicenter Phase I Dose Escalation Study of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy with Bevacizumab in the Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Glioma (S43.005). Neurology 2015, 84 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.84.14_supplement.s43.005.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2013
Bevacizumab for acute neurologic deterioration in patients with glioblastoma
Kaley T, Nolan C, Carver A, Omuro A. Bevacizumab for acute neurologic deterioration in patients with glioblastoma. CNS Oncology 2013, 2: 413-418. PMID: 25054664, PMCID: PMC6136096, DOI: 10.2217/cns.13.40.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabBrainBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansInpatientsKarnofsky Performance StatusMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultConceptsNeurologic dysfunctionNeurologic deteriorationOutpatient treatmentGlioblastoma patientsAcute neurologic dysfunctionDose of bevacizumabAcute neurologic deteriorationSevere neurologic dysfunctionQuality of lifeBevacizumab treatmentHospitalized patientsRetrospective reviewSteroid dependenceDexamethasone administrationRehabilitation admissionTumor locationPeritumoral edemaBevacizumabPatientsAbstractTextDysfunctionTreatmentGlioblastomaHospitalizationEdemaSurvival benefit from bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) according to transcriptional subclasses.
Huse J, Beal K, Zhang J, Kastenhuber E, Kaley T, Abrey L, Gutin P, Brennan C, Omuro A. Survival benefit from bevacizumab in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) according to transcriptional subclasses. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2013, 31: 2057-2057. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.2057.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMedian overall survivalOverall survivalBevacizumab treatmentSurvival benefitNanoString gene expression assaysProspective phase II trialPhase II trialNew treatment optionsParaffin-embedded tissue blocksGBM molecular subtypesMGMT promoter methylationEvaluable ptsPrimary endpointII trialUnselected patientsTreatment optionsMolecular subtypesTumor volumeStereotactic radiotherapyBevacizumabSurvival advantageTherapeutic implicationsMolecular subclassesGlioblastomaTumors
2011
FLAIR, T1 contrast enhancement, MR perfusion, and FDG PET following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT), bevacizumab (BEV), and temozolomide (TMZ) for glioblastoma (GBM).
Grommes C, Karimi S, Beal K, Chan T, Abrey L, Gutin P, Omuro A. FLAIR, T1 contrast enhancement, MR perfusion, and FDG PET following hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HFSRT), bevacizumab (BEV), and temozolomide (TMZ) for glioblastoma (GBM). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2011, 29: 2048-2048. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.2048.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Phase II trial of continuous low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) for recurrent malignant glioma (MG) with and without prior exposure to bevacizumab (BEV).
Khasraw M, Abrey L, Lassman A, Hormigo A, Nolan C, Gavrilovic I, Mellinghoff I, Reiner A, DeAngelis L, Omuro A. Phase II trial of continuous low-dose temozolomide (TMZ) for recurrent malignant glioma (MG) with and without prior exposure to bevacizumab (BEV). Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2010, 28: 2065-2065. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.2065.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2008
What is the place of bevacizumab and irinotecan in the treatment of glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas?
Omuro AM, Delattre JY. What is the place of bevacizumab and irinotecan in the treatment of glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas? Current Opinion In Neurology 2008, 21: 717-719. PMID: 18989118, DOI: 10.1097/wco.0b013e3283184625.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMalignant gliomasOverall survivalClinical trialsProspective phase II trialPlace of bevacizumabProgression-free survivalPhase II trialNew treatment strategiesHigh response rateTreatment of glioblastomaII trialRecurrent diseaseSalvage treatmentCytotoxic chemotherapyMost patientsConventional radiographic methodsDisease progressionHistorical controlsSurvival resultsRadiographic criteriaTreatment strategiesBevacizumabResponse rateNew treatmentsGliomas