Long-term outcomes of ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): a systematic review and meta-analysis
Odanović N, Schwann A, Zhang Z, Kapadia S, Kunnirickal S, Parise H, Tirziu D, Ilic I, Lansky A, Pietras C, Shah S. Long-term outcomes of ischaemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2024, 11: e002852. PMID: 39353703, PMCID: PMC11448144, DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002852.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCoronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study GroupRate of MACEReduced coronary flow reserveCoronary flow reservePrognosis of patientsVasospastic anginaPatient yearsMyocardial infarctionPrimary outcomeIncidence of primary outcomeLong-term prognosis of patientsSystematic reviewMeta-analysisLong-term prognosisInternational Study GroupAdverse cardiovascular eventsLong-term outcomesImaging stress testsMeta-analysis of studiesRandom-effects modelWeb of ScienceINOCACardiovascular eventsFollow-upVasomotor disordersPercutaneous Coronary Revascularization Strategies After Myocardial Infarction A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Reddy R, Howard J, Jamil Y, Madhavan M, Nanna M, Lansky A, Leon M, Ahmad Y. Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Strategies After Myocardial Infarction A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2024, 84: 276-294. PMID: 38986670, DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.051.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsRelative riskCardiovascular mortalityMyocardial infarctionMultivessel coronary artery diseaseAll-cause mortalityAdverse cardiac eventsST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionComplete revascularizationCoronary artery diseaseBayesian network meta-analysesMortality reductionA systematic reviewNetwork meta-analysesElevation myocardial infarctionSystematic reviewMeta-analysesCardiac eventsArtery diseasePrimary outcomeNetwork meta-analysisRevascularization strategyMeta-analysisHead-to-head trialsCoronary revascularization strategyAcute kidney injuryLong-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
Talanas G, Laconi A, Kereiakes D, Merella P, Reardon M, Spano A, Petretto G, Lauriola F, Casula M, Micheluzzi V, Isgender M, Chatzizisis Y, Farkouh M, Lansky A, Piazza N, Portoghese M, Casu G, Navarese E. Long-Term Outcomes of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The Society For Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions 2024, 3: 102143. PMID: 39131994, PMCID: PMC11307397, DOI: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102143.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSurgical aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacementAortic valve replacementLong-term outcomesMeta-analysis of randomized trialsSevere aortic stenosisValve replacementValve thrombosisPacemaker implantationValve gradientAortic stenosisParavalvular leakFollow-upStroke riskRandomized trialsLong-term outcomes of patientsBalloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacementSelf-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacementSafety of transcatheter aortic valve replacementRisk of transcatheter aortic valve replacementRisk of pacemaker implantationSecondary end pointsSurgical risk profileOutcomes of patientsMeta-analysisSAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT MODALITIES FOR BELOW-THE-KNEE PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS
Tirziu D, Saleh A, Huang H, Akhlaghi N, Breen T, Parikh S, Rosenfield K, Armstrong E, Geraghty P, Brodmann M, Adams G, Snyder D, Zilinyi R, Altin S, Parise H, Lansky A. SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT MODALITIES FOR BELOW-THE-KNEE PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND NETWORK META-ANALYSIS. Journal Of The American College Of Cardiology 2024, 83: 843. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(24)02833-x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials
Sreenivasan J, Reddy R, Jamil Y, Malik A, Chamie D, Howard J, Nanna M, Mintz G, Maehara A, Ali Z, Moses J, Chen S, Chieffo A, Colombo A, Leon M, Lansky A, Ahmad Y. Intravascular Imaging–Guided Versus Angiography‐Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Trials. Journal Of The American Heart Association 2024, 13: e031111. PMID: 38214263, PMCID: PMC10926835, DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.031111.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAdverse cardiac eventsPercutaneous coronary interventionAngiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventionTarget vessel revascularizationTarget-lesion revascularizationCardiac eventsCardiac deathImaging-guided percutaneous coronary interventionWeighted mean follow-up durationMeta-analysisPrimary outcomeMean follow-up durationStent thrombosisMeta-analysis of randomized trialsStudy-level meta-analysisComplex lesion subsetsIntravascular imagingAll-cause deathRandom-effects meta-analysisStandard of careIntention-to-treat principleUpdates of clinical guidelinesMixed-effects meta-regressionComplex percutaneous coronary interventionIntravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention