2021
The Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Interpregnancy Interval
Keller J, Norton J, Zhang F, Paul R, Madden T, Raghuraman N, Stout M, Carter E. The Impact of Group Prenatal Care on Interpregnancy Interval. American Journal Of Perinatology 2021, 40: 1659-1664. PMID: 34891199, DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739413.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsInterpregnancy intervalGroup prenatal carePrenatal careLARC uptakeInclusion criteriaMissouri MedicaidLogistic regressionBackward stepwise logistic regressionReversible contraception uptakePrior preterm birthRetrospective cohort studyTraditional prenatal careSignificant decreaseBirth certificate recordsCenteringPregnancy group prenatal careStepwise logistic regressionCohort studyPregnancy spacingPrenatal visitSecondary outcomesSingleton deliveriesPreterm birthPrimary outcomePotential confoundersMaternal age
2014
Maternal Age and Risk of Labor and Delivery Complications
Cavazos-Rehg P, Krauss M, Spitznagel E, Bommarito K, Madden T, Olsen M, Subramaniam H, Peipert J, Bierut L. Maternal Age and Risk of Labor and Delivery Complications. Maternal And Child Health Journal 2014, 19: 1202-1211. PMID: 25366100, PMCID: PMC4418963, DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1624-7.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsComplications of laborPoor fetal growthPregnant womenMaternal morbidityPreterm deliverySevere preeclampsiaFetal distressMild preeclampsiaFetal growthMaternal ageOlder womenGreater oddsUnited States Nationwide Inpatient SampleExtremes of ageNationwide Inpatient SampleYear old womanSeparate logistic regression modelsYears of ageRisk of laborLogistic regression modelsDelivery complicationsClinical confoundersPostpartum hemorrhageInpatient SampleSuch complications
2013
The impact of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse on contraceptive method selection and discontinuation.
Allsworth J, M. Secura G, Zhao Q, Madden T, Peipert J. The impact of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse on contraceptive method selection and discontinuation. American Journal Of Public Health 2013, 103: 1857-64. PMID: 23948012, PMCID: PMC3780737, DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301371.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2011
Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception
Peipert J, Zhao Q, Allsworth J, Petrosky E, Madden T, Eisenberg D, Secura G. Continuation and Satisfaction of Reversible Contraception. Obstetrics And Gynecology 2011, 117: 1105-1113. PMID: 21508749, PMCID: PMC3548669, DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31821188ad.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultChildContraceptionContraceptive Agents, FemaleContraceptive Devices, FemaleContraceptives, OralFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntrauterine DevicesKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTime FactorsTransdermal PatchYoung AdultConceptsOral contraceptive pillsIntrauterine deviceReversible contraception methodsContinuation ratesReversible contraceptionContraception methodsContraceptive methodsFirst-line contraceptive methodReversible contraception usersProspective cohort studyHigh contraceptive efficacyMonths of enrollmentDepot medroxyprogesterone acetateLevonorgestrel intrauterine systemCopper intrauterine deviceContraceptive CHOICE ProjectHigh rateSurvey time pointsCohort studyIntrauterine systemContraceptive pillsMedroxyprogesterone acetateOCP usersContraceptive efficacyHormonal methods