2023
Patient experiences with tissue‐based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer
Leapman M, Sutherland R, Gross C, Ma X, Seibert T, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Loeb S, Schulman‐Green D. Patient experiences with tissue‐based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer. BJUI Compass 2023, 5: 142-149. PMID: 38179031, PMCID: PMC10764160, DOI: 10.1002/bco2.277.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchActive surveillanceProstate cancerGene expression testGenomic testingCancer riskPatient experienceGrade group 2 prostate cancerGleason Grade Group 1Risk prostate cancerGrade group 1Prostate cancer riskProstate cancer managementProstate cancer aggressivenessHereditary cancer riskGermline genetic testsTissue-based testsGenomic test resultsConclusions PatientsInitial biopsyPhysician recommendationPatient knowledgePatient counsellingConventional content analysisCancer managementExpression testPatient experiences with tissue-based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Leapman M, Sutherland R, Gross C, Ma X, Jeong F, Seibert T, Cooperberg M, Catalona W, Loeb S, Schulman-Green D. Patient experiences with tissue-based genomic testing during active surveillance for prostate cancer. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2023, 41: 333-333. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.333.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchActive surveillanceProstate cancerGene expression testGenomic testingCancer riskPatient experienceGleason Grade Group 1Risk prostate cancerGrade group 1Routine clinical careProstate cancer riskGroup 2 tumorsProstate cancer managementProstate cancer aggressivenessHereditary cancer riskGermline genetic testsTissue-based testsRace/ethnicityInitial biopsyPatient knowledgeMean agePatient counselingCancer managementClinical careExpression testProstate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations
Rajwa P, Quhal F, Pradere B, Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Leapman M, Gore J, Paradysz A, Tilki D, Merseburger A, Morgan T, Briganti A, Palapattu G, Shariat S. Prostate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Nature Reviews Urology 2023, 20: 205-216. PMID: 36600087, DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00680-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsProstate cancer riskBRCA1/2 mutation carriersMagnetic resonance imagingProstate cancerMutation carriersCancer riskProspective studyBRCA2 mutationsProstate cancer-specific mortalityProstate specific antigen measurementsCancer-specific mortalityProstate cancer incidenceAggressive clinical behaviorProstate cancer screeningRisk stratification strategiesLong-term resultsSignificant prostate cancerOptimal screening strategyGermline BRCA1/2 mutationsOptimal screening protocolProstate magnetic resonance imagingQuality of lifeBRCA2 tumor suppressor genesOverall survivalDisease characteristics
2018
Comparison of a low-cost immunohistochemistry marker panel with a cell-cycle progression assay for the prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy.
Leapman M, Nguyen H, Cowan J, Xue L, Stohr B, Simko J, Cooperberg M, Carroll P. Comparison of a low-cost immunohistochemistry marker panel with a cell-cycle progression assay for the prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2018, 36: 118-118. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.118.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPCa-specific mortalityRadical prostatectomyBiochemical recurrenceCCP scoreIHC panelCell cycle progression scoreExpression statusERG expressionCox proportional hazards regressionRisk of BCRPositive ERG expressionProportional hazards regressionProstate cancer riskPrediction of outcomeHigh Ki67Median ageIndependent predictorsPathologic characteristicsHazards regressionPrognostic utilityIHC statusInstitutional databaseLocalized PCaC-indexImmunohistochemistry panel