2024
RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI
Sundaresan V, Webb L, Rabil M, Golos A, Sutherland R, Sprenkle P, Kim I, Leapman M. RISKS OF GRADE RECLASSIFICATION AMONG PATIENTS WITH GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER AND PI-RADS 5 FINDINGS ON PROSTATE MRI. Urologic Oncology Seminars And Original Investigations 2024, 42: s79. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.222.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGleason Grade Group 1PI-RADS 5 lesionsPI-RADSProstate biopsyProstate cancerGleason upgradingRadical prostatectomyActive surveillanceProstate MRIMultivariate logistic regressionGrade Group 1 prostate cancerConversion to active treatmentOptimal management of patientsGrade group 1PI-RADS 5Gleason grade groupProstate Imaging ReportingDied of diseaseManagement of patientsLogistic regressionPrimary study outcomeAssociated with oddsMedian PSAMetastatic diseaseGrade disease
2016
External validation of a prognostic Gleason grade classification system.
Leapman M, Cowan J, Roberge G, Eltemamy M, Simko J, Carroll P, Cooperberg M. External validation of a prognostic Gleason grade classification system. Journal Of Clinical Oncology 2016, 34: 123-123. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.2_suppl.123.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchProstate cancer-specific mortalityRisk of recurrenceGleason grade groupRadical prostatectomyAdjusted pairwise comparisonsGrade groupUCSF cohortGrade diseaseGleason 4Metastatic progressionCox proportional hazards modelGleason classification systemGrade classification systemImmediate radical prostatectomyCancer-specific mortalityAcademic referral centerHigh-grade diseaseIndependent prognostic abilityProportional hazards modelConsecutive PSA valuesDiscrimination of outcomesGleason grading systemGleason grade 3Salvage treatmentReferral center