In 2019, Yale helped launch medRxiv, a preprint server that revolutionized how health researchers share their findings. Just months later, the COVID-19 pandemic hit and underscored medRxiv’s critical role in global health research.
To safeguard the future of open-access scientific publishing, the founders of medRxiv and its companion server, bioRxiv, are establishing openRxiv—an independent organization dedicated to ensuring these platforms remain freely accessible and resilient for generations to come.
To date, the two servers have been owned and managed by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, which co-launched medRxiv with Yale and BMJ. Now, openRxiv will provide the governance, resources, and oversight needed to ensure that medRxiv and bioRxiv continue to thrive without reliance on a single institution.
Demand for rapid, open scientific communication has never been higher. Over the past year, submissions to medRxiv and bioRxiv have surged by 16% and 20%, respectively. Together, they post around 5,000 new preprints each month and host more than 335,000 in total—fueling global knowledge-sharing at an unprecedented pace.
“MedRxiv and bioRxiv have shown that researchers want immediate access to new findings and broader peer engagement,” says Harlan Krumholz, MD, Harold H. Hines, Jr. Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) at Yale School of Medicine (YSM) and cofounder of medRxiv. “OpenRxiv ensures these critical resources remain freely available and continue evolving to serve the scientific community.”
When researchers submit new studies to a journal, their papers are sent privately to multiple reviewers—scientific peers—who weigh in on the rigor of the research, make recommendations for improvement, and share any concerns they have about the work. The journal then decides whether to publish the study, ask for additional experiments, or reject it altogether. The process can take months and allows for constructive feedback from only two or three individuals.
Preprint servers like medRxiv allow researchers to share early versions of their papers with a much wider community of scientists. They can get a greater amount of feedback and incorporate suggestions they find useful, which can strengthen the research and the final study.